Loading…

Do L1 Reading Achievement and L1 Print Exposure Contribute to the Prediction of L2 Proficiency?

The study examined whether individual differences in high school first language (L1) reading achievement and print exposure would account for unique variance in second language (L2) written (word decoding, spelling, writing, reading comprehension) and oral (listening/speaking) proficiency after adju...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Language learning 2012-06, Vol.62 (2), p.473-505
Main Authors: Sparks, Richard L., Patton, Jon, Ganschow, Leonore, Humbach, Nancy
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5294-158a17e2d0a37a673ab445f57f65c0a3bc7c561104d4cee200f4b3c39642e1463
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5294-158a17e2d0a37a673ab445f57f65c0a3bc7c561104d4cee200f4b3c39642e1463
container_end_page 505
container_issue 2
container_start_page 473
container_title Language learning
container_volume 62
creator Sparks, Richard L.
Patton, Jon
Ganschow, Leonore
Humbach, Nancy
description The study examined whether individual differences in high school first language (L1) reading achievement and print exposure would account for unique variance in second language (L2) written (word decoding, spelling, writing, reading comprehension) and oral (listening/speaking) proficiency after adjusting for the effects of early L1 literacy and verbal skills, cognitive ability in L1, and L2 aptitude. Participants were administered measures of L1 word decoding, spelling, reading comprehension, phonological awareness, receptive vocabulary, listening comprehension, and cognitive ability in 1st through 5th grades; L2 aptitude in 9th grade; and L1 reading achievement, L1 print exposure, and L2 proficiency in 10th grade. The findings showed that L1 reading achievement in 10th grade made significant and unique contributions to L2 word decoding, L2 reading comprehension, L2 listening/speaking, and overall L2 proficiency after adjusting for the effects of L1 literacy and verbal skills, cognitive ability in L1, and L2 aptitude. Subsequent analyses showed that L1 print exposure variables made unique contributions to L2 reading comprehension, L2 decoding, L2 writing, L2 listening/speaking, and overall L2 proficiency even after adjusting for the effects of L1 literacy and verbal skills during elementary school, cognitive ability in L1, L2 aptitude, and 10th‐grade reading achievement. The results suggest that stronger L1 reading skills are related to stronger L2 outcomes and that opportunity for and engagement in L1 literacy experiences may also be related to differences in L2 proficiency.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00694.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1038109939</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ964952</ericid><sourcerecordid>1038109939</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5294-158a17e2d0a37a673ab445f57f65c0a3bc7c561104d4cee200f4b3c39642e1463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM2O0zAUhSMEEmXgDVhYQkhskvFvEi8QqkrpANEwIBDsLNe5YVxSu9gJtG-PQ0ZdsMIb2_d85177ZBkiuCBpXe4Kwssql5LSgmJCC4xLyYvjvWxxFu5nC4wpy2vG2MPsUYw7nBYty0WmXnvUEPQJdGvdd7Q0txZ-wR7cgLRrJ-km2HRZHw8-jgHQyrsh2O04ABo8Gm4hAdBaM1jvkO9QQ1PBd9ZYcOb06nH2oNN9hCd3-0X25c368-oqbz5s3q6WTW4ElTwnotakAtpizSpdVkxvORedqLpSmFTbmsqIkhDMW24AKMYd3zLDZMkppH-yi-zF3PcQ_M8R4qD2Nhroe-3Aj1ERzGqCpWQyoc_-QXd-DC69LlGEcCEJnRrWM2WCjzFApw7B7nU4JUhNyaudmgJWU8BqSl79TV4dk_X53QAdje67oJ2x8eynoq4lkTRxT2cOgjVnef0ufUqKSX45y79tD6f_Hq-a5fUmnZI_n_02DnA8-3X4oVLAlVBfrzfq5huT7z9ioQT7Ax8Sq-c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1011459126</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do L1 Reading Achievement and L1 Print Exposure Contribute to the Prediction of L2 Proficiency?