Loading…

Interactive semiautomatic contour delineation using statistical conditional random fields framework

Purpose: Contouring a normal anatomical structure during radiation treatment planning requires significant time and effort. The authors present a fast and accurate semiautomatic contour delineation method to reduce the time and effort required of expert users. Methods: Following an initial segmentat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Medical physics (Lancaster) 2012-07, Vol.39 (7), p.4547-4558
Main Authors: Hu, Yu-Chi, Grossberg, Michael D., Wu, Abraham, Riaz, Nadeem, Perez, Carmen, Mageras, Gig S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4499-92ebc7482842113f86a93b0e05d9d94afbed4bec74c19588105c98e6e852e9623
cites
container_end_page 4558
container_issue 7
container_start_page 4547
container_title Medical physics (Lancaster)
container_volume 39
creator Hu, Yu-Chi
Grossberg, Michael D.
Wu, Abraham
Riaz, Nadeem
Perez, Carmen
Mageras, Gig S.
description Purpose: Contouring a normal anatomical structure during radiation treatment planning requires significant time and effort. The authors present a fast and accurate semiautomatic contour delineation method to reduce the time and effort required of expert users. Methods: Following an initial segmentation on one CT slice, the user marks the target organ and nontarget pixels with a few simple brush strokes. The algorithm calculates statistics from this information that, in turn, determines the parameters of an energy function containing both boundary and regional components. The method uses a conditional random field graphical model to define the energy function to be minimized for obtaining an estimated optimal segmentation, and a graph partition algorithm to efficiently solve the energy function minimization. Organ boundary statistics are estimated from the segmentation and propagated to subsequent images; regional statistics are estimated from the simple brush strokes that are either propagated or redrawn as needed on subsequent images. This greatly reduces the user input needed and speeds up segmentations. The proposed method can be further accelerated with graph-based interpolation of alternating slices in place of user-guided segmentation. CT images from phantom and patients were used to evaluate this method. The authors determined the sensitivity and specificity of organ segmentations using physician-drawn contours as ground truth, as well as the predicted-to-ground truth surface distances. Finally, three physicians evaluated the contours for subjective acceptability. Interobserver and intraobserver analysis was also performed and Bland–Altman plots were used to evaluate agreement. Results: Liver and kidney segmentations in patient volumetric CT images show that boundary samples provided on a single CT slice can be reused through the entire 3D stack of images to obtain accurate segmentation. In liver, our method has better sensitivity and specificity (0.925 and 0.995) than region growing (0.897 and 0.995) and level set methods (0.912 and 0.985) as well as shorter mean predicted-to-ground truth distance (2.13 mm) compared to regional growing (4.58 mm) and level set methods (8.55 mm and 4.74 mm). Similar results are observed in kidney segmentation. Physician evaluation of ten liver cases showed that 83% of contours did not need any modification, while 6% of contours needed modifications as assessed by two or more evaluators. In interobserver and intraobse
doi_str_mv 10.1118/1.4728979
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1030075155</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1030075155</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4499-92ebc7482842113f86a93b0e05d9d94afbed4bec74c19588105c98e6e852e9623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV9rFDEUxYNY7Fp98AvIPIowbf7OJC-ClGoLlfqgzyGT3KnRmWRNMlv67Zt1t0tF8Onm5vzuOXAvQm8IPiWEyDNyynsqVa-eoRXlPWs5xeo5WmGseEs5FsfoZc4_McYdE_gFOqZUMtzLboXsVSiQjC1-A02G2ZulxNkUbxsbQ4lLahxMPkD9iqFZsg-3TS61y5Ux05ZyfqvVdzLBxbkZPUwuN2MyM9zF9OsVOhrNlOH1vp6g758uvp1fttc3n6_OP163lnOlWkVhsD2XVHJKCBtlZxQbMGDhlFPcjAM4PkBFLFFCSoKFVRI6kIKC6ig7QR92vutlmMFZCCWZSa-Tn02619F4_bcS_A99GzeacUI549Xg3d4gxd8L5KJnny1MkwkQl6wJZhj3gghR0bdPsw4hj5utQLsD7vwE9wedYL09mSZ6fzL95eu2VP79js_Wlz_LPsxsYnrCr934P_ifAPYALtunBg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1030075155</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interactive semiautomatic contour delineation using statistical conditional random fields framework</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Hu, Yu-Chi ; Grossberg, Michael D. ; Wu, Abraham ; Riaz, Nadeem ; Perez, Carmen ; Mageras, Gig S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hu, Yu-Chi ; Grossberg, Michael D. ; Wu, Abraham ; Riaz, Nadeem ; Perez, Carmen ; Mageras, Gig S.