Loading…

Current aesthetic use of abobotulinumtoxinA in clinical practice: an evidence-based consensus review

The amount and complexity of scientific and clinical evidence for aesthetic use of botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) has expanded rapidly in recent years, especially for abobotulinumtoxinA, necessitating reassessment of current knowledge about aesthetic use of abobotulinumtoxinA and other BoNT-A...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Aesthetic surgery journal 2012-09, Vol.32 (1 Suppl), p.8S-29S
Main Authors: Maas, Corey, Kane, Michael A C, Bucay, Vivian W, Allen, Shawn, Applebaum, David J, Baumann, Leslie, Cox, Sue Ellen, Few, Julius W, Joseph, John H, Lorenc, Z Paul, Moradi, Amir, Nestor, Mark S, Schlessinger, Joel, Wortzman, Mitchell, Lawrence, Ira, Lin, Xiaoming, Nelson, Diane
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-3ae90d444a3edef5904e117508f5bcb58aa85055f6105168efd2baa3d4fbe0ab3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-3ae90d444a3edef5904e117508f5bcb58aa85055f6105168efd2baa3d4fbe0ab3
container_end_page 29S
container_issue 1 Suppl
container_start_page 8S
container_title Aesthetic surgery journal
container_volume 32
creator Maas, Corey
Kane, Michael A C
Bucay, Vivian W
Allen, Shawn
Applebaum, David J
Baumann, Leslie
Cox, Sue Ellen
Few, Julius W
Joseph, John H
Lorenc, Z Paul
Moradi, Amir
Nestor, Mark S
Schlessinger, Joel
Wortzman, Mitchell
Lawrence, Ira
Lin, Xiaoming
Nelson, Diane
description The amount and complexity of scientific and clinical evidence for aesthetic use of botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) has expanded rapidly in recent years, especially for abobotulinumtoxinA, necessitating reassessment of current knowledge about aesthetic use of abobotulinumtoxinA and other BoNT-A preparations. A committee of 13 plastic surgeons, facial plastic surgeons, and dermatologists engaged in a live discussion of information from a systematic literature review and an Internet-based survey of their beliefs and practices. The committee achieved consensus on most issues. It was concluded that doses of different BoNT-A preparations cannot be interconverted with a fixed ratio. The size of the "field of effect" is difficult to measure, and comparisons between preparations have yielded equivocal results. Nonresponse due to neutralizing antibodies appears exceedingly rare with currently available BoNT-A preparations and of little concern clinically. BoNT-A dose, injection depth, and injection technique should be adjusted according to the anatomic area being treated and each patient's individual characteristics and goals. Aesthetic use of BoNT-A has a good safety profile. Most adverse events are minor and related to the trauma of injection, although special care is needed in certain anatomic areas. Detailed recommendations for treatment of different anatomic areas are presented. BoNT-A products are often used in conjunction with other treatment modalities (eg, fillers and resurfacing), but little agreement was reached on best practices. The findings reported in this consensus document may serve as a practical guide for aesthetic practitioners as they apply the latest knowledge about BoNT-A in providing their patients with optimal care.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1090820X12455192
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1039885796</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1039885796</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-3ae90d444a3edef5904e117508f5bcb58aa85055f6105168efd2baa3d4fbe0ab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEtPwzAQhC0EoqVw54R85BJYx3Yac6sqXlIlLiD1FvmxEUGJU-yEx7_HVQsHTrur-WalGULOGVwxNp9fM1BQ5rBmuZCSqfyATJnM5xnnsD5Me5KzrT4hJzG-AYDihTgmkzxXgikGU-KWYwjoB6oxDq84NJaOEWlfU2160w9j2_ixG_qvxi9o46lNd2N1SzdB20TjDdWe4kfj0FvMjI7oqO19RB_HSENS8POUHNW6jXi2nzPycnf7vHzIVk_3j8vFKrO5UkPGNSpwQgjN0WEtFQhMMSWUtTTWyFLrUoKUdcFAsqLE2uVGa-5EbRC04TNyufu7Cf37mAJVXRMttq322I-xYsBVWcq5KhIKO9SGPsaAdbUJTafDd4KqbbfV_26T5WL_fTQduj_Db5n8ByUhdis</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1039885796</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Current aesthetic use of abobotulinumtoxinA in clinical practice: an evidence-based consensus review</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Maas, Corey ; Kane, Michael A C ; Bucay, Vivian W ; Allen, Shawn ; Applebaum, David J ; Baumann, Leslie ; Cox, Sue Ellen ; Few, Julius W ; Joseph, John H ; Lorenc, Z Paul ; Moradi, Amir ; Nestor, Mark S ; Schlessinger, Joel ; Wortzman, Mitchell ; Lawrence, Ira ; Lin, Xiaoming ; Nelson, Diane</creator><creatorcontrib>Maas, Corey ; Kane, Michael A C ; Bucay, Vivian W ; Allen, Shawn ; Applebaum, David J ; Baumann, Leslie ; Cox, Sue Ellen ; Few, Julius W ; Joseph, John H ; Lorenc, Z