Loading…
Missing Links in Party-System Polarization: How Institutions and Voters Matter
This article aims to understand the determinants of party-system polarization by moving beyond the (almost exclusive) emphasis placed in the literature on the role of the electoral system and the number of parties. We propose a larger menu of explanatory variables that includes both institutional an...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Journal of politics 2012-04, Vol.74 (2), p.460-473 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-371dafc95812bd90cdf7ad22781f6249e9835f63e944d304ca9f2e0b6de812273 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-371dafc95812bd90cdf7ad22781f6249e9835f63e944d304ca9f2e0b6de812273 |
container_end_page | 473 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 460 |
container_title | The Journal of politics |
container_volume | 74 |
creator | Curini, Luigi Hino, Airo |
description | This article aims to understand the determinants of party-system polarization by moving beyond the (almost exclusive) emphasis placed in the literature on the role of the electoral system and the number of parties. We propose a larger menu of explanatory variables that includes both institutional and voters-related factors. Regarding the institutional factors, we highlight the consequences of expectations of coalition formations as well as office-related elections (e.g., Presidential ones) on party-system convergence in legislative elections. For the voters-related factors, we address the importance of specific characteristics of the electorate following insights from the spatial theory of voting. To test our hypotheses, we use survey data covering 33 nations and 67 elections. While hypotheses derived from electoral systems and number of parties find little empirical support, the new variables that we consider involving institutions and voters matter significantly. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0022381611001721 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1074662254</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0022381611001721</cupid><jstor_id>10.1017/s0022381611001721</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1017/s0022381611001721</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-371dafc95812bd90cdf7ad22781f6249e9835f63e944d304ca9f2e0b6de812273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wIMQ8OJlNV-b3XgT8aPQqlD1WtLdbE1tNzWTReqvN2WLih-Yy5DM8868mUFon5JjSmh2MiSEMZ5TSSmJd0Y3UIcKmScsJfkm6qzSySq_jXYApiQeqUQH3QwsgK0nuG_rZ8C2xnfah2UyXEIwc3znZtrbNx2sq0_xtXvFvRqCDc3qAbCuS_zogvGABzrEuIu2Kj0Ds7eOXfRweXF_fp30b69652f9pBCKh4RntNRVodKcsnGpSFFWmS4Zy3JaSSaUUTlPK8mNEqLkRBRaVcyQsSxNVLCMd9FRW3fh3UtjIIzmFgozm-nauAZGlOVc8ixV8n-UZEJKxlIR0cNv6NQ1vo4fiVQcbCpTQSNFW6rwDsCbarTwdq79MkIrLhv9WEbUnLSapniyhZ64hTcAn-V_Uxy0iikE5z9aMB4XKuMQu4ivXej52NtyYr6a_cvHO2kwohw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1011056541</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Missing Links in Party-System Polarization: How Institutions and Voters Matter</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Curini, Luigi ; Hino, Airo</creator><creatorcontrib>Curini, Luigi ; Hino, Airo</creatorcontrib><description>This article aims to understand the determinants of party-system polarization by moving beyond the (almost exclusive) emphasis placed in the literature on the role of the electoral system and the number of parties. We propose a larger menu of explanatory variables that includes both institutional and voters-related factors. Regarding the institutional factors, we highlight the consequences of expectations of coalition formations as well as office-related elections (e.g., Presidential ones) on party-system convergence in legislative elections. For the voters-related factors, we address the importance of specific characteristics of the electorate following insights from the spatial theory of voting. To test our hypotheses, we use survey data covering 33 nations and 67 elections. While hypotheses derived from electoral systems and number of parties find little empirical support, the new variables that we consider involving institutions and voters matter significantly.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3816</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2508</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0022381611001721</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPOLA3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Coalition Formation ; Coalition governments ; Cross-national analysis ; Democracy ; Determinants ; Elections ; Electoral Systems ; Electorate ; Expectations ; Government cabinets ; Institutions ; Party politics ; Party systems ; Polarization ; Political analysis ; Political campaigns ; Political cleavages ; Political parties ; Presidential elections ; Presidents ; Spatial models ; Voter behavior ; Voters ; Voting ; Voting behavior ; Voting behaviour</subject><ispartof>The Journal of politics, 2012-04, Vol.74 (2), p.460-473</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Southern Political Science Association 2012</rights><rights>Copyright Cambridge University Press Apr 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-371dafc95812bd90cdf7ad22781f6249e9835f63e944d304ca9f2e0b6de812273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-371dafc95812bd90cdf7ad22781f6249e9835f63e944d304ca9f2e0b6de812273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223,33224</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Curini, Luigi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hino, Airo</creatorcontrib><title>Missing Links in Party-System Polarization: How Institutions and Voters Matter</title><title>The Journal of politics</title><description>This article aims to understand the determinants of party-system polarization by moving beyond the (almost exclusive) emphasis placed in the literature on the role of the electoral system and the number of parties. We propose a larger menu of explanatory variables that includes both institutional and voters-related factors. Regarding the institutional factors, we highlight the consequences of expectations of coalition formations as well as office-related elections (e.g., Presidential ones) on party-system convergence in legislative elections. For the voters-related factors, we address the importance of specific characteristics of the electorate following insights from the spatial theory of voting. To test our hypotheses, we use survey data covering 33 nations and 67 elections. While hypotheses derived from electoral systems and number of parties find little empirical support, the new variables that we consider involving institutions and voters matter significantly.