Loading…

The themes, institutions, and people of medical education research 1988–2010: content analysis of abstracts from six journals

The present study aimed at providing an overview of the most common themes of research into medical education. Changes in frequency of occurrence of these themes over time and differences between US and European journals were studied. The most productive institutions and researchers in the field wer...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice 2012-10, Vol.17 (4), p.515-527
Main Author: Rotgans, Jerome I.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-f65e29055a674918928f960952b64db6d132b350922d86ea39a9c98d9b1e0fb93
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-f65e29055a674918928f960952b64db6d132b350922d86ea39a9c98d9b1e0fb93
container_end_page 527
container_issue 4
container_start_page 515
container_title Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice
container_volume 17
creator Rotgans, Jerome I.
description The present study aimed at providing an overview of the most common themes of research into medical education. Changes in frequency of occurrence of these themes over time and differences between US and European journals were studied. The most productive institutions and researchers in the field were examined. A content analysis was carried out on 10,168 abstracts extracted from the six most influential journals in medical education published since 1988. Twenty-nine major themes were identified, of which student assessment, clinical and communication skills, clinical clerkships, and problem-based learning were the most prominent ones. Some of these themes, such as multiple-choice examinations or computer-assisted instruction seemed to have had their day, whereas other topics, such as the study of clinical clerkships, clinical reasoning, and scholarship in education were on their way up. Medical education research turned out to be a thoroughly international affair to which both US and European research centers contribute. The medical education literature shows an overwhelming emphasis on the preparation of medical students for professional practice. Moreover, the emphasis is very much on the individual student; most research seems to have been conducted with a psychological perspective in mind. It is argued that medical education research would profit from broadening its scope, including sociological, economical, ecological, and system perspectives. These perspectives might bring answers to new questions relevant to the quality of medical education. It is suggested that medical education is in need of moving beyond the conventional effectiveness-driven research approach to a more theory- and discovery-driven approach.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10459-011-9328-x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1038227612</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ979812</ericid><sourcerecordid>1038227612</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-f65e29055a674918928f960952b64db6d132b350922d86ea39a9c98d9b1e0fb93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc2KFTEQhYMozjj6AIJIwI0LW1PJ7XRqdjKMfwy4Gdchna72Zuifa5KGOyt9B9_QJzHXnhlBcFUJ9Z2qQx3GnoJ4DUI0bxKITY2VAKhQSVPt77FjqBtVgW6a--WtjKw2iPqIPUrpSgihwJiH7EgCNoCojtn3yy3xvKWR0iseppRDXnKYp_JzU8d3NO8G4nPPR-qCdwOnbvHuQPBIiVz0Ww5ozK8fP6UAccr9PGWaclG74TqFdNC6NuXofE68j_PIU9jzq3mJhUiP2YO-FHpyU0_Yl3fnl2cfqovP7z-evb2ovEKVq17XJFHUtdPNBsGgND1qgbVs9aZrdQdKtqoWKGVnNDmFDj2aDlsg0beoTtjLde4uzt8WStmOIXkaBjfRvCQLotxKNhpkQV_8g96atVLWCKo4UIWClfJxTilSb3cxjC5el1H2kI5d07ElHXtIx-6L5vnN5KUt97xT3MZRgGcrQDH4u_b5J2zQ_HEm13Yqrekrxb_O_r_0N9cbo_I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2259137493</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The themes, institutions, and people of medical education research 1988–2010: content analysis of abstracts from six journals</title><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Springer Nature</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Rotgans, Jerome I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rotgans, Jerome I.</creatorcontrib><description>The present study aimed at providing an overview of the most common themes of research into medical education. Changes in frequency of occurrence of these themes over time and differences between US and European journals were studied. The most productive institutions and researchers in the field were examined. A content analysis was carried out on 10,168 abstracts extracted from the six most influential journals in medical education published since 1988. Twenty-nine major themes were identified, of which student assessment, clinical and communication skills, clinical clerkships, and problem-based learning were the most prominent ones. Some of these themes, such as multiple-choice examinations or computer-assisted instruction seemed to have had their day, whereas other topics, such as the study of clinical clerkships, clinical reasoning, and scholarship in education were on their way up. Medical education research turned out to be a thoroughly international affair to which both US and European research centers contribute. The medical education literature shows an overwhelming emphasis on the preparation of medical students for professional practice. Moreover, the emphasis is very much on the individual student; most research seems to have been conducted with a psychological perspective in mind. It is argued that medical education research would profit from broadening its scope, including sociological, economical, ecological, and system perspectives. These perspectives might bring answers to new questions relevant to the quality of medical education. It is suggested that medical education is in need of moving beyond the conventional effectiveness-driven research approach to a more theory- and discovery-driven approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1382-4996</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1677</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10459-011-9328-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21971993</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Bibliometrics ; Clinical Competence - standards ; Clinical Competence - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Clinical Experience ; Content Analysis ; Education ; Education, Medical - standards ; Education, Medical - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Education, Medical - trends ; Europe ; Faculty, Medical - standards ; Faculty, Medical - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Graduate Students ; Higher Education ; Humans ; Journalism, Medical ; Medical Education ; Medical Students ; Multiple choice ; Problem Based Learning ; Qualitative research ; Research - manpower ; Research - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Research - trends ; Schools, Medical - standards ; Schools, Medical - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Schools, Medical - trends ; Teaching Methods ; Thinking Skills ; United States</subject><ispartof>Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice, 2012-10, Vol.17 (4), p.515-527</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011</rights><rights>Advances in Health Sciences Education is a copyright of Springer, (2011). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-f65e29055a674918928f960952b64db6d132b350922d86ea39a9c98d9b1e0fb93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-f65e29055a674918928f960952b64db6d132b350922d86ea39a9c98d9b1e0fb93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2259137493?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21378,21394,27924,27925,33611,33612,33877,33878,43733,43880</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ979812$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21971993$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rotgans, Jerome I.</creatorcontrib><title>The themes, institutions, and people of medical education research 1988–2010: content analysis of abstracts from six journals</title><title>Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice</title><addtitle>Adv in Health Sci Educ</addtitle><addtitle>Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract</addtitle><description>The present study aimed at providing an overview of the most common themes of research into medical education. Changes in frequency of occurrence of these themes over time and differences between US and European journals were studied. The most productive institutions and researchers in the field were examined. A content analysis was carried out on 10,168 abstracts extracted from the six most influential journals in medical education published since 1988. Twenty-nine major themes were identified, of which student assessment, clinical and communication skills, clinical clerkships, and problem-based learning were the most prominent ones. Some of these themes, such as multiple-choice examinations or computer-assisted instruction seemed to have had their day, whereas other topics, such as the study of clinical clerkships, clinical reasoning, and scholarship in education were on their way up. Medical education research turned out to be a thoroughly international affair to which both US and European research centers contribute. The medical education literature shows an overwhelming emphasis on the preparation of medical students for professional practice. Moreover, the emphasis is very much on the individual student; most research seems to have been conducted with a psychological perspective in mind. It is argued that medical education research would profit from broadening its scope, including sociological, economical, ecological, and system perspectives. These perspectives might bring answers to new questions relevant to the quality of medical education. It is suggested that medical education is in need of moving beyond the conventional effectiveness-driven research approach to a more theory- and discovery-driven approach.</description><subject>Bibliometrics</subject><subject>Clinical Competence - standards</subject><subject>Clinical Competence - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Clinical Experience</subject><subject>Content Analysis</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Education, Medical - standards</subject><subject>Education, Medical - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Education, Medical - trends</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Faculty, Medical - standards</subject><subject>Faculty, Medical - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Graduate Students</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Journalism, Medical</subject><subject>Medical Education</subject><subject>Medical Students</subject><subject>Multiple choice</subject><subject>Problem Based Learning</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Research - manpower</subject><subject>Research - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Research - trends</subject><subject>Schools, Medical - standards</subject><subject>Schools, Medical - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Schools, Medical - trends</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Thinking Skills</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1382-4996</issn><issn>1573-1677</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc2KFTEQhYMozjj6AIJIwI0LW1PJ7XRqdjKMfwy4Gdchna72Zuifa5KGOyt9B9_QJzHXnhlBcFUJ9Z2qQx3GnoJ4DUI0bxKITY2VAKhQSVPt77FjqBtVgW6a--WtjKw2iPqIPUrpSgihwJiH7EgCNoCojtn3yy3xvKWR0iseppRDXnKYp_JzU8d3NO8G4nPPR-qCdwOnbvHuQPBIiVz0Ww5ozK8fP6UAccr9PGWaclG74TqFdNC6NuXofE68j_PIU9jzq3mJhUiP2YO-FHpyU0_Yl3fnl2cfqovP7z-evb2ovEKVq17XJFHUtdPNBsGgND1qgbVs9aZrdQdKtqoWKGVnNDmFDj2aDlsg0beoTtjLde4uzt8WStmOIXkaBjfRvCQLotxKNhpkQV_8g96atVLWCKo4UIWClfJxTilSb3cxjC5el1H2kI5d07ElHXtIx-6L5vnN5KUt97xT3MZRgGcrQDH4u_b5J2zQ_HEm13Yqrekrxb_O_r_0N9cbo_I</recordid><startdate>20121001</startdate><enddate>20121001</enddate><creator>Rotgans, Jerome I.