Paul ; Moradi, Amir ; Nestor, Mark S ; Schlessinger, Joel ; Wortzman, Mitchell ; Lawrence, Ira ; Lin, Xiaoming ; Nelson, Diane ; Consensus Committee ; Technology Consultants</creatorcontrib><description>The amount and complexity of scientific and clinical evidence for aesthetic use of botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) has expanded rapidly in recent years, especially for abobotulinumtoxinA, necessitating reassessment of current knowledge about aesthetic use of abobotulinumtoxinA and other BoNT-A preparations. A committee of 13 plastic surgeons, facial plastic surgeons, and dermatologists engaged in a live discussion of information from a systematic literature review and an Internet-based survey of their beliefs and practices. The committee achieved consensus on most issues. It was concluded that doses of different BoNT-A preparations cannot be interconverted with a fixed ratio. The size of the "field of effect" is difficult to measure, and comparisons between preparations have yielded equivocal results. Nonresponse due to neutralizing antibodies appears exceedingly rare with currently available BoNT-A preparations and of little concern clinically. BoNT-A dose, injection depth, and injection technique should be adjusted according to the anatomic area being treated and each patient's individual characteristics and goals. Aesthetic use of BoNT-A has a good safety profile. Most adverse events are minor and related to the trauma of injection, although special care is needed in certain anatomic areas. Detailed recommendations for treatment of different anatomic areas are presented. BoNT-A products are often used in conjunction with other treatment modalities (eg, fillers and resurfacing), but little agreement was reached on best practices. The findings reported in this consensus document may serve as a practical guide for aesthetic practitioners as they apply the latest knowledge about BoNT-A in providing their patients with optimal care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1090-820X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-330X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1090820X12455192</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22941910</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Antibodies, Neutralizing - immunology ; Botulinum Toxins, Type A - administration &amp; dosage ; Botulinum Toxins, Type A - adverse effects ; Cosmetic Techniques ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Evidence-Based Medicine ; Humans ; Injections ; Neurotoxins - administration &amp; dosage ; Neurotoxins - adverse effects</subject><ispartof>Aesthetic surgery journal, 2012-09, Vol.32 (1 Suppl), p.8S-29S</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-3ae90d444a3edef5904e117508f5bcb58aa85055f6105168efd2baa3d4fbe0ab3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-3ae90d444a3edef5904e117508f5bcb58aa85055f6105168efd2baa3d4fbe0ab3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22941910$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maas, Corey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kane, Michael A C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bucay, Vivian W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Shawn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Applebaum, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baumann, Leslie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cox, Sue Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Few, Julius W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joseph, John H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lorenc, Z Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moradi, Amir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nestor, Mark S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlessinger, Joel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wortzman, Mitchell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence, Ira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Xiaoming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Consensus Committee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Technology Consultants</creatorcontrib><title>Current aesthetic use of abobotulinumtoxinA in clinical practice: an evidence-based consensus review</title><title>Aesthetic surgery journal</title><addtitle>Aesthet Surg J</addtitle><description>The amount and complexity of scientific and clinical evidence for aesthetic use of botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) has expanded rapidly in recent years, especially for abobotulinumtoxinA, necessitating reassessment of current knowledge about aesthetic use of abobotulinumtoxinA and other BoNT-A preparations. A committee of 13 plastic surgeons, facial plastic surgeons, and