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: Contouring a normal anatomical structure during radiation treatment planning requires significant time and effort. The authors present a fast and accurate semiautomatic contour delineation method to reduce the time and effort required of expert users. Methods: Following an initial segmentation on one CT slice, the user marks the target organ and nontarget pixels with a few simple brush strokes. The algorithm calculates statistics from this information that, in turn, determines the parameters of an energy function containing both boundary and regional components. The method uses a conditional random field graphical model to define the energy function to be minimized for obtaining an estimated optimal segmentation, and a graph partition algorithm to efficiently solve the energy function minimization. Organ boundary statistics are estimated from the segmentation and propagated to subsequent images; regional statistics are estimated from the simple brush strokes that are either propagated or redrawn as needed on subsequent images. This greatly reduces the user input needed and speeds up segmentations. The proposed method can be further accelerated with graph-based interpolation of alternating slices in place of user-guided segmentation. CT images from phantom and patients were used to evaluate this method. The authors determined the sensitivity and specificity of organ segmentations using physician-drawn contours as ground truth, as well as the predicted-to-ground truth surface distances. Finally, three physicians evaluated the contours for subjective acceptability. Interobserver and intraobserver analysis was also performed and Bland–Altman plots were used to evaluate agreement. Results: Liver and kidney segmentations in patient volumetric CT images show that boundary samples provided on a single CT slice can be reused through the entire 3D stack of images to obtain accurate segmentation. In liver, our method has better sensitivity and specificity (0.925 and 0.995) than region growing (0.897 and 0.995) and level set methods (0.912 and 0.985) as well as shorter mean predicted-to-ground truth distance (2.13 mm) compared to regional growing (4.58 mm) and level set methods (8.55 mm and 4.74 mm). Similar results are observed in kidney segmentation. Physician evaluation of ten liver cases showed that 83% of contours did not need any modification, while 6% of contours needed modifications as assessed by two or more evaluators. In interobserver and intraobserver analysis, Bland–Altman plots showed our method to have better repeatability than the manual method while the delineation time was 15% faster on average. Conclusions: Our method achieves high accuracy in liver and kidney segmentation and considerably reduces the time and labor required for contour delineation. Since it extracts purely statistical information from the samples interactively specified by expert users, the method avoids heuristic assumptions commonly used by other methods. In addition, the method can be expanded to 3D directly without modification because the underlying graphical framework and graph partition optimization method fit naturally with the image grid structure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.4728979</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22830786</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPHYA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>Anatomy ; Artificial Intelligence ; Computed tomography ; Computerised tomographs ; computerised tomography ; conditional random fields ; Data Interpretation, Statistical ; Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications ; graph cut ; Humans ; Image data processing or generation, in general ; image segmentation ; interpolation ; Interpolation; curve fitting ; kidney ; Kidneys ; liver ; Medical image contrast ; medical image processing ; Medical image segmentation ; Medical imaging ; minimisation ; Numerical optimization ; Pattern Recognition, Automated - methods ; phantoms ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Probability theory, stochastic processes, and statistics ; radiation therapy ; Radiation Therapy Physics ; Radiation treatment ; radiation treatment planning ; Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods ; Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Reproducibility of Results ; Segmentation ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Single‐slice ; statistics ; Tissues ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - instrumentation ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods ; Treatment planning ; User-Computer Interface</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 2012-07, Vol.39 (7), p.4547-4558</ispartof><rights>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>2012 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 American Association of Physicists in Medicine 2012 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4499-92ebc7482842113f86a93b0e05d9d94afbed4bec74c19588105c98e6e852e9623</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22830786$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hu, Yu-Chi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grossberg, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Abraham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riaz, Nadeem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perez, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mageras, Gig S.