Loading…
Variability in habitat value of commercial salt production ponds: implications for waterbird management and tidal marsh restoration planning
Salt evaporation ponds are used in place of lost natural estuarine habitats for foraging and roosting by waterbirds around the world, but have started to be decommissioned in some areas due to low profitability. In San Francisco Bay, three former salt pond complexes (Alviso, Eden Landing, and Ravens...
Saved in:
Published in: | Hydrobiologia 2012-11, Vol.697 (1), p.139-155 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-25094f0a3b3264001ad08f4b3904d75e39893a7fd4b0612ffdeb25fa2172855f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-25094f0a3b3264001ad08f4b3904d75e39893a7fd4b0612ffdeb25fa2172855f3 |
container_end_page | 155 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 139 |
container_title | Hydrobiologia |
container_volume | 697 |
creator | Athearn, Nicole D. Takekawa, John Y. Bluso-Demers, Jill D. Shinn, Joel M. Arriana Brand, L. Robinson-Nilsen, Caitlin W. Strong, Cheryl M. |
description | Salt evaporation ponds are used in place of lost natural estuarine habitats for foraging and roosting by waterbirds around the world, but have started to be decommissioned in some areas due to low profitability. In San Francisco Bay, three former salt pond complexes (Alviso, Eden Landing, and Ravenswood) have been decommissioned, i.e., taken out of commission, and are planned for marsh restoration. We compared total and foraging abundance and densities of ducks, shorebirds, and piscivores, as well as eared grebes (
Podiceps nigricollis
) among decommissioned and commercial pond complexes. Complex use was consistent within groups and variable among groups, with most use occurring in decommissioned ponds: 73% of ducks were observed in the Alviso complex and 9% in the commercial ponds; 51% of shorebirds were in the Eden Landing complex and only 17% in commercial ponds; and 56% of piscivores were in the Alviso complex and |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10750-012-1177-y |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1069204483</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2748860031</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-25094f0a3b3264001ad08f4b3904d75e39893a7fd4b0612ffdeb25fa2172855f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1O3DAUha2qSJ0CD9CdpW7YBPwTj5PuqhEtSCOxAbbRTWwPRok9tZ1W8w48dO8oLBASK9tX3zk614eQb5xdcsb0VeZMK1YxLirOta4On8iKKy0rhc_PZMUYb6qGq-YL-ZrzM0NNK9iKvDxC8tD70ZcD9YE-4b1AoX9hnC2Njg5xmmwaPIw0w1joPkUzD8XHQPcxmPyD-mk_-gGOo0xdTPQfFJt6nwydIMDOTjYUCsHQ4g3aTJDyE002l5hgMRohBB92Z-TEwZjt-et5Sh5-Xd9vbqrt3e_bzc9tNdRclUoo1taOgeylWNe4GRjWuLqXLauNVla2TStBO1P3bM2Fc8b2QjkQXItGKSdPycXii8v8mTFIN_k82BFj2DjnjrM1fk5dNxLR7-_Q5zingOmQklqsW6k1UnyhhhRzTtZ1--RxzwNC3bGfbumnw366Yz_dATVi0WRkw86mt84fif4D5qSVvw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1037269377</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Variability in habitat value of commercial salt production ponds: implications for waterbird management and tidal marsh restoration planning</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Athearn, Nicole D. ; Takekawa, John Y. ; Bluso-Demers, Jill D. ; Shinn, Joel M. ; Arriana Brand, L. ; Robinson-Nilsen, Caitlin W. ; Strong, Cheryl M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Athearn, Nicole D. ; Takekawa, John Y. ; Bluso-Demers, Jill D. ; Shinn, Joel M. ; Arriana Brand, L. ; Robinson-Nilsen, Caitlin W. ; Strong, Cheryl M.</creatorcontrib><description>Salt evaporation ponds are used in place of lost natural estuarine habitats for foraging and roosting by waterbirds around the world, but have started to be decommissioned in some areas due to low profitability. In San Francisco Bay, three former salt pond complexes (Alviso, Eden Landing, and Ravenswood) have been decommissioned, i.e., taken out of commission, and are planned for marsh restoration. We compared total and foraging abundance and densities of ducks, shorebirds, and piscivores, as well as eared grebes (
Podiceps nigricollis
