Loading…

Missing Links in Party-System Polarization: How Institutions and Voters Matter

This article aims to understand the determinants of party-system polarization by moving beyond the (almost exclusive) emphasis placed in the literature on the role of the electoral system and the number of parties. We propose a larger menu of explanatory variables that includes both institutional an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of politics 2012-04, Vol.74 (2), p.460-473
Main Authors: Curini, Luigi, Hino, Airo
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-371dafc95812bd90cdf7ad22781f6249e9835f63e944d304ca9f2e0b6de812273
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-371dafc95812bd90cdf7ad22781f6249e9835f63e944d304ca9f2e0b6de812273
container_end_page 473
container_issue 2
container_start_page 460
container_title The Journal of politics
container_volume 74
creator Curini, Luigi
Hino, Airo
description This article aims to understand the determinants of party-system polarization by moving beyond the (almost exclusive) emphasis placed in the literature on the role of the electoral system and the number of parties. We propose a larger menu of explanatory variables that includes both institutional and voters-related factors. Regarding the institutional factors, we highlight the consequences of expectations of coalition formations as well as office-related elections (e.g., Presidential ones) on party-system convergence in legislative elections. For the voters-related factors, we address the importance of specific characteristics of the electorate following insights from the spatial theory of voting. To test our hypotheses, we use survey data covering 33 nations and 67 elections. While hypotheses derived from electoral systems and number of parties find little empirical support, the new variables that we consider involving institutions and voters matter significantly.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0022381611001721
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1074662254</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0022381611001721</cupid><jstor_id>10.1017/s0022381611001721</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1017/s0022381611001721</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-371dafc95812bd90cdf7ad22781f6249e9835f63e944d304ca9f2e0b6de812273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wIMQ8OJlNV-b3XgT8aPQqlD1WtLdbE1tNzWTReqvN2WLih-Yy5DM8868mUFon5JjSmh2MiSEMZ5TSSmJd0Y3UIcKmScsJfkm6qzSySq_jXYApiQeqUQH3QwsgK0nuG_rZ8C2xnfah2UyXEIwc3znZtrbNx2sq0_xtXvFvRqCDc3qAbCuS_zogvGABzrEuIu2Kj0Ds7eOXfRweXF_fp30b69652f9pBCKh4RntNRVodKcsnGpSFFWmS4Zy3JaSSaUUTlPK8mNEqLkRBRaVcyQsSxNVLCMd9FRW3fh3UtjIIzmFgozm-nauAZGlOVc8ixV8n-UZEJKxlIR0cNv6NQ1vo4fiVQcbCpTQSNFW6rwDsCbarTwdq79MkIrLhv9WEbUnLSapniyhZ64hTcAn-V_Uxy0iikE5z9aMB4XKuMQu4ivXej52NtyYr6a_cvHO2kwohw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1011056541</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Missing Links in Party-System Polarization: How Institutions and Voters Matter</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Curini, Luigi ; Hino, Airo</creator><creatorcontrib>Curini, Luigi ; Hino, Airo</creatorcontrib><description>This article aims to understand the determinants of party-system polarization by moving beyond the (almost exclusive) emphasis placed in the literature on the role of the electoral system and the number of parties. We propose a larger menu of explanatory variables that includes both institutional and voters-related factors. Regarding the institutional factors, we highlight the consequences of expectations of coalition formations as well as office-related elections (e.g., Presidential ones) on party-system convergence in legislative elections. For the voters-related factors, we address the importance of specific characteristics of the electorate following insights from the spatial theory of voting. To test our hypotheses, we use survey data covering 33 nations and 67 elections. While hypotheses derived from electoral systems and number of parties find little empirical support, the new variables that we consider involving institutions and voters matter significantly.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3816</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2508</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0022381611001721</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPOLA3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Coalition Formation ; Coalition governments ; Cross-national analysis ; Democracy ; Determinants ; Elections ; Electoral Systems ; Electorate ; Expectations ; Government cabinets ; Institutions ; Party politics ; Party systems ; Polarization ; Political analysis ; Political campaigns ; Political cleavages ; Political parties ; Presidential elections ; Presidents ; Spatial models ; Voter behavior ; Voters ; Voting ; Voting behavior ; Voting behaviour</subject><ispartof>The Journal of politics, 2012-04, Vol.74 (2), p.460-473</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Southern Political Science Association 2012</rights><rights>Copyright Cambridge University Press Apr 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-371dafc95812bd90cdf7ad22781f6249e9835f63e944d304ca9f2e0b6de812273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-371dafc95812bd90cdf7ad22781f6249e9835f63e944d304ca9f2e0b6de812273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223,33224</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Curini, Luigi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hino, Airo</creatorcontrib><title>Missing Links in Party-System Polarization: How Institutions and Voters Matter</title><title>The Journal of politics</title><description>This article aims to understand the determinants of party-system polarization by moving beyond the (almost exclusive) emphasis placed in the literature on the role of the electoral system and the number of parties. We propose a larger menu of explanatory variables that includes both institutional and voters-related factors. Regarding the institutional factors, we highlight the consequences of expectations of coalition formations as well as office-related elections (e.g., Presidential ones) on party-system convergence in legislative elections. For the voters-related factors, we address the importance of specific characteristics of the electorate following insights from the spatial theory of voting. To test our hypotheses, we use survey data covering 33 nations and 67 elections. While hypotheses derived from electoral systems and number of parties find little empirical support, the new variables that we consider involving institutions and voters matter significantly.