</title><source>EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><creator>Sparks, Richard L. ; Patton, Jon ; Ganschow, Leonore ; Humbach, Nancy</creator><creatorcontrib>Sparks, Richard L. ; Patton, Jon ; Ganschow, Leonore ; Humbach, Nancy</creatorcontrib><description>The study examined whether individual differences in high school first language (L1) reading achievement and print exposure would account for unique variance in second language (L2) written (word decoding, spelling, writing, reading comprehension) and oral (listening/speaking) proficiency after adjusting for the effects of early L1 literacy and verbal skills, cognitive ability in L1, and L2 aptitude. Participants were administered measures of L1 word decoding, spelling, reading comprehension, phonological awareness, receptive vocabulary, listening comprehension, and cognitive ability in 1st through 5th grades; L2 aptitude in 9th grade; and L1 reading achievement, L1 print exposure, and L2 proficiency in 10th grade. The findings showed that L1 reading achievement in 10th grade made significant and unique contributions to L2 word decoding, L2 reading comprehension, L2 listening/speaking, and overall L2 proficiency after adjusting for the effects of L1 literacy and verbal skills, cognitive ability in L1, and L2 aptitude. Subsequent analyses showed that L1 print exposure variables made unique contributions to L2 reading comprehension, L2 decoding, L2 writing, L2 listening/speaking, and overall L2 proficiency even after adjusting for the effects of L1 literacy and verbal skills during elementary school, cognitive ability in L1, L2 aptitude, and 10th‐grade reading achievement. The results suggest that stronger L1 reading skills are related to stronger L2 outcomes and that opportunity for and engagement in L1 literacy experiences may also be related to differences in L2 proficiency.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-8333</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9922</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00694.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LNGLA5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Cognitive Ability ; cognitive efficiency hypothesis ; Education. Teaching ; Elementary School Students ; environmental opportunity hypothesis ; Grade 10 ; Grade 9 ; High School Students ; Individual Differences ; L1 reading ; L2 proficiency ; language aptitude ; Language Proficiency ; Linguistics ; Listening Comprehension ; Measures (Individuals) ; Native Language ; Oral Language ; Phonological Awareness ; Prediction ; print exposure ; Production and comprehension processes ; Psycholinguistics ; Psychology of language ; Reading Achievement ; Reading Comprehension ; Reading programs ; Reading Skills ; Receptive Language ; Second Language Learning ; Speech Communication ; Spelling ; Verbal Ability ; Vocabulary development</subject><ispartof>Language learning, 2012-06, Vol.62 (2), p.473-505</ispartof><rights>2012 Language Learning Research Club, University of Michigan</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5294-158a17e2d0a37a673ab445f57f65c0a3bc7c561104d4cee200f4b3c39642e1463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5294-158a17e2d0a37a673ab445f57f65c0a3bc7c561104d4cee200f4b3c39642e1463</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,31250,31251</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ964952$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25889192$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sparks, Richard L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patton, Jon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganschow, Leonore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humbach, Nancy</creatorcontrib><title>Do L1 Reading Achievement and L1 Print Exposure Contribute to the Prediction of L2 Proficiency?</title><title>Language learning</title><description>The study examined whether individual differences in high school first language (L1) reading achievement and print exposure would account for unique variance in second language (L2) written (word decoding, spelling, writing, reading comprehension) and oral (listening/speaking) proficiency after adjusting for the effects of early L1 literacy and verbal skills, cognitive ability in L1, and L2 aptitude. Participants were administered measures of L1 word decoding, spelling, reading comprehension, phonological awareness, receptive vocabulary, listening comprehension, and cognitive ability in 1st through 5th grades; L2 aptitude in 9th grade; and L1 reading achievement, L1 print exposure, and L2 proficiency in 10th grade. The findings showed that L1 reading achievement in 10th grade made significant and unique contributions to L2 word decoding, L2 reading comprehension, L2 listening/speaking, and overall L2 proficiency after adjusting for the effects of L1 literacy and verbal skills, cognitive ability in L1, and L2 aptitude. Subsequent analyses showed that L1 print exposure variables made unique contributions to L2 reading comprehension, L2 decoding, L2 writing, L2 listening/speaking, and overall L2 proficiency even after adjusting for the effects of L1 literacy and verbal skills during elementary school, cognitive ability in L1, L2 aptitude, and 10th‐grade reading achievement. The results suggest that stronger L1 reading skills are related to stronger L2 outcomes and that opportunity for and engagement in L1 literacy experiences may also be related to differences in L2 proficiency.</description><subject>Cognitive Ability</subject><subject>cognitive efficiency hypothesis</subject><subject>Education. Teaching</subject><subject>Elementary School Students</subject><subject>environmental opportunity hypothesis</subject><subject>Grade 10</subject><subject>Grade 9</subject><subject>High School Students</subject><subject>Individual Differences</subject><subject>L1 reading</subject><subject>L2 proficiency</subject><subject>language aptitude</subject><subject>Language Proficiency</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Listening Comprehension</subject><subject>Measures (Individuals)</subject><subject>Native Language</subject><subject>Oral Language</subject><subject>Phonological Awareness</subject><subject>Prediction</subject><subject>print exposure</subject><subject>Production and comprehension processes</subject><subject>Psycholinguistics</subject><subject>Psychology of language</subject><subject>Reading Achievement</subject><subject>Reading Comprehension</subject><subject>Reading programs</subject><subject>Reading Skills</subject><subject>Receptive Language</subject><subject>Second Language Learning</subject><subject>Speech Communication</subject><subject>Spelling</subject><subject>Verbal Ability</subject><subject>Vocabulary development</subject><issn>0023-8333</issn><issn>1467-9922</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkM2O0zAUhSMEEmXgDVhYQkhskvFvEi8QqkrpANEwIBDsLNe5YVxSu9gJtG-PQ0ZdsMIb2_d85177ZBkiuCBpXe4Kwssql5LSgmJCC4xLyYvjvWxxFu5nC4wpy2vG2MPsUYw7nBYty0WmXnvUEPQJdGvdd7Q0txZ-wR7cgLRrJ-km2HRZHw8-jgHQyrsh2O04ABo8Gm4hAdBaM1jvkO9QQ1PBd9ZYcOb06nH2oNN9hCd3-0X25c368-oqbz5s3q6WTW4ElTwnotakAtpizSpdVkxvORedqLpSmFTbmsqIkhDMW24AKMYd3zLDZMkppH-yi-zF3PcQ_M8R4qD2Nhroe-3Aj1ERzGqCpWQyoc_-QXd-DC69LlGEcCEJnRrWM2WCjzFApw7B7nU4JUhNyaudmgJWU8BqSl79TV4dk_X53QAdje67oJ2x8eynoq4lkTRxT2cOgjVnef0ufUqKSX45y79tD6f_Hq-a5fUmnZI_n_02DnA8-3X4oVLAlVBfrzfq5huT7z9ioQT7Ax8Sq-c</recordid><startdate>201206</startdate><enddate>201206</enddate><creator>Sparks, Richard L.</creator><creator>Patton, Jon</creator><creator>Ganschow, Leonore</creator><creator>Humbach, Nancy</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201206</creationdate><title>Do L1 Reading Achievement and L1 Print Exposure Contribute to the Prediction of L2 Proficiency?</title><author>Sparks, Richard L. ; Patton, Jon ; Ganschow, Leonore ; Humbach, Nancy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5294-158a17e2d0a37a673ab445f57f65c0a3bc7c561104d4cee200f4b3c39642e1463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Cognitive Ability</topic><topic>cognitive efficiency hypothesis</topic><topic>Education. Teaching</topic><topic>Elementary School Students</topic><topic>environmental opportunity hypothesis</topic><topic>Grade 10</topic><topic>Grade 9</topic><topic>High School Students</topic><topic>Individual Differences</topic><topic>L1 reading</topic><topic>L2 proficiency</topic><topic>language aptitude</topic><topic>Language Proficiency</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Listening Comprehension</topic><topic>Measures (Individuals)</topic><topic>Native Language</topic><topic>Oral Language</topic><topic>Phonological Awareness</topic><topic>Prediction</topic><topic>print exposure</topic><topic>Production and comprehension processes</topic><topic>Psycholinguistics</topic><topic>Psychology of language</topic><topic>Reading Achievement</topic><topic>Reading Comprehension</topic><topic>Reading programs</topic><topic>Reading Skills</topic><topic>Receptive Language</topic><topic>Second Language Learning</topic><topic>Speech Communication</topic><topic>Spelling</topic><topic>Verbal Ability</topic><topic>Vocabulary development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sparks, Richard L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patton, Jon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganschow, Leonore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humbach, Nancy</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Language learning</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sparks, Richard L.</au><au>Patton, Jon</au><au>Ganschow, Leonore</au><au>Humbach, Nancy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ964952</ericid><atitle>Do L1 Reading Achievement and L1 Print Exposure Contribute to the Prediction of L2 Proficiency?</atitle><jtitle>Language learning</jtitle><date>2012-06</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>473</spage><epage>505</epage><pages>473-505</pages><issn>0023-8333</issn><eissn>1467-9922</eissn><coden>LNGLA5</coden><abstract>The study examined whether individual differences in high school first language (L1) reading achievement and print exposure would account for unique variance in second language (L2) written (word decoding, spelling, writing, reading comprehension) and oral (listening/speaking) proficiency after adjusting for the effects of early L1 literacy and verbal skills, cognitive ability in L1, and L2 aptitude. Participants were administered measures of L1 word decoding, spelling, reading comprehension, phonological awareness, receptive vocabulary, listening comprehension, and cognitive ability in 1st through 5th grades; L2 aptitude in 9th grade; and L1 reading achievement, L1 print exposure, and L2 proficiency in 10th grade. The findings showed that L1 reading achievement in 10th grade made significant and unique contributions to L2 word decoding, L2 reading comprehension, L2 listening/speaking, and overall L2 proficiency after adjusting for the effects of L1 literacy and verbal skills, cognitive ability in L1, and L2 aptitude. Subsequent analyses showed that L1 print exposure variables made unique contributions to L2 reading comprehension, L2 decoding, L2 writing, L2 listening/speaking, and overall L2 proficiency even after adjusting for the effects of L1 literacy and verbal skills during elementary school, cognitive ability in L1, L2 aptitude, and 10th‐grade reading achievement. The results suggest that stronger L1 reading skills are related to stronger L2 outcomes and that opportunity for and engagement in L1 literacy experiences may also be related to differences in L2 proficiency.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00694.x</doi><tpages>33</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0023-8333
ispartof Language learning, 2012-06, Vol.62 (2), p.473-505
issn 0023-8333
1467-9922
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1038109939
source EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; ERIC; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)
subjects Cognitive Ability
cognitive efficiency hypothesis
Education. Teaching
Elementary School Students
environmental opportunity hypothesis
Grade 10
Grade 9
High School Students
Individual Differences
L1 reading
L2 proficiency
language aptitude
Language Proficiency
Linguistics
Listening Comprehension
Measures (Individuals)
Native Language
Oral Language
Phonological Awareness
Prediction
print exposure
Production and comprehension processes
Psycholinguistics
Psychology of language
Reading Achievement
Reading Comprehension
Reading programs
Reading Skills
Receptive Language
Second Language Learning
Speech Communication
Spelling
Verbal Ability
Vocabulary development
title Do L1 Reading Achievement and L1 Print Exposure Contribute to the Prediction of L2 Proficiency?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T19%3A06%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20L1%20Reading%20Achievement%20and%20L1%20Print%20Exposure%20Contribute%20to%20the%20Prediction%20of%20L2%20Proficiency?&rft.jtitle=Language%20learning&rft.au=Sparks,%20Richard%20L.&rft.date=2012-06&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=473&rft.epage=505&rft.pages=473-505&rft.issn=0023-8333&rft.eissn=1467-9922&rft.coden=LNGLA5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00694.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1038109939%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5294-158a17e2d0a37a673ab445f57f65c0a3bc7c561104d4cee200f4b3c39642e1463%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1011459126&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ964952&rfr_iscdi=true