Loading…

Relative validity of the geisinger rural aging study food frequency questionnaire

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative validity of a population specific food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and evaluate the effectiveness of the instrument for assessing nutritional risk in older adults. DESIGN: A cross-over design with participants completing two different dietary assessment instrum...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of nutrition, health & aging health & aging, 2012-07, Vol.16 (7), p.667-672
Main Authors: Mitchell, Diane C, Tucker, K. L, Maras, J, Lawrence, F. R, Smiciklas-Wright, H, Jensen, G. L, Still, C. D, Hartman, T. J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c609t-3513e16445d9eb35e364169b9929476c4cdf91cc4a68731cae44da848c54dda83
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c609t-3513e16445d9eb35e364169b9929476c4cdf91cc4a68731cae44da848c54dda83
container_end_page 672
container_issue 7
container_start_page 667
container_title The Journal of nutrition, health & aging
container_volume 16
creator Mitchell, Diane C
Tucker, K. L
Maras, J
Lawrence, F. R
Smiciklas-Wright, H
Jensen, G. L
Still, C. D
Hartman, T. J
description OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative validity of a population specific food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and evaluate the effectiveness of the instrument for assessing nutritional risk in older adults. DESIGN: A cross-over design with participants completing two different dietary assessment instruments in random order. SETTING: The Geisinger Rural Aging Study (GRAS), a longitudinal study of over 20,000 adults living in the central, northern and eastern counties of Pennsylvania. PARTICIPANTS: A subset of GRAS consisting of 245 older adults (60% women) ranging in age from 70 to 95 years. MEASUREMENTS: Energy and nutrient intakes were assessed from two instruments: a population specific food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and four 24-hour dietary recalls conducted over a two week period. RESULTS: Pearson correlation coefficients between the FFQ and dietary recalls for most nutrients were 0.5 or higher which suggests that the FFQ provided relatively valid estimates of macro and micronutrient intakes examined. Bland-Altman plots were generated to examine the agreement between instruments. Data are shown for energy, folate and zinc with close agreement at lower intakes indicative of risk for folate and zinc. Sensitivity results also showed that the FFQ was able to correctly classify individuals adequately at risk for most nutrients examined. CONCLUSION: This population specific FFQ appears to be a valid instrument for use in in evaluating risk for many nutrients that are of particular concern in older adults residing throughout many predominately rural counties in Pennsylvania.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12603-012-0030-3
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1030078860</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2727820951</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c609t-3513e16445d9eb35e364169b9929476c4cdf91cc4a68731cae44da848c54dda83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF1LHDEUhoNUqm77A7ypASn0ZtqcJJNMLkWsLQjSD69DNnNmG5mdaDIj7L8362y1CL0I54Q85-TlIeQY2GdgTH_JwBUTFQNeMSZYJfbIIWjFKqmb5k3puTaV1kwfkKOcbxmTtWnUW3LAeSOUBjgkP35i78bwgPTB9aEN44bGjo5_kK4w5DCsMNE0JddTtyo3msep3dAuxpZ2Ce8nHPyGlpLHEIfBhYTvyH7n-ozvd3VBbr5e_D7_Vl1dX34_P7uqvGJmrEQNAkFJWbcGl6JGoSQoszSGG6mVl77tDHgvnWq0AO9QytY1svG1bEsjFuTTvPcuxacAdh2yx753A8YpWyhGWPFQDC3I6Sv0Nk5pKOmeKFMbI6FQMFM-xZwTdvYuhbVLmwLZrW87-7bFt936tqLMfNhtnpZrbJ8n_gouwMcd4LJ3fZfc4EN-4ZTghsM2Ip-5XJ621v-N-P_fT-ahzkXrVqksvvnFGUhWjjBCiEdOBp_q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1030959941</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relative validity of the geisinger rural aging study food frequency questionnaire</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Mitchell, Diane C ; Tucker, K. L ; Maras, J ; Lawrence, F. R ; Smiciklas-Wright, H ; Jensen, G. L ; Still, C. D ; Hartman, T. J</creator><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Diane C ; Tucker, K. L ; Maras, J ; Lawrence, F. R ; Smiciklas-Wright, H ; Jensen, G. L ; Still, C. D ; Hartman, T. J</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative validity of a population specific food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and evaluate the effectiveness of the instrument for assessing nutritional risk in older adults. DESIGN: A cross-over design with participants completing two different dietary assessment instruments in random order. SETTING: The Geisinger Rural Aging Study (GRAS), a longitudinal study of over 20,000 adults living in the central, northern and eastern counties of Pennsylvania. PARTICIPANTS: A subset of GRAS consisting of 245 older adults (60% women) ranging in age from 70 to 95 years. MEASUREMENTS: Energy and nutrient intakes were assessed from two instruments: a population specific food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and four 24-hour dietary recalls conducted over a two week period. RESULTS: Pearson correlation coefficients between the FFQ and dietary recalls for most nutrients were 0.5 or higher which suggests that the FFQ provided relatively valid estimates of macro and micronutrient intakes examined. Bland-Altman plots were generated to examine the agreement between instruments. Data are shown for energy, folate and zinc with close agreement at lower intakes indicative of risk for folate and zinc. Sensitivity results also showed that the FFQ was able to correctly classify individuals adequately at risk for most nutrients examined. CONCLUSION: This population specific FFQ appears to be a valid instrument for use in in evaluating risk for many nutrients that are of particular concern in older adults residing throughout many predominately rural counties in Pennsylvania.