Loading…

IVF/ICSI outcomes of the OCP plus GnRH agonist protocol versus the OCP plus GnRH antagonist fixed protocol in women with PCOS: a randomized trial

Objective To compare the IVF/ICSI outcomes of the long GnRH agonist and the fixed GnRH antagonist protocol in women with PCOS. Design Randomized controlled trial. Setting Baskent University Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Patients Three hundred women with PCOS. Interventions IVF/ICSI follow...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Archives of gynecology and obstetrics 2012-09, Vol.286 (3), p.763-769
Main Authors: Haydardedeoglu, Bulent, Kilicdag, Esra Bulgan, Parlakgumus, Ayse Huriye, Zeyneloglu, Hulusi Bulent
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective To compare the IVF/ICSI outcomes of the long GnRH agonist and the fixed GnRH antagonist protocol in women with PCOS. Design Randomized controlled trial. Setting Baskent University Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Patients Three hundred women with PCOS. Interventions IVF/ICSI following the long GnRH agonist down-regulation or the fixed GnRH antagonist protocols. Main outcome measures Ongoing pregnancy rates. Results Ongoing pregnancy rates were 36.4 % in the OCP + GnRH agonist group and 35.9 % in the OCP + GnRH antagonist group ( p  > 0.05). Progesterone levels on the day of hCG (0.76 ± 0.71 vs. 0.58 ± 0.50), endometrial thickness on the day of hCG ( 11.57  ± 2.50 vs. 10.50 ± 2.01), total gonadotropin used (1388.71 ± 482.39 vs. 1253.25 ± 415.81), and duration of COH ( 9.07  ± 1.96 vs. 8.39 ± 1.75) were significantly lower in the OCP + GnRH antagonist group. Conclusion The OCP + long GnRH agonist and the OCP + fixed GnRH antagonist protocols yield similar ongoing pregnancy rates in women with PCOS. Although this study consisting three hundred patients, seems to be large enough in a single center, we were not able to reach to the actual size of power analysis which was approximately 3,000.
ISSN:0932-0067
1432-0711
DOI:10.1007/s00404-012-2348-9