Loading…

Local carotid stiffness and intima-media thickness assessment by a novel ultrasound-based system in essential hypertension

Abstract Objective To evaluate local carotid stiffness (CS) and intima-medial thickness (C-IMT) in hypertensive patients with different cardiovascular risk profile, using a new user-friendly ultrasound-based system, previously validated vs. RF-based echotracking device. Methods We investigated a pop...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Atherosclerosis 2012-08, Vol.223 (2), p.372-377
Main Authors: Giannarelli, Chiara, Bianchini, Elisabetta, Bruno, Rosa Maria, Magagna, Armando, Landini, Linda, Faita, Francesco, Gemignani, Vincenzo, Penno, Giuseppe, Taddei, Stefano, Ghiadoni, Lorenzo
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Objective To evaluate local carotid stiffness (CS) and intima-medial thickness (C-IMT) in hypertensive patients with different cardiovascular risk profile, using a new user-friendly ultrasound-based system, previously validated vs. RF-based echotracking device. Methods We investigated a population with different cardiovascular risk: 45 healthy normotensives (NT), 90 non-diabetic hypertensives (HT), and 48 patients with hypertension and type-2 diabetes (DM). Framingham risk factor score (FRS) was calculated. PWV was assessed by applanation tonometry. The relative stroke change in diameter (Δ D ) and C-IMT were measured on carotid scans. Distensibility coefficient (DC) was calculated as Δ A /( A *Δ P ), where A  = diastolic lumen area, Δ A  = stroke change in lumen area, and Δ P  = carotid pulse pressure. CS (m/s) was calculated as ( ρ *DC) − 1/2 ( ρ  = blood density). Results CS, C-IMT, PWV were significantly increased in HT and DM vs. NT. C-IMT and PWV were significantly higher in DM than HT. Δ D and DC were significantly lower in HT and DM vs. NT. FRS ≥10% group showed increased carotid diameter, C-IMT and CS than the FRS
ISSN:0021-9150
1879-1484
DOI:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2012.05.027