Loading…

Habitat use at fine spatial scale: how does patch clustering criteria explain the use of meadows by red deer?

Large mammalian herbivores are keystone species in different ecosystems. To mediate the effects of large mammalian herbivores on ecosystems, it is crucial to understand their habitat selection pattern. At finer scales, herbivore patch selection depends strongly on plant community traits and therefor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of wildlife research 2012-08, Vol.58 (4), p.645-654
Main Authors: Bellu, Annalisa, Bugalho, Miguel N, Monteiro-Henriques, Tiago, Costa, José C, Rego, Francisco C
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-d5fdf6a02b8dad725beaed5c841c2812dfb867f90e7282561ea8b934af1ebf1a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-d5fdf6a02b8dad725beaed5c841c2812dfb867f90e7282561ea8b934af1ebf1a3
container_end_page 654
container_issue 4
container_start_page 645
container_title European journal of wildlife research
container_volume 58
creator Bellu, Annalisa
Bugalho, Miguel N
Monteiro-Henriques, Tiago
Costa, José C
Rego, Francisco C
description Large mammalian herbivores are keystone species in different ecosystems. To mediate the effects of large mammalian herbivores on ecosystems, it is crucial to understand their habitat selection pattern. At finer scales, herbivore patch selection depends strongly on plant community traits and therefore its understanding is constrained by patch definition criteria. Our aim was to assess which criteria for patch definition best explained use of meadows by wild, free-ranging, red deer (Cervus elaphus) in a study area in Northeast Portugal. We used two clustering criteria types based on floristic composition and gross forage classes, respectively. For the floristic criteria, phytosociological approach was used to classify plant communities, and its objectivity evaluated with a mathematical clustering of the floristic relevés. Cover of dominant plant species was tested as a proxy for the phytosociological method. For the gross forage classes, the graminoids/forbs ratio and the percentage cover of legumes were used. For assessing deer relative use of meadows we used faecal accumulation rates. Patches clustered according to floristic classification better explained selection of patches by deer. Plant community classifications based on phytosociology, or proxies of this, used for characterizing meadow patches resulted useful to understand herbivore selection pattern at fine scales and thus potentially suitable to assist wildlife management decisions.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10344-012-0612-8
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1032895202</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1032895202</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-d5fdf6a02b8dad725beaed5c841c2812dfb867f90e7282561ea8b934af1ebf1a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9LHjEQxpdSoVb7AXoy4MXLtvm3m6yXImJrQehBPYfZZOIb2XezJruo395st4dSaA6ZYfg9D8M8VfWZ0S-MUvU1MyqkrCnjNW3Lp99Vh0yKrqaNku9Lvw5lK_mH6mPOj5TyjormsNpfQx9mmMmSkZTiw4gkTzAHGEi2MOA52cVn4iJmUsZ2R-yw5BlTGB-ITWHtgODLNEAYybzD307Rkz2Ci8-Z9K8koSMOMX07rg48DBk__alH1f33q7vL6_rm14-flxc3tRVKzLVrvPMtUN5rB07xpkdA11gtmeWaced73SrfUVRc86ZlCLrvhATPsPcMxFF1tvlOKT4tmGezD9niMMCIccmmHIvrruGUF_T0H_QxLmks2xWKK6aU1KpQbKNsijkn9GZKYQ_ptUBmDcBsAZgSgFkDMLpo-KbJ03osTH87_190sok8RAMPKWRzf8spk7Q8QWUj3gCbQZHg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1027177487</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Habitat use at fine spatial scale: how does patch clustering criteria explain the use of meadows by red deer?</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Bellu, Annalisa ; Bugalho, Miguel N ; Monteiro-Henriques, Tiago ; Costa, José C ; Rego, Francisco C</creator><creatorcontrib>Bellu, Annalisa ; Bugalho, Miguel N ; Monteiro-Henriques, Tiago ; Costa, José C ; Rego, Francisco C</creatorcontrib><description>Large mammalian herbivores are keystone species in different ecosystems. To mediate the effects of large mammalian herbivores on ecosystems, it is crucial to understand their habitat selection pattern. At finer scales, herbivore patch selection depends strongly on plant community traits and therefore its understanding is constrained by patch definition criteria. Our aim was to assess which criteria for patch definition best explained use of meadows by wild, free-ranging, red deer (Cervus elaphus) in a study area in Northeast Portugal. We used two clustering criteria types based on floristic composition and gross forage classes, respectively. For the floristic criteria, phytosociological approach was used to classify plant communities, and its objectivity evaluated with a mathematical clustering of the floristic relevés. Cover of dominant plant species was tested as a proxy for the phytosociological method. For the gross forage classes, the graminoids/forbs ratio and the percentage cover of legumes were used. For assessing deer relative use of meadows we used faecal accumulation rates. Patches clustered according to floristic classification better explained selection of patches by deer. Plant community classifications based on phytosociology, or proxies of this, used