Loading…

Trade liberalization and welfare: Differentiated-good versus homogeneous-good markets

► We examine the effects of liberalization on industrial location and national welfare. ► We incorporate trade costs in both differentiated-good and homogeneous-good sectors. ► The impacts of liberalization in these sectors on welfare are different from each other. ► If an industry is liberalized wh...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the Japanese and international economies 2012-09, Vol.26 (3), p.308-325
Main Authors: Takatsuka, Hajime, Zeng, Dao-Zhi
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-7a36c999955963ec116a3028e26ea66adae18b02770aabb71481a276b1bccd8f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-7a36c999955963ec116a3028e26ea66adae18b02770aabb71481a276b1bccd8f3
container_end_page 325
container_issue 3
container_start_page 308
container_title Journal of the Japanese and international economies
container_volume 26
creator Takatsuka, Hajime
Zeng, Dao-Zhi
description ► We examine the effects of liberalization on industrial location and national welfare. ► We incorporate trade costs in both differentiated-good and homogeneous-good sectors. ► The impacts of liberalization in these sectors on welfare are different from each other. ► If an industry is liberalized while the other is protected, a conflict might occur. ► Appropriate liberalization in both sectors is effective to alleviate such a conflict. In this paper, we examine the effects of liberalization on industrial location and national welfare in a framework of new economic geography. Specifically, we explicitly incorporate arbitrary trade costs in both differentiated-good and homogeneous-good sectors into a two-country model, and clarify the effects of trade-barrier reduction in each sector. We show that their impacts on welfare levels in the two countries are different, and, if an industry is liberalized while the other is protected, a conflict between the countries might occur. Therefore, appropriate liberalization in both sectors is effective to alleviate such a conflict.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jjie.2012.05.003
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1112140689</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0889158312000214</els_id><sourcerecordid>2750537301</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-7a36c999955963ec116a3028e26ea66adae18b02770aabb71481a276b1bccd8f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EEuXxBzhF4sIlwes0joO4oPKUKnGBs7VxNuCQxsVOi-DX41JOHNjLSqtvVjPD2AnwDDjI8y7rOkuZ4CAyXmSc5ztsArwqUiUV7LIJV6pKoVD5PjsIoeOREBIm7PnJY0NJb2vy2NsvHK0bEhya5IP6Fj1dJNe2bcnTMFocqUlfnGuSNfmwCsmrW7gXGsitwva-QP9GYzhiey32gY5_9yF7vr15mt2n88e7h9nVPDXTCsa0xFyaKk5RVDInAyAx50KRkIRSYoMEquaiLDliXZcwVYCilDXUxjSqzQ_Z2fbv0rv3FYVRL2ww1Pf440kDgIApl6qK6OkftHMrP0R3GnheSinktIiU2FLGuxA8tXrpbQz1GSG9aVp3etO03jSteaFjj1F0uRVRjLq25HUwlgZDjfVkRt04-5_8G-8dh0I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1037662645</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Trade liberalization and welfare: Differentiated-good versus homogeneous-good markets</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Takatsuka, Hajime ; Zeng, Dao-Zhi</creator><creatorcontrib>Takatsuka, Hajime ; Zeng, Dao-Zhi</creatorcontrib><description>► We examine the effects of liberalization on industrial location and national welfare. ► We incorporate trade costs in both differentiated-good and homogeneous-good sectors. ► The impacts of liberalization in these sectors on welfare are different from each other. ► If an industry is liberalized while the other is protected, a conflict might occur. ► Appropriate liberalization in both sectors is effective to alleviate such a conflict. In this paper, we examine the effects of liberalization on industrial location and national welfare in a framework of new economic geography. Specifically, we explicitly incorporate arbitrary trade costs in both differentiated-good and homogeneous-good sectors into a two-country model, and clarify the effects of trade-barrier reduction in each sector. We show that their impacts on welfare levels in the two countries are different, and, if an industry is liberalized while the other is protected, a conflict between the countries might occur. Therefore, appropriate liberalization in both sectors is effective to alleviate such a conflict.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0889-1583</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8681</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jjie.2012.05.003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Duluth: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Economic geography ; Firm location ; Home market effect ; Liberalization ; Location of industry ; Market ; Studies ; Trade costs ; Trade liberalization ; Trade theory ; Welfare</subject><ispartof>Journal of the Japanese and international economies, 2012-09, Vol.26 (3), p.308-325</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-7a36c999955963ec116a3028e26ea66adae18b02770aabb71481a276b1bccd8f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-7a36c999955963ec116a3028e26ea66adae18b02770aabb71481a276b1bccd8f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223,33224</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Takatsuka, Hajime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Dao-Zhi</creatorcontrib><title>Trade liberalization and welfare: Differentiated-good versus homogeneous-good markets</title><title>Journal of the Japanese and international economies</title><description>► We examine the effects of liberalization on industrial location and national welfare. ► We incorporate trade costs in both differentiated-good and homogeneous-good sectors. ► The impacts of liberalization in these sectors on welfare are different from each other. ► If an industry is liberalized while the other is protected, a conflict might occur. ► Appropriate liberalization in both sectors is effective to alleviate such a conflict. In this paper, we examine the effects of liberalization on industrial location and national welfare in a framework of new economic geography. Specifically, we explicitly incorporate arbitrary trade costs in both differentiated-good and homogeneous-good sectors into a two-country model, and clarify the effects of trade-barrier reduction in each sector. We show that their impacts on welfare levels in the two countries are different, and, if an industry is liberalized while the other is protected, a conflict between the countries might occur. Therefore, appropriate liberalization in both sectors is effective to alleviate such a conflict.</description><subject>Economic geography</subject><subject>Firm location</subject><subject>Home market effect</subject><subject>Liberalization</subject><subject>Location of industry</subject><subject>Market</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Trade costs</subject><subject>Trade liberalization</subject><subject>Trade theory</subject><subject>Welfare</subject><issn>0889-1583</issn><issn>1095-8681</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EEuXxBzhF4sIlwes0joO4oPKUKnGBs7VxNuCQxsVOi-DX41JOHNjLSqtvVjPD2AnwDDjI8y7rOkuZ4CAyXmSc5ztsArwqUiUV7LIJV6pKoVD5PjsIoeOREBIm7PnJY0NJb2vy2NsvHK0bEhya5IP6Fj1dJNe2bcnTMFocqUlfnGuSNfmwCsmrW7gXGsitwva-QP9GYzhiey32gY5_9yF7vr15mt2n88e7h9nVPDXTCsa0xFyaKk5RVDInAyAx50KRkIRSYoMEquaiLDliXZcwVYCilDXUxjSqzQ_Z2fbv0rv3FYVRL2ww1Pf440kDgIApl6qK6OkftHMrP0R3GnheSinktIiU2FLGuxA8tXrpbQz1GSG9aVp3etO03jSteaFjj1F0uRVRjLq25HUwlgZDjfVkRt04-5_8G-8dh0I</recordid><startdate>20120901</startdate><enddate>20120901</enddate><creator>Takatsuka, Hajime</creator><creator>Zeng, Dao-Zhi</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120901</creationdate><title>Trade liberalization and welfare: Differentiated-good versus homogeneous-good markets</title><author>Takatsuka, Hajime ; Zeng, Dao-Zhi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-7a36c999955963ec116a3028e26ea66adae18b02770aabb71481a276b1bccd8f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Economic geography</topic><topic>Firm location</topic><topic>Home market effect</topic><topic>Liberalization</topic><topic>Location of industry</topic><topic>Market</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Trade costs</topic><topic>Trade liberalization</topic><topic>Trade theory</topic><topic>Welfare</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Takatsuka, Hajime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Dao-Zhi</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of the Japanese and international economies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Takatsuka, Hajime</au><au>Zeng, Dao-Zhi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Trade liberalization and welfare: Differentiated-good versus homogeneous-good markets</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the Japanese and international economies</jtitle><date>2012-09-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>308</spage><epage>325</epage><pages>308-325</pages><issn>0889-1583</issn><eissn>1095-8681</eissn><abstract>► We examine the effects of liberalization on industrial location and national welfare. ► We incorporate trade costs in both differentiated-good and homogeneous-good sectors. ► The impacts of liberalization in these sectors on welfare are different from each other. ► If an industry is liberalized while the other is protected, a conflict might occur. ► Appropriate liberalization in both sectors is effective to alleviate such a conflict. In this paper, we examine the effects of liberalization on industrial location and national welfare in a framework of new economic geography. Specifically, we explicitly incorporate arbitrary trade costs in both differentiated-good and homogeneous-good sectors into a two-country model, and clarify the effects of trade-barrier reduction in each sector. We show that their impacts on welfare levels in the two countries are different, and, if an industry is liberalized while the other is protected, a conflict between the countries might occur. Therefore, appropriate liberalization in both sectors is effective to alleviate such a conflict.</abstract><cop>Duluth</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jjie.2012.05.003</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0889-1583
ispartof Journal of the Japanese and international economies, 2012-09, Vol.26 (3), p.308-325
issn 0889-1583
1095-8681
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1112140689
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Elsevier
subjects Economic geography
Firm location
Home market effect
Liberalization
Location of industry
Market
Studies
Trade costs
Trade liberalization
Trade theory
Welfare
title Trade liberalization and welfare: Differentiated-good versus homogeneous-good markets
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T02%3A40%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Trade%20liberalization%20and%20welfare:%20Differentiated-good%20versus%20homogeneous-good%20markets&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20Japanese%20and%20international%20economies&rft.au=Takatsuka,%20Hajime&rft.date=2012-09-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=308&rft.epage=325&rft.pages=308-325&rft.issn=0889-1583&rft.eissn=1095-8681&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jjie.2012.05.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2750537301%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-7a36c999955963ec116a3028e26ea66adae18b02770aabb71481a276b1bccd8f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1037662645&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true