Loading…

Beef, Dog, and Other Mythologies: Connotative Semiotics in Mahāyoga Tantra Ritual and Scripture

Scholars have long debated how the antinomian elements in the Buddhist Tantras are to be interpreted. Some maintain that they are to be taken literally; others that they are figurative or "symbolic." Both, however--in approaching these statements as examples of directly denotative natural...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the American Academy of Religion 2007-06, Vol.75 (2), p.383-417
Main Author: Wedemeyer, Christian K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 417
container_issue 2
container_start_page 383
container_title Journal of the American Academy of Religion
container_volume 75
creator Wedemeyer, Christian K.
description Scholars have long debated how the antinomian elements in the Buddhist Tantras are to be interpreted. Some maintain that they are to be taken literally; others that they are figurative or "symbolic." Both, however--in approaching these statements as examples of directly denotative natural language--miss the most essential aspect of the semiology of these traditions. This paper demonstrates that the Buddhist Mahāyoga Tantras employ a form of signification (theorized by Roland Barthes) called "connotative semiotics," in which signs (a signifier-signified union) from natural language function as signifiers in a higher-order discourse. Employing these simiological tools enables criticism to recognize that what is fundamentally operative--in both ritual performance and scriptural narrative--is a grammar of purity and pollution in significant dialog with both earlier Buddhistn Tantras and Broader Indian religious norms. This suggests that such antinomianism--far from representing either "tribal" practices or rarified yogic codes--reflects concerns native to mainstream Indian religion.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jaarel/lfm006
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1035876230</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40006375</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40006375</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j312t-1c96a6b98424342487efbe521e47c140866df75b1c2812d3b01c422bd15974693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1r3DAQhkVpodtNjj0WRKCQQ5xoJFkfuSXbT0gIdNOzK2vlXRnb2khyYI_5b_lh9TYhlDAMw8AzDwMvQh-BnALR7Kw1JrrurGt6QsQbNAMuZcFLVb5FM0IILSQo_R59SKmdVqCSzdCfS-eaE_wlrE-wGVb4Jm9cxNe7vAldWHuXzvEiDEPIJvt7h5eu9yF7m7Af8LXZPD7swtrgWzPkaPAvn0fT_fMsbfTbPEZ3gN41pkvu8HnO0e9vX28XP4qrm-8_FxdXRcuA5gKsFkbUWnHK2dRKuqZ2JQXHpQVOlBCrRpY1WKqArlhNwHJK6xWUWnKh2RwdP3m3MdyNLuWq98m6rjODC2OqgLBSSUEZmdCjV2gbxjhM31VUcqolK8UEfX6GTLKma6IZrE_VNvrexF0FSmkBci_jL7LW2dyPyf3nAw0gq-U-in0SRFLC1FRz9OnprE05xBctn4IRTJbsLwNIimA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>274297356</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Beef, Dog, and Other Mythologies: Connotative Semiotics in Mahāyoga Tantra Ritual and Scripture</title><source>EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Project Muse:Jisc Collections:Project MUSE Journals Agreement 2024:Premium Collection</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><source>Humanities Index</source><creator>Wedemeyer, Christian K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wedemeyer, Christian K.</creatorcontrib><description>Scholars have long debated how the antinomian elements in the Buddhist Tantras are to be interpreted. Some maintain that they are to be taken literally; others that they are figurative or "symbolic." Both, however--in approaching these statements as examples of directly denotative natural language--miss the most essential aspect of the semiology of these traditions. This paper demonstrates that the Buddhist Mahāyoga Tantras employ a form of signification (theorized by Roland Barthes) called "connotative semiotics," in which signs (a signifier-signified union) from natural language function as signifiers in a higher-order discourse. Employing these simiological tools enables criticism to recognize that what is fundamentally operative--in both ritual performance and scriptural narrative--is a grammar of purity and pollution in significant dialog with both earlier Buddhistn Tantras and Broader Indian religious norms. This suggests that such antinomianism--far from representing either "tribal" practices or rarified yogic codes--reflects concerns native to mainstream Indian religion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-7189</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-4585</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jaarel/lfm006</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cary, NC: American Academy of Religion, Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Ambrosia ; Asian religions ; Beef ; Buddhism ; Buddism ; History and sciences of religions ; Meats ; Religious literature ; Religious rituals ; Rites &amp; ceremonies ; Sacred texts ; Semiotic connotation ; Semiotic signs ; Semiotics ; Signification ; Symbolism ; Tantra ; Theology</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 2007-06, Vol.75 (2), p.383-417</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2007 American Academy of Religion</rights><rights>Copyright © 2007 The Author. Published by Oxford University Press, on behalf of the American Academy of Religion.</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press, on behalf of the American Academy of Religion. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40006375$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40006375$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,33848,33849,58237,58470</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18896170$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wedemeyer, Christian K.</creatorcontrib><title>Beef, Dog, and Other Mythologies: Connotative Semiotics in Mahāyoga Tantra Ritual and Scripture</title><title>Journal of the American Academy of Religion</title><description>Scholars have long debated how the antinomian elements in the Buddhist Tantras are to be interpreted. Some maintain that they are to be taken literally; others that they are figurative or "symbolic." Both, however--in approaching these statements as examples of directly denotative natural language--miss the most essential aspect of the semiology of these traditions. This paper demonstrates that the Buddhist Mahāyoga Tantras employ a form of signification (theorized by Roland Barthes) called "connotative semiotics," in which signs (a signifier-signified union) from natural language function as signifiers in a higher-order discourse. Employing these simiological tools enables criticism to recognize that what is fundamentally operative--in both ritual performance and scriptural narrative--is a grammar of purity and pollution in significant dialog with both earlier Buddhistn Tantras and Broader Indian religious norms. This suggests that such antinomianism--far from representing either "tribal" practices or rarified yogic codes--reflects concerns native to mainstream Indian religion.