</creatorcontrib><title>Interactive semiautomatic contour delineation using statistical conditional random fields framework</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><description>Purpose: Contouring a normal anatomical structure during radiation treatment planning requires significant time and effort. The authors present a fast and accurate semiautomatic contour delineation method to reduce the time and effort required of expert users. Methods: Following an initial segmentation on one CT slice, the user marks the target organ and nontarget pixels with a few simple brush strokes. The algorithm calculates statistics from this information that, in turn, determines the parameters of an energy function containing both boundary and regional components. The method uses a conditional random field graphical model to define the energy function to be minimized for obtaining an estimated optimal segmentation, and a graph partition algorithm to efficiently solve the energy function minimization. Organ boundary statistics are estimated from the segmentation and propagated to subsequent images; regional statistics are estimated from the simple brush strokes that are either propagated or redrawn as needed on subsequent images. This greatly reduces the user input needed and speeds up segmentations. The proposed method can be further accelerated with graph-based interpolation of alternating slices in place of user-guided segmentation. CT images from phantom and patients were used to evaluate this method. The authors determined the sensitivity and specificity of organ segmentations using physician-drawn contours as ground truth, as well as the predicted-to-ground truth surface distances. Finally, three physicians evaluated the contours for subjective acceptability. Interobserver and intraobserver analysis was also performed and Bland–Altman plots were used to evaluate agreement. Results: Liver and kidney segmentations in patient volumetric CT images show that boundary samples provided on a single CT slice can be reused through the entire 3D stack of images to obtain accurate segmentation. In liver, our method has better sensitivity and specificity (0.925 and 0.995) than region growing (0.897 and 0.995) and level set methods (0.912 and 0.985) as well as shorter mean predicted-to-ground truth distance (2.13 mm) compared to regional growing (4.58 mm) and level set methods (8.55 mm and 4.74 mm). Similar results are observed in kidney segmentation. Physician evaluation of ten liver cases showed that 83% of contours did not need any modification, while 6% of contours needed modifications as assessed by two or more evaluators. In interobserver and intraobserver analysis, Bland–Altman plots showed our method to have better repeatability than the manual method while the delineation time was 15% faster on average. Conclusions: Our method achieves high accuracy in liver and kidney segmentation and considerably reduces the time and labor required for contour delineation. Since it extracts purely statistical information from the samples interactively specified by expert users, the method avoids heuristic assumptions commonly used by other methods. In addition, the method can be expanded to 3D directly without modification because the underlying graphical framework and graph partition optimization method fit naturally with the image grid structure.</description><subject>Anatomy</subject><subject>Artificial Intelligence</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Computerised tomographs</subject><subject>computerised tomography</subject><subject>conditional random fields</subject><subject>Data Interpretation, Statistical</subject><subject>Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications</subject><subject>graph cut</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image data processing or generation, in general</subject><subject>image segmentation</subject><subject>interpolation</subject><subject>Interpolation; curve fitting</subject><subject>kidney</subject><subject>Kidneys</subject><subject>liver</subject><subject>Medical image contrast</subject><subject>medical image processing</subject><subject>Medical image segmentation</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>minimisation</subject><subject>Numerical optimization</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Automated - methods</subject><subject>phantoms</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Probability theory, stochastic processes, and statistics</subject><subject>radiation therapy</subject><subject>Radiation Therapy Physics</subject><subject>Radiation treatment</subject><subject>radiation treatment