Loading…

A test to identify judgement bias in mice

► We investigated a judgement bias test for mice. ► BALB/c mice revealed a negative judgement bias under red and white light testing conditions. ► 129P3 mice did not differentiate between the odour cues in the judgement bias test. ► c-Fos expression levels in distinct brain areas strain-dependently...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Behavioural brain research 2012-07, Vol.233 (1), p.45-54
Main Authors: Boleij, Hetty, Klooster, José van’t, Lavrijsen, Marla, Kirchhoff, Susanne, Arndt, Saskia S., Ohl, Frauke
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-33170a345f651207e6f79c783c0f291a8922bd519f2f9395c5ae3509037d30343
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-33170a345f651207e6f79c783c0f291a8922bd519f2f9395c5ae3509037d30343
container_end_page 54
container_issue 1
container_start_page 45
container_title Behavioural brain research
container_volume 233
creator Boleij, Hetty
Klooster, José van’t
Lavrijsen, Marla
Kirchhoff, Susanne
Arndt, Saskia S.
Ohl, Frauke
description ► We investigated a judgement bias test for mice. ► BALB/c mice revealed a negative judgement bias under red and white light testing conditions. ► 129P3 mice did not differentiate between the odour cues in the judgement bias test. ► c-Fos expression levels in distinct brain areas strain-dependently differed in response to the ambiguous cues. ► The here presented test might be of use to investigate emotional states via an assessment of judgement bias in mice. Emotional states are known to affect cognitive processes. For example highly anxious individuals interpret ambiguous stimuli more negatively than low anxious people, an effect called negative judgement bias. Recently, the measurement of judgement bias has been used to try and indicate emotional states in animals. In the present experiment a potential test for judgement bias in mice was examined. Mice were trained with two distinct odour cues (vanilla or apple) predicting either a palatable or an unpalatable almond piece. Subsequently their reaction to mixtures of both odours, the ambiguous stimuli, was investigated. Mice of the BALB/cJ and 129P3/J inbred mouse strains (high initial anxiety and low initial anxiety phenotypes respectively) were tested. While BALB/cJ mice showed odour association learning and showed intermediate reactions to the ambiguous cues, 129P3/J mice did not discriminate between the cues. Additionally BALB/cJ mice that were tested under more aversive white light conditions revealed a higher latency to approach the almond piece than mice tested under less aversive red light conditions. The ambiguous stimulus however was interpreted as negative under both test conditions. Brain c-Fos expression levels (a marker for neuronal activity) differed between the BALB/c/J and 129P3/J in the lateral amygdala and the prelimbic cortex, indicating differences in ambiguous information processing between the strains. The behavioural results suggest that the present judgement bias test might be used to assess emotional states in at least BALB/c mice, however further research on both behaviour and on the involved brain mechanisms is necessary to confirm this idea.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.04.039
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1028027545</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0166432812003002</els_id><sourcerecordid>1028027545</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-33170a345f651207e6f79c783c0f291a8922bd519f2f9395c5ae3509037d30343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1Lw0AQhhdRbK3-AC-Sox4SZ7-SLJ5K8QsKXvS8JJtZ2dAkdTcR_PduafUonoaB532ZeQi5pJBRoPltm9W1zxhQloHIgKsjMqdlwdJCCnVM5pHJU8FZOSNnIbQAIEDSUzJjTOYMBJ2Tm2UyYhiTcUhcg_3o7FfSTs07dnFJaleFxPVJ5wyekxNbbQJeHOaCvD3cv66e0vXL4_NquU6NYGpMOacFVFxIm0vKoMDcFsoUJTdgmaJVqRirG0mVZVZxJY2skEtQwIuGAxd8Qa73vVs_fEzxNt25YHCzqXocpqApsBJY_FD-B6Usj_Cule5R44cQPFq99a6r_FeE9E6mbnWUqXcyNQgdZcbM1aF-qjtsfhM_9iJwtwcw-vh06HUwDnuDjfNoRt0M7o_6b78jgD4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1021260274</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A test to identify judgement bias in mice</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Boleij, Hetty ; Klooster, José van’t ; Lavrijsen, Marla ; Kirchhoff, Susanne ; Arndt, Saskia S. ; Ohl, Frauke</creator><creatorcontrib>Boleij, Hetty ; Klooster, José van’t ; Lavrijsen, Marla ; Kirchhoff, Susanne ; Arndt, Saskia S. ; Ohl, Frauke</creatorcontrib><description>► We investigated a judgement bias test for mice. ► BALB/c mice revealed a negative judgement bias under red and white light testing conditions. ► 129P3 mice did not differentiate between the odour cues in the judgement bias test. ► c-Fos expression levels in distinct brain areas strain-dependently differed in response to the ambiguous cues. ► The here