</description><subject>Ambrosia</subject><subject>Asian religions</subject><subject>Beef</subject><subject>Buddhism</subject><subject>Buddism</subject><subject>History and sciences of religions</subject><subject>Meats</subject><subject>Religious literature</subject><subject>Religious rituals</subject><subject>Rites &amp; ceremonies</subject><subject>Sacred texts</subject><subject>Semiotic connotation</subject><subject>Semiotic signs</subject><subject>Semiotics</subject><subject>Signification</subject><subject>Symbolism</subject><subject>Tantra</subject><subject>Theology</subject><issn>0002-7189</issn><issn>1477-4585</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C18</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1r3DAQhkVpodtNjj0WRKCQQ5xoJFkfuSXbT0gIdNOzK2vlXRnb2khyYI_5b_lh9TYhlDAMw8AzDwMvQh-BnALR7Kw1JrrurGt6QsQbNAMuZcFLVb5FM0IILSQo_R59SKmdVqCSzdCfS-eaE_wlrE-wGVb4Jm9cxNe7vAldWHuXzvEiDEPIJvt7h5eu9yF7m7Af8LXZPD7swtrgWzPkaPAvn0fT_fMsbfTbPEZ3gN41pkvu8HnO0e9vX28XP4qrm-8_FxdXRcuA5gKsFkbUWnHK2dRKuqZ2JQXHpQVOlBCrRpY1WKqArlhNwHJK6xWUWnKh2RwdP3m3MdyNLuWq98m6rjODC2OqgLBSSUEZmdCjV2gbxjhM31VUcqolK8UEfX6GTLKma6IZrE_VNvrexF0FSmkBci_jL7LW2dyPyf3nAw0gq-U-in0SRFLC1FRz9OnprE05xBctn4IRTJbsLwNIimA</recordid><startdate>20070601</startdate><enddate>20070601</enddate><creator>Wedemeyer, Christian K.</creator><general>American Academy of Religion, Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>C18</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070601</creationdate><title>Beef, Dog, and Other Mythologies: Connotative Semiotics in Mahāyoga Tantra Ritual and Scripture</title><author>Wedemeyer, Christian K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j312t-1c96a6b98424342487efbe521e47c140866df75b1c2812d3b01c422bd15974693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Ambrosia</topic><topic>Asian religions</topic><topic>Beef</topic><topic>Buddhism</topic><topic>Buddism</topic><topic>History and sciences of religions</topic><topic>Meats</topic><topic>Religious literature</topic><topic>Religious rituals</topic><topic>Rites &amp; ceremonies</topic><topic>Sacred texts</topic><topic>Semiotic connotation</topic><topic>Semiotic signs</topic><topic>Semiotics</topic><topic>Signification</topic><topic>Symbolism</topic><topic>Tantra</topic><topic>Theology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wedemeyer, Christian K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Academy of Religion</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wedemeyer, Christian K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Beef, Dog, and Other Mythologies: Connotative Semiotics in Mahāyoga Tantra Ritual and Scripture</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Academy of Religion</jtitle><date>2007-06-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>383</spage><epage>417</epage><pages>383-417</pages><issn>0002-7189</issn><eissn>1477-4585</eissn><abstract>Scholars have long debated how the antinomian elements in the Buddhist Tantras are to be interpreted. Some maintain that they are to be taken literally; others that they are figurative or "symbolic." Both, however--in approaching these statements as examples of directly denotative natural language--miss the most essential aspect of the semiology of these traditions. This paper demonstrates that the Buddhist Mahāyoga Tantras employ a form of signification (theorized by Roland Barthes) called "connotative semiotics," in which signs (a signifier-signified union) from natural language function as signifiers in a higher-order discourse. Employing these simiological tools enables criticism to recognize that what is fundamentally operative--in both ritual performance and scriptural narrative--is a grammar of purity and pollution in significant dialog with both earlier Buddhistn Tantras and Broader Indian religious norms. This suggests that such antinomianism--far from representing either "tribal" practices or rarified yogic codes--reflects concerns native to mainstream Indian religion.</abstract><cop>Cary, NC</cop><pub>American Academy of Religion, Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/jaarel/lfm006</doi><tpages>35</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-7189
ispartof Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 2007-06, Vol.75 (2), p.383-417
issn 0002-7189
1477-4585
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1035876230
source EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Project Muse:Jisc Collections:Project MUSE Journals Agreement 2024:Premium Collection; Oxford Journals Online; Humanities Index
subjects Ambrosia
Asian religions
Beef
Buddhism
Buddism
History and sciences of religions
Meats
Religious literature
Religious rituals
Rites & ceremonies
Sacred texts
Semiotic connotation
Semiotic signs
Semiotics
Signification
Symbolism
Tantra
Theology
title Beef, Dog, and Other Mythologies: Connotative Semiotics in Mahāyoga Tantra Ritual and Scripture
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T18%3A54%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Beef,%20Dog,%20and%20Other%20Mythologies:%20Connotative%20Semiotics%20in%20Mah%C4%81yoga%20Tantra%20Ritual%20and%20Scripture&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Academy%20of%20Religion&rft.au=Wedemeyer,%20Christian%20K.&rft.date=2007-06-01&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=383&rft.epage=417&rft.pages=383-417&rft.issn=0002-7189&rft.eissn=1477-4585&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jaarel/lfm006&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40006375%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j312t-1c96a6b98424342487efbe521e47c140866df75b1c2812d3b01c422bd15974693%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=274297356&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=40006375&rfr_iscdi=true