Anthropometry as a Predictor of Bench Press Performance Done at Different Loads

• Published in: Journal of strength and conditioning research 2012-09, Vol.26 (9), p.2460-2467
• Main Authors: Caruso, John F., Taylor, Skyler T., Lutz, Brant M., Olson, Nathan M., Mason, Melissa L., Borgsmiller, Jake A., Riner, Rebekah D.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Accelerometry; Adult; Anthropometry; Arm - anatomy & histology; Body Height; Body Weight; Humans; Male; Muscle Strength; Weight Lifting; Young Adult
• ISSN: 1064-8011; 1533-4287
• DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31823c44bb

ABSTRACTCaruso, JF, Taylor, ST, Lutz, BM, Olson, NM, Mason, ML, Borgsmiller, JA, and Riner, RD. Anthropometry as a predictor of bench press performance done at different loads. J Strength Cond Res 26(9)2460–2467, 2012—The purpose of our study was to examine the ability of anthropometric variables (body mass, total arm length, biacromial width) to predict bench press performance at both maximal and submaximal loads. Our methods required 36 men to visit our laboratory and submit to anthropometric measurements, followed by lifting as much weight as possible in good form one time (1 repetition maximum, 1RM) in the exercise. They made 3 more visits in which they performed 4 sets of bench presses to volitional failure at 1 of 3 (40, 55, or 75% 1RM) submaximal loads. An accelerometer (Myotest Inc., Royal Oak MI) measured peak force, velocity, and power after each submaximal load set. With stepwise multivariate regression, our 3 anthropometric variables attempted to explain significant amounts of variance for 13 bench press performance indices. For criterion measures that reached significance, separate Pearson product moment correlation coefficients further assessed if the strength of association each anthropometric variable had with the criterion was also significant. Our analyses showed that anthropometry explained significant amounts (p < 0.05) of variance for 8 criterion measures. It was concluded that body mass had strong univariate correlations with 1RM and force-related measures, total arm length was moderately associated with 1RM and criterion variables at the lightest load, whereas biacromial width had an inverse relationship with the peak number of repetitions performed per set at the 2 lighter loads. Practical applications suggest results may help coaches and practitioners identify anthropometric features that may best predict various measures of bench press prowess in athletes.