presented test might be of use to investigate emotional states via an assessment of judgement bias in mice. Emotional states are known to affect cognitive processes. For example highly anxious individuals interpret ambiguous stimuli more negatively than low anxious people, an effect called negative judgement bias. Recently, the measurement of judgement bias has been used to try and indicate emotional states in animals. In the present experiment a potential test for judgement bias in mice was examined. Mice were trained with two distinct odour cues (vanilla or apple) predicting either a palatable or an unpalatable almond piece. Subsequently their reaction to mixtures of both odours, the ambiguous stimuli, was investigated. Mice of the BALB/cJ and 129P3/J inbred mouse strains (high initial anxiety and low initial anxiety phenotypes respectively) were tested. While BALB/cJ mice showed odour association learning and showed intermediate reactions to the ambiguous cues, 129P3/J mice did not discriminate between the cues. Additionally BALB/cJ mice that were tested under more aversive white light conditions revealed a higher latency to approach the almond piece than mice tested under less aversive red light conditions. The ambiguous stimulus however was interpreted as negative under both test conditions. Brain c-Fos expression levels (a marker for neuronal activity) differed between the BALB/c/J and 129P3/J in the lateral amygdala and the prelimbic cortex, indicating differences in ambiguous information processing between the strains. The behavioural results suggest that the present judgement bias test might be used to assess emotional states in at least BALB/c mice, however further research on both behaviour and on the involved brain mechanisms is necessary to confirm this idea.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0166-4328</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7549</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.04.039</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22562041</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>129P3 mice ; Amygdala ; Analysis of Variance ; Animals ; Anxiety ; Associative learning ; BALB/c mice ; Behavior, Animal - physiology ; Behaviour ; Bias ; Brain ; Brain - metabolism ; c-Fos protein ; Chemical stimuli ; Choice Behavior - physiology ; Cognitive ability ; Cortex ; Corticosterone - blood ; Discrimination Learning - physiology ; Emotions ; Functional Laterality ; Inbreeding ; Information processing ; Judgement bias ; Judgment - physiology ; Light effects ; Malus ; Mice ; Mice, 129 Strain ; Mice, Inbred BALB C ; Odor ; Odorants ; Odour conditioning ; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-fos - metabolism ; Prunus dulcis ; Reaction Time - physiology ; Time Factors ; vanilla</subject><ispartof>Behavioural brain research, 2012-07, Vol.233 (1), p.45-54</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-33170a345f651207e6f79c783c0f291a8922bd519f2f9395c5ae3509037d30343</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-33170a345f651207e6f79c783c0f291a8922bd519f2f9395c5ae3509037d30343</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22562041$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boleij, Hetty</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klooster, José van’t</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavrijsen, Marla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirchhoff, Susanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arndt, Saskia S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohl, Frauke</creatorcontrib><title>A test to identify judgement bias in mice</title><title>Behavioural brain research</title><addtitle>Behav Brain Res</addtitle><description>► We investigated a judgement bias test for mice. ► BALB/c mice revealed a negative judgement bias under red and white light testing conditions. ► 129P3 mice did not differentiate between the odour cues in the judgement bias test. ► c-Fos expression levels in distinct brain areas strain-dependently differed in response to the ambiguous cues. ► The here presented test might be of use to investigate emotional states via an assessment of judgement bias in mice. Emotional states are known to affect cognitive processes. For example highly anxious individuals interpret ambiguous stimuli more negatively than low anxious people, an effect called negative judgement bias. Recently, the measurement of judgement bias has been used to try and indicate emotional states in animals. In the present experiment a potential test for judgement bias in mice was examined. Mice were trained with two distinct odour cues (vanilla or apple) predicting either a palatable or an unpalatable almond piece. Subsequently their reaction to mixtures of both odours, the ambiguous stimuli, was investigated. Mice of the BALB/cJ and 