Loading…
Do L1 Reading Achievement and L1 Print Exposure Contribute to the Prediction of L2 Proficiency?
The study examined whether individual differences in high school first language (L1) reading achievement and print exposure would account for unique variance in second language (L2) written (word decoding, spelling, writing, reading comprehension) and oral (listening/speaking) proficiency after adju...
Saved in:
Published in: | Language learning 2012-06, Vol.62 (2), p.473-505 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5294-158a17e2d0a37a673ab445f57f65c0a3bc7c561104d4cee200f4b3c39642e1463 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5294-158a17e2d0a37a673ab445f57f65c0a3bc7c561104d4cee200f4b3c39642e1463 |
container_end_page | 505 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 473 |
container_title | Language learning |
container_volume | 62 |
creator | Sparks, Richard L. Patton, Jon Ganschow, Leonore Humbach, Nancy |
description | The study examined whether individual differences in high school first language (L1) reading achievement and print exposure would account for unique variance in second language (L2) written (word decoding, spelling, writing, reading comprehension) and oral (listening/speaking) proficiency after adjusting for the effects of early L1 literacy and verbal skills, cognitive ability in L1, and L2 aptitude. Participants were administered measures of L1 word decoding, spelling, reading comprehension, phonological awareness, receptive vocabulary, listening comprehension, and cognitive ability in 1st through 5th grades; L2 aptitude in 9th grade; and L1 reading achievement, L1 print exposure, and L2 proficiency in 10th grade. The findings showed that L1 reading achievement in 10th grade made significant and unique contributions to L2 word decoding, L2 reading comprehension, L2 listening/speaking, and overall L2 proficiency after adjusting for the effects of L1 literacy and verbal skills, cognitive ability in L1, and L2 aptitude. Subsequent analyses showed that L1 print exposure variables made unique contributions to L2 reading comprehension, L2 decoding, L2 writing, L2 listening/speaking, and overall L2 proficiency even after adjusting for the effects of L1 literacy and verbal skills during elementary school, cognitive ability in L1, L2 aptitude, and 10th‐grade reading achievement. The results suggest that stronger L1 reading skills are related to stronger L2 outcomes and that opportunity for and engagement in L1 literacy experiences may also be related to differences in L2 proficiency. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00694.x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1038109939</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ964952</ericid><sourcerecordid>1038109939</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5294-158a17e2d0a37a673ab445f57f65c0a3bc7c561104d4cee200f4b3c39642e1463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM2O0zAUhSMEEmXgDVhYQkhskvFvEi8QqkrpANEwIBDsLNe5YVxSu9gJtG-PQ0ZdsMIb2_d85177ZBkiuCBpXe4Kwssql5LSgmJCC4xLyYvjvWxxFu5nC4wpy2vG2MPsUYw7nBYty0WmXnvUEPQJdGvdd7Q0txZ-wR7cgLRrJ-km2HRZHw8-jgHQyrsh2O04ABo8Gm4hAdBaM1jvkO9QQ1PBd9ZYcOb06nH2oNN9hCd3-0X25c368-oqbz5s3q6WTW4ElTwnotakAtpizSpdVkxvORedqLpSmFTbmsqIkhDMW24AKMYd3zLDZMkppH-yi-zF3PcQ_M8R4qD2Nhroe-3Aj1ERzGqCpWQyoc_-QXd-DC69LlGEcCEJnRrWM2WCjzFApw7B7nU4JUhNyaudmgJWU8BqSl79TV4dk_X53QAdje67oJ2x8eynoq4lkTRxT2cOgjVnef0ufUqKSX45y79tD6f_Hq-a5fUmnZI_n_02DnA8-3X4oVLAlVBfrzfq5huT7z9ioQT7Ax8Sq-c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1011459126</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do L1 Reading Achievement and L1 Print Exposure Contribute to the Prediction of L2 Proficiency?</title><source>EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><creator>Sparks, Richard L. ; Patton, Jon ; Ganschow, Leonore ; Humbach, Nancy</creator><creatorcontrib>Sparks, Richard L. ; Patton, Jon ; Ganschow, Leonore ; Humbach, Nancy</creatorcontrib><description>The study examined whether individual differences in high school first language (L1) reading achievement and print exposure would account for unique variance in second language (L2) written (word decoding, spelling, writing, reading comprehension) and oral (listening/speaking) proficiency after adjusting for the effects of early L1 literacy and verbal skills, cognitive ability in L1, and L2 aptitude. Participants were administered measures of L1 word decoding, spelling, reading comprehension, phonological awareness, receptive vocabulary, listening comprehension, and cognitive ability in 1st through 5th grades; L2 aptitude in 9th grade; and L1 reading achievement, L1 print exposure, and L2 proficiency in 10th grade. The findings showed that L1 reading achievement in 10th grade made significant and unique contributions to L2 word decoding, L2 reading comprehension, L2 listening/speaking, and overall L2 proficiency after adjusting for the effects of L1 literacy and verbal skills, cognitive ability in L1, and L2 aptitude. Subsequent analyses showed that L1 print exposure variables made unique contributions to L2 reading comprehension, L2 decoding, L2 writing, L2 listening/speaking, and overall L2 proficiency even after adjusting for the effects of L1 literacy and verbal skills during elementary school, cognitive ability in L1, L2 aptitude, and 10th‐grade reading achievement. The results suggest that stronger L1 reading skills are related to stronger L2 outcomes and that opportunity for and engagement in L1 literacy experiences may also be related to differences in L2 proficiency.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-8333</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9922</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00694.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LNGLA5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Cognitive Ability ; cognitive efficiency hypothesis ; Education. Teaching ; Elementary School Students ; environmental opportunity hypothesis ; Grade 10 ; Grade 9 ; High School Students ; Individual Differences ; L1 reading ; L2 proficiency ; language aptitude ; Language Proficiency ; Linguistics ; Listening Comprehension ; Measures (Individuals) ; Native Language ; Oral Language ; Phonological Awareness ; Prediction ; print exposure ; Production and comprehension processes ; Psycholinguistics ; Psychology of language ; Reading Achievement ; Reading Comprehension ; Reading programs ; Reading Skills ; Receptive Language ; Second Language Learning ; Speech Communication ; Spelling ; Verbal Ability ; Vocabulary development</subject><ispartof>Language learning, 2012-06, Vol.62 (2), p.473-505</ispartof><rights>2012 Language Learning Research Club, University of Michigan</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5294-158a17e2d0a37a673ab445f57f65c0a3bc7c561104d4cee200f4b3c39642e1463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5294-158a17e2d0a37a673ab445f57f65c0a3bc7c561104d4cee200f4b3c39642e1463</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,31250,31251</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ964952$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25889192$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sparks, Richard L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patton, Jon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganschow, Leonore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humbach, Nancy</creatorcontrib><title>Do L1 Reading Achievement and L1 Print Exposure Contribute to the Prediction of L2 Proficiency?</title><title>Language learning</title><description>The study examined whether individual differences in high school first language (L1) reading achievement and print exposure would account for unique variance in second language (L2) written (word decoding, spelling, writing, reading comprehension) and oral (listening/speaking) proficiency after adjusting for the effects of early L1 literacy and verbal skills, cognitive ability in L1, and L2 aptitude. Participants were administered measures of L1 word decoding, spelling, reading comprehension, phonological awareness, receptive vocabulary, listening comprehension, and cognitive ability in 1st through 5th grades; L2 aptitude in 9th grade; and L1 reading achievement, L1 print exposure, and L2 proficiency in 10th grade. The findings showed that L1 reading achievement in 10th grade made significant and unique contributions to L2 word decoding, L2 reading comprehension, L2 listening/speaking, and overall L2 proficiency after adjusting for the effects of L1 literacy and verbal skills, cognitive ability in L1, and L2 aptitude. Subsequent analyses showed that L1 print exposure variables made unique contributions to L2 reading comprehension, L2 decoding, L2 writing, L2 listening/speaking, and overall L2 proficiency even after adjusting for the effects of L1 literacy and verbal skills during elementary school, cognitive ability in L1, L2 aptitude, and 10th‐grade reading achievement. The results suggest that stronger L1 reading skills are related to stronger L2 outcomes and that opportunity for and engagement in L1 literacy experiences may also be related to differences in L2 proficiency.