) among decommissioned and commercial pond complexes. Complex use was consistent within groups and variable among groups, with most use occurring in decommissioned ponds: 73% of ducks were observed in the Alviso complex and 9% in the commercial ponds; 51% of shorebirds were in the Eden Landing complex and only 17% in commercial ponds; and 56% of piscivores were in the Alviso complex and <18% in commercial ponds. Only eared grebes were more abundant (59%) in commercial ponds. Differences among groups in within-complex and within-pond abundance were likely related to pond salinity and topography, respectively. Our results suggest that the effects of pond conversion on waterbird groups may be disproportionate to pond area depending on the characteristics of the converted ponds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-8158</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5117</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10750-012-1177-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Aquatic birds ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Ecology ; Environmental restoration ; Evaporation ; Freshwater ; Freshwater & Marine Ecology ; Habitats ; Life Sciences ; Limnology ; Limnology and Aquatic Birds ; Podiceps nigricollis ; Ponds ; Salts ; Wetlands ; Wildfowl ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Hydrobiologia, 2012-11, Vol.697 (1), p.139-155</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. (outside the USA) 2012</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-25094f0a3b3264001ad08f4b3904d75e39893a7fd4b0612ffdeb25fa2172855f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-25094f0a3b3264001ad08f4b3904d75e39893a7fd4b0612ffdeb25fa2172855f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Athearn, Nicole D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takekawa, John Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bluso-Demers, Jill D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shinn, Joel M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arriana Brand, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson-Nilsen, Caitlin W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strong, Cheryl M.</creatorcontrib><title>Variability in habitat value of commercial salt production ponds: implications for waterbird management and tidal marsh restoration planning</title><title>Hydrobiologia</title><addtitle>Hydrobiologia</addtitle><description>Salt evaporation ponds are used in place of lost natural estuarine habitats for foraging and roosting by waterbirds around the world, but have started to be decommissioned in some areas due to low profitability. In San Francisco Bay, three former salt pond complexes (Alviso, Eden Landing, and Ravenswood) have been decommissioned, i.e., taken out of commission, and are planned for marsh restoration. We compared total and foraging abundance and densities of ducks, shorebirds, and piscivores, as well as eared grebes (
Podiceps nigricollis
) among decommissioned and commercial pond complexes. Complex use was consistent within groups and variable among groups, with most use occurring in decommissioned ponds: 73% of ducks were observed in the Alviso complex and 9% in the commercial ponds; 51% of shorebirds were in the Eden Landing complex and only 17% in commercial ponds; and 56% of piscivores were in the Alviso complex and <18% in commercial ponds. Only eared grebes were more abundant (59%) in commercial ponds. Differences among groups in within-complex and within-pond abundance were likely related to pond salinity and topography, respectively. Our results suggest that the effects of pond conversion on waterbird groups may be disproportionate to pond area depending on the characteristics of the converted ponds.</description><subject>Aquatic birds</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environmental restoration</subject><subject>Evaporation</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Limnology</subject><subject>Limnology and Aquatic Birds</subject><subject>Podiceps nigricollis</subject><subject>Ponds</subject><subject>Salts</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><subject>Wildfowl</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0018-8158</issn><issn>1573-5117</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc1O3DAUha2qSJ0CD9CdpW7YBPwTj5PuqhEtSCOxAbbRTWwPRok9tZ1W8w48dO8oLBASK9tX3zk614eQb5xdcsb0VeZMK1YxLirOta4On8iKKy0rhc_PZMUYb6qGq-YL-ZrzM0NNK9iKvDxC8tD70ZcD9YE-4b1AoX9hnC2Njg5xmmwaPIw0w1joPkUzD8XHQPcxmPyD-mk_-gGOo0xdTPQfFJt6nwydIMDOTjYUCsHQ4g3aTJDyE002l5hgMRohBB92Z-TEwZjt-et5Sh5-Xd9vbqrt3e_bzc9tNdRclUoo1taOgeylWNe4GRjWuLqXLauNVla2TStBO1P3bM2Fc8b2QjkQXItGKSdPycXii8v8mTFIN_k82BFj2DjnjrM1fk5dNxLR7-_Q5zingOmQklqsW6k1UnyhhhRzTtZ1--RxzwNC3bGfbumnw366Yz_dATVi0WRkw86mt84fif4D5qSVvw</recordid><startdate>20121101</startdate><enddate>20121101</enddate><creator>Athearn, Nicole D.</creator><creator>Takekawa, John Y.</creator><creator>Bluso-Demers, Jill D.</creator><creator>Shinn, Joel M.</creator><creator>Arriana Brand, L.</creator><creator>Robinson-Nilsen, Caitlin W.</creator><creator>Strong, Cheryl M.