Loading…

Trade liberalization and welfare: Differentiated-good versus homogeneous-good markets

► We examine the effects of liberalization on industrial location and national welfare. ► We incorporate trade costs in both differentiated-good and homogeneous-good sectors. ► The impacts of liberalization in these sectors on welfare are different from each other. ► If an industry is liberalized wh...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the Japanese and international economies 2012-09, Vol.26 (3), p.308-325
Main Authors: Takatsuka, Hajime, Zeng, Dao-Zhi
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:► We examine the effects of liberalization on industrial location and national welfare. ► We incorporate trade costs in both differentiated-good and homogeneous-good sectors. ► The impacts of liberalization in these sectors on welfare are different from each other. ► If an industry is liberalized while the other is protected, a conflict might occur. ► Appropriate liberalization in both sectors is effective to alleviate such a conflict. In this paper, we examine the effects of liberalization on industrial location and national welfare in a framework of new economic geography. Specifically, we explicitly incorporate arbitrary trade costs in both differentiated-good and homogeneous-good sectors into a two-country model, and clarify the effects of trade-barrier reduction in each sector. We show that their impacts on welfare levels in the two countries are different, and, if an industry is liberalized while the other is protected, a conflict between the countries might occur. Therefore, appropriate liberalization in both sectors is effective to alleviate such a conflict.
ISSN:0889-1583
1095-8681
DOI:10.1016/j.jjie.2012.05.003