The iliac wing sign: An indicator of the presence of bone and/or soft-tissue injury of the pelvis and hips

• Published in: European journal of radiology 2012-09, Vol.81 (9), p.2348-2352
• Main Authors: Kakigi, Takahide, Hosono, Makoto, Shimono, Taro, Hiraoka, Taizo, Nishimura, Kazumasa
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Arthralgia - diagnosis; Arthralgia - etiology; Bone fractures; Child; Female; Fiducial Markers; Fractures, Bone - complications; Fractures, Bone - pathology; Hip Injuries - complications; Hip Injuries - pathology; Hip pain; Humans; Magnetic resonance imaging; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods; Male; Middle Aged; Radiology; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity; Soft Tissue Injuries - complications; Soft Tissue Injuries - pathology; Soft-tissue injuries; Young Adult
• ISSN: 0720-048X; 1872-7727
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.08.006

Abstract Purpose To prospectively evaluate the feasibility of using the “iliac wing sign (IWS)” as an indicator of bone and/or soft-tissue injury of the pelvis and hips on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. IWS means edema of the iliacus muscle attachment entering the iliac wing that is visualized as a linear high signal intensity on fat-suppressed T2-weighted MR images. Methods Consecutive 106 patients who complained of hip pain were enrolled in this study. We evaluated the correlation between IWS and bone and/or soft-tissue injury of the pelvis and hips using Fisher's exact test. Further, performance parameters of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, the positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of IWS were calculated. Results Thirty-eight of the 106 (36%) patients had bone and/or soft-tissue injury. Twenty-seven of these 38 (71%) patients with injury showed a positive IWS, while only 11 of 68 (16%) patients without injury showed a positive IWS ( p < .0001). IWS, thus, yielded a sensitivity of 71%, specificity of 84%, accuracy of 79%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 71%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 84%. Conclusion In cases with a positive IWS, the careful interpretation of MR images is needed because injury presence is highly likely, as suggested by the relatively high sensitivity and PPV. IWS absence may mean a low probability of injury because of the high specificity and NPV.