Loading…

Excision of a submandibular gland: a safe day case procedure?

Abstract There are considerable benefits, both for patients and hospitals, if operations are done as day case procedures. Excision of a submandibular gland is a relatively common operation and it is usual practice for surgeons to be cautious, admit the patient for an overnight stay, and leave a drai...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery 2012-09, Vol.50 (6), p.567-568
Main Authors: Laverick, S, Chandramohan, J, McLoughlin, P.M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-860bb2102f5e2db1117454408e510c0ad1684825ed79e3ec4091b6a4968454773
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-860bb2102f5e2db1117454408e510c0ad1684825ed79e3ec4091b6a4968454773
container_end_page 568
container_issue 6
container_start_page 567
container_title British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery
container_volume 50
creator Laverick, S
Chandramohan, J
McLoughlin, P.M
description Abstract There are considerable benefits, both for patients and hospitals, if operations are done as day case procedures. Excision of a submandibular gland is a relatively common operation and it is usual practice for surgeons to be cautious, admit the patient for an overnight stay, and leave a drain in place. To assess the amount of postoperative bleeding into the wound (and hence potential risk to the airway) we have studied prospectively the amount of drainage that occurs. Sixty consecutive patients admitted for overnight postoperative monitoring after excision of a submandibular gland had a suction drain placed as part of the procedure. Drainage was measured by departmental staff at regular intervals during the following 24 h. Nearly all the patients drained 40 ml or less (mean 18 ml) and in all cases there was a clear decrease in the volumes drained over the first 6–8 h postoperatively. Drainage then became negligible. The plateau in drainage was evident regardless of the initial volume drained. Surgeons should be confident that drainage will cease after 6–8 h in most patients, and residual drainage is negligible.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.10.012
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1032609597</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0266435611006425</els_id><sourcerecordid>1032609597</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-860bb2102f5e2db1117454408e510c0ad1684825ed79e3ec4091b6a4968454773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtLxDAUhYMoOj5-gSBduul4b5qkU0FFxBcILtR1SNNbSe20mkzF-femjrpw4yrhcE7OzXcZ20eYIqA6aqZl08_DlANiVKaAfI1NUGY8xULAOpsAVyoVmVRbbDuEBgAkR7nJtjjnQnKVT9jJ5Yd1wfVd0teJScJQzk1XuXJojU-e23g_HmVTU1KZZWJNoOTV95aqwdPZLtuoTRto7_vcYU9Xl48XN-nd_fXtxfldagWKRTpTUJYcgdeSeFUiYi6kEDAjiWDBVKhmYsYlVXlBGVkBBZbKiCLKUuR5tsMOV-_G6reBwkLPXbDUxvmoH4JGyLiCQhajNVtZre9D8FTrV-_mxi-jSY_cdKO_uOmR2yhGbjF18F0QAVD1m_kBFQ0nKwPFb7478jpYR13k4DzZha5690_B6Z-8bV3nrGlfaEmh6QffRYIadeAa9MO4unFziABKcJl9AhijkS8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1032609597</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Excision of a submandibular gland: a safe day case procedure?</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Laverick, S ; Chandramohan, J ; McLoughlin, P.M</creator><creatorcontrib>Laverick, S ; Chandramohan, J ; McLoughlin, P.M</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract There are considerable benefits, both for patients and hospitals, if operations are done as day case procedures. Excision of a submandibular gland is a relatively common operation and it is usual practice for surgeons to be cautious, admit the patient for an overnight stay, and leave a drain in place. To assess the amount of postoperative bleeding into the wound (and hence potential risk to the airway) we have studied prospectively the amount of drainage that occurs. Sixty consecutive patients admitted for overnight postoperative monitoring after excision of a submandibular gland had a suction drain placed as part of the procedure. Drainage was measured by departmental staff at regular intervals during the following 24 h. Nearly all the patients drained 40 ml or less (mean 18 ml) and in all cases there was a clear decrease in the volumes drained over the first 6–8 h postoperatively. Drainage then became negligible. The plateau in drainage was evident regardless of the initial volume drained. Surgeons should be confident that drainage will cease after 6–8 h in most patients, and residual drainage is negligible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0266-4356</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-1940</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.10.012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22245267</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scotland: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Airway Obstruction - etiology ; Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - methods ; British Association of Day Surgery ; Day surgery ; Dentistry ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Monitoring, Physiologic ; Postoperative Hemorrhage - etiology ; Prospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Submandibular Gland - surgery ; Submandibular gland excision ; Suction - instrumentation ; Surgery ; Time Factors ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>British journal of oral &amp; maxillofacial surgery, 2012-09, Vol.50 (6), p.567-568</ispartof><rights>2011</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-860bb2102f5e2db1117454408e510c0ad1684825ed79e3ec4091b6a4968454773</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-860bb2102f5e2db1117454408e510c0ad1684825ed79e3ec4091b6a4968454773</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22245267$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Laverick, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandramohan, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLoughlin, P.M</creatorcontrib><title>Excision of a submandibular gland: a safe day case procedure?