Loading…
'HAPPY COPIOUSNESS'? OED'S RECORDING OF FEMALE AUTHORS OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY
Eighteenth-century language usage is markedly under-represented in the first two editions of the OED, whose quotations for this period were gathered almost entirely during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. This article reviews some of the possible causes, characteristics and consequ...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Review of English studies 2012-02, Vol.63 (258), p.86-117 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 117 |
container_issue | 258 |
container_start_page | 86 |
container_title | The Review of English studies |
container_volume | 63 |
creator | BREWER, CHARLOTTE |
description | Eighteenth-century language usage is markedly under-represented in the first two editions of the OED, whose quotations for this period were gathered almost entirely during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. This article reviews some of the possible causes, characteristics and consequences of OED's gap in eighteenth-century documentation and shows that female authors were particularly scanted. The role of quotations in the OED, as the evidential basis for the dictionary, is briefly considered, along with eighteenth-century (and Victorian/Edwardian) views on women and language, and the availability of female-authored texts for quotation by the lexicographers. The article reports sample reading in eighteenth-century female writers (especially Jean Adam, Penelope Aubin and Anna Seward), which shows that OED could easily have supplied its eighteenth-century deficiency from such authors, and that it often favoured distinctive usages in female-authored texts—innovative, eccentric or domestic vocabulary—rather than usage which exemplified linguistic norms (especially in poetry, where Seward's case is examined). It also discusses revisions to the OED so far conducted in the third (ongoing) edition, and their implications for readers and editors of eighteenth-century texts. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/res/hgq102 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1112666509</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A287680883</galeid><jstor_id>41410091</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A287680883</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-799c42903be58611829d2d808b6900a3e601cd9f03f70e5c21be4ba309d002043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0cFr2zAUBnAxVljW9bL7wOySMvD6niTL0mkYV4kDaRxi59CTcBwlS3Dj1nJg_e-r4LHDLr1IIH486dNHyFeEnwiK3XXW3f3evyDQD2SEPMZQKCE_khEA46GIIvxEPjt3BAAqmByR5ThLlsvHIM2Xs3xdLHRRjH8Fub4fF8FKp_nqfraYBvkkmOiHZK6DZF1m-aq4nJSZDvRsmpVaL8osSP26Xj1-IVe7qnH25u9-TdYTXaZZOM-nszSZhzXjrA9jpWpOFbCNjaRAlFRt6VaC3AgFUDErAOut2gHbxWCjmuLG8k3FQG3904Gza3I7zH3u2pezdb15OrjaNk11su3ZGUSkQojI_8q7FCgDFsv4MvX7f_TYnruTD2KU4lyKGMGjcED7qrHmcKrbU2__9HXbNHZvjY-Z5iahMhY-j2Te_xh83bXOdXZnnrvDU9W9-pvNpTbjazNDbR5_G_DR9W33T3LkCKCQvQGpFInd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>994486710</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>'HAPPY COPIOUSNESS'? OED'S RECORDING OF FEMALE AUTHORS OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY</title><source>EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><source>Humanities Index</source><creator>BREWER, CHARLOTTE</creator><creatorcontrib>BREWER, CHARLOTTE</creatorcontrib><description>Eighteenth-century language usage is markedly under-represented in the first two editions of the OED, whose quotations for this period were gathered almost entirely during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. This article reviews some of the possible causes, characteristics and consequences of OED's gap in eighteenth-century documentation and shows that female authors were particularly scanted. The role of quotations in the OED, as the evidential basis for the dictionary, is briefly considered, along with eighteenth-century (and Victorian/Edwardian) views on women and language, and the availability of female-authored texts for quotation by the lexicographers. The article reports sample reading in eighteenth-century female writers (especially Jean Adam, Penelope Aubin and Anna Seward), which shows that OED could easily have supplied its eighteenth-century deficiency from such authors, and that it often favoured distinctive usages in female-authored texts—innovative, eccentric or domestic vocabulary—rather than usage which exemplified linguistic norms (especially in poetry, where Seward's case is examined). It also discusses revisions to the OED so far conducted in the third (ongoing) edition, and their implications for readers and editors of eighteenth-century texts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0034-6551</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-6968</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/res/hgq102</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RWESA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adam, Jean ; Aubin, Penelope (1679-1731) ; Authors ; Criticism and interpretation ; Dictionaries ; Encyclopaedias ; Encyclopedias and dictionaries ; English language ; European history ; History ; Language ; Lexicography ; Linguistics ; Men ; Poetry ; Quotations ; Seward, Anna (1742-1809) ; Vocabulary ; Women ; Women authors ; Women writers ; Words ; Writers</subject><ispartof>The Review of English studies, 2012-02, Vol.63 (258), p.86-117</ispartof><rights>Oxford University Press 2012</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford Publishing Limited(England) Feb 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41410091$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41410091$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,31270,33849,33850,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>BREWER, CHARLOTTE</creatorcontrib><title>'HAPPY COPIOUSNESS'? OED'S RECORDING OF FEMALE AUTHORS OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY</title><title>The Review of English studies</title><addtitle>Review of English Studies</addtitle><description>Eighteenth-century language usage is markedly under-represented in the first two editions of the OED, whose quotations for this period were gathered almost entirely during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. This article reviews some of the possible causes, characteristics and consequences of OED's gap in eighteenth-century documentation and shows that female authors were particularly scanted. The role of quotations in the OED, as the evidential basis for the dictionary, is briefly considered, along with eighteenth-century (and Victorian/Edwardian) views on women and language, and the availability of female-authored texts for quotation by the lexicographers. The article reports sample reading in eighteenth-century female writers (especially Jean Adam, Penelope Aubin and Anna Seward), which shows that OED could easily have supplied its eighteenth-century deficiency from such authors, and that it often favoured distinctive usages in female-authored texts—innovative, eccentric or domestic vocabulary—rather than usage which exemplified linguistic norms (especially in poetry, where Seward's case is examined). It also discusses revisions to the OED so far conducted in the third (ongoing) edition, and their implications for readers and editors of eighteenth-century texts.</description><subject>Adam, Jean</subject><subject>Aubin, Penelope (1679-1731)</subject><subject>Authors</subject><subject>Criticism and interpretation</subject><subject>Dictionaries</subject><subject>Encyclopaedias</subject><subject>Encyclopedias and dictionaries</subject><subject>English language</subject><subject>European history</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Lexicography</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Poetry</subject><subject>Quotations</subject><subject>Seward, Anna (1742-1809)</subject><subject>Vocabulary</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Women authors</subject><subject>Women writers</subject><subject>Words</subject><subject>Writers</subject><issn>0034-6551</issn><issn>1471-6968</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C18</sourceid><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0cFr2zAUBnAxVljW9bL7wOySMvD6niTL0mkYV4kDaRxi59CTcBwlS3Dj1nJg_e-r4LHDLr1IIH486dNHyFeEnwiK3XXW3f3evyDQD2SEPMZQKCE_khEA46GIIvxEPjt3BAAqmByR5ThLlsvHIM2Xs3xdLHRRjH8Fub4fF8FKp_nqfraYBvkkmOiHZK6DZF1m-aq4nJSZDvRsmpVaL8osSP26Xj1-IVe7qnH25u9-TdYTXaZZOM-nszSZhzXjrA9jpWpOFbCNjaRAlFRt6VaC3AgFUDErAOut2gHbxWCjmuLG8k3FQG3904Gza3I