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121101</creationdate><title>Variability in habitat value of commercial salt production ponds: implications for waterbird management and tidal marsh restoration planning</title><author>Athearn, Nicole D. ; Takekawa, John Y. ; Bluso-Demers, Jill D. ; Shinn, Joel M. ; Arriana Brand, L. ; Robinson-Nilsen, Caitlin W. ; Strong, Cheryl M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-25094f0a3b3264001ad08f4b3904d75e39893a7fd4b0612ffdeb25fa2172855f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Aquatic birds</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environmental restoration</topic><topic>Evaporation</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Limnology</topic><topic>Limnology and Aquatic Birds</topic><topic>Podiceps nigricollis</topic><topic>Ponds</topic><topic>Salts</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><topic>Wildfowl</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Athearn, Nicole D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takekawa, John Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bluso-Demers, Jill D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shinn, Joel M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arriana Brand, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson-Nilsen, Caitlin W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strong, Cheryl M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Hydrobiologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Athearn, Nicole D.</au><au>Takekawa, John Y.</au><au>Bluso-Demers, Jill D.</au><au>Shinn, Joel M.</au><au>Arriana Brand, L.</au><au>Robinson-Nilsen, Caitlin W.</au><au>Strong, Cheryl M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Variability in habitat value of commercial salt production ponds: implications for waterbird management and tidal marsh restoration planning</atitle><jtitle>Hydrobiologia</jtitle><stitle>Hydrobiologia</stitle><date>2012-11-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>697</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>139</spage><epage>155</epage><pages>139-155</pages><issn>0018-8158</issn><eissn>1573-5117</eissn><abstract>Salt evaporation ponds are used in place of lost natural estuarine habitats for foraging and roosting by waterbirds around the world, but have started to be decommissioned in some areas due to low profitability. In San Francisco Bay, three former salt pond complexes (Alviso, Eden Landing, and Ravenswood) have been decommissioned, i.e., taken out of commission, and are planned for marsh restoration. We compared total and foraging abundance and densities of ducks, shorebirds, and piscivores, as well as eared grebes (
Podiceps nigricollis
) among decommissioned and commercial pond complexes. Complex use was consistent within groups and variable among groups, with most use occurring in decommissioned ponds: 73% of ducks were observed in the Alviso complex and 9% in the commercial ponds; 51% of shorebirds were in the Eden Landing complex and only 17% in commercial ponds; and 56% of piscivores were in the Alviso complex and <18% in commercial ponds. Only eared grebes were more abundant (59%) in commercial ponds. Differences among groups in within-complex and within-pond abundance were likely related to pond salinity and topography, respectively. Our results suggest that the effects of pond conversion on waterbird groups may be disproportionate to pond area depending on the characteristics of the converted ponds.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10750-012-1177-y</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0018-8158 |
ispartof | Hydrobiologia, 2012-11, Vol.697 (1), p.139-155 |
issn | 0018-8158 1573-5117 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1069204483 |
source | Springer Link |
subjects | Aquatic birds Biomedical and Life Sciences Ecology Environmental restoration Evaporation Freshwater Freshwater & Marine Ecology Habitats Life Sciences Limnology Limnology and Aquatic Birds Podiceps nigricollis Ponds Salts Wetlands Wildfowl Zoology |
title | Variability in habitat value of commercial salt production ponds: implications for waterbird management and tidal marsh restoration planning |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T22%3A10%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Variability%20in%20habitat%20value%20of%20commercial%20salt%20production%20ponds:%20implications%20for%20waterbird%20management%20and%20tidal%20marsh%20restoration%20planning&rft.jtitle=Hydrobiologia&rft.au=Athearn,%20Nicole%20D.&rft.date=2012-11-01&rft.volume=697&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=139&rft.epage=155&rft.pages=139-155&rft.issn=0018-8158&rft.eissn=1573-5117&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10750-012-1177-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2748860031%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-25094f0a3b3264001ad08f4b3904d75e39893a7fd4b0612ffdeb25fa2172855f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1037269377&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |