Loading…
Habitat use at fine spatial scale: how does patch clustering criteria explain the use of meadows by red deer?
Large mammalian herbivores are keystone species in different ecosystems. To mediate the effects of large mammalian herbivores on ecosystems, it is crucial to understand their habitat selection pattern. At finer scales, herbivore patch selection depends strongly on plant community traits and therefor...
Saved in:
Published in: | European journal of wildlife research 2012-08, Vol.58 (4), p.645-654 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-d5fdf6a02b8dad725beaed5c841c2812dfb867f90e7282561ea8b934af1ebf1a3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-d5fdf6a02b8dad725beaed5c841c2812dfb867f90e7282561ea8b934af1ebf1a3 |
container_end_page | 654 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 645 |
container_title | European journal of wildlife research |
container_volume | 58 |
creator | Bellu, Annalisa Bugalho, Miguel N Monteiro-Henriques, Tiago Costa, José C Rego, Francisco C |
description | Large mammalian herbivores are keystone species in different ecosystems. To mediate the effects of large mammalian herbivores on ecosystems, it is crucial to understand their habitat selection pattern. At finer scales, herbivore patch selection depends strongly on plant community traits and therefore its understanding is constrained by patch definition criteria. Our aim was to assess which criteria for patch definition best explained use of meadows by wild, free-ranging, red deer (Cervus elaphus) in a study area in Northeast Portugal. We used two clustering criteria types based on floristic composition and gross forage classes, respectively. For the floristic criteria, phytosociological approach was used to classify plant communities, and its objectivity evaluated with a mathematical clustering of the floristic relevés. Cover of dominant plant species was tested as a proxy for the phytosociological method. For the gross forage classes, the graminoids/forbs ratio and the percentage cover of legumes were used. For assessing deer relative use of meadows we used faecal accumulation rates. Patches clustered according to floristic classification better explained selection of patches by deer. Plant community classifications based on phytosociology, or proxies of this, used for characterizing meadow patches resulted useful to understand herbivore selection pattern at fine scales and thus potentially suitable to assist wildlife management decisions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10344-012-0612-8 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1032895202</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1032895202</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-d5fdf6a02b8dad725beaed5c841c2812dfb867f90e7282561ea8b934af1ebf1a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9LHjEQxpdSoVb7AXoy4MXLtvm3m6yXImJrQehBPYfZZOIb2XezJruo395st4dSaA6ZYfg9D8M8VfWZ0S-MUvU1MyqkrCnjNW3Lp99Vh0yKrqaNku9Lvw5lK_mH6mPOj5TyjormsNpfQx9mmMmSkZTiw4gkTzAHGEi2MOA52cVn4iJmUsZ2R-yw5BlTGB-ITWHtgODLNEAYybzD307Rkz2Ci8-Z9K8koSMOMX07rg48DBk__alH1f33q7vL6_rm14-flxc3tRVKzLVrvPMtUN5rB07xpkdA11gtmeWaced73SrfUVRc86ZlCLrvhATPsPcMxFF1tvlOKT4tmGezD9niMMCIccmmHIvrruGUF_T0H_QxLmks2xWKK6aU1KpQbKNsijkn9GZKYQ_ptUBmDcBsAZgSgFkDMLpo-KbJ03osTH87_190sok8RAMPKWRzf8spk7Q8QWUj3gCbQZHg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1027177487</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Habitat use at fine spatial scale: how does patch clustering criteria explain the use of meadows by red deer?</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Bellu, Annalisa ; Bugalho, Miguel N ; Monteiro-Henriques, Tiago ; Costa, José C ; Rego, Francisco C</creator><creatorcontrib>Bellu, Annalisa ; Bugalho, Miguel N ; Monteiro-Henriques, Tiago ; Costa, José C ; Rego, Francisco C</creatorcontrib><description>Large mammalian herbivores are keystone species in different ecosystems. To mediate the effects of large mammalian herbivores on ecosystems, it is crucial to understand their habitat selection pattern. At finer scales, herbivore patch selection depends strongly on plant community traits and therefore its understanding is constrained by patch definition criteria. Our aim was to assess which criteria for patch definition best explained use of meadows by wild, free-ranging, red deer (Cervus elaphus) in a study area in Northeast Portugal. We used two clustering criteria types based on floristic composition and gross forage classes, respectively. For the floristic criteria, phytosociological approach was used to classify plant communities, and its objectivity evaluated with a mathematical clustering of the floristic relevés. Cover of dominant plant species was tested as a proxy for the phytosociological method. For the gross forage classes, the graminoids/forbs ratio and the percentage cover of legumes were used. For assessing deer relative use of meadows we used faecal accumulation rates. Patches clustered according to floristic classification better explained selection of patches by deer. Plant community classifications based on phytosociology, or proxies of this, used for characterizing meadow patches resulted useful to understand herbivore selection pattern at fine scales and thus potentially suitable to assist wildlife management decisions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1612-4642</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-0574</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10344-012-0612-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Animal populations ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Cervus elaphus ; Classification ; Deer ; Ecology ; ecosystems ; Fish & Wildlife Biology & Management ; forage ; Foraging behavior ; Forbs ; Grasslands ; Habitat selection ; Habitat utilization ; Habitats ; Herbivores ; Keystone species ; Legumes ; Life Sciences ; Mammals ; Meadows ; Original Paper ; Phytosociology ; Plant communities ; Plant species ; Poaceae ; Statistical analysis ; Wildlife management ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>European journal of wildlife research, 2012-08, Vol.58 (4), p.645-654</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-d5fdf6a02b8dad725beaed5c841c2812dfb867f90e7282561ea8b934af1ebf1a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-d5fdf6a02b8dad725beaed5c841c2812dfb867f90e7282561ea8b934af1ebf1a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bellu, Annalisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bugalho, Miguel N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monteiro-Henriques, Tiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa, José C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rego, Francisco C</creatorcontrib><title>Habitat use at fine spatial scale: how does patch clustering criteria explain the use of meadows by red deer?</title><title>European journal of wildlife research</title><addtitle>Eur J Wildl Res</addtitle><description>Large mammalian herbivores are keystone species in different ecosystems. To mediate the effects of large mammalian herbivores on ecosystems, it is crucial to understand their habitat selection pattern. At finer scales, herbivore patch selection depends strongly on plant community traits and therefore its understanding is constrained by patch definition criteria. Our aim was to assess which criteria for patch definition best explained use of meadows by wild, free-ranging, red deer (Cervus elaphus) in a study area in Northeast Portugal. We used two clustering criteria types based on floristic composition and gross forage classes, respectively. For the floristic criteria, phytosociological approach was used to classify plant communities, and its objectivity evaluated with a mathematical clustering of the floristic relevés. Cover of dominant plant species was tested as a proxy for the phytosociological method. For the gross forage classes, the graminoids/forbs ratio and the percentage cover of legumes were used. For assessing deer relative use of meadows we used faecal accumulation rates. Patches clustered according to floristic classification better explained selection of patches by deer. Plant community classifications based on phytosociology, or proxies of this, used for characterizing meadow patches resulted useful to understand herbivore selection pattern at fine scales and thus potentially suitable to assist wildlife management decisions.</description><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cervus elaphus</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Deer</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>ecosystems</subject><subject>Fish & Wildlife Biology & Management</subject><subject>forage</subject><subject>Foraging behavior</subject><subject>Forbs</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Habitat selection</subject><subject>Habitat utilization</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Keystone species</subject><subject>Legumes</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Mammals</subject><subject>Meadows</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Phytosociology</subject><subject>Plant communities</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Poaceae</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>1612-4642</issn><issn>1439-0574</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kU9LHjEQxpdSoVb7AXoy4MXLtvm3m6yXImJrQehBPYfZZOIb2XezJruo395st4dSaA6ZYfg9D8M8VfWZ0S-MUvU1MyqkrCnjNW3Lp99Vh0yKrqaNku9Lvw5lK_mH6mPOj5TyjormsNpfQx9mmMmSkZTiw4gkTzAHGEi2MOA52cVn4iJmUsZ2R-yw5BlTGB-ITWHtgODLNEAYybzD307Rkz2Ci8-Z9K8koSMOMX07rg48DBk__alH1f33q7vL6_rm14-flxc3tRVKzLVrvPMtUN5rB07xpkdA11gtmeWaced73SrfUVRc86ZlCLrvhATPsPcMxFF1tvlOKT4tmGezD9niMMCIccmmHIvrruGUF_T0H_QxLmks2xWKK6aU1KpQbKNsijkn9GZKYQ_ptUBmDcBsAZgSgFkDMLpo-KbJ03osTH87_190sok8RAMPKWRzf8spk7Q8QWUj3gCbQZHg</recordid><startdate>20120801</startdate><enddate>20120801</enddate><creator>Bellu, Annalisa</creator><creator>Bugalho, Miguel N</creator><creator>Monteiro-Henriques, Tiago</creator><creator>Costa, José C</creator><creator>Rego, Francisco C</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120801</creationdate><title>Habitat use at fine spatial scale: how does patch clustering criteria explain the use of meadows by red deer?