planning</subject><subject>Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods</subject><subject>Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Segmentation</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Single‐slice</subject><subject>statistics</subject><subject>Tissues</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - instrumentation</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><subject>Treatment planning</subject><subject>User-Computer Interface</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><issn>0094-2405</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kV9rFDEUxYNY7Fp98AvIPIowbf7OJC-ClGoLlfqgzyGT3KnRmWRNMlv67Zt1t0tF8Onm5vzuOXAvQm8IPiWEyDNyynsqVa-eoRXlPWs5xeo5WmGseEs5FsfoZc4_McYdE_gFOqZUMtzLboXsVSiQjC1-A02G2ZulxNkUbxsbQ4lLahxMPkD9iqFZsg-3TS61y5Ux05ZyfqvVdzLBxbkZPUwuN2MyM9zF9OsVOhrNlOH1vp6g758uvp1fttc3n6_OP163lnOlWkVhsD2XVHJKCBtlZxQbMGDhlFPcjAM4PkBFLFFCSoKFVRI6kIKC6ig7QR92vutlmMFZCCWZSa-Tn02619F4_bcS_A99GzeacUI549Xg3d4gxd8L5KJnny1MkwkQl6wJZhj3gghR0bdPsw4hj5utQLsD7vwE9wedYL09mSZ6fzL95eu2VP79js_Wlz_LPsxsYnrCr934P_ifAPYALtunBg</recordid><startdate>201207</startdate><enddate>201207</enddate><creator>Hu, Yu-Chi</creator><creator>Grossberg, Michael D.</creator><creator>Wu, Abraham</creator><creator>Riaz, Nadeem</creator><creator>Perez, Carmen</creator><creator>Mageras, Gig S.</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201207</creationdate><title>Interactive semiautomatic contour delineation using statistical conditional random fields framework</title><author>Hu, Yu-Chi ; Grossberg, Michael D. ; Wu, Abraham ; Riaz, Nadeem ; Perez, Carmen ; Mageras, Gig S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4499-92ebc7482842113f86a93b0e05d9d94afbed4bec74c19588105c98e6e852e9623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Anatomy</topic><topic>Artificial Intelligence</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Computerised tomographs</topic><topic>computerised tomography</topic><topic>conditional random fields</topic><topic>Data Interpretation, Statistical</topic><topic>Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications</topic><topic>graph cut</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image data processing or generation, in general</topic><topic>image segmentation</topic><topic>interpolation</topic><topic>Interpolation; curve fitting</topic><topic>kidney</topic><topic>Kidneys</topic><topic>liver</topic><topic>Medical image contrast</topic><topic>medical image processing</topic><topic>Medical image segmentation</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>minimisation</topic><topic>Numerical optimization</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Automated - methods</topic><topic>phantoms</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Probability theory, stochastic processes, and statistics</topic><topic>radiation therapy</topic><topic>Radiation Therapy Physics</topic><topic>Radiation treatment</topic><topic>radiation treatment planning</topic><topic>Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods</topic><topic>Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Segmentation</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Single‐slice</topic><topic>statistics</topic><topic>Tissues</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - instrumentation</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><topic>Treatment planning</topic><topic>User-Computer Interface</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hu, Yu-Chi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grossberg, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Abraham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riaz, Nadeem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perez, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mageras, Gig S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hu, Yu-Chi</au><au>Grossberg, Michael D.</au><au>Wu, Abraham</au><au>Riaz, Nadeem</au><au>Perez, Carmen</au><au>Mageras, Gig S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interactive semiautomatic contour delineation using statistical conditional random fields framework</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><date>2012-07</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>4547</spage><epage>4558</epage><pages>4547-4558</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><eissn>0094-2405</eissn><coden>MPHYA6</coden><abstract>Purpose: Contouring a normal anatomical structure during radiation treatment planning requires significant time and effort. The authors present a fast and accurate semiautomatic contour delineation method to reduce the time and effort required of expert users. Methods: Following an initial segmentation on one CT slice, the user marks the target organ and nontarget pixels with a few simple brush strokes. The algorithm calculates statistics from this information that, in turn, determines the parameters of an energy function containing both boundary and