Loading…
Trade liberalization and welfare: Differentiated-good versus homogeneous-good markets
► We examine the effects of liberalization on industrial location and national welfare. ► We incorporate trade costs in both differentiated-good and homogeneous-good sectors. ► The impacts of liberalization in these sectors on welfare are different from each other. ► If an industry is liberalized wh...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of the Japanese and international economies 2012-09, Vol.26 (3), p.308-325 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | ► We examine the effects of liberalization on industrial location and national welfare. ► We incorporate trade costs in both differentiated-good and homogeneous-good sectors. ► The impacts of liberalization in these sectors on welfare are different from each other. ► If an industry is liberalized while the other is protected, a conflict might occur. ► Appropriate liberalization in both sectors is effective to alleviate such a conflict.
In this paper, we examine the effects of liberalization on industrial location and national welfare in a framework of new economic geography. Specifically, we explicitly incorporate arbitrary trade costs in both differentiated-good and homogeneous-good sectors into a two-country model, and clarify the effects of trade-barrier reduction in each sector. We show that their impacts on welfare levels in the two countries are different, and, if an industry is liberalized while the other is protected, a conflict between the countries might occur. Therefore, appropriate liberalization in both sectors is effective to alleviate such a conflict. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0889-1583 1095-8681 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jjie.2012.05.003 |