Loading…

Evaluation of the use of a rapid diagnostic consultation of lung cancer. Delay time of diagnosis and therapy

To analyze the results obtained in a lung cancer screening program since its inception five years ago regarding correct referrals, diagnostic and therapeutic delay times and days of hospitalization. To compare the diagnostic-therapeutic delays and hospital stays with those obtained in patients evalu...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Archivos de bronconeumología (English ed.) 2012-08, Vol.48 (8), p.267-273
Main Authors:	Hueto Pérez De Heredia, Javier, Cebollero Rivas, Pilar, Cascante Rodrigo, José Antonio, Andrade Vela, Isabel, Pascal Martínez, Idoya, Boldú Mitjans, Joan, Eguía Astibia, Víctor Manuel
Format:	Article
Language:	eng ; spa
Subjects:	Aged Ambulatory Care - statistics & numerical data Delayed Diagnosis Diagnostic Techniques, Respiratory System - utilization Female Hospitalization - statistics & numerical data Humans Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data Lung Diseases - diagnosis Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis Lung Neoplasms - pathology Lung Neoplasms - therapy Male Mass Screening - methods Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data Mass Screening - utilization Middle Aged Neoplasm Staging Referral and Consultation Retrospective Studies Socioeconomic Factors Spain - epidemiology Time Factors
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

cited_by
cites
container_end_page	273
container_issue	8
container_start_page	267
container_title	Archivos de bronconeumología (English ed.)
container_volume	48
creator	Hueto Pérez De Heredia, Javier Cebollero Rivas, Pilar Cascante Rodrigo, José Antonio Andrade Vela, Isabel Pascal Martínez, Idoya Boldú Mitjans, Joan Eguía Astibia, Víctor Manuel
description	To analyze the results obtained in a lung cancer screening program since its inception five years ago regarding correct referrals, diagnostic and therapeutic delay times and days of hospitalization. To compare the diagnostic-therapeutic delays and hospital stays with those obtained in patients evaluated with the standard system. Included for study were all those patients evaluated in our Lung Cancer Screening Program (LCSP) in the last five years. For the cases with LC, we recorded the dates the patients were referred to a specialist, the first consultation, diagnostic tests, stage, start of treatment and days of hospitalization. We compared these same data with lung cancer patients who did not partake in the LCSP and were diagnosed between October 2008 and October 2010. We evaluated 179 patients remitted to the LCSP, which represented 26.7% of the consultations; 166 (92.7%) of the referrals were correct, out of which 44.5% were LC. In 75.6% of these, the entire study was completed in the outpatient setting, and more than 85% of the cases met the current recommendations related with diagnostic-therapeutic delays. When these results were compared with the non-LCSP group (n=151), differences were found in the data for hospitalizations: there was a lower percentage of hospitalizations (P
doi_str_mv	10.1016/j.arbres.2012.03.009
format	article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1039887799</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1039887799</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p141t-cce935466036ea863ec107364ddacd08cdfb26707bc0090b5db04e8058cbd7683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMtOwzAQRS0kREvhDxDykk3CTJzYzhKV8pAqsYF15FeLK8cJcYLUv6dAYTV3ce6R7hByhZAjIL_d5WrQg0t5AVjkwHKA-oTMsRJ1VmBRz8h5SjsAzhHxjMyKohKVRJyTsPpUYVKj7yLtNnR8d3RK7jsqOqjeW2q92sYujd5Q08U0hfGfDlPcUqOicUNO711Qezr69qd9bPlEVbTf2oNsf0FONyokd3m8C_L2sHpdPmXrl8fn5d0667HEMTPG1awqOQfGnZKcOYMgGC-tVcaCNHajCy5AaHPYCbqyGkonoZJGW8ElW5CbX28_dB-TS2PT-mRcCCq6bkoNAqulFKKuD-j1EZ1062zTD75Vw775-xD7AlKbaPY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1039887799</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of the use of a rapid diagnostic consultation of lung cancer. Delay time of diagnosis and therapy</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Hueto Pérez De Heredia, Javier ; Cebollero Rivas, Pilar ; Cascante Rodrigo, José Antonio ; Andrade Vela, Isabel ; Pascal Martínez, Idoya ; Boldú Mitjans, Joan ; Eguía Astibia, Víctor Manuel</creator><creatorcontrib>Hueto Pérez De Heredia, Javier ; Cebollero Rivas, Pilar ; Cascante Rodrigo, José Antonio ; Andrade Vela, Isabel ; Pascal Martínez, Idoya ; Boldú Mitjans, Joan ; Eguía Astibia, Víctor Manuel</creatorcontrib><description>To analyze the results obtained in a lung cancer screening program since its inception five years ago regarding correct referrals, diagnostic and therapeutic delay times and days of hospitalization. To compare the diagnostic-therapeutic delays and hospital stays with those obtained in patients evaluated with the standard system. Included for study were all those patients evaluated in our Lung Cancer Screening Program (LCSP) in the last five years. For the cases with LC, we recorded the dates the patients were referred to a specialist, the first consultation, diagnostic tests, stage, start of treatment and days of hospitalization. We compared these same data with lung cancer patients who did not partake in the LCSP and were diagnosed between October 2008 and October 2010. We evaluated 179 patients remitted to the LCSP, which represented 26.7% of the consultations; 166 (92.7%) of the referrals were correct, out of which 44.5% were LC. In 75.6% of these, the entire study was completed in the outpatient setting, and more than 85% of the cases met the current recommendations related with diagnostic-therapeutic delays. When these results were compared with the non-LCSP group (n=151), differences were found in the data for hospitalizations: there was a lower percentage of hospitalizations (P<.0001) and shorter hospital stays (P<.0001) in the LCSP group. There were no differences between the two groups for diagnostic or therapeutic delays. In our setting, lung cancer screening programs allow for cancer studies to be carried out in the outpatient consultations in a large percentage of cases, and within the time periods recommended by current guidelines. In spite of this fact, we have detected that these programs are underused.