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121001</creationdate><title>The themes, institutions, and people of medical education research 1988–2010: content analysis of abstracts from six journals</title><author>Rotgans, Jerome I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-f65e29055a674918928f960952b64db6d132b350922d86ea39a9c98d9b1e0fb93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Bibliometrics</topic><topic>Clinical Competence - standards</topic><topic>Clinical Competence - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Clinical Experience</topic><topic>Content Analysis</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Education, Medical - standards</topic><topic>Education, Medical - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Education, Medical - trends</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Faculty, Medical - standards</topic><topic>Faculty, Medical - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Graduate Students</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Journalism, Medical</topic><topic>Medical Education</topic><topic>Medical Students</topic><topic>Multiple choice</topic><topic>Problem Based Learning</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Research - manpower</topic><topic>Research - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Research - trends</topic><topic>Schools, Medical - standards</topic><topic>Schools, Medical - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Schools, Medical - trends</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Thinking Skills</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rotgans, Jerome I.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rotgans, Jerome I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ979812</ericid><atitle>The themes, institutions, and people of medical education research 1988–2010: content analysis of abstracts from six journals</atitle><jtitle>Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice</jtitle><stitle>Adv in Health Sci Educ</stitle><addtitle>Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract</addtitle><date>2012-10-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>515</spage><epage>527</epage><pages>515-527</pages><issn>1382-4996</issn><eissn>1573-1677</eissn><abstract>The present study aimed at providing an overview of the most common themes of research into medical education. Changes in frequency of occurrence of these themes over time and differences between US and European journals were studied. The most productive institutions and researchers in the field were examined. A content analysis was carried out on 10,168 abstracts extracted from the six most influential journals in medical education published since 1988. Twenty-nine major themes were identified, of which student assessment, clinical and communication skills, clinical clerkships, and problem-based learning were the most prominent ones. Some of these themes, such as multiple-choice examinations or computer-assisted instruction seemed to have had their day, whereas other topics, such as the study of clinical clerkships, clinical reasoning, and scholarship in education were on their way up. Medical education research turned out to be a thoroughly international affair to which both US and European research centers contribute. The medical education literature shows an overwhelming emphasis on the preparation of medical students for professional practice. Moreover, the emphasis is very much on the individual student; most research seems to have been conducted with a psychological perspective in mind. It is argued that medical education research would profit from broadening its scope, including sociological, economical, ecological, and system perspectives. These perspectives might bring answers to new questions relevant to the quality of medical education. It is suggested that medical education is in need of moving beyond the conventional effectiveness-driven research approach to a more theory- and discovery-driven approach.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>21971993</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10459-011-9328-x</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1382-4996
ispartof Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice, 2012-10, Vol.17 (4), p.515-527
issn 1382-4996
1573-1677
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1038227612
source Social Science Premium Collection; Springer Nature; ERIC; Education Collection
subjects Bibliometrics
Clinical Competence - standards
Clinical Competence - statistics & numerical data
Clinical Experience
Content Analysis
Education
Education, Medical - standards
Education, Medical - statistics & numerical data
Education, Medical - trends
Europe
Faculty, Medical - standards
Faculty, Medical - statistics & numerical data
Graduate Students
Higher Education
Humans
Journalism, Medical
Medical Education
Medical Students
Multiple choice
Problem Based Learning
Qualitative research
Research - manpower
Research - statistics & numerical data
Research - trends
Schools, Medical - standards
Schools, Medical - statistics & numerical data
Schools, Medical - trends
Teaching Methods
Thinking Skills
United States
title The themes, institutions, and people of medical education research 1988–2010: content analysis of abstracts from six journals
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T17%3A35%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20themes,%20institutions,%20and%20people%20of%20medical%20education%20research%201988%E2%80%932010:%20content%20analysis%20of%20abstracts%20from%20six%20journals&rft.jtitle=Advances%20in%20health%20sciences%20education%20:%20theory%20and%20practice&rft.au=Rotgans,%20Jerome%20I.&rft.date=2012-10-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=515&rft.epage=527&rft.pages=515-527&rft.issn=1382-4996&rft.eissn=1573-1677&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10459-011-9328-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1038227612%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-f65e29055a674918928f960952b64db6d132b350922d86ea39a9c98d9b1e0fb93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2259137493&rft_id=info:pmid/21971993&rft_ericid=EJ979812&rfr_iscdi=true