Simplification of biotic ligand models of Cu, Ni, and Zn by 1-, 2-, and 3-parameter transfer functions

Biotic ligand models for calculation of watertype‐specific no effect concentrations are recognized as a major improvement in risk assessment of metals in surface waters. Model complexity and data requirement, however, hamper the regulatory implementation. To facilitate regulatory use, biotic ligand...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Integrated environmental assessment and management 2012-10, Vol.8 (4), p.738-748
Main Authors: Verschoor, Anja J, Vink, Jos PM, Vijver, Martina G
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Biotic ligand models
Carbon - analysis
Chemical speciation
Copper - toxicity
Dissolved organic carbon
Environmental Monitoring - methods
Linear Models
Metals
Models, Biological
Netherlands
Nickel - toxicity
Regression analysis
Regulatory tools
Risk Assessment
Speciation
Surface water
Water chemistry
Water Framework Directive
Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity
Zinc
Zinc - toxicity
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Biotic ligand models for calculation of watertype‐specific no effect concentrations are recognized as a major improvement in risk assessment of metals in surface waters. Model complexity and data requirement, however, hamper the regulatory implementation. To facilitate regulatory use, biotic ligand models (BLM) for the calculation of Ni, Cu, and Zn HC5 values were simplified to linear equations with an acceptable level of accuracy, requiring a maximum of 3 measured water chemistry parameters. In single‐parameter models, dissolved organic carbon (DOC) is the only significant parameter with an accuracy of 72%–75% to predict HC5s computed by the full BLMs. In 2‐parameter models, Mg, Ca, or pH are selected by stepwise multiple regression for Ni, Cu, and Zn HC5, respectively, and increase the accuracy to 87%–94%. The accuracy is further increased by addition of a third parameter to 88%–97%. Three‐parameter models have DOC and pH in common, the third parameter is Mg, Ca, or Na for HC5 of Ni, Cu, and Zn, respectively. Mechanisms of chemical speciation and competitive binding to the biotic ligand explain the selection of these parameters. User‐defined requirements, such as desired level of reliability and the availability of measured data, determine the selection of functions to predict HC5. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2012; 8: 738–748. © 2012 SETAC
ISSN:1551-3777
1551-3793
DOI:10.1002/ieam.1298