Loading…

Contrasting Performance and Different Tolerance of Chestnut Rose and Grape to Excess Manganese

Grape (cultivar Jinshou) and chestnut rose (cultivar Gui 4) were exposed to excess manganese (Mn) treatments to characterize the physiological basis for Mn tolerance in woody plants. Chestnut rose exhibited a high sensitivity to this environmental constraint whereas grape appeared rather tolerant to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of plant growth regulation 2012-09, Vol.31 (3), p.416-426
Main Authors: Yao, Yin An, Mou, Donglin, Xu, Gang, Lutts, Stanley, Achal, Varenyam, Ma, Jinbiao
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-f0b4da2b9fd73c1936db257a272d2d3ee64242cf67ec79dbf0ae136841021ef73
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-f0b4da2b9fd73c1936db257a272d2d3ee64242cf67ec79dbf0ae136841021ef73
container_end_page 426
container_issue 3
container_start_page 416
container_title Journal of plant growth regulation
container_volume 31
creator Yao, Yin An
Mou, Donglin
Xu, Gang
Lutts, Stanley
Achal, Varenyam
Ma, Jinbiao
description Grape (cultivar Jinshou) and chestnut rose (cultivar Gui 4) were exposed to excess manganese (Mn) treatments to characterize the physiological basis for Mn tolerance in woody plants. Chestnut rose exhibited a high sensitivity to this environmental constraint whereas grape appeared rather tolerant to Mn excess. Stomatal density and closure rate were affected by excess Mn in chestnut rose and brittleness of the leaf vein was reported as a novel Mn toxicity symptom in this species. Linear reductions in biomass accumulation and photosynthetic pigment concentrations with increasing Mn level were observed in chestnut rose but not in grape, except under the extremely high Mn concentration (118 mM). Our results showed that the contrasting performances between the two species were related to the differences in ion transfer and homeostasis. Mn was readily allocated to the photosynthetic organ in chestnut rose but was mainly restricted to the roots in grape. Excess Mn caused iron (Fe) and nitrogen (N) deficiencies in chestnut rose but not in grape. The synthesis of antioxidant phenylpropanoid compounds and chelating phytochelatins were activated in Mn-treated grape but strongly repressed in chestnut rose. The importance of these parameters in the overall strategy of Mn tolerance in grape is discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00344-011-9251-7
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1034816298</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2724393251</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-f0b4da2b9fd73c1936db257a272d2d3ee64242cf67ec79dbf0ae136841021ef73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AE8GvHipTj7atEdZ11VQFD-uhmw7WSu7yZq0oP_erPUggqdhhucdXh5CDhmcMgB1FgGElBkwllU8Z5naIiMmRZ6VDNQ2GYHi6ZhX-S7Zi_ENgKVFjcjLxLsumNi1bkHvMVgfVsbVSI1r6EVrLQZ0HX3ySwzfd2_p5BVj5_qOPvg4gLNg1kg7T6cfNcZIb41bGIcR98mONcuIBz9zTJ4vp0-Tq-zmbnY9Ob_JaqFEl1mYy8bweWUbJWpWiaKZ81wZrnjDG4FYSC55bQuFtaqauQWDTBSlZMAZWiXG5GT4uw7-vU_19KqNNS6XqYXvo2bJTskKXpUJPf6Dvvk-uNRuQwEHpXKZKDZQdfAxBrR6HdqVCZ8J0hvjejCuk3G9Ma43JfiQiYl1Cwy_P_8fOhpC1nhtFqGN-vmRA5MAUHIlCvEFmsWMDA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1030207754</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Contrasting Performance and Different Tolerance of Chestnut Rose and Grape to Excess Manganese</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Yao, Yin An ; Mou, Donglin ; Xu, Gang ; Lutts, Stanley ; Achal, Varenyam ; Ma, Jinbiao</creator><creatorcontrib>Yao, Yin An ; Mou, Donglin ; Xu, Gang ; Lutts, Stanley ; Achal, Varenyam ; Ma, Jinbiao</creatorcontrib><description>Grape (cultivar Jinshou) and chestnut rose (cultivar Gui 4) were exposed to excess manganese (Mn) treatments to characterize the physiological basis for Mn tolerance in woody plants. Chestnut rose exhibited a high sensitivity to this environmental constraint whereas grape appeared rather tolerant to Mn excess. Stomatal density and closure rate were affected by excess Mn in chestnut rose and brittleness of the leaf vein was reported as a novel Mn toxicity symptom in this species. Linear reductions in biomass accumulation and photosynthetic pigment concentrations with increasing Mn level were observed in chestnut rose but not in grape, except under the extremely high Mn concentration (118 mM). Our results showed that the contrasting performances between the two species were related to the differences in ion transfer and homeostasis. Mn was readily allocated to the photosynthetic organ in chestnut rose but was mainly restricted to the roots in grape. Excess Mn caused iron (Fe) and nitrogen (N) deficiencies in chestnut rose but not in grape. The synthesis of antioxidant phenylpropanoid compounds and chelating phytochelatins were activated in Mn-treated grape but strongly repressed in chestnut rose. The