Loading…
Relative validity of the geisinger rural aging study food frequency questionnaire
OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative validity of a population specific food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and evaluate the effectiveness of the instrument for assessing nutritional risk in older adults. DESIGN: A cross-over design with participants completing two different dietary assessment instrum...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Journal of nutrition, health & aging health & aging, 2012-07, Vol.16 (7), p.667-672 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c609t-3513e16445d9eb35e364169b9929476c4cdf91cc4a68731cae44da848c54dda83 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c609t-3513e16445d9eb35e364169b9929476c4cdf91cc4a68731cae44da848c54dda83 |
container_end_page | 672 |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 667 |
container_title | The Journal of nutrition, health & aging |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Mitchell, Diane C Tucker, K. L Maras, J Lawrence, F. R Smiciklas-Wright, H Jensen, G. L Still, C. D Hartman, T. J |
description | OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative validity of a population specific food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and evaluate the effectiveness of the instrument for assessing nutritional risk in older adults. DESIGN: A cross-over design with participants completing two different dietary assessment instruments in random order. SETTING: The Geisinger Rural Aging Study (GRAS), a longitudinal study of over 20,000 adults living in the central, northern and eastern counties of Pennsylvania. PARTICIPANTS: A subset of GRAS consisting of 245 older adults (60% women) ranging in age from 70 to 95 years. MEASUREMENTS: Energy and nutrient intakes were assessed from two instruments: a population specific food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and four 24-hour dietary recalls conducted over a two week period. RESULTS: Pearson correlation coefficients between the FFQ and dietary recalls for most nutrients were 0.5 or higher which suggests that the FFQ provided relatively valid estimates of macro and micronutrient intakes examined. Bland-Altman plots were generated to examine the agreement between instruments. Data are shown for energy, folate and zinc with close agreement at lower intakes indicative of risk for folate and zinc. Sensitivity results also showed that the FFQ was able to correctly classify individuals adequately at risk for most nutrients examined. CONCLUSION: This population specific FFQ appears to be a valid instrument for use in in evaluating risk for many nutrients that are of particular concern in older adults residing throughout many predominately rural counties in Pennsylvania. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12603-012-0030-3 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1030078860</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2727820951</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c609t-3513e16445d9eb35e364169b9929476c4cdf91cc4a68731cae44da848c54dda83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF1LHDEUhoNUqm77A7ypASn0ZtqcJJNMLkWsLQjSD69DNnNmG5mdaDIj7L8362y1CL0I54Q85-TlIeQY2GdgTH_JwBUTFQNeMSZYJfbIIWjFKqmb5k3puTaV1kwfkKOcbxmTtWnUW3LAeSOUBjgkP35i78bwgPTB9aEN44bGjo5_kK4w5DCsMNE0JddTtyo3msep3dAuxpZ2Ce8nHPyGlpLHEIfBhYTvyH7n-ozvd3VBbr5e_D7_Vl1dX34_P7uqvGJmrEQNAkFJWbcGl6JGoSQoszSGG6mVl77tDHgvnWq0AO9QytY1svG1bEsjFuTTvPcuxacAdh2yx753A8YpWyhGWPFQDC3I6Sv0Nk5pKOmeKFMbI6FQMFM-xZwTdvYuhbVLmwLZrW87-7bFt936tqLMfNhtnpZrbJ8n_gouwMcd4LJ3fZfc4EN-4ZTghsM2Ip-5XJ621v-N-P_fT-ahzkXrVqksvvnFGUhWjjBCiEdOBp_q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1030959941</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relative validity of the geisinger rural aging study food frequency questionnaire</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Mitchell, Diane C ; Tucker, K. L ; Maras, J ; Lawrence, F. R ; Smiciklas-Wright, H ; Jensen, G. L ; Still, C. D ; Hartman, T. J</creator><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Diane C ; Tucker, K. L ; Maras, J ; Lawrence, F. R ; Smiciklas-Wright, H ; Jensen, G. L ; Still, C. D ; Hartman, T. J</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative validity of a population specific food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and evaluate the effectiveness of the instrument for assessing nutritional risk in older adults. DESIGN: A cross-over design with participants completing two different dietary assessment instruments in random order. SETTING: The Geisinger Rural Aging Study (GRAS), a longitudinal study of over 20,000 adults living in the central, northern and eastern counties of Pennsylvania. PARTICIPANTS: A subset of GRAS consisting of 245 older adults (60% women) ranging in age from 70 to 95 years. MEASUREMENTS: Energy and nutrient intakes were assessed from two instruments: a population specific food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and four 24-hour dietary recalls conducted over a two week period. RESULTS: Pearson correlation coefficients between the FFQ and dietary recalls for most nutrients were 0.5 or higher which suggests that the FFQ provided relatively valid estimates of macro and micronutrient intakes examined. Bland-Altman plots were generated to examine the agreement between instruments. Data are shown for energy, folate and zinc with close agreement at lower intakes indicative of risk for folate and zinc. Sensitivity results also showed that the FFQ was able to correctly classify individuals adequately at risk for most nutrients examined. CONCLUSION: This population specific FFQ appears to be a valid instrument for use in in evaluating risk for many nutrients that are of particular concern in older adults residing throughout many predominately rural counties in Pennsylvania.