Loading…
Excision of a submandibular gland: a safe day case procedure?
Abstract There are considerable benefits, both for patients and hospitals, if operations are done as day case procedures. Excision of a submandibular gland is a relatively common operation and it is usual practice for surgeons to be cautious, admit the patient for an overnight stay, and leave a drai...
Saved in:
Published in: | British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery 2012-09, Vol.50 (6), p.567-568 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-860bb2102f5e2db1117454408e510c0ad1684825ed79e3ec4091b6a4968454773 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-860bb2102f5e2db1117454408e510c0ad1684825ed79e3ec4091b6a4968454773 |
container_end_page | 568 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 567 |
container_title | British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | Laverick, S Chandramohan, J McLoughlin, P.M |
description | Abstract There are considerable benefits, both for patients and hospitals, if operations are done as day case procedures. Excision of a submandibular gland is a relatively common operation and it is usual practice for surgeons to be cautious, admit the patient for an overnight stay, and leave a drain in place. To assess the amount of postoperative bleeding into the wound (and hence potential risk to the airway) we have studied prospectively the amount of drainage that occurs. Sixty consecutive patients admitted for overnight postoperative monitoring after excision of a submandibular gland had a suction drain placed as part of the procedure. Drainage was measured by departmental staff at regular intervals during the following 24 h. Nearly all the patients drained 40 ml or less (mean 18 ml) and in all cases there was a clear decrease in the volumes drained over the first 6–8 h postoperatively. Drainage then became negligible. The plateau in drainage was evident regardless of the initial volume drained. Surgeons should be confident that drainage will cease after 6–8 h in most patients, and residual drainage is negligible. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.10.012 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1032609597</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0266435611006425</els_id><sourcerecordid>1032609597</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-860bb2102f5e2db1117454408e510c0ad1684825ed79e3ec4091b6a4968454773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtLxDAUhYMoOj5-gSBduul4b5qkU0FFxBcILtR1SNNbSe20mkzF-femjrpw4yrhcE7OzXcZ20eYIqA6aqZl08_DlANiVKaAfI1NUGY8xULAOpsAVyoVmVRbbDuEBgAkR7nJtjjnQnKVT9jJ5Yd1wfVd0teJScJQzk1XuXJojU-e23g_HmVTU1KZZWJNoOTV95aqwdPZLtuoTRto7_vcYU9Xl48XN-nd_fXtxfldagWKRTpTUJYcgdeSeFUiYi6kEDAjiWDBVKhmYsYlVXlBGVkBBZbKiCLKUuR5tsMOV-_G6reBwkLPXbDUxvmoH4JGyLiCQhajNVtZre9D8FTrV-_mxi-jSY_cdKO_uOmR2yhGbjF18F0QAVD1m_kBFQ0nKwPFb7478jpYR13k4DzZha5690_B6Z-8bV3nrGlfaEmh6QffRYIadeAa9MO4unFziABKcJl9AhijkS8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1032609597</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Excision of a submandibular gland: a safe day case procedure?</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Laverick, S ; Chandramohan, J ; McLoughlin, P.M</creator><creatorcontrib>Laverick, S ; Chandramohan, J ; McLoughlin, P.M</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract There are considerable benefits, both for patients and hospitals, if operations are done as day case procedures. Excision of a submandibular gland is a relatively common operation and it is usual practice for surgeons to be cautious, admit the patient for an overnight stay, and leave a drain in place. To assess the amount of postoperative bleeding into the wound (and hence potential risk to the airway) we have studied prospectively the amount of drainage that occurs. Sixty consecutive patients admitted for overnight postoperative monitoring after excision of a submandibular gland had a suction drain placed as part of the procedure. Drainage was measured by departmental staff at regular intervals during the following 24 h. Nearly all the patients drained 40 ml or less (mean 18 ml) and in all cases there was a clear decrease in the volumes drained over the first 6–8 h postoperatively. Drainage then became negligible. The plateau in drainage was evident regardless of the initial volume drained. Surgeons should be confident that drainage will cease after 6–8 h in most patients, and residual drainage is negligible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0266-4356</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-1940</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.10.012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22245267</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scotland: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Airway Obstruction - etiology ; Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - methods ; British Association of Day Surgery ; Day surgery ; Dentistry ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Monitoring, Physiologic ; Postoperative Hemorrhage - etiology ; Prospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Submandibular Gland - surgery ; Submandibular gland excision ; Suction - instrumentation ; Surgery ; Time Factors ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery, 2012-09, Vol.50 (6), p.567-568</ispartof><rights>2011</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-860bb2102f5e2db1117454408e510c0ad1684825ed79e3ec4091b6a4968454773</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-860bb2102f5e2db1117454408e510c0ad1684825ed79e3ec4091b6a4968454773</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22245267$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Laverick, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandramohan, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLoughlin, P.M</creatorcontrib><title>Excision of a submandibular gland: a safe day case procedure?