</description><subject>Coalition Formation</subject><subject>Coalition governments</subject><subject>Cross-national analysis</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Determinants</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Electoral Systems</subject><subject>Electorate</subject><subject>Expectations</subject><subject>Government cabinets</subject><subject>Institutions</subject><subject>Party politics</subject><subject>Party systems</subject><subject>Polarization</subject><subject>Political analysis</subject><subject>Political campaigns</subject><subject>Political cleavages</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Presidential elections</subject><subject>Presidents</subject><subject>Spatial models</subject><subject>Voter behavior</subject><subject>Voters</subject><subject>Voting</subject><subject>Voting behavior</subject><subject>Voting behaviour</subject><issn>0022-3816</issn><issn>1468-2508</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wIMQ8OJlNV-b3XgT8aPQqlD1WtLdbE1tNzWTReqvN2WLih-Yy5DM8868mUFon5JjSmh2MiSEMZ5TSSmJd0Y3UIcKmScsJfkm6qzSySq_jXYApiQeqUQH3QwsgK0nuG_rZ8C2xnfah2UyXEIwc3znZtrbNx2sq0_xtXvFvRqCDc3qAbCuS_zogvGABzrEuIu2Kj0Ds7eOXfRweXF_fp30b69652f9pBCKh4RntNRVodKcsnGpSFFWmS4Zy3JaSSaUUTlPK8mNEqLkRBRaVcyQsSxNVLCMd9FRW3fh3UtjIIzmFgozm-nauAZGlOVc8ixV8n-UZEJKxlIR0cNv6NQ1vo4fiVQcbCpTQSNFW6rwDsCbarTwdq79MkIrLhv9WEbUnLSapniyhZ64hTcAn-V_Uxy0iikE5z9aMB4XKuMQu4ivXej52NtyYr6a_cvHO2kwohw</recordid><startdate>20120401</startdate><enddate>20120401</enddate><creator>Curini, Luigi</creator><creator>Hino, Airo</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>University of Chicago Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120401</creationdate><title>Missing Links in Party-System Polarization: How Institutions and Voters Matter</title><author>Curini, Luigi ; Hino, Airo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-371dafc95812bd90cdf7ad22781f6249e9835f63e944d304ca9f2e0b6de812273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Coalition Formation</topic><topic>Coalition governments</topic><topic>Cross-national analysis</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Determinants</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Electoral Systems</topic><topic>Electorate</topic><topic>Expectations</topic><topic>Government cabinets</topic><topic>Institutions</topic><topic>Party politics</topic><topic>Party systems</topic><topic>Polarization</topic><topic>Political analysis</topic><topic>Political campaigns</topic><topic>Political cleavages</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Presidential elections</topic><topic>Presidents</topic><topic>Spatial models</topic><topic>Voter behavior</topic><topic>Voters</topic><topic>Voting</topic><topic>Voting behavior</topic><topic>Voting behaviour</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Curini, Luigi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hino, Airo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The Journal of politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Curini, Luigi</au><au>Hino, Airo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Missing Links in Party-System Polarization: How Institutions and Voters Matter</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of politics</jtitle><date>2012-04-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>460</spage><epage>473</epage><pages>460-473</pages><issn>0022-3816</issn><eissn>1468-2508</eissn><coden>JPOLA3</coden><abstract>This article aims to understand the determinants of party-system polarization by moving beyond the (almost exclusive) emphasis placed in the literature on the role of the electoral system and the number of parties. We propose a larger menu of explanatory variables that includes both institutional and voters-related factors. Regarding the institutional factors, we highlight the consequences of expectations of coalition formations as well as office-related elections (e.g., Presidential ones) on party-system convergence in legislative elections. For the voters-related factors, we address the importance of specific characteristics of the electorate following insights from the spatial theory of voting. To test our hypotheses, we use survey data covering 33 nations and 67 elections. While hypotheses derived from electoral systems and number of parties find little empirical support, the new variables that we consider involving institutions and voters matter significantly.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0022381611001721</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3816
ispartof The Journal of politics, 2012-04, Vol.74 (2), p.460-473
issn 0022-3816
1468-2508
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1074662254
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Business Source Ultimate; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts
subjects Coalition Formation
Coalition governments
Cross-national analysis
Democracy
Determinants
Elections
Electoral Systems
Electorate
Expectations
Government cabinets
Institutions
Party politics
Party systems
Polarization
Political analysis
Political campaigns
Political cleavages
Political parties
Presidential elections
Presidents
Spatial models
Voter behavior
Voters
Voting
Voting behavior
Voting behaviour
title Missing Links in Party-System Polarization: How Institutions and Voters Matter
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T01%3A00%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Missing%20Links%20in%20Party-System%20Polarization:%20How%20Institutions%20and%20Voters%20Matter&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20politics&rft.au=Curini,%20Luigi&rft.date=2012-04-01&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=460&rft.epage=473&rft.pages=460-473&rft.issn=0022-3816&rft.eissn=1468-2508&rft.coden=JPOLA3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0022381611001721&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E10.1017/s0022381611001721%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-371dafc95812bd90cdf7ad22781f6249e9835f63e944d304ca9f2e0b6de812273%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1011056541&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0022381611001721&rft_jstor_id=10.1017/s0022381611001721&rfr_iscdi=true