</description><subject>Coalition Formation</subject><subject>Coalition governments</subject><subject>Cross-national analysis</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Determinants</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Electoral Systems</subject><subject>Electorate</subject><subject>Expectations</subject><subject>Government cabinets</subject><subject>Institutions</subject><subject>Party politics</subject><subject>Party systems</subject><subject>Polarization</subject><subject>Political analysis</subject><subject>Political campaigns</subject><subject>Political cleavages</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Presidential elections</subject><subject>Presidents</subject><subject>Spatial models</subject><subject>Voter behavior</subject><subject>Voters</subject><subject>Voting</subject><subject>Voting behavior</subject><subject>Voting behaviour</subject><issn>0022-3816</issn><issn>1468-2508</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wIMQ8OJlNV-b3XgT8aPQqlD1WtLdbE1tNzWTReqvN2WLih-Yy5DM8868mUFon5JjSmh2MiSEMZ5TSSmJd0Y3UIcKmScsJfkm6qzSySq_jXYApiQeqUQH3QwsgK0nuG_rZ8C2xnfah2UyXEIwc3znZtrbNx2sq0_xtXvFvRqCDc3qAbCuS_zogvGABzrEuIu2Kj0Ds7eOXfRweXF_fp30b69652f9pBCKh4RntNRVodKcsnGpSFFWmS4Zy3JaSSaUUTlPK8mNEqLkRBRaVcyQsSxNVLCMd9FRW3fh3UtjIIzmFgozm-nauAZGlOVc8ixV8n-UZEJKxlIR0cNv6NQ1vo4fiVQcbCpTQSNFW6rwDsCbarTwdq79MkIrLhv9WEbUnLSapniyhZ64hTcAn-V_Uxy0iikE5z9aMB4XKuMQu4ivXej52NtyYr6a_cvHO2kwohw</recordid><startdate>20120401</startdate><enddate>20120401</enddate><creator>Curini, Luigi</creator><creator>Hino, Airo</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>University of Chicago Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120401</creationdate><title>Missing Links in Party-System Polarization: How Institutions and Voters Matter</title><author>Curini, Luigi ; Hino, Airo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-371dafc95812bd90cdf7ad22781f6249e9835f63e944d304ca9f2e0b6de812273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Coalition Formation</topic><topic>Coalition governments</topic><topic>Cross-national analysis</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Determinants</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Electoral Systems</topic><topic>Electorate</topic><topic>Expectations</topic><topic>Government cabinets</topic><topic>Institutions</topic><topic>Party politics</topic><topic>Party systems</topic><topic>Polarization</topic><topic>Political analysis</topic><topic>Political campaigns</topic><topic>Political cleavages</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Presidential elections</topic><topic>Presidents</topic><topic>Spatial models</topic><topic>Voter behavior</topic><topic>Voters</topic><topic>Voting</topic><topic>Voting behavior</topic><topic>Voting behaviour</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Curini, Luigi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hino, Airo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The Journal of politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Curini, Luigi</au><au>Hino, Airo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Missing Links in Party-System Polarization: How Institutions and Voters Matter</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of politics</jtitle><date>2012-04-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>460</spage><epage>473</epage><pages>460-473</pages><issn>0022-3816</issn><eissn>1468-2508</eissn><coden>JPOLA3</coden><abstract>This article aims to understand the determinants of party-system polarization by moving beyond the (almost exclusive) emphasis placed in the literature on the role of the electoral system and the number of parties. We propose a larger menu of explanatory variables that includes both institutional and voters-related factors. Regarding the institutional factors, we highlight the consequences of expectations of coalition formations as well as office-related elections (e.g., Presidential ones) on party-system convergence in legislative elections. For the voters-related factors, we address the importance of specific characteristics of the electorate following insights from the spatial theory of voting. To test our hypotheses, we use survey data covering 33 nations and 67 elections. While hypotheses derived from electoral systems and number of parties find little empirical support, the new variables that we consider involving institutions and voters matter significantly.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0022381611001721</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-3816 |
ispartof | The Journal of politics, 2012-04, Vol.74 (2), p.460-473 |
issn | 0022-3816 1468-2508 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1074662254 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Business Source Ultimate; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts |
subjects | Coalition Formation Coalition governments Cross-national analysis Democracy Determinants Elections Electoral Systems Electorate Expectations Government cabinets Institutions Party politics Party systems Polarization Political analysis Political campaigns Political cleavages Political parties Presidential elections Presidents Spatial models Voter behavior Voters Voting Voting behavior Voting behaviour |
title | Missing Links in Party-System Polarization: How Institutions and Voters Matter |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T01%3A00%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Missing%20Links%20in%20Party-System%20Polarization:%20How%20Institutions%20and%20Voters%20Matter&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20politics&rft.au=Curini,%20Luigi&rft.date=2012-04-01&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=460&rft.epage=473&rft.pages=460-473&rft.issn=0022-3816&rft.eissn=1468-2508&rft.coden=JPOLA3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0022381611001721&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E10.1017/s0022381611001721%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-371dafc95812bd90cdf7ad22781f6249e9835f63e944d304ca9f2e0b6de812273%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1011056541&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0022381611001721&rft_jstor_id=10.1017/s0022381611001721&rfr_iscdi=true |