</title><author>Bellu, Annalisa ; Bugalho, Miguel N ; Monteiro-Henriques, Tiago ; Costa, José C ; Rego, Francisco C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-d5fdf6a02b8dad725beaed5c841c2812dfb867f90e7282561ea8b934af1ebf1a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cervus elaphus</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Deer</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>ecosystems</topic><topic>Fish & Wildlife Biology & Management</topic><topic>forage</topic><topic>Foraging behavior</topic><topic>Forbs</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Habitat selection</topic><topic>Habitat utilization</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Keystone species</topic><topic>Legumes</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Mammals</topic><topic>Meadows</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Phytosociology</topic><topic>Plant communities</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Poaceae</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bellu, Annalisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bugalho, Miguel N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monteiro-Henriques, Tiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa, José C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rego, Francisco C</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>European journal of wildlife research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bellu, Annalisa</au><au>Bugalho, Miguel N</au><au>Monteiro-Henriques, Tiago</au><au>Costa, José C</au><au>Rego, Francisco C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Habitat use at fine spatial scale: how does patch clustering criteria explain the use of meadows by red deer?</atitle><jtitle>European journal of wildlife research</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Wildl Res</stitle><date>2012-08-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>645</spage><epage>654</epage><pages>645-654</pages><issn>1612-4642</issn><eissn>1439-0574</eissn><abstract>Large mammalian herbivores are keystone species in different ecosystems. To mediate the effects of large mammalian herbivores on ecosystems, it is crucial to understand their habitat selection pattern. At finer scales, herbivore patch selection depends strongly on plant community traits and therefore its understanding is constrained by patch definition criteria. Our aim was to assess which criteria for patch definition best explained use of meadows by wild, free-ranging, red deer (Cervus elaphus) in a study area in Northeast Portugal. We used two clustering criteria types based on floristic composition and gross forage classes, respectively. For the floristic criteria, phytosociological approach was used to classify plant communities, and its objectivity evaluated with a mathematical clustering of the floristic relevés. Cover of dominant plant species was tested as a proxy for the phytosociological method. For the gross forage classes, the graminoids/forbs ratio and the percentage cover of legumes were used. For assessing deer relative use of meadows we used faecal accumulation rates. Patches clustered according to floristic classification better explained selection of patches by deer. Plant community classifications based on phytosociology, or proxies of this, used for characterizing meadow patches resulted useful to understand herbivore selection pattern at fine scales and thus potentially suitable to assist wildlife management decisions.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s10344-012-0612-8</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1612-4642 |
ispartof | European journal of wildlife research, 2012-08, Vol.58 (4), p.645-654 |
issn | 1612-4642 1439-0574 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1032895202 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Animal populations Biomedical and Life Sciences Cervus elaphus Classification Deer Ecology ecosystems Fish & Wildlife Biology & Management forage Foraging behavior Forbs Grasslands Habitat selection Habitat utilization Habitats Herbivores Keystone species Legumes Life Sciences Mammals Meadows Original Paper Phytosociology Plant communities Plant species Poaceae Statistical analysis Wildlife management Zoology |
title | Habitat use at fine spatial scale: how does patch clustering criteria explain the use of meadows by red deer? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T04%3A47%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Habitat%20use%20at%20fine%20spatial%20scale:%20how%20does%20patch%20clustering%20criteria%20explain%20the%20use%20of%20meadows%20by%20red%20deer?&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20wildlife%20research&rft.au=Bellu,%20Annalisa&rft.date=2012-08-01&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=645&rft.epage=654&rft.pages=645-654&rft.issn=1612-4642&rft.eissn=1439-0574&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10344-012-0612-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1032895202%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-d5fdf6a02b8dad725beaed5c841c2812dfb867f90e7282561ea8b934af1ebf1a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1027177487&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |