Loading…
The themes, institutions, and people of medical education research 1988–2010: content analysis of abstracts from six journals
The present study aimed at providing an overview of the most common themes of research into medical education. Changes in frequency of occurrence of these themes over time and differences between US and European journals were studied. The most productive institutions and researchers in the field wer...
Saved in:
Published in: | Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice 2012-10, Vol.17 (4), p.515-527 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-f65e29055a674918928f960952b64db6d132b350922d86ea39a9c98d9b1e0fb93 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-f65e29055a674918928f960952b64db6d132b350922d86ea39a9c98d9b1e0fb93 |
container_end_page | 527 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 515 |
container_title | Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Rotgans, Jerome I. |
description | The present study aimed at providing an overview of the most common themes of research into medical education. Changes in frequency of occurrence of these themes over time and differences between US and European journals were studied. The most productive institutions and researchers in the field were examined. A content analysis was carried out on 10,168 abstracts extracted from the six most influential journals in medical education published since 1988. Twenty-nine major themes were identified, of which student assessment, clinical and communication skills, clinical clerkships, and problem-based learning were the most prominent ones. Some of these themes, such as multiple-choice examinations or computer-assisted instruction seemed to have had their day, whereas other topics, such as the study of clinical clerkships, clinical reasoning, and scholarship in education were on their way up. Medical education research turned out to be a thoroughly international affair to which both US and European research centers contribute. The medical education literature shows an overwhelming emphasis on the preparation of medical students for professional practice. Moreover, the emphasis is very much on the individual student; most research seems to have been conducted with a psychological perspective in mind. It is argued that medical education research would profit from broadening its scope, including sociological, economical, ecological, and system perspectives. These perspectives might bring answers to new questions relevant to the quality of medical education. It is suggested that medical education is in need of moving beyond the conventional effectiveness-driven research approach to a more theory- and discovery-driven approach. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10459-011-9328-x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1038227612</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ979812</ericid><sourcerecordid>1038227612</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-f65e29055a674918928f960952b64db6d132b350922d86ea39a9c98d9b1e0fb93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc2KFTEQhYMozjj6AIJIwI0LW1PJ7XRqdjKMfwy4Gdchna72Zuifa5KGOyt9B9_QJzHXnhlBcFUJ9Z2qQx3GnoJ4DUI0bxKITY2VAKhQSVPt77FjqBtVgW6a--WtjKw2iPqIPUrpSgihwJiH7EgCNoCojtn3yy3xvKWR0iseppRDXnKYp_JzU8d3NO8G4nPPR-qCdwOnbvHuQPBIiVz0Ww5ozK8fP6UAccr9PGWaclG74TqFdNC6NuXofE68j_PIU9jzq3mJhUiP2YO-FHpyU0_Yl3fnl2cfqovP7z-evb2ovEKVq17XJFHUtdPNBsGgND1qgbVs9aZrdQdKtqoWKGVnNDmFDj2aDlsg0beoTtjLde4uzt8WStmOIXkaBjfRvCQLotxKNhpkQV_8g96atVLWCKo4UIWClfJxTilSb3cxjC5el1H2kI5d07ElHXtIx-6L5vnN5KUt97xT3MZRgGcrQDH4u_b5J2zQ_HEm13Yqrekrxb_O_r_0N9cbo_I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2259137493</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The themes, institutions, and people of medical education research 1988–2010: content analysis of abstracts from six journals</title><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Springer Nature</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Rotgans, Jerome I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rotgans, Jerome I.</creatorcontrib><description>The present study aimed at providing an overview of the most common themes of research into medical education. Changes in frequency of occurrence of these themes over time and differences between US and European journals were studied. The most productive institutions and researchers in the field were examined. A content analysis was carried out on 10,168 abstracts extracted from the six most influential journals in medical education published since 1988. Twenty-nine major themes were identified, of which student assessment, clinical and communication skills, clinical clerkships, and problem-based learning were the most prominent ones. Some of these themes, such as multiple-choice examinations or computer-assisted instruction seemed to have had their day, whereas other topics, such as the study of clinical clerkships, clinical reasoning, and scholarship in education were on their way up. Medical education research turned out to be a thoroughly international affair to which both US and European research centers contribute. The medical education literature shows an overwhelming emphasis on the preparation of medical students for professional practice. Moreover, the emphasis is very much on the individual student; most research seems to have been conducted with a psychological perspective in mind. It is argued that medical education research would profit from broadening its scope, including sociological, economical, ecological, and system perspectives. These perspectives might bring answers to new questions relevant to the quality of medical education. It is suggested that medical education is in need of moving beyond the conventional effectiveness-driven research approach to a more theory- and discovery-driven approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1382-4996</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1677</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10459-011-9328-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21971993</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Bibliometrics ; Clinical Competence - standards ; Clinical Competence - statistics & numerical data ; Clinical Experience ; Content Analysis ; Education ; Education, Medical - standards ; Education, Medical - statistics & numerical data ; Education, Medical - trends ; Europe ; Faculty, Medical - standards ; Faculty, Medical - statistics & numerical data ; Graduate Students ; Higher Education ; Humans ; Journalism, Medical ; Medical Education ; Medical Students ; Multiple choice ; Problem Based Learning ; Qualitative research ; Research - manpower ; Research - statistics & numerical data ; Research - trends ; Schools, Medical - standards ; Schools, Medical - statistics & numerical data ; Schools, Medical - trends ; Teaching Methods ; Thinking Skills ; United States</subject><ispartof>Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice, 2012-10, Vol.17 (4), p.515-527</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011</rights><rights>Advances in Health Sciences Education is a copyright of Springer, (2011). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-f65e29055a674918928f960952b64db6d132b350922d86ea39a9c98d9b1e0fb93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-f65e29055a674918928f960952b64db6d132b350922d86ea39a9c98d9b1e0fb93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2259137493?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21378,21394,27924,27925,33611,33612,33877,33878,43733,43880</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ979812$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21971993$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rotgans, Jerome I.</creatorcontrib><title>The themes, institutions, and people of medical education research 1988–2010: content analysis of abstracts from six journals</title><title>Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice</title><addtitle>Adv in Health Sci Educ</addtitle><addtitle>Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract</addtitle><description>The present study aimed at providing an overview of the most common themes of research into medical education. Changes in frequency of occurrence of these themes over time and differences between US and European journals were studied. The most productive institutions and researchers in the field were examined. A content analysis was carried out on 10,168 abstracts extracted from the six most influential journals in medical education published since 1988. Twenty-nine major themes were identified, of which student assessment, clinical and communication skills, clinical clerkships, and problem-based learning were the most prominent ones. Some of these themes, such as multiple-choice examinations or computer-assisted instruction seemed to have had their day, whereas other topics, such as the study of clinical clerkships, clinical reasoning, and scholarship in education were on their way up. Medical education research turned out to be a thoroughly international affair to which both US and European research centers contribute. The medical education literature shows an overwhelming emphasis on the preparation of medical students for professional practice. Moreover, the emphasis is very much on the individual student; most research seems to have been conducted with a psychological perspective in mind. It is argued that medical education research would profit from broadening its scope, including sociological, economical, ecological, and system perspectives. These perspectives might bring answers to new questions relevant to the quality of medical education. It is suggested that medical education is in need of moving beyond the conventional effectiveness-driven research approach to a more theory- and discovery-driven approach.</description><subject>Bibliometrics</subject><subject>Clinical Competence - standards</subject><subject>Clinical Competence - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Clinical Experience</subject><subject>Content Analysis</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Education, Medical - standards</subject><subject>Education, Medical - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Education, Medical - trends</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Faculty, Medical - standards</subject><subject>Faculty, Medical - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Graduate Students</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Journalism, Medical</subject><subject>Medical Education</subject><subject>Medical Students</subject><subject>Multiple choice</subject><subject>Problem Based Learning</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Research - manpower</subject><subject>Research - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Research - trends</subject><subject>Schools, Medical - standards</subject><subject>Schools, Medical - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Schools, Medical - trends</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Thinking Skills</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1382-4996</issn><issn>1573-1677</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc2KFTEQhYMozjj6AIJIwI0LW1PJ7XRqdjKMfwy4Gdchna72Zuifa5KGOyt9B9_QJzHXnhlBcFUJ9Z2qQx3GnoJ4DUI0bxKITY2VAKhQSVPt77FjqBtVgW6a--WtjKw2iPqIPUrpSgihwJiH7EgCNoCojtn3yy3xvKWR0iseppRDXnKYp_JzU8d3NO8G4nPPR-qCdwOnbvHuQPBIiVz0Ww5ozK8fP6UAccr9PGWaclG74TqFdNC6NuXofE68j_PIU9jzq3mJhUiP2YO-FHpyU0_Yl3fnl2cfqovP7z-evb2ovEKVq17XJFHUtdPNBsGgND1qgbVs9aZrdQdKtqoWKGVnNDmFDj2aDlsg0beoTtjLde4uzt8WStmOIXkaBjfRvCQLotxKNhpkQV_8g96atVLWCKo4UIWClfJxTilSb3cxjC5el1H2kI5d07ElHXtIx-6L5vnN5KUt97xT3MZRgGcrQDH4u_b5J2zQ_HEm13Yqrekrxb_O_r_0N9cbo_I</recordid><startdate>20121001</startdate><enddate>20121001</enddate><creator>Rotgans, Jerome I.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121001</creationdate><title>The themes, institutions, and people of medical education research 1988–2010: content analysis of abstracts from six journals</title><author>Rotgans, Jerome I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-f65e29055a674918928f960952b64db6d132b350922d86ea39a9c98d9b1e0fb93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Bibliometrics</topic><topic>Clinical Competence - standards</topic><topic>Clinical Competence - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Clinical Experience</topic><topic>Content Analysis</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Education, Medical - standards</topic><topic>Education, Medical - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Education, Medical - trends</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Faculty, Medical - standards</topic><topic>Faculty, Medical - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Graduate Students</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Journalism, Medical</topic><topic>Medical Education</topic><topic>Medical Students</topic><topic>Multiple choice</topic><topic>Problem Based Learning</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Research - manpower</topic><topic>Research - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Research - trends</topic><topic>Schools, Medical - standards</topic><topic>Schools, Medical - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Schools, Medical - trends</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Thinking Skills</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rotgans, Jerome I.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rotgans, Jerome I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ979812</ericid><atitle>The themes, institutions, and people of medical education research 1988–2010: content analysis of abstracts from six journals</atitle><jtitle>Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice</jtitle><stitle>Adv in Health Sci Educ</stitle><addtitle>Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract</addtitle><date>2012-10-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>515</spage><epage>527</epage><pages>515-527</pages><issn>1382-4996</issn><eissn>1573-1677</eissn><abstract>The present study aimed at providing an overview of the most common themes of research into medical education. Changes in frequency of occurrence of these themes over time and differences between US and European journals were studied. The most productive institutions and researchers in the field were examined. A content analysis was carried out on 10,168 abstracts extracted from the six most influential journals in medical education published since 1988. Twenty-nine major themes were identified, of which student assessment, clinical and communication skills, clinical clerkships, and problem-based learning were the most prominent ones. Some of these themes, such as multiple-choice examinations or computer-assisted instruction seemed to have had their day, whereas other topics, such as the study of clinical clerkships, clinical reasoning, and scholarship in education were on their way up. Medical education research turned out to be a thoroughly international affair to which both US and European research centers contribute. The medical education literature shows an overwhelming emphasis on the preparation of medical students for professional practice. Moreover, the emphasis is very much on the individual student; most research seems to have been conducted with a psychological perspective in mind. It is argued that medical education research would profit from broadening its scope, including sociological, economical, ecological, and system perspectives. These perspectives might bring answers to new questions relevant to the quality of medical education. It is suggested that medical education is in need of moving beyond the conventional effectiveness-driven research approach to a more theory- and discovery-driven approach.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>21971993</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10459-011-9328-x</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1382-4996 |
ispartof | Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice, 2012-10, Vol.17 (4), p.515-527 |
issn | 1382-4996 1573-1677 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1038227612 |
source | Social Science Premium Collection; Springer Nature; ERIC; Education Collection |
subjects | Bibliometrics Clinical Competence - standards Clinical Competence - statistics & numerical data Clinical Experience Content Analysis Education Education, Medical - standards Education, Medical - statistics & numerical data Education, Medical - trends Europe Faculty, Medical - standards Faculty, Medical - statistics & numerical data Graduate Students Higher Education Humans Journalism, Medical Medical Education Medical Students Multiple choice Problem Based Learning Qualitative research Research - manpower Research - statistics & numerical data Research - trends Schools, Medical - standards Schools, Medical - statistics & numerical data Schools, Medical - trends Teaching Methods Thinking Skills United States |
title | The themes, institutions, and people of medical education research 1988–2010: content analysis of abstracts from six journals |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T17%3A35%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20themes,%20institutions,%20and%20people%20of%20medical%20education%20research%201988%E2%80%932010:%20content%20analysis%20of%20abstracts%20from%20six%20journals&rft.jtitle=Advances%20in%20health%20sciences%20education%20:%20theory%20and%20practice&rft.au=Rotgans,%20Jerome%20I.&rft.date=2012-10-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=515&rft.epage=527&rft.pages=515-527&rft.issn=1382-4996&rft.eissn=1573-1677&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10459-011-9328-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1038227612%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-f65e29055a674918928f960952b64db6d132b350922d86ea39a9c98d9b1e0fb93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2259137493&rft_id=info:pmid/21971993&rft_ericid=EJ979812&rfr_iscdi=true |