</title><title>British journal of oral &amp; maxillofacial surgery</title><addtitle>Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>Abstract There are considerable benefits, both for patients and hospitals, if operations are done as day case procedures. Excision of a submandibular gland is a relatively common operation and it is usual practice for surgeons to be cautious, admit the patient for an overnight stay, and leave a drain in place. To assess the amount of postoperative bleeding into the wound (and hence potential risk to the airway) we have studied prospectively the amount of drainage that occurs. Sixty consecutive patients admitted for overnight postoperative monitoring after excision of a submandibular gland had a suction drain placed as part of the procedure. Drainage was measured by departmental staff at regular intervals during the following 24 h. Nearly all the patients drained 40 ml or less (mean 18 ml) and in all cases there was a clear decrease in the volumes drained over the first 6–8 h postoperatively. Drainage then became negligible. The plateau in drainage was evident regardless of the initial volume drained. Surgeons should be confident that drainage will cease after 6–8 h in most patients, and residual drainage is negligible.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Airway Obstruction - etiology</subject><subject>Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>British Association of Day Surgery</subject><subject>Day surgery</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Monitoring, Physiologic</subject><subject>Postoperative Hemorrhage - etiology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Submandibular Gland - surgery</subject><subject>Submandibular gland excision</subject><subject>Suction - instrumentation</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0266-4356</issn><issn>1532-1940</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUtLxDAUhYMoOj5-gSBduul4b5qkU0FFxBcILtR1SNNbSe20mkzF-femjrpw4yrhcE7OzXcZ20eYIqA6aqZl08_DlANiVKaAfI1NUGY8xULAOpsAVyoVmVRbbDuEBgAkR7nJtjjnQnKVT9jJ5Yd1wfVd0teJScJQzk1XuXJojU-e23g_HmVTU1KZZWJNoOTV95aqwdPZLtuoTRto7_vcYU9Xl48XN-nd_fXtxfldagWKRTpTUJYcgdeSeFUiYi6kEDAjiWDBVKhmYsYlVXlBGVkBBZbKiCLKUuR5tsMOV-_G6reBwkLPXbDUxvmoH4JGyLiCQhajNVtZre9D8FTrV-_mxi-jSY_cdKO_uOmR2yhGbjF18F0QAVD1m_kBFQ0nKwPFb7478jpYR13k4DzZha5690_B6Z-8bV3nrGlfaEmh6QffRYIadeAa9MO4unFziABKcJl9AhijkS8</recordid><startdate>20120901</startdate><enddate>20120901</enddate><creator>Laverick, S</creator><creator>Chandramohan, J</creator><creator>McLoughlin, P.M</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120901</creationdate><title>Excision of a submandibular gland: a safe day case procedure?</title><author>Laverick, S ; Chandramohan, J ; McLoughlin, P.M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-860bb2102f5e2db1117454408e510c0ad1684825ed79e3ec4091b6a4968454773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Airway Obstruction - etiology</topic><topic>Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>British Association of Day Surgery</topic><topic>Day surgery</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Monitoring, Physiologic</topic><topic>Postoperative Hemorrhage - etiology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Submandibular Gland - surgery</topic><topic>Submandibular gland excision</topic><topic>Suction - instrumentation</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Laverick, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandramohan, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLoughlin, P.M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of oral &amp; maxillofacial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Laverick, S</au><au>Chandramohan, J</au><au>McLoughlin, P.M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Excision of a submandibular gland: a safe day case procedure?</atitle><jtitle>British journal of oral &amp; maxillofacial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2012-09-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>567</spage><epage>568</epage><pages>567-568</pages><issn>0266-4356</issn><eissn>1532-1940</eissn><abstract>Abstract There are considerable benefits, both for patients and hospitals, if operations are done as day case procedures. Excision of a submandibular gland is a relatively common operation and it is usual practice for surgeons to be cautious, admit the patient for an overnight stay, and leave a drain in place. To assess the amount of postoperative bleeding into the wound (and hence potential risk to the airway) we have studied prospectively the amount of drainage that occurs. Sixty consecutive patients admitted for overnight postoperative monitoring after excision of a submandibular gland had a suction drain placed as part of the procedure. Drainage was measured by departmental staff at regular intervals during the following 24 h. Nearly all the patients drained 40 ml or less (mean 18 ml) and in all cases there was a clear decrease in the volumes drained over the first 6–8 h postoperatively. Drainage then became negligible. The plateau in drainage was evident regardless of the initial volume drained. Surgeons should be confident that drainage will cease after 6–8 h in most patients, and residual drainage is negligible.</abstract><cop>Scotland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>22245267</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.10.012</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0266-4356
ispartof British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery, 2012-09, Vol.50 (6), p.567-568
issn 0266-4356
1532-1940
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1032609597
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Airway Obstruction - etiology
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - methods
British Association of Day Surgery
Day surgery
Dentistry
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Monitoring, Physiologic
Postoperative Hemorrhage - etiology
Prospective Studies
Risk Factors
Submandibular Gland - surgery
Submandibular gland excision
Suction - instrumentation
Surgery
Time Factors
Young Adult
title Excision of a submandibular gland: a safe day case procedure?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T15%3A51%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Excision%20of%20a%20submandibular%20gland:%20a%20safe%20day%20case%20procedure?&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20oral%20&%20maxillofacial%20surgery&rft.au=Laverick,%20S&rft.date=2012-09-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=567&rft.epage=568&rft.pages=567-568&rft.issn=0266-4356&rft.eissn=1532-1940&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.10.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1032609597%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-860bb2102f5e2db1117454408e510c0ad1684825ed79e3ec4091b6a4968454773%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1032609597&rft_id=info:pmid/22245267&rfr_iscdi=true