for characterizing meadow patches resulted useful to understand herbivore selection pattern at fine scales and thus potentially suitable to assist wildlife management decisions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1612-4642</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-0574</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10344-012-0612-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Animal populations ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Cervus elaphus ; Classification ; Deer ; Ecology ; ecosystems ; Fish &amp; Wildlife Biology &amp; Management ; forage ; Foraging behavior ; Forbs ; Grasslands ; Habitat selection ; Habitat utilization ; Habitats ; Herbivores ; Keystone species ; Legumes ; Life Sciences ; Mammals ; Meadows ; Original Paper ; Phytosociology ; Plant communities ; Plant species ; Poaceae ; Statistical analysis ; Wildlife management ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>European journal of wildlife research, 2012-08, Vol.58 (4), p.645-654</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-d5fdf6a02b8dad725beaed5c841c2812dfb867f90e7282561ea8b934af1ebf1a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-d5fdf6a02b8dad725beaed5c841c2812dfb867f90e7282561ea8b934af1ebf1a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bellu, Annalisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bugalho, Miguel N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monteiro-Henriques, Tiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa, José C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rego, Francisco C</creatorcontrib><title>Habitat use at fine spatial scale: how does patch clustering criteria explain the use of meadows by red deer?</title><title>European journal of wildlife research</title><addtitle>Eur J Wildl Res</addtitle><description>Large mammalian herbivores are keystone species in different ecosystems. To mediate the effects of large mammalian herbivores on ecosystems, it is crucial to understand their habitat selection pattern. At finer scales, herbivore patch selection depends strongly on plant community traits and therefore its understanding is constrained by patch definition criteria. Our aim was to assess which criteria for patch definition best explained use of meadows by wild, free-ranging, red deer (Cervus elaphus) in a study area in Northeast Portugal. We used two clustering criteria types based on floristic composition and gross forage classes, respectively. For the floristic criteria, phytosociological approach was used to classify plant communities, and its objectivity evaluated with a mathematical clustering of the floristic relevés. Cover of dominant plant species was tested as a proxy for the phytosociological method. For the gross forage classes, the graminoids/forbs ratio and the percentage cover of legumes were used. For assessing deer relative use of meadows we used faecal accumulation rates. Patches clustered according to floristic classification better explained selection of patches by deer. Plant community classifications based on phytosociology, or proxies of this, used for characterizing meadow patches resulted useful to understand herbivore selection pattern at fine scales and thus potentially suitable to assist wildlife management decisions.</description><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cervus elaphus</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Deer</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>ecosystems</subject><subject>Fish &amp; Wildlife Biology &amp; Management</subject><subject>forage</subject><subject>Foraging behavior</subject><subject>Forbs</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Habitat selection</subject><subject>Habitat utilization</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Keystone species</subject><subject>Legumes</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Mammals</subject><subject>Meadows</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Phytosociology</subject><subject>Plant communities</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Poaceae</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>1612-4642</issn><issn>1439-0574</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kU9LHjEQxpdSoVb7AXoy4MXLtvm3m6yXImJrQehBPYfZZOIb2XezJruo395st4dSaA6ZYfg9D8M8VfWZ0S-MUvU1MyqkrCnjNW3Lp99Vh0yKrqaNku9Lvw5lK_mH6mPOj5TyjormsNpfQx9mmMmSkZTiw4gkTzAHGEi2MOA52cVn4iJmUsZ2R-yw5BlTGB-ITWHtgODLNEAYybzD307Rkz2Ci8-Z9K8koSMOMX07rg48DBk__alH1f33q7vL6_rm14-flxc3tRVKzLVrvPMtUN5rB07xpkdA11gtmeWaced73SrfUVRc86ZlCLrvhATPsPcMxFF1tvlOKT4tmGezD9niMMCIccmmHIvrruGUF_T0H_QxLmks2xWKK6aU1KpQbKNsijkn9GZKYQ_ptUBmDcBsAZgSgFkDMLpo-KbJ03osTH87_190sok8RAMPKWRzf8spk7Q8QWUj3gCbQZHg</recordid><startdate>20120801</startdate><enddate>20120801</enddate><creator>Bellu, Annalisa</creator><creator>Bugalho, Miguel N</creator><creator>Monteiro-Henriques, Tiago</creator><creator>Costa, José C</creator><creator>Rego, Francisco C</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120801</creationdate><title>Habitat use at fine spatial scale: how does patch clustering criteria explain the use of meadows by red deer?</title><author>Bellu, Annalisa ; Bugalho, Miguel N ; Monteiro-Henriques, Tiago ; Costa, José C ; Rego, Francisco C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-d5fdf6a02b8dad725beaed5c841c2812dfb867f90e7282561ea8b934af1ebf1a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cervus elaphus</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Deer</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>ecosystems</topic><topic>Fish &amp; Wildlife Biology &amp; Management</topic><topic>forage</topic><topic>Foraging behavior</topic><topic>Forbs</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Habitat selection</topic><topic>Habitat utilization</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Keystone species</topic><topic>Legumes</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Mammals</topic><topic>Meadows</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Phytosociology</topic><topic>Plant communities</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Poaceae</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bellu, Annalisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bugalho, Miguel N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monteiro-Henriques, Tiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa, José C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rego, Francisco C</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>European journal of wildlife research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bellu, Annalisa</au><au>Bugalho, Miguel N</au><au>Monteiro-Henriques, Tiago</au><au>Costa, José C</au><au>Rego, Francisco C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Habitat use at fine spatial scale: how does patch clustering criteria explain the use of meadows by red deer?</atitle><jtitle>European journal of wildlife research</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Wildl Res</stitle><date>2012-08-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>645</spage><epage>654</epage><pages>645-654</pages><issn>1612-4642</issn><eissn>1439-0574</eissn><abstract>Large mammalian herbivores are keystone species in different ecosystems. To mediate the effects of large mammalian herbivores on ecosystems, it is crucial to understand their habitat selection pattern. At finer scales, herbivore patch selection depends strongly on plant community traits and therefore its understanding is constrained by patch definition criteria. Our aim was to assess which criteria for patch definition best explained use of meadows by wild, free-ranging, red deer (Cervus elaphus) in a study area in Northeast Portugal. We used two clustering criteria types based on floristic composition and gross forage classes, respectively. For the floristic criteria, phytosociological approach was used to classify plant communities, and its objectivity evaluated with a mathematical clustering of the floristic relevés. Cover of dominant plant species was tested as a proxy for the phytosociological method. For the gross forage classes, the graminoids/forbs ratio and the percentage cover of legumes were used. For assessing deer relative use of meadows we used faecal accumulation rates. Patches clustered according to floristic classification better explained selection of patches by deer. Plant community classifications based on phytosociology, or proxies of this, used for characterizing meadow patches resulted useful to understand herbivore selection pattern at fine scales and thus potentially suitable to assist wildlife management decisions.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s10344-012-0612-8</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1612-4642
ispartof European journal of wildlife research, 2012-08, Vol.58 (4), p.645-654
issn 1612-4642
1439-0574
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1032895202
source Springer Nature
subjects Animal populations
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Cervus elaphus
Classification
Deer
Ecology
ecosystems
Fish & Wildlife Biology & Management
forage
Foraging behavior
Forbs
Grasslands
Habitat selection
Habitat utilization
Habitats
Herbivores
Keystone species
Legumes
Life Sciences
Mammals
Meadows
Original Paper
Phytosociology
Plant communities
Plant species
Poaceae
Statistical analysis
Wildlife management
Zoology
title Habitat use at fine spatial scale: how does patch clustering criteria explain the use of meadows by red deer?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T04%3A47%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Habitat%20use%20at%20fine%20spatial%20scale:%20how%20does%20patch%20clustering%20criteria%20explain%20the%20use%20of%20meadows%20by%20red%20deer?&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20wildlife%20research&rft.au=Bellu,%20Annalisa&rft.date=2012-08-01&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=645&rft.epage=654&rft.pages=645-654&rft.issn=1612-4642&rft.eissn=1439-0574&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10344-012-0612-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1032895202%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-d5fdf6a02b8dad725beaed5c841c2812dfb867f90e7282561ea8b934af1ebf1a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1027177487&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true