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1279-7707</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1760-4788</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12603-012-0030-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22836711</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Paris: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aging ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognitive ability ; correlation ; cross-over studies ; Diet - statistics & numerical data ; diet recall ; Dietary Carbohydrates - administration & dosage ; Dietary Carbohydrates - analysis ; Dietary Fats - administration & dosage ; Dietary Fats - analysis ; Dietary Proteins - administration & dosage ; Dietary Proteins - analysis ; elderly ; energy ; Energy Intake ; Feeding Behavior ; Feeding. Feeding behavior ; Female ; folic acid ; Folic Acid - administration & dosage ; Folic Acid - analysis ; Follow-Up Studies ; Food ; food frequency questionnaires ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Geriatrics/Gerontology ; Humans ; Interviews as Topic ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Memory ; Micronutrients - administration & dosage ; Micronutrients - analysis ; Neurosciences ; Nutrients ; Nutrition ; Nutrition Assessment ; Nutrition research ; Older people ; Pennsylvania ; Primary Care Medicine ; Quality of Life Research ; Questionnaires ; risk ; Risk Assessment ; Rural Population ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Validity ; Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems ; women ; zinc ; Zinc - administration & dosage ; Zinc - analysis]]></subject><ispartof>The Journal of nutrition, health & aging, 2012-07, Vol.16 (7), p.667-672</ispartof><rights>Serdi and Springer-Verlag France 2012</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Serdi and Springer Verlag France 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c609t-3513e16445d9eb35e364169b9929476c4cdf91cc4a68731cae44da848c54dda83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c609t-3513e16445d9eb35e364169b9929476c4cdf91cc4a68731cae44da848c54dda83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=26329210$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22836711$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Diane C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tucker, K. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maras, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence, F. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smiciklas-Wright, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, G. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Still, C. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartman, T. J</creatorcontrib><title>Relative validity of the geisinger rural aging study food frequency questionnaire</title><title>The Journal of nutrition, health & aging</title><addtitle>J Nutr Health Aging</addtitle><addtitle>J Nutr Health Aging</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative validity of a population specific food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and evaluate the effectiveness of the instrument for assessing nutritional risk in older adults. DESIGN: A cross-over design with participants completing two different dietary assessment instruments in random order. SETTING: The Geisinger Rural Aging Study (GRAS), a longitudinal study of over 20,000 adults living in the central, northern and eastern counties of Pennsylvania. PARTICIPANTS: A subset of GRAS consisting of 245 older adults (60% women) ranging in age from 70 to 95 years. MEASUREMENTS: Energy and nutrient intakes were assessed from two instruments: a population specific food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and four 24-hour dietary recalls conducted over a two week period. RESULTS: Pearson correlation coefficients between the FFQ and dietary recalls for most nutrients were 0.5 or higher which suggests that the FFQ provided relatively valid estimates of macro and micronutrient intakes examined. Bland-Altman plots were generated to examine the agreement between instruments. Data are shown for energy, folate and zinc with close agreement at lower intakes indicative of risk for folate and zinc. Sensitivity results also showed that the FFQ was able to correctly classify individuals adequately at risk for most nutrients examined. CONCLUSION: This population specific FFQ appears to be a valid instrument for use in in evaluating risk for many nutrients that are of particular concern in older adults residing throughout many predominately rural counties in Pennsylvania.