</description><subject>Cognitive Ability</subject><subject>cognitive efficiency hypothesis</subject><subject>Education. Teaching</subject><subject>Elementary School Students</subject><subject>environmental opportunity hypothesis</subject><subject>Grade 10</subject><subject>Grade 9</subject><subject>High School Students</subject><subject>Individual Differences</subject><subject>L1 reading</subject><subject>L2 proficiency</subject><subject>language aptitude</subject><subject>Language Proficiency</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Listening Comprehension</subject><subject>Measures (Individuals)</subject><subject>Native Language</subject><subject>Oral Language</subject><subject>Phonological Awareness</subject><subject>Prediction</subject><subject>print exposure</subject><subject>Production and comprehension processes</subject><subject>Psycholinguistics</subject><subject>Psychology of language</subject><subject>Reading Achievement</subject><subject>Reading Comprehension</subject><subject>Reading programs</subject><subject>Reading Skills</subject><subject>Receptive Language</subject><subject>Second Language Learning</subject><subject>Speech Communication</subject><subject>Spelling</subject><subject>Verbal Ability</subject><subject>Vocabulary development</subject><issn>0023-8333</issn><issn>1467-9922</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkM2O0zAUhSMEEmXgDVhYQkhskvFvEi8QqkrpANEwIBDsLNe5YVxSu9gJtG-PQ0ZdsMIb2_d85177ZBkiuCBpXe4Kwssql5LSgmJCC4xLyYvjvWxxFu5nC4wpy2vG2MPsUYw7nBYty0WmXnvUEPQJdGvdd7Q0txZ-wR7cgLRrJ-km2HRZHw8-jgHQyrsh2O04ABo8Gm4hAdBaM1jvkO9QQ1PBd9ZYcOb06nH2oNN9hCd3-0X25c368-oqbz5s3q6WTW4ElTwnotakAtpizSpdVkxvORedqLpSmFTbmsqIkhDMW24AKMYd3zLDZMkppH-yi-zF3PcQ_M8R4qD2Nhroe-3Aj1ERzGqCpWQyoc_-QXd-DC69LlGEcCEJnRrWM2WCjzFApw7B7nU4JUhNyaudmgJWU8BqSl79TV4dk_X53QAdje67oJ2x8eynoq4lkTRxT2cOgjVnef0ufUqKSX45y79tD6f_Hq-a5fUmnZI_n_02DnA8-3X4oVLAlVBfrzfq5huT7z9ioQT7Ax8Sq-c</recordid><startdate>201206</startdate><enddate>201206</enddate><creator>Sparks, Richard L.</creator><creator>Patton, Jon</creator><creator>Ganschow, Leonore</creator><creator>Humbach, Nancy</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201206</creationdate><title>Do L1 Reading Achievement and L1 Print Exposure Contribute to the Prediction of L2 Proficiency?</title><author>Sparks, Richard L. ; Patton, Jon ; Ganschow, Leonore ; Humbach, Nancy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5294-158a17e2d0a37a673ab445f57f65c0a3bc7c561104d4cee200f4b3c39642e1463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Cognitive Ability</topic><topic>cognitive efficiency hypothesis</topic><topic>Education. Teaching</topic><topic>Elementary School Students</topic><topic>environmental opportunity hypothesis</topic><topic>Grade 10</topic><topic>Grade 9</topic><topic>High School Students</topic><topic>Individual Differences</topic><topic>L1 reading</topic><topic>L2 proficiency</topic><topic>language aptitude</topic><topic>Language Proficiency</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Listening Comprehension</topic><topic>Measures (Individuals)</topic><topic>Native Language</topic><topic>Oral Language</topic><topic>Phonological Awareness</topic><topic>Prediction</topic><topic>print exposure</topic><topic>Production and comprehension processes</topic><topic>Psycholinguistics</topic><topic>Psychology of language</topic><topic>Reading Achievement</topic><topic>Reading Comprehension</topic><topic>Reading programs</topic><topic>Reading Skills</topic><topic>Receptive Language</topic><topic>Second Language Learning</topic><topic>Speech Communication</topic><topic>Spelling</topic><topic>Verbal Ability</topic><topic>Vocabulary development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sparks, Richard L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patton, Jon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganschow, Leonore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humbach, Nancy</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Language learning</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sparks, Richard L.</au><au>Patton, Jon</au><au>Ganschow, Leonore</au><au>Humbach, Nancy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ964952</ericid><atitle>Do L1 Reading Achievement and L1 Print Exposure Contribute to the Prediction of L2 Proficiency?</atitle><jtitle>Language learning</jtitle><date>2012-06</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>473</spage><epage>505</epage><pages>473-505</pages><issn>0023-8333</issn><eissn>1467-9922</eissn><coden>LNGLA5</coden><abstract>The study examined whether individual differences in high school first language (L1) reading achievement and print exposure would account for unique variance in second language (L2) written (word decoding, spelling, writing, reading comprehension) and oral (listening/speaking) proficiency after adjusting for the effects of early L1 literacy and verbal skills, cognitive ability in L1, and L2 aptitude. Participants were administered measures of L1 word decoding, spelling, reading comprehension, phonological awareness, receptive vocabulary, listening comprehension, and cognitive ability in 1st through 5th grades; L2 aptitude in 9th grade; and L1 reading achievement, L1 print exposure, and L2 proficiency in 10th grade. The findings showed that L1 reading achievement in 10th grade made significant and unique contributions to L2 word decoding, L2 reading comprehension, L2 listening/speaking, and overall L2 proficiency after adjusting for the effects of L1 literacy and verbal skills, cognitive ability in L1, and L2 aptitude. Subsequent analyses showed that L1 print exposure variables made unique contributions to L2 reading comprehension, L2 decoding, L2 writing, L2 listening/speaking, and overall L2 proficiency even after adjusting for the effects of L1 literacy and verbal skills during elementary school, cognitive ability in L1, L2 aptitude, and 10th‐grade reading achievement. The results suggest that stronger L1 reading skills are related to stronger L2 outcomes and that opportunity for and engagement in L1 literacy experiences may also be related to differences in L2 proficiency.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00694.x</doi><tpages>33</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0023-8333 |
ispartof | Language learning, 2012-06, Vol.62 (2), p.473-505 |
issn | 0023-8333 1467-9922 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1038109939 |
source | EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; ERIC; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA) |
subjects | Cognitive Ability cognitive efficiency hypothesis Education. Teaching Elementary School Students environmental opportunity hypothesis Grade 10 Grade 9 High School Students Individual Differences L1 reading L2 proficiency language aptitude Language Proficiency Linguistics Listening Comprehension Measures (Individuals) Native Language Oral Language Phonological Awareness Prediction print exposure Production and comprehension processes Psycholinguistics Psychology of language Reading Achievement Reading Comprehension Reading programs Reading Skills Receptive Language Second Language Learning Speech Communication Spelling Verbal Ability Vocabulary development |
title | Do L1 Reading Achievement and L1 Print Exposure Contribute to the Prediction of L2 Proficiency? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T19%3A06%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20L1%20Reading%20Achievement%20and%20L1%20Print%20Exposure%20Contribute%20to%20the%20Prediction%20of%20L2%20Proficiency?&rft.jtitle=Language%20learning&rft.au=Sparks,%20Richard%20L.&rft.date=2012-06&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=473&rft.epage=505&rft.pages=473-505&rft.issn=0023-8333&rft.eissn=1467-9922&rft.coden=LNGLA5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00694.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1038109939%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5294-158a17e2d0a37a673ab445f57f65c0a3bc7c561104d4cee200f4b3c39642e1463%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1011459126&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ964952&rfr_iscdi=true |