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1279-7707</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1760-4788</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12603-012-0030-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22836711</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Paris: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aging ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognitive ability ; correlation ; cross-over studies ; Diet - statistics & numerical data ; diet recall ; Dietary Carbohydrates - administration & dosage ; Dietary Carbohydrates - analysis ; Dietary Fats - administration & dosage ; Dietary Fats - analysis ; Dietary Proteins - administration & dosage ; Dietary Proteins - analysis ; elderly ; energy ; Energy Intake ; Feeding Behavior ; Feeding. Feeding behavior ; Female ; folic acid ; Folic Acid - administration & dosage ; Folic Acid - analysis ; Follow-Up Studies ; Food ; food frequency questionnaires ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Geriatrics/Gerontology ; Humans ; Interviews as Topic ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Memory ; Micronutrients - administration & dosage ; Micronutrients - analysis ; Neurosciences ; Nutrients ; Nutrition ; Nutrition Assessment ; Nutrition research ; Older people ; Pennsylvania ; Primary Care Medicine ; Quality of Life Research ; Questionnaires ; risk ; Risk Assessment ; Rural Population ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Validity ; Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems ; women ; zinc ; Zinc - administration & dosage ; Zinc - analysis]]></subject><ispartof>The Journal of nutrition, health &amp; aging, 2012-07, Vol.16 (7), p.667-672</ispartof><rights>Serdi and Springer-Verlag France 2012</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Serdi and Springer Verlag France 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c609t-3513e16445d9eb35e364169b9929476c4cdf91cc4a68731cae44da848c54dda83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c609t-3513e16445d9eb35e364169b9929476c4cdf91cc4a68731cae44da848c54dda83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=26329210$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22836711$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Diane C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tucker, K. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maras, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence, F. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smiciklas-Wright, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, G. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Still, C. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartman, T. J</creatorcontrib><title>Relative validity of the geisinger rural aging study food frequency questionnaire</title><title>The Journal of nutrition, health &amp; aging</title><addtitle>J Nutr Health Aging</addtitle><addtitle>J Nutr Health Aging</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative validity of a population specific food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and evaluate the effectiveness of the instrument for assessing nutritional risk in older adults. DESIGN: A cross-over design with participants completing two different dietary assessment instruments in random order. SETTING: The Geisinger Rural Aging Study (GRAS), a longitudinal study of over 20,000 adults living in the central, northern and eastern counties of Pennsylvania. PARTICIPANTS: A subset of GRAS consisting of 245 older adults (60% women) ranging in age from 70 to 95 years. MEASUREMENTS: Energy and nutrient intakes were assessed from two instruments: a population specific food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and four 24-hour dietary recalls conducted over a two week period. RESULTS: Pearson correlation coefficients between the FFQ and dietary recalls for most nutrients were 0.5 or higher which suggests that the FFQ provided relatively valid estimates of macro and micronutrient intakes examined. Bland-Altman plots were generated to examine the agreement between instruments. Data are shown for energy, folate and zinc with close agreement at lower intakes indicative of risk for folate and zinc. Sensitivity results also showed that the FFQ was able to correctly classify individuals adequately at risk for most nutrients examined. CONCLUSION: This population specific FFQ appears to be a valid instrument for use in in evaluating risk for many nutrients that are of particular concern in older adults residing throughout many predominately rural counties in Pennsylvania.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>correlation</subject><subject>cross-over studies</subject><subject>Diet - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>diet recall</subject><subject>Dietary Carbohydrates - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Dietary Carbohydrates - analysis</subject><subject>Dietary Fats - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Dietary Fats - analysis</subject><subject>Dietary Proteins - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Dietary Proteins - analysis</subject><subject>elderly</subject><subject>energy</subject><subject>Energy Intake</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior</subject><subject>Feeding. Feeding behavior</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>folic acid</subject><subject>Folic Acid - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Folic Acid - analysis</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>food frequency questionnaires</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Geriatrics/Gerontology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interviews as Topic</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Micronutrients - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Micronutrients - analysis</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Nutrition Assessment</subject><subject>Nutrition research</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Pennsylvania</subject><subject>Primary Care Medicine</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>risk</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Rural Population</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems</subject><subject>women</subject><subject>zinc</subject><subject>Zinc - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Zinc - analysis</subject><issn>1279-7707</issn><issn>1760-4788</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kF1LHDEUhoNUqm77A7ypASn0ZtqcJJNMLkWsLQjSD69DNnNmG5mdaDIj7L8362y1CL0I54Q85-TlIeQY2GdgTH_JwBUTFQNeMSZYJfbIIWjFKqmb5k3puTaV1kwfkKOcbxmTtWnUW3LAeSOUBjgkP35i78bwgPTB9aEN44bGjo5_kK4w5DCsMNE0JddTtyo3msep3dAuxpZ2Ce8nHPyGlpLHEIfBhYTvyH7n-ozvd3VBbr5e_D7_Vl1dX34_P7uqvGJmrEQNAkFJWbcGl6JGoSQoszSGG6mVl77tDHgvnWq0AO9QytY1svG1bEsjFuTTvPcuxacAdh2yx753A8YpWyhGWPFQDC3I6Sv0Nk5pKOmeKFMbI6FQMFM-xZwTdvYuhbVLmwLZrW87-7bFt936tqLMfNhtnpZrbJ8n_gouwMcd4LJ3fZfc4EN-4ZTghsM2Ip-5XJ621v-N-P_fT-ahzkXrVqksvvnFGUhWjjBCiEdOBp_q</recordid><startdate>20120701</startdate><enddate>20120701</enddate><creator>Mitchell, Diane C</creator><creator>Tucker, K. L</creator><creator>Maras, J</creator><creator>Lawrence, F. R</creator><creator>Smiciklas-Wright, H</creator><creator>Jensen, G. L</creator><creator>Still, C. D</creator><creator>Hartman, T. J</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120701</creationdate><title>Relative validity of the geisinger rural aging study food frequency questionnaire</title><author>Mitchell, Diane C ; Tucker, K. L ; Maras, J ; Lawrence, F. R ; Smiciklas-Wright, H ; Jensen, G. L ; Still, C. D ; Hartman, T. J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c609t-3513e16445d9eb35e364169b9929476c4cdf91cc4a68731cae44da848c54dda83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>correlation</topic><topic>cross-over studies</topic><topic>Diet - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>diet recall</topic><topic>Dietary Carbohydrates - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Dietary Carbohydrates - analysis</topic><topic>Dietary Fats - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Dietary Fats - analysis</topic><topic>Dietary Proteins - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Dietary Proteins - analysis</topic><topic>elderly</topic><topic>energy</topic><topic>Energy Intake</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior</topic><topic>Feeding. Feeding behavior</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>folic acid</topic><topic>Folic Acid - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Folic Acid - analysis</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>food frequency questionnaires</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Geriatrics/Gerontology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interviews as Topic</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Micronutrients - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Micronutrients - analysis</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Nutrition Assessment</topic><topic>Nutrition research</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Pennsylvania</topic><topic>Primary Care Medicine</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>risk</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Rural Population</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems</topic><topic>women</topic><topic>zinc</topic><topic>Zinc - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Zinc - analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Diane C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tucker, K. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maras, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence, F. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smiciklas-Wright, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, G. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Still, C. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartman, T. J</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of nutrition, health &amp; aging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mitchell, Diane C</au><au>Tucker, K. L</au><au>Maras, J</au><au>Lawrence, F. R</au><au>Smiciklas-Wright, H</au><au>Jensen, G. L</au><au>Still, C. D</au><au>Hartman, T. J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Relative validity of the geisinger rural aging study food frequency questionnaire</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of nutrition, health &amp; aging</jtitle><stitle>J Nutr Health Aging</stitle><addtitle>J Nutr Health Aging</addtitle><date>2012-07-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>667</spage><epage>672</epage><pages>667-672</pages><issn>1279-7707</issn><eissn>1760-4788</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative validity of a population specific food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and evaluate the effectiveness of the instrument for assessing nutritional risk in older adults. DESIGN: A cross-over design with participants completing two different dietary assessment instruments in random order. SETTING: The Geisinger Rural Aging Study (GRAS), a longitudinal study of over 20,000 adults living in the central, northern and eastern counties of Pennsylvania. PARTICIPANTS: A subset of GRAS consisting of 245 older adults (60% women) ranging in age from 70 to 95 years. MEASUREMENTS: Energy and nutrient intakes were assessed from two instruments: a population specific food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and four 24-hour dietary recalls conducted over a two week period. RESULTS: Pearson correlation coefficients between the FFQ and dietary recalls for most nutrients were 0.5 or higher which suggests that the FFQ provided relatively valid estimates of macro and micronutrient intakes examined. Bland-Altman plots were generated to examine the agreement between instruments. Data are shown for energy, folate and zinc with close agreement at lower intakes indicative of risk for folate and zinc. Sensitivity results also showed that the FFQ was able to correctly classify individuals adequately at risk for most nutrients examined. CONCLUSION: This population specific FFQ appears to be a valid instrument for use in in evaluating risk for many nutrients that are of particular concern in older adults residing throughout many predominately rural counties in Pennsylvania.</abstract><cop>Paris</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>22836711</pmid><doi>10.1007/s12603-012-0030-3</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1279-7707
ispartof The Journal of nutrition, health & aging, 2012-07, Vol.16 (7), p.667-672
issn 1279-7707
1760-4788
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1030078860
source Springer Link
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aging
Biological and medical sciences
Cognitive ability
correlation
cross-over studies
Diet - statistics & numerical data
diet recall
Dietary Carbohydrates - administration & dosage
Dietary Carbohydrates - analysis
Dietary Fats - administration & dosage
Dietary Fats - analysis
Dietary Proteins - administration & dosage
Dietary Proteins - analysis
elderly
energy
Energy Intake
Feeding Behavior
Feeding. Feeding behavior
Female
folic acid
Folic Acid - administration & dosage
Folic Acid - analysis
Follow-Up Studies
Food
food frequency questionnaires
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Geriatrics/Gerontology
Humans
Interviews as Topic
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Memory
Micronutrients - administration & dosage
Micronutrients - analysis
Neurosciences
Nutrients
Nutrition
Nutrition Assessment
Nutrition research
Older people
Pennsylvania
Primary Care Medicine
Quality of Life Research
Questionnaires
risk
Risk Assessment
Rural Population
Surveys and Questionnaires
Validity
Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems
women
zinc
Zinc - administration & dosage
Zinc - analysis
title Relative validity of the geisinger rural aging study food frequency questionnaire
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T17%3A32%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relative%20validity%20of%20the%20geisinger%20rural%20aging%20study%20food%20frequency%20questionnaire&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20nutrition,%20health%20&%20aging&rft.au=Mitchell,%20Diane%20C&rft.date=2012-07-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=667&rft.epage=672&rft.pages=667-672&rft.issn=1279-7707&rft.eissn=1760-4788&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12603-012-0030-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2727820951%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c609t-3513e16445d9eb35e364169b9929476c4cdf91cc4a68731cae44da848c54dda83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1030959941&rft_id=info:pmid/22836711&rfr_iscdi=true