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1579-2129</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.arbres.2012.03.009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22575811</identifier><language>eng ; spa</language><publisher>Spain</publisher><subject>Aged ; Ambulatory Care - statistics & numerical data ; Delayed Diagnosis ; Diagnostic Techniques, Respiratory System - utilization ; Female ; Hospitalization - statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data ; Lung Diseases - diagnosis ; Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Lung Neoplasms - pathology ; Lung Neoplasms - therapy ; Male ; Mass Screening - methods ; Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data ; Mass Screening - utilization ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging ; Referral and Consultation ; Retrospective Studies ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Spain - epidemiology ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Archivos de bronconeumología (English ed.), 2012-08, Vol.48 (8), p.267-273</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 SEPAR. Published by Elsevier Espana. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22575811$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hueto Pérez De Heredia, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cebollero Rivas, Pilar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cascante Rodrigo, José Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrade Vela, Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pascal Martínez, Idoya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boldú Mitjans, Joan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eguía Astibia, Víctor Manuel</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of the use of a rapid diagnostic consultation of lung cancer. Delay time of diagnosis and therapy</title><title>Archivos de bronconeumología (English ed.)</title><addtitle>Arch Bronconeumol</addtitle><description>To analyze the results obtained in a lung cancer screening program since its inception five years ago regarding correct referrals, diagnostic and therapeutic delay times and days of hospitalization. To compare the diagnostic-therapeutic delays and hospital stays with those obtained in patients evaluated with the standard system. Included for study were all those patients evaluated in our Lung Cancer Screening Program (LCSP) in the last five years. For the cases with LC, we recorded the dates the patients were referred to a specialist, the first consultation, diagnostic tests, stage, start of treatment and days of hospitalization. We compared these same data with lung cancer patients who did not partake in the LCSP and were diagnosed between October 2008 and October 2010. We evaluated 179 patients remitted to the LCSP, which represented 26.7% of the consultations; 166 (92.7%) of the referrals were correct, out of which 44.5% were LC. In 75.6% of these, the entire study was completed in the outpatient setting, and more than 85% of the cases met the current recommendations related with diagnostic-therapeutic delays. When these results were compared with the non-LCSP group (n=151), differences were found in the data for hospitalizations: there was a lower percentage of hospitalizations (P<.0001) and shorter hospital stays (P<.0001) in the LCSP group. There were no differences between the two groups for diagnostic or therapeutic delays. In our setting, lung cancer screening programs allow for cancer studies to be carried out in the outpatient consultations in a large percentage of cases, and within the time periods recommended by current guidelines. In spite of this fact, we have detected that these programs are underused.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Ambulatory Care - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Delayed Diagnosis</subject><subject>Diagnostic Techniques, Respiratory System - utilization</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospitalization - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Lung Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mass Screening - methods</subject><subject>Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Mass Screening - utilization</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Spain - epidemiology</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>1579-2129</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kMtOwzAQRS0kREvhDxDykk3CTJzYzhKV8pAqsYF15FeLK8cJcYLUv6dAYTV3ce6R7hByhZAjIL_d5WrQg0t5AVjkwHKA-oTMsRJ1VmBRz8h5SjsAzhHxjMyKohKVRJyTsPpUYVKj7yLtNnR8d3RK7jsqOqjeW2q92sYujd5Q08U0hfGfDlPcUqOicUNO711Qezr69qd9bPlEVbTf2oNsf0FONyokd3m8C_L2sHpdPmXrl8fn5d0667HEMTPG1awqOQfGnZKcOYMgGC-tVcaCNHajCy5AaHPYCbqyGkonoZJGW8ElW5CbX28_dB-TS2PT-mRcCCq6bkoNAqulFKKuD-j1EZ1062zTD75Vw775-xD7AlKbaPY</recordid><startdate>201208</startdate><enddate>201208</enddate><creator>Hueto Pérez De Heredia, Javier</creator><creator>Cebollero Rivas, Pilar</creator><creator>Cascante Rodrigo, José Antonio</creator><creator>Andrade Vela, Isabel</creator><creator>Pascal Martínez, Idoya</creator><creator>Boldú Mitjans, Joan</creator><creator>Eguía Astibia, Víctor Manuel</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201208</creationdate><title>Evaluation of the use of a rapid diagnostic consultation of lung cancer. Delay time of diagnosis and therapy</title><author>Hueto Pérez De Heredia, Javier ; Cebollero Rivas, Pilar ; Cascante Rodrigo, José Antonio ; Andrade Vela, Isabel ; Pascal Martínez, Idoya ; Boldú Mitjans, Joan ; Eguía Astibia, Víctor Manuel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p141t-cce935466036ea863ec107364ddacd08cdfb26707bc0090b5db04e8058cbd7683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; spa</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Ambulatory Care - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Delayed Diagnosis</topic><topic>Diagnostic Techniques, Respiratory System - utilization</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospitalization - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Lung Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mass Screening - methods</topic><topic>Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Mass Screening - utilization</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Spain - epidemiology</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hueto Pérez De Heredia, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cebollero Rivas, Pilar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cascante Rodrigo, José Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrade Vela, Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pascal Martínez, Idoya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boldú Mitjans, Joan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eguía Astibia, Víctor Manuel</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archivos de bronconeumología (English ed.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hueto Pérez De Heredia, Javier</au><au>Cebollero Rivas, Pilar</au><au>Cascante Rodrigo, José Antonio</au><au>Andrade Vela, Isabel</au><au>Pascal Martínez, Idoya</au><au>Boldú Mitjans, Joan</au><au>Eguía Astibia, Víctor Manuel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of the use of a rapid diagnostic consultation of lung cancer. Delay time of diagnosis and therapy</atitle><jtitle>Archivos de bronconeumología (English ed.)</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Bronconeumol</addtitle><date>2012-08</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>267</spage><epage>273</epage><pages>267-273</pages><eissn>1579-2129</eissn><abstract>To analyze the results obtained in a lung cancer screening program since its inception five years ago regarding correct referrals, diagnostic and therapeutic delay times and days of hospitalization. To compare the diagnostic-therapeutic delays and hospital stays with those obtained in patients evaluated with the standard system. Included for study were all those patients evaluated in our Lung Cancer Screening Program (LCSP) in the last five years. For the cases with LC, we recorded the dates the patients were referred to a specialist, the first consultation, diagnostic tests, stage, start of treatment and days of hospitalization. We compared these same data with lung cancer patients who did not partake in the LCSP and were diagnosed between October 2008 and October 2010. We evaluated 179 patients remitted to the LCSP, which represented 26.7% of the consultations; 166 (92.7%) of the referrals were correct, out of which 44.5% were LC. In 75.6% of these, the entire study was completed in the outpatient setting, and more than 85% of the cases met the current recommendations related with diagnostic-therapeutic delays. When these results were compared with the non-LCSP group (n=151), differences were found in the data for hospitalizations: there was a lower percentage of hospitalizations (P<.0001) and shorter hospital stays (P<.0001) in the LCSP group. There were no differences between the two groups for diagnostic or therapeutic delays. In our setting, lung cancer screening programs allow for cancer studies to be carried out in the outpatient consultations in a large percentage of cases, and within the time periods recommended by current guidelines. In spite of this fact, we have detected that these programs are underused.</abstract><cop>Spain</cop><pmid>22575811</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.arbres.2012.03.009</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	EISSN: 1579-2129
ispartof	Archivos de bronconeumología (English ed.), 2012-08, Vol.48 (8), p.267-273
issn	1579-2129
language	eng ; spa
recordid	cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1039887799
source	ScienceDirect Freedom Collection; ScienceDirect Journals
subjects	Aged Ambulatory Care - statistics & numerical data Delayed Diagnosis Diagnostic Techniques, Respiratory System - utilization Female Hospitalization - statistics & numerical data Humans Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data Lung Diseases - diagnosis Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis Lung Neoplasms - pathology Lung Neoplasms - therapy Male Mass Screening - methods Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data Mass Screening - utilization Middle Aged Neoplasm Staging Referral and Consultation Retrospective Studies Socioeconomic Factors Spain - epidemiology Time Factors
title	Evaluation of the use of a rapid diagnostic consultation of lung cancer. Delay time of diagnosis and therapy
url	http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T20%3A16%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20the%20use%20of%20a%20rapid%20diagnostic%20consultation%20of%20lung%20cancer.%20Delay%20time%20of%20diagnosis%20and%20therapy&rft.jtitle=Archivos%20de%20bronconeumologi%CC%81a%20(English%20ed.)&rft.au=Hueto%20P%C3%A9rez%20De%20Heredia,%20Javier&rft.date=2012-08&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=267&rft.epage=273&rft.pages=267-273&rft.eissn=1579-2129&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.arbres.2012.03.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1039887799%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p141t-cce935466036ea863ec107364ddacd08cdfb26707bc0090b5db04e8058cbd7683%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1039887799&rft_id=info:pmid/22575811&rfr_iscdi=true