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>correlation</subject><subject>cross-over studies</subject><subject>Diet - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>diet recall</subject><subject>Dietary Carbohydrates - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Dietary Carbohydrates - analysis</subject><subject>Dietary Fats - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Dietary Fats - analysis</subject><subject>Dietary Proteins - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Dietary Proteins - analysis</subject><subject>elderly</subject><subject>energy</subject><subject>Energy Intake</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior</subject><subject>Feeding. Feeding behavior</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>folic acid</subject><subject>Folic Acid - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Folic Acid - analysis</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>food frequency questionnaires</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Geriatrics/Gerontology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interviews as Topic</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Micronutrients - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Micronutrients - analysis</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Nutrition Assessment</subject><subject>Nutrition research</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Pennsylvania</subject><subject>Primary Care Medicine</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>risk</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Rural Population</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems</subject><subject>women</subject><subject>zinc</subject><subject>Zinc - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Zinc - analysis</subject><issn>1279-7707</issn><issn>1760-4788</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kF1LHDEUhoNUqm77A7ypASn0ZtqcJJNMLkWsLQjSD69DNnNmG5mdaDIj7L8362y1CL0I54Q85-TlIeQY2GdgTH_JwBUTFQNeMSZYJfbIIWjFKqmb5k3puTaV1kwfkKOcbxmTtWnUW3LAeSOUBjgkP35i78bwgPTB9aEN44bGjo5_kK4w5DCsMNE0JddTtyo3msep3dAuxpZ2Ce8nHPyGlpLHEIfBhYTvyH7n-ozvd3VBbr5e_D7_Vl1dX34_P7uqvGJmrEQNAkFJWbcGl6JGoSQoszSGG6mVl77tDHgvnWq0AO9QytY1svG1bEsjFuTTvPcuxacAdh2yx753A8YpWyhGWPFQDC3I6Sv0Nk5pKOmeKFMbI6FQMFM-xZwTdvYuhbVLmwLZrW87-7bFt936tqLMfNhtnpZrbJ8n_gouwMcd4LJ3fZfc4EN-4ZTghsM2Ip-5XJ621v-N-P_fT-ahzkXrVqksvvnFGUhWjjBCiEdOBp_q</recordid><startdate>20120701</startdate><enddate>20120701</enddate><creator>Mitchell, Diane C</creator><creator>Tucker, K. L</creator><creator>Maras, J</creator><creator>Lawrence, F. R</creator><creator>Smiciklas-Wright, H</creator><creator>Jensen, G. L</creator><creator>Still, C. D</creator><creator>Hartman, T. J</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120701</creationdate><title>Relative validity of the geisinger rural aging study food frequency questionnaire</title><author>Mitchell, Diane C ; Tucker, K. L ; Maras, J ; Lawrence, F. R ; Smiciklas-Wright, H ; Jensen, G. L ; Still, C. D ; Hartman, T. J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c609t-3513e16445d9eb35e364169b9929476c4cdf91cc4a68731cae44da848c54dda83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>correlation</topic><topic>cross-over studies</topic><topic>Diet - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>diet recall</topic><topic>Dietary Carbohydrates - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Dietary Carbohydrates - analysis</topic><topic>Dietary Fats - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Dietary Fats - analysis</topic><topic>Dietary Proteins - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Dietary Proteins - analysis</topic><topic>elderly</topic><topic>energy</topic><topic>Energy Intake</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior</topic><topic>Feeding. Feeding behavior</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>folic acid</topic><topic>Folic Acid - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Folic Acid - analysis</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>food frequency questionnaires</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Geriatrics/Gerontology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interviews as Topic</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Micronutrients - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Micronutrients - analysis</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Nutrition Assessment</topic><topic>Nutrition research</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Pennsylvania</topic><topic>Primary Care Medicine</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>risk</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Rural Population</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems</topic><topic>women</topic><topic>zinc</topic><topic>Zinc - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Zinc - analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Diane C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tucker, K. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maras, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence, F. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smiciklas-Wright, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, G. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Still, C. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartman, T. J</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of nutrition, health & aging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mitchell, Diane C</au><au>Tucker, K. L</au><au>Maras, J</au><au>Lawrence, F. R</au><au>Smiciklas-Wright, H</au><au>Jensen, G. L</au><au>Still, C. D</au><au>Hartman, T. J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Relative validity of the geisinger rural aging study food frequency questionnaire</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of nutrition, health & aging</jtitle><stitle>J Nutr Health Aging</stitle><addtitle>J Nutr Health Aging</addtitle><date>2012-07-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>667</spage><epage>672</epage><pages>667-672</pages><issn>1279-7707</issn><eissn>1760-4788</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative validity of a population specific food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and evaluate the effectiveness of the instrument for assessing nutritional risk in older adults. DESIGN: A cross-over design with participants completing two different dietary assessment instruments in random order. SETTING: The Geisinger Rural Aging Study (GRAS), a longitudinal study of over 20,000 adults living in the central, northern and eastern counties of Pennsylvania. PARTICIPANTS: A subset of GRAS consisting of 245 older adults (60% women) ranging in age from 70 to 95 years. MEASUREMENTS: Energy and nutrient intakes were assessed from two instruments: a population specific food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and four 24-hour dietary recalls conducted over a two week period. RESULTS: Pearson correlation coefficients between the FFQ and dietary recalls for most nutrients were 0.5 or higher which suggests that the FFQ provided relatively valid estimates of macro and micronutrient intakes examined. Bland-Altman plots were generated to examine the agreement between instruments. Data are shown for energy, folate and zinc with close agreement at lower intakes indicative of risk for folate and zinc. Sensitivity results also showed that the FFQ was able to correctly classify individuals adequately at risk for most nutrients examined. CONCLUSION: This population specific FFQ appears to be a valid instrument for use in in evaluating risk for many nutrients that are of particular concern in older adults residing throughout many predominately rural counties in Pennsylvania.</abstract><cop>Paris</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>22836711</pmid><doi>10.1007/s12603-012-0030-3</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1279-7707 |
ispartof | The Journal of nutrition, health & aging, 2012-07, Vol.16 (7), p.667-672 |
issn | 1279-7707 1760-4788 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1030078860 |
source | Springer Link |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Aging Biological and medical sciences Cognitive ability correlation cross-over studies Diet - statistics & numerical data diet recall Dietary Carbohydrates - administration & dosage Dietary Carbohydrates - analysis Dietary Fats - administration & dosage Dietary Fats - analysis Dietary Proteins - administration & dosage Dietary Proteins - analysis elderly energy Energy Intake Feeding Behavior Feeding. Feeding behavior Female folic acid Folic Acid - administration & dosage Folic Acid - analysis Follow-Up Studies Food food frequency questionnaires Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Geriatrics/Gerontology Humans Interviews as Topic Longitudinal Studies Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Memory Micronutrients - administration & dosage Micronutrients - analysis Neurosciences Nutrients Nutrition Nutrition Assessment Nutrition research Older people Pennsylvania Primary Care Medicine Quality of Life Research Questionnaires risk Risk Assessment Rural Population Surveys and Questionnaires Validity Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems women zinc Zinc - administration & dosage Zinc - analysis |
title | Relative validity of the geisinger rural aging study food frequency questionnaire |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T17%3A32%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relative%20validity%20of%20the%20geisinger%20rural%20aging%20study%20food%20frequency%20questionnaire&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20nutrition,%20health%20&%20aging&rft.au=Mitchell,%20Diane%20C&rft.date=2012-07-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=667&rft.epage=672&rft.pages=667-672&rft.issn=1279-7707&rft.eissn=1760-4788&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12603-012-0030-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2727820951%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c609t-3513e16445d9eb35e364169b9929476c4cdf91cc4a68731cae44da848c54dda83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1030959941&rft_id=info:pmid/22836711&rfr_iscdi=true |