129P3/J inbred mouse strains (high initial anxiety and low initial anxiety phenotypes respectively) were tested. While BALB/cJ mice showed odour association learning and showed intermediate reactions to the ambiguous cues, 129P3/J mice did not discriminate between the cues. Additionally BALB/cJ mice that were tested under more aversive white light conditions revealed a higher latency to approach the almond piece than mice tested under less aversive red light conditions. The ambiguous stimulus however was interpreted as negative under both test conditions. Brain c-Fos expression levels (a marker for neuronal activity) differed between the BALB/c/J and 129P3/J in the lateral amygdala and the prelimbic cortex, indicating differences in ambiguous information processing between the strains. The behavioural results suggest that the present judgement bias test might be used to assess emotional states in at least BALB/c mice, however further research on both behaviour and on the involved brain mechanisms is necessary to confirm this idea.</description><subject>129P3 mice</subject><subject>Amygdala</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Associative learning</subject><subject>BALB/c mice</subject><subject>Behavior, Animal - physiology</subject><subject>Behaviour</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Brain - metabolism</subject><subject>c-Fos protein</subject><subject>Chemical stimuli</subject><subject>Choice Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Cortex</subject><subject>Corticosterone - blood</subject><subject>Discrimination Learning - physiology</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Functional Laterality</subject><subject>Inbreeding</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Judgement bias</subject><subject>Judgment - physiology</subject><subject>Light effects</subject><subject>Malus</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Mice, 129 Strain</subject><subject>Mice, Inbred BALB C</subject><subject>Odor</subject><subject>Odorants</subject><subject>Odour conditioning</subject><subject>Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-fos - metabolism</subject><subject>Prunus dulcis</subject><subject>Reaction Time - physiology</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>vanilla</subject><issn>0166-4328</issn><issn>1872-7549</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE1Lw0AQhhdRbK3-AC-Sox4SZ7-SLJ5K8QsKXvS8JJtZ2dAkdTcR_PduafUonoaB532ZeQi5pJBRoPltm9W1zxhQloHIgKsjMqdlwdJCCnVM5pHJU8FZOSNnIbQAIEDSUzJjTOYMBJ2Tm2UyYhiTcUhcg_3o7FfSTs07dnFJaleFxPVJ5wyekxNbbQJeHOaCvD3cv66e0vXL4_NquU6NYGpMOacFVFxIm0vKoMDcFsoUJTdgmaJVqRirG0mVZVZxJY2skEtQwIuGAxd8Qa73vVs_fEzxNt25YHCzqXocpqApsBJY_FD-B6Usj_Cule5R44cQPFq99a6r_FeE9E6mbnWUqXcyNQgdZcbM1aF-qjtsfhM_9iJwtwcw-vh06HUwDnuDjfNoRt0M7o_6b78jgD4</recordid><startdate>20120715</startdate><enddate>20120715</enddate><creator>Boleij, Hetty</creator><creator>Klooster, José van’t</creator><creator>Lavrijsen, Marla</creator><creator>Kirchhoff, Susanne</creator><creator>Arndt, Saskia S.</creator><creator>Ohl, Frauke</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120715</creationdate><title>A test to identify judgement bias in mice</title><author>Boleij, Hetty ; Klooster, José van’t ; Lavrijsen, Marla ; Kirchhoff, Susanne ; Arndt, Saskia S. ; Ohl, Frauke</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-33170a345f651207e6f79c783c0f291a8922bd519f2f9395c5ae3509037d30343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>129P3 mice</topic><topic>Amygdala</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Associative learning</topic><topic>BALB/c mice</topic><topic>Behavior, Animal - physiology</topic><topic>Behaviour</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Brain - metabolism</topic><topic>c-Fos protein</topic><topic>Chemical stimuli</topic><topic>Choice Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Cortex</topic><topic>Corticosterone - blood</topic><topic>Discrimination Learning - physiology</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Functional Laterality</topic><topic>Inbreeding</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Judgement bias</topic><topic>Judgment - physiology</topic><topic>Light effects</topic><topic>Malus</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Mice, 129 Strain</topic><topic>Mice, Inbred BALB C</topic><topic>Odor</topic><topic>Odorants</topic><topic>Odour conditioning</topic><topic>Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-fos - metabolism</topic><topic>Prunus dulcis</topic><topic>Reaction Time - physiology</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>vanilla</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boleij, Hetty</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klooster, José van’t</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavrijsen, Marla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirchhoff, Susanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arndt, Saskia S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohl, Frauke</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Behavioural brain research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boleij, Hetty</au><au>Klooster, José van’t</au><au>Lavrijsen, Marla</au><au>Kirchhoff, Susanne</au><au>Arndt, Saskia S.