WHY HASN'T READER-RESPONSE CRITICISM CAUGHT ON IN NEW TESTAMENT STUDIES?

By comparison with other models; different approaches to reader-response criticism

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Literature & theology 1990-11, Vol.4 (3), p.278-292
Main Author: Porter, Stanley E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Biblical studies
Formalist art
Gospels
Interpretive communities
Literary criticism
Literary formalism
New Testament
Reader response theory
Reading strategies
Textual criticism
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 292
container_issue 3
container_start_page 278
container_title Literature & theology
container_volume 4
creator Porter, Stanley E.
description By comparison with other models; different approaches to reader-response criticism
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1035854736</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23924828</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23924828</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j153t-e9084f31986b4b0b5d9f79d10f6801e121ca91a6e4b7ae2908a8bc88ce3e11993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdzkFLwzAYxvEgCs7pRxACHvRSyJukTXKS0sW1sHXSZgxPJe1SWNnW2WwHv72FefL0XH48_G_QBLgQAY8ou0UTQiMVACXhPXrwviMEhFBigtJN-oXTuMxfDS50PNNFUOjyc5WXGidFZrIkK5c4idfz1OBVjrMc53qDjS5NvNS5waVZzzJdvj-iu9buvXv62ylaf2iTpMFiNc-SeBF0ELJz4BSRvGWgZFTzmtThVrVCbYG0kSTggEJjFdjI8VpYR0dtZd1I2TjmAJRiU_R2_T0N_ffF-XN12PnG7ff26PqLr4CwUIZcsGikL_9o11-G41hXASNChqCYHNXzVXX-3A_Vadgd7PBTUaYol1SyXz8RWP8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1307851938</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>WHY HASN'T READER-RESPONSE CRITICISM CAUGHT ON IN NEW TESTAMENT STUDIES?</title><source>Oxford University Press Archive</source><source>Humanities Index</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Porter, Stanley E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Porter, Stanley E.</creatorcontrib><description>By comparison with other models; different approaches to reader-response criticism</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-1205</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-4623</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Biblical studies ; Formalist art ; Gospels ; Interpretive communities ; Literary criticism ; Literary formalism ; New Testament ; Reader response theory ; Reading strategies ; Textual criticism</subject><ispartof>Literature &amp; theology, 1990-11, Vol.4 (3), p.278-292</ispartof><rights>Oxford University Press 1990</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23924828$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23924828$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,33850,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Porter, Stanley E.</creatorcontrib><title>WHY HASN'T READER-RESPONSE CRITICISM CAUGHT ON IN NEW TESTAMENT STUDIES?</title><title>Literature &amp; theology</title><description>By comparison with other models; different approaches to reader-response criticism</description><subject>Biblical studies</subject><subject>Formalist art</subject><subject>Gospels</subject><subject>Interpretive communities</subject><subject>Literary criticism</subject><subject>Literary formalism</subject><subject>New Testament</subject><subject>Reader response theory</subject><subject>Reading strategies</subject><subject>Textual criticism</subject><issn>0269-1205</issn><issn>1477-4623</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C18</sourceid><recordid>eNpdzkFLwzAYxvEgCs7pRxACHvRSyJukTXKS0sW1sHXSZgxPJe1SWNnW2WwHv72FefL0XH48_G_QBLgQAY8ou0UTQiMVACXhPXrwviMEhFBigtJN-oXTuMxfDS50PNNFUOjyc5WXGidFZrIkK5c4idfz1OBVjrMc53qDjS5NvNS5waVZzzJdvj-iu9buvXv62ylaf2iTpMFiNc-SeBF0ELJz4BSRvGWgZFTzmtThVrVCbYG0kSTggEJjFdjI8VpYR0dtZd1I2TjmAJRiU_R2_T0N_ffF-XN12PnG7ff26PqLr4CwUIZcsGikL_9o11-G41hXASNChqCYHNXzVXX-3A_Vadgd7PBTUaYol1SyXz8RWP8</recordid><startdate>19901101</startdate><enddate>19901101</enddate><creator>Porter, Stanley E.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>HZAIM</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>C18</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19901101</creationdate><title>WHY HASN'T READER-RESPONSE CRITICISM CAUGHT ON IN NEW TESTAMENT STUDIES?</title><author>Porter, Stanley E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j153t-e9084f31986b4b0b5d9f79d10f6801e121ca91a6e4b7ae2908a8bc88ce3e11993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Biblical studies</topic><topic>Formalist art</topic><topic>Gospels</topic><topic>Interpretive communities</topic><topic>Literary criticism</topic><topic>Literary formalism</topic><topic>New Testament</topic><topic>Reader response theory</topic><topic>Reading strategies</topic><topic>Textual criticism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Porter, Stanley E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 26</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><jtitle>Literature &amp; theology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Porter, Stanley E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>WHY HASN'T READER-RESPONSE CRITICISM CAUGHT ON IN NEW TESTAMENT STUDIES?</atitle><jtitle>Literature &amp; theology</jtitle><date>1990-11-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>278</spage><epage>292</epage><pages>278-292</pages><issn>0269-1205</issn><eissn>1477-4623</eissn><abstract>By comparison with other models; different approaches to reader-response criticism</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0269-1205
ispartof Literature & theology, 1990-11, Vol.4 (3), p.278-292
issn 0269-1205
1477-4623
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1035854736
source Oxford University Press Archive; Humanities Index; JSTOR
subjects Biblical studies
Formalist art
Gospels
Interpretive communities
Literary criticism
Literary formalism
New Testament
Reader response theory
Reading strategies
Textual criticism
title WHY HASN'T READER-RESPONSE CRITICISM CAUGHT ON IN NEW TESTAMENT STUDIES?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T13%3A18%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=WHY%20HASN'T%20READER-RESPONSE%20CRITICISM%20CAUGHT%20ON%20IN%20NEW%20TESTAMENT%20STUDIES?&rft.jtitle=Literature%20&%20theology&rft.au=Porter,%20Stanley%20E.&rft.date=1990-11-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=278&rft.epage=292&rft.pages=278-292&rft.issn=0269-1205&rft.eissn=1477-4623&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23924828%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j153t-e9084f31986b4b0b5d9f79d10f6801e121ca91a6e4b7ae2908a8bc88ce3e11993%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1307851938&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=23924828&rfr_iscdi=true