</title><title>British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery</title><addtitle>Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>Abstract There are considerable benefits, both for patients and hospitals, if operations are done as day case procedures. Excision of a submandibular gland is a relatively common operation and it is usual practice for surgeons to be cautious, admit the patient for an overnight stay, and leave a drain in place. To assess the amount of postoperative bleeding into the wound (and hence potential risk to the airway) we have studied prospectively the amount of drainage that occurs. Sixty consecutive patients admitted for overnight postoperative monitoring after excision of a submandibular gland had a suction drain placed as part of the procedure. Drainage was measured by departmental staff at regular intervals during the following 24 h. Nearly all the patients drained 40 ml or less (mean 18 ml) and in all cases there was a clear decrease in the volumes drained over the first 6–8 h postoperatively. Drainage then became negligible. The plateau in drainage was evident regardless of the initial volume drained. Surgeons should be confident that drainage will cease after 6–8 h in most patients, and residual drainage is negligible.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Airway Obstruction - etiology</subject><subject>Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>British Association of Day Surgery</subject><subject>Day surgery</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Monitoring, Physiologic</subject><subject>Postoperative Hemorrhage - etiology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Submandibular Gland - surgery</subject><subject>Submandibular gland excision</subject><subject>Suction - instrumentation</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0266-4356</issn><issn>1532-1940</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUtLxDAUhYMoOj5-gSBduul4b5qkU0FFxBcILtR1SNNbSe20mkzF-femjrpw4yrhcE7OzXcZ20eYIqA6aqZl08_DlANiVKaAfI1NUGY8xULAOpsAVyoVmVRbbDuEBgAkR7nJtjjnQnKVT9jJ5Yd1wfVd0teJScJQzk1XuXJojU-e23g_HmVTU1KZZWJNoOTV95aqwdPZLtuoTRto7_vcYU9Xl48XN-nd_fXtxfldagWKRTpTUJYcgdeSeFUiYi6kEDAjiWDBVKhmYsYlVXlBGVkBBZbKiCLKUuR5tsMOV-_G6reBwkLPXbDUxvmoH4JGyLiCQhajNVtZre9D8FTrV-_mxi-jSY_cdKO_uOmR2yhGbjF18F0QAVD1m_kBFQ0nKwPFb7478jpYR13k4DzZha5690_B6Z-8bV3nrGlfaEmh6QffRYIadeAa9MO4unFziABKcJl9AhijkS8</recordid><startdate>20120901</startdate><enddate>20120901</enddate><creator>Laverick, S</creator><creator>Chandramohan, J</creator><creator>McLoughlin, P.M</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120901</creationdate><title>Excision of a submandibular gland: a safe day case procedure?</title><author>Laverick, S ; Chandramohan, J ; McLoughlin, P.M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-860bb2102f5e2db1117454408e510c0ad1684825ed79e3ec4091b6a4968454773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Airway Obstruction - etiology</topic><topic>Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>British Association of Day Surgery</topic><topic>Day surgery</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Monitoring, Physiologic</topic><topic>Postoperative Hemorrhage - etiology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Submandibular Gland - surgery</topic><topic>Submandibular gland excision</topic><topic>Suction - instrumentation</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Laverick, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandramohan, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLoughlin, P.M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Laverick, S</au><au>Chandramohan, J</au><au>McLoughlin, P.M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Excision of a submandibular gland: a safe day case procedure?</atitle><jtitle>British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2012-09-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>567</spage><epage>568</epage><pages>567-568</pages><issn>0266-4356</issn><eissn>1532-1940</eissn><abstract>Abstract There are considerable benefits, both for patients and hospitals, if operations are done as day case procedures. Excision of a submandibular gland is a relatively common operation and it is usual practice for surgeons to be cautious, admit the patient for an overnight stay, and leave a drain in place. To assess the amount of postoperative bleeding into the wound (and hence potential risk to the airway) we have studied prospectively the amount of drainage that occurs. Sixty consecutive patients admitted for overnight postoperative monitoring after excision of a submandibular gland had a suction drain placed as part of the procedure. Drainage was measured by departmental staff at regular intervals during the following 24 h. Nearly all the patients drained 40 ml or less (mean 18 ml) and in all cases there was a clear decrease in the volumes drained over the first 6–8 h postoperatively. Drainage then became negligible. The plateau in drainage was evident regardless of the initial volume drained. Surgeons should be confident that drainage will cease after 6–8 h in most patients, and residual drainage is negligible.</abstract><cop>Scotland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>22245267</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.10.012</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0266-4356 |
ispartof | British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery, 2012-09, Vol.50 (6), p.567-568 |
issn | 0266-4356 1532-1940 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1032609597 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024 |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Airway Obstruction - etiology Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - methods British Association of Day Surgery Day surgery Dentistry Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Male Middle Aged Monitoring, Physiologic Postoperative Hemorrhage - etiology Prospective Studies Risk Factors Submandibular Gland - surgery Submandibular gland excision Suction - instrumentation Surgery Time Factors Young Adult |
title | Excision of a submandibular gland: a safe day case procedure? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T15%3A51%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Excision%20of%20a%20submandibular%20gland:%20a%20safe%20day%20case%20procedure?&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20oral%20&%20maxillofacial%20surgery&rft.au=Laverick,%20S&rft.date=2012-09-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=567&rft.epage=568&rft.pages=567-568&rft.issn=0266-4356&rft.eissn=1532-1940&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.10.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1032609597%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-860bb2102f5e2db1117454408e510c0ad1684825ed79e3ec4091b6a4968454773%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1032609597&rft_id=info:pmid/22245267&rfr_iscdi=true |