importance of these parameters in the overall strategy of Mn tolerance in grape is discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0721-7595</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-8107</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00344-011-9251-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Antioxidants ; Biomass ; biomass production ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Cultivars ; Fruits ; grapes ; Homeostasis ; Iron ; Leaves ; Life Sciences ; Manganese ; Nitrogen ; phenylpropanoids ; Photosynthetic pigments ; phytochelatins ; Plant Anatomy/Development ; Plant Physiology ; Plant Sciences ; Roots ; Rosa roxburghii ; Stomata ; Toxicity ; Veins ; Vitaceae ; Woody plants</subject><ispartof>Journal of plant growth regulation, 2012-09, Vol.31 (3), p.416-426</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-f0b4da2b9fd73c1936db257a272d2d3ee64242cf67ec79dbf0ae136841021ef73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-f0b4da2b9fd73c1936db257a272d2d3ee64242cf67ec79dbf0ae136841021ef73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yao, Yin An</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mou, Donglin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Gang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lutts, Stanley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Achal, Varenyam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Jinbiao</creatorcontrib><title>Contrasting Performance and Different Tolerance of Chestnut Rose and Grape to Excess Manganese</title><title>Journal of plant growth regulation</title><addtitle>J Plant Growth Regul</addtitle><description>Grape (cultivar Jinshou) and chestnut rose (cultivar Gui 4) were exposed to excess manganese (Mn) treatments to characterize the physiological basis for Mn tolerance in woody plants. Chestnut rose exhibited a high sensitivity to this environmental constraint whereas grape appeared rather tolerant to Mn excess. Stomatal density and closure rate were affected by excess Mn in chestnut rose and brittleness of the leaf vein was reported as a novel Mn toxicity symptom in this species. Linear reductions in biomass accumulation and photosynthetic pigment concentrations with increasing Mn level were observed in chestnut rose but not in grape, except under the extremely high Mn concentration (118 mM). Our results showed that the contrasting performances between the two species were related to the differences in ion transfer and homeostasis. Mn was readily allocated to the photosynthetic organ in chestnut rose but was mainly restricted to the roots in grape. Excess Mn caused iron (Fe) and nitrogen (N) deficiencies in chestnut rose but not in grape. The synthesis of antioxidant phenylpropanoid compounds and chelating phytochelatins were activated in Mn-treated grape but strongly repressed in chestnut rose. The importance of these parameters in the overall strategy of Mn tolerance in grape is discussed.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Antioxidants</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>biomass production</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cultivars</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>grapes</subject><subject>Homeostasis</subject><subject>Iron</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Manganese</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>phenylpropanoids</subject><subject>Photosynthetic pigments</subject><subject>phytochelatins</subject><subject>Plant Anatomy/Development</subject><subject>Plant Physiology</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Roots</subject><subject>Rosa roxburghii</subject><subject>Stomata</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>Veins</subject><subject>Vitaceae</subject><subject>Woody plants</subject><issn>0721-7595</issn><issn>1435-8107</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AE8GvHipTj7atEdZ11VQFD-uhmw7WSu7yZq0oP_erPUggqdhhucdXh5CDhmcMgB1FgGElBkwllU8Z5naIiMmRZ6VDNQ2GYHi6ZhX-S7Zi_ENgKVFjcjLxLsumNi1bkHvMVgfVsbVSI1r6EVrLQZ0HX3ySwzfd2_p5BVj5_qOPvg4gLNg1kg7T6cfNcZIb41bGIcR98mONcuIBz9zTJ4vp0-Tq-zmbnY9Ob_JaqFEl1mYy8bweWUbJWpWiaKZ81wZrnjDG4FYSC55bQuFtaqauQWDTBSlZMAZWiXG5GT4uw7-vU_19KqNNS6XqYXvo2bJTskKXpUJPf6Dvvk-uNRuQwEHpXKZKDZQdfAxBrR6HdqVCZ8J0hvjejCuk3G9Ma43JfiQiYl1Cwy_P_8fOhpC1nhtFqGN-vmRA5MAUHIlCvEFmsWMDA</recordid><startdate>20120901</startdate><enddate>20120901</enddate><creator>Yao, Yin An</creator><creator>Mou, Donglin</creator><creator>Xu, Gang</creator><creator>Lutts, Stanley</creator><creator>Achal, Varenyam</creator><creator>Ma, Jinbiao</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120901</creationdate><title>Contrasting Performance and Different Tolerance of Chestnut Rose and Grape to Excess Manganese</title><author>Yao, Yin An ; Mou, Donglin ; Xu, Gang ; Lutts, Stanley ; Achal, Varenyam ; Ma, Jinbiao</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-f0b4da2b9fd73c1936db257a272d2d3ee64242cf67ec79dbf0ae136841021ef73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Antioxidants</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>biomass production</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cultivars</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>grapes</topic><topic>Homeostasis</topic><topic>Iron</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Manganese</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>phenylpropanoids</topic><topic>Photosynthetic pigments</topic><topic>phytochelatins</topic><topic>Plant Anatomy/Development</topic><topic>Plant Physiology</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Roots</topic><topic>Rosa roxburghii</topic><topic>Stomata</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>Veins</topic><topic>Vitaceae</topic><topic>Woody plants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yao, Yin An</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mou, Donglin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Gang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lutts, Stanley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Achal, Varenyam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Jinbiao</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of plant growth regulation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yao, Yin An</au><au>Mou, Donglin</au><au>Xu, Gang</au><au>Lutts, Stanley</au><au>Achal, Varenyam</au><au>Ma, Jinbiao</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Contrasting Performance and Different Tolerance of Chestnut Rose and Grape to Excess Manganese</atitle><jtitle>Journal of plant growth regulation</jtitle><stitle>J Plant Growth Regul</stitle><date>2012-09-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>416</spage><epage>426</epage><pages>416-426</pages><issn>0721-7595</issn><eissn>1435-8107</eissn><abstract>Grape (cultivar Jinshou) and chestnut rose (cultivar Gui 4) were exposed to excess manganese (Mn) treatments to characterize the physiological basis for Mn tolerance in woody plants. Chestnut rose exhibited a high sensitivity to this environmental constraint whereas grape appeared rather tolerant to Mn excess. Stomatal density and closure rate were affected by excess Mn in chestnut rose and brittleness of the leaf vein was reported as a novel Mn toxicity symptom in this species. Linear reductions in biomass accumulation and photosynthetic pigment concentrations with increasing Mn level were observed in chestnut rose but not in grape, except under the extremely high Mn concentration (118 mM). Our results showed that the contrasting performances between the two species were related to the differences in ion transfer and homeostasis. Mn was readily allocated to the photosynthetic organ in chestnut rose but was mainly restricted to the roots in grape. Excess Mn caused iron (Fe) and nitrogen (N) deficiencies in chestnut rose but not in grape. The synthesis of antioxidant phenylpropanoid compounds and chelating phytochelatins were activated in Mn-treated grape but strongly repressed in chestnut rose. The importance of these parameters in the overall strategy of Mn tolerance in grape is discussed.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s00344-011-9251-7</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0721-7595
ispartof Journal of plant growth regulation, 2012-09, Vol.31 (3), p.416-426
issn 0721-7595
1435-8107
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1034816298
source Springer Nature
subjects Agriculture
Antioxidants
Biomass
biomass production
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Cultivars
Fruits
grapes
Homeostasis
Iron
Leaves
Life Sciences
Manganese
Nitrogen
phenylpropanoids
Photosynthetic pigments
phytochelatins
Plant Anatomy/Development
Plant Physiology
Plant Sciences
Roots
Rosa roxburghii
Stomata
Toxicity
Veins
Vitaceae
Woody plants
title Contrasting Performance and Different Tolerance of Chestnut Rose and Grape to Excess Manganese
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T12%3A00%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contrasting%20Performance%20and%20Different%20Tolerance%20of%20Chestnut%20Rose%20and%20Grape%20to%20Excess%20Manganese&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20plant%20growth%20regulation&rft.au=Yao,%20Yin%20An&rft.date=2012-09-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=416&rft.epage=426&rft.pages=416-426&rft.issn=0721-7595&rft.eissn=1435-8107&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00344-011-9251-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2724393251%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-f0b4da2b9fd73c1936db257a272d2d3ee64242cf67ec79dbf0ae136841021ef73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1030207754&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true