Nato: the case for the defence

The article looks at how Nato's role in Afghanistan has changed and argues that American political and strategic errors lie behind the present problems. Generally, in its five years of involvement in Afghanistan, Nato has brought stability, development and rule of law in areas where it has had...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Independent on Sunday 2006-09, p.30-30
Main Author: Garden, Tim
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 30
container_issue
container_start_page 30
container_title Independent on Sunday
container_volume
creator Garden, Tim
description The article looks at how Nato's role in Afghanistan has changed and argues that American political and strategic errors lie behind the present problems. Generally, in its five years of involvement in Afghanistan, Nato has brought stability, development and rule of law in areas where it has had responsibility, while areas looked after by the US coalition have remained a battleground. Throwing more soldiers at a faulty plan is a recipe for failure. (Quotes from original text)
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1035821072</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1035821072</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_10358210723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0sDS10DU0NzLmYOAtLs5MMjAwsTSwNDA342SQ80ssybdSKMlIVUhOLE5VSMsvAnNSUtNS85JTeRhY0xJzilN5oTQ3g4aba4izh25BUX5haWpxSXxuZnFyak5OYl5qfmlxvKGBsamFkaEB0C4SlAIAT7Uv0A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1035821072</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nato: the case for the defence</title><source>Newsbank Access Global NewsBank 2023 Edition</source><source>Humanities Index</source><creator>Garden, Tim</creator><creatorcontrib>Garden, Tim</creatorcontrib><description>The article looks at how Nato's role in Afghanistan has changed and argues that American political and strategic errors lie behind the present problems. Generally, in its five years of involvement in Afghanistan, Nato has brought stability, development and rule of law in areas where it has had responsibility, while areas looked after by the US coalition have remained a battleground. Throwing more soldiers at a faulty plan is a recipe for failure. (Quotes from original text)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0958-1723</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Independent on Sunday, 2006-09, p.30-30</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,33850</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Garden, Tim</creatorcontrib><title>Nato: the case for the defence</title><title>Independent on Sunday</title><description>The article looks at how Nato's role in Afghanistan has changed and argues that American political and strategic errors lie behind the present problems. Generally, in its five years of involvement in Afghanistan, Nato has brought stability, development and rule of law in areas where it has had responsibility, while areas looked after by the US coalition have remained a battleground. Throwing more soldiers at a faulty plan is a recipe for failure. (Quotes from original text)</description><issn>0958-1723</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C18</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYeA0sDS10DU0NzLmYOAtLs5MMjAwsTSwNDA342SQ80ssybdSKMlIVUhOLE5VSMsvAnNSUtNS85JTeRhY0xJzilN5oTQ3g4aba4izh25BUX5haWpxSXxuZnFyak5OYl5qfmlxvKGBsamFkaEB0C4SlAIAT7Uv0A</recordid><startdate>20060917</startdate><enddate>20060917</enddate><creator>Garden, Tim</creator><scope>C18</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060917</creationdate><title>Nato: the case for the defence</title><author>Garden, Tim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_10358210723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Garden, Tim</creatorcontrib><collection>Humanities Index</collection><jtitle>Independent on Sunday</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Garden, Tim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nato: the case for the defence</atitle><jtitle>Independent on Sunday</jtitle><date>2006-09-17</date><risdate>2006</risdate><spage>30</spage><epage>30</epage><pages>30-30</pages><issn>0958-1723</issn><abstract>The article looks at how Nato's role in Afghanistan has changed and argues that American political and strategic errors lie behind the present problems. Generally, in its five years of involvement in Afghanistan, Nato has brought stability, development and rule of law in areas where it has had responsibility, while areas looked after by the US coalition have remained a battleground. Throwing more soldiers at a faulty plan is a recipe for failure. (Quotes from original text)</abstract></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0958-1723
ispartof Independent on Sunday, 2006-09, p.30-30
issn 0958-1723
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1035821072
source Newsbank Access Global NewsBank 2023 Edition; Humanities Index
title Nato: the case for the defence
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T00%3A45%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nato:%20the%20case%20for%20the%20defence&rft.jtitle=Independent%20on%20Sunday&rft.au=Garden,%20Tim&rft.date=2006-09-17&rft.spage=30&rft.epage=30&rft.pages=30-30&rft.issn=0958-1723&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1035821072%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_10358210723%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1035821072&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true