</au><au>Ohl, Frauke</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A test to identify judgement bias in mice</atitle><jtitle>Behavioural brain research</jtitle><addtitle>Behav Brain Res</addtitle><date>2012-07-15</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>233</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>45</spage><epage>54</epage><pages>45-54</pages><issn>0166-4328</issn><eissn>1872-7549</eissn><abstract>► We investigated a judgement bias test for mice. ► BALB/c mice revealed a negative judgement bias under red and white light testing conditions. ► 129P3 mice did not differentiate between the odour cues in the judgement bias test. ► c-Fos expression levels in distinct brain areas strain-dependently differed in response to the ambiguous cues. ► The here presented test might be of use to investigate emotional states via an assessment of judgement bias in mice. Emotional states are known to affect cognitive processes. For example highly anxious individuals interpret ambiguous stimuli more negatively than low anxious people, an effect called negative judgement bias. Recently, the measurement of judgement bias has been used to try and indicate emotional states in animals. In the present experiment a potential test for judgement bias in mice was examined. Mice were trained with two distinct odour cues (vanilla or apple) predicting either a palatable or an unpalatable almond piece. Subsequently their reaction to mixtures of both odours, the ambiguous stimuli, was investigated. Mice of the BALB/cJ and 129P3/J inbred mouse strains (high initial anxiety and low initial anxiety phenotypes respectively) were tested. While BALB/cJ mice showed odour association learning and showed intermediate reactions to the ambiguous cues, 129P3/J mice did not discriminate between the cues. Additionally BALB/cJ mice that were tested under more aversive white light conditions revealed a higher latency to approach the almond piece than mice tested under less aversive red light conditions. The ambiguous stimulus however was interpreted as negative under both test conditions. Brain c-Fos expression levels (a marker for neuronal activity) differed between the BALB/c/J and 129P3/J in the lateral amygdala and the prelimbic cortex, indicating differences in ambiguous information processing between the strains. The behavioural results suggest that the present judgement bias test might be used to assess emotional states in at least BALB/c mice, however further research on both behaviour and on the involved brain mechanisms is necessary to confirm this idea.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>22562041</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bbr.2012.04.039</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0166-4328
ispartof Behavioural brain research, 2012-07, Vol.233 (1), p.45-54
issn 0166-4328
1872-7549
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1028027545
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects 129P3 mice
Amygdala
Analysis of Variance
Animals
Anxiety
Associative learning
BALB/c mice
Behavior, Animal - physiology
Behaviour
Bias
Brain
Brain - metabolism
c-Fos protein
Chemical stimuli
Choice Behavior - physiology
Cognitive ability
Cortex
Corticosterone - blood
Discrimination Learning - physiology
Emotions
Functional Laterality
Inbreeding
Information processing
Judgement bias
Judgment - physiology
Light effects
Malus
Mice
Mice, 129 Strain
Mice, Inbred BALB C
Odor
Odorants
Odour conditioning
Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-fos - metabolism
Prunus dulcis
Reaction Time - physiology
Time Factors
vanilla
title A test to identify judgement bias in mice
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T22%3A21%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20test%20to%20identify%20judgement%20bias%20in%20mice&rft.jtitle=Behavioural%20brain%20research&rft.au=Boleij,%20Hetty&rft.date=2012-07-15&rft.volume=233&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=45&rft.epage=54&rft.pages=45-54&rft.issn=0166-4328&rft.eissn=1872-7549&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bbr.2012.04.039&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1028027545%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-33170a345f651207e6f79c783c0f291a8922bd519f2f9395c5ae3509037d30343%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1021260274&rft_id=info:pmid/22562041&rfr_iscdi=true