dermatologists engaged in a live discussion of information from a systematic literature review and an Internet-based survey of their beliefs and practices. The committee achieved consensus on most issues. It was concluded that doses of different BoNT-A preparations cannot be interconverted with a fixed ratio. The size of the "field of effect" is difficult to measure, and comparisons between preparations have yielded equivocal results. Nonresponse due to neutralizing antibodies appears exceedingly rare with currently available BoNT-A preparations and of little concern clinically. BoNT-A dose, injection depth, and injection technique should be adjusted according to the anatomic area being treated and each patient's individual characteristics and goals. Aesthetic use of BoNT-A has a good safety profile. Most adverse events are minor and related to the trauma of injection, although special care is needed in certain anatomic areas. Detailed recommendations for treatment of different anatomic areas are presented. BoNT-A products are often used in conjunction with other treatment modalities (eg, fillers and resurfacing), but little agreement was reached on best practices. The findings reported in this consensus document may serve as a practical guide for aesthetic practitioners as they apply the latest knowledge about BoNT-A in providing their patients with optimal care.</description><subject>Antibodies, Neutralizing - immunology</subject><subject>Botulinum Toxins, Type A - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Botulinum Toxins, Type A - adverse effects</subject><subject>Cosmetic Techniques</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injections</subject><subject>Neurotoxins - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Neurotoxins - adverse effects</subject><issn>1090-820X</issn><issn>1527-330X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkEtPwzAQhC0EoqVw54R85BJYx3Yac6sqXlIlLiD1FvmxEUGJU-yEx7_HVQsHTrur-WalGULOGVwxNp9fM1BQ5rBmuZCSqfyATJnM5xnnsD5Me5KzrT4hJzG-AYDihTgmkzxXgikGU-KWYwjoB6oxDq84NJaOEWlfU2160w9j2_ixG_qvxi9o46lNd2N1SzdB20TjDdWe4kfj0FvMjI7oqO19RB_HSENS8POUHNW6jXi2nzPycnf7vHzIVk_3j8vFKrO5UkPGNSpwQgjN0WEtFQhMMSWUtTTWyFLrUoKUdcFAsqLE2uVGa-5EbRC04TNyufu7Cf37mAJVXRMttq322I-xYsBVWcq5KhIKO9SGPsaAdbUJTafDd4KqbbfV_26T5WL_fTQduj_Db5n8ByUhdis</recordid><startdate>20120901</startdate><enddate>20120901</enddate><creator>Maas, Corey</creator><creator>Kane, Michael A C</creator><creator>Bucay, Vivian W</creator><creator>Allen, Shawn</creator><creator>Applebaum, David J</creator><creator>Baumann, Leslie</creator><creator>Cox, Sue Ellen</creator><creator>Few, Julius W</creator><creator>Joseph, John H</creator><creator>Lorenc, Z Paul</creator><creator>Moradi, Amir</creator><creator>Nestor, Mark S</creator><creator>Schlessinger, Joel</creator><creator>Wortzman, Mitchell</creator><creator>Lawrence, Ira</creator><creator>Lin, Xiaoming</creator><creator>Nelson, Diane</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120901</creationdate><title>Current aesthetic use of abobotulinumtoxinA in clinical practice: an evidence-based consensus review</title><author>Maas, Corey ; Kane, Michael A C ; Bucay, Vivian W ; Allen, Shawn ; Applebaum, David J ; Baumann, Leslie ; Cox, Sue Ellen ; Few, Julius W ; Joseph, John H ; Lorenc, Z Paul ; Moradi, Amir ; Nestor, Mark S ; Schlessinger, Joel ; Wortzman, Mitchell ; Lawrence, Ira ; Lin, Xiaoming ; Nelson, Diane</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-3ae90d444a3edef5904e117508f5bcb58aa85055f6105168efd2baa3d4fbe0ab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Antibodies, Neutralizing - immunology</topic><topic>Botulinum Toxins, Type A - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Botulinum Toxins, Type A - adverse effects</topic><topic>Cosmetic Techniques</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injections</topic><topic>Neurotoxins - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Neurotoxins - adverse effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maas, Corey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kane, Michael A C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bucay, Vivian W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Shawn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Applebaum, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baumann, Leslie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cox, Sue Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Few, Julius W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joseph, John H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lorenc, Z Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moradi, Amir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nestor, Mark S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlessinger, Joel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wortzman, Mitchell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence, Ira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Xiaoming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Consensus Committee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Technology Consultants</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Aesthetic surgery journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maas, Corey</au><au>Kane, Michael A C</au><au>Bucay, Vivian W</au><au>Allen, Shawn</au><au>Applebaum, David J</au><au>Baumann, Leslie</au><au>Cox, Sue Ellen</au><au>Few, Julius W</au><au>Joseph, John H</au><au>Lorenc, Z Paul</au><au>Moradi, Amir</au><au>Nestor, Mark S</au><au>Schlessinger, Joel</au><au>Wortzman, Mitchell</au><au>Lawrence, Ira</au><au>Lin, Xiaoming</au><au>Nelson, Diane</au><aucorp>Consensus Committee</aucorp><aucorp>Technology Consultants</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Current aesthetic use of abobotulinumtoxinA in clinical practice: an evidence-based consensus review</atitle><jtitle>Aesthetic surgery journal</jtitle><addtitle>Aesthet Surg J</addtitle><date>2012-09-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>1 Suppl</issue><spage>8S</spage><epage>29S</epage><pages>8S-29S</pages><issn>1090-820X</issn><eissn>1527-330X</eissn><abstract>The amount and complexity of scientific and clinical evidence for aesthetic use of botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) has expanded rapidly in recent years, especially for abobotulinumtoxinA, necessitating reassessment of current knowledge about aesthetic use of abobotulinumtoxinA and other BoNT-A preparations. A committee of 13 plastic surgeons, facial plastic surgeons, and dermatologists engaged in a live discussion of information from a systematic literature review and an Internet-based survey of their beliefs and practices. The committee achieved consensus on most issues. It was concluded that doses of different BoNT-A preparations cannot be interconverted with a fixed ratio. The size of the "field of effect" is difficult to measure, and comparisons between preparations have yielded equivocal results. Nonresponse due to neutralizing antibodies appears exceedingly rare with currently available BoNT-A preparations and of little concern clinically. BoNT-A dose, injection depth, and injection technique should be adjusted according to the anatomic area being treated and each patient's individual characteristics and goals. Aesthetic use of BoNT-A has a good safety profile. Most adverse events are minor and related to the trauma of injection, although special care is needed in certain anatomic areas. Detailed recommendations for treatment of different anatomic areas are presented. BoNT-A products are often used in conjunction with other treatment modalities (eg, fillers and resurfacing), but little agreement was reached on best practices. The findings reported in this consensus document may serve as a practical guide for aesthetic practitioners as they apply the latest knowledge about BoNT-A in providing their patients with optimal care.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>22941910</pmid><doi>10.1177/1090820X12455192</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1090-820X
ispartof Aesthetic surgery journal, 2012-09, Vol.32 (1 Suppl), p.8S-29S
issn 1090-820X
1527-330X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1039885796
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects Antibodies, Neutralizing - immunology
Botulinum Toxins, Type A - administration & dosage
Botulinum Toxins, Type A - adverse effects
Cosmetic Techniques
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Evidence-Based Medicine
Humans
Injections
Neurotoxins - administration & dosage
Neurotoxins - adverse effects
title Current aesthetic use of abobotulinumtoxinA in clinical practice: an evidence-based consensus review
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T22%3A34%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Current%20aesthetic%20use%20of%20abobotulinumtoxinA%20in%20clinical%20practice:%20an%20evidence-based%20consensus%20review&rft.jtitle=Aesthetic%20surgery%20journal&rft.au=Maas,%20Corey&rft.aucorp=Consensus%20Committee&rft.date=2012-09-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=1%20Suppl&rft.spage=8S&rft.epage=29S&rft.pages=8S-29S&rft.issn=1090-820X&rft.eissn=1527-330X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1090820X12455192&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1039885796%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-3ae90d444a3edef5904e117508f5bcb58aa85055f6105168efd2baa3d4fbe0ab3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1039885796&rft_id=info:pmid/22941910&rfr_iscdi=true