regional components. The method uses a conditional random field graphical model to define the energy function to be minimized for obtaining an estimated optimal segmentation, and a graph partition algorithm to efficiently solve the energy function minimization. Organ boundary statistics are estimated from the segmentation and propagated to subsequent images; regional statistics are estimated from the simple brush strokes that are either propagated or redrawn as needed on subsequent images. This greatly reduces the user input needed and speeds up segmentations. The proposed method can be further accelerated with graph-based interpolation of alternating slices in place of user-guided segmentation. CT images from phantom and patients were used to evaluate this method. The authors determined the sensitivity and specificity of organ segmentations using physician-drawn contours as ground truth, as well as the predicted-to-ground truth surface distances. Finally, three physicians evaluated the contours for subjective acceptability. Interobserver and intraobserver analysis was also performed and Bland–Altman plots were used to evaluate agreement. Results: Liver and kidney segmentations in patient volumetric CT images show that boundary samples provided on a single CT slice can be reused through the entire 3D stack of images to obtain accurate segmentation. In liver, our method has better sensitivity and specificity (0.925 and 0.995) than region growing (0.897 and 0.995) and level set methods (0.912 and 0.985) as well as shorter mean predicted-to-ground truth distance (2.13 mm) compared to regional growing (4.58 mm) and level set methods (8.55 mm and 4.74 mm). Similar results are observed in kidney segmentation. Physician evaluation of ten liver cases showed that 83% of contours did not need any modification, while 6% of contours needed modifications as assessed by two or more evaluators. In interobserver and intraobserver analysis, Bland–Altman plots showed our method to have better repeatability than the manual method while the delineation time was 15% faster on average. Conclusions: Our method achieves high accuracy in liver and kidney segmentation and considerably reduces the time and labor required for contour delineation. Since it extracts purely statistical information from the samples interactively specified by expert users, the method avoids heuristic assumptions commonly used by other methods. In addition, the method can be expanded to 3D directly without modification because the underlying graphical framework and graph partition optimization method fit naturally with the image grid structure.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><pmid>22830786</pmid><doi>10.1118/1.4728979</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-2405
ispartof Medical physics (Lancaster), 2012-07, Vol.39 (7), p.4547-4558
issn 0094-2405
2473-4209
0094-2405
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1030075155
source Wiley
subjects Anatomy
Artificial Intelligence
Computed tomography
Computerised tomographs
computerised tomography
conditional random fields
Data Interpretation, Statistical
Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
graph cut
Humans
Image data processing or generation, in general
image segmentation
interpolation
Interpolation
curve fitting
kidney
Kidneys
liver
Medical image contrast
medical image processing
Medical image segmentation
Medical imaging
minimisation
Numerical optimization
Pattern Recognition, Automated - methods
phantoms
Phantoms, Imaging
Probability theory, stochastic processes, and statistics
radiation therapy
Radiation Therapy Physics
Radiation treatment
radiation treatment planning
Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods
Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods
Reproducibility of Results
Segmentation
Sensitivity and Specificity
Single‐slice
statistics
Tissues
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - instrumentation
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
Treatment planning
User-Computer Interface
title Interactive semiautomatic contour delineation using statistical conditional random fields framework
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T13%3A24%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interactive%20semiautomatic%20contour%20delineation%20using%20statistical%20conditional%20random%20fields%20framework&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=Hu,%20Yu-Chi&rft.date=2012-07&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=4547&rft.epage=4558&rft.pages=4547-4558&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft.coden=MPHYA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.4728979&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E1030075155%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4499-92ebc7482842113f86a93b0e05d9d94afbed4bec74c19588105c98e6e852e9623%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1030075155&rft_id=info:pmid/22830786&rfr_iscdi=true