Environmental impact and cost analysis of coal versus nuclear power: The U.S. case

• Published in: Energy (Oxford) 2012-09, Vol.45 (1), p.31-42
• Main Authors: Vujic, Jasmina, Antic, Dragoljub P, Vukmirovic, Zorka
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: air; air pollution; Applied sciences; at-risk population; coal; cost analysis; cost effectiveness; effluents; electricity; Energy; environmental impact; Exact sciences and technology; greenhouse gas emissions; nuclear power; power plants; production technology; renewable energy sources; risk
• ISSN: 0360-5442
• DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2012.02.011

With all energy production systems there are environmental issues to be considered, risks to be assessed, and challenges to be addressed. It must be emphasized that an ideal energy source that is at the same time efficient, cost-effective, environment-friendly, and risk-free does not exist. There are always some necessary trade-offs to be made, in order to ensure optimal use of energy resources, while limiting environmental and health impacts. Nuclear energy is currently the only technology with a secure base-load electricity supply and no greenhouse gas emissions that has the potential to expand at a large scale. However, the spent fuel and safety issues must be addressed. Another base-load electricity source – the fossil-burning power plants – although affordable, emits various air pollutants (chemical and radioactive effluents, dust, ash, etc.), which are dispersed from a power source and transported through various pathways that could lead to the general population exposure. This paper summarizes current status and future trends in base-load electricity sources in the U.S., including environmental footprints, new regulatory requirements, and cost issues. It also presents an analysis of challenges that need to be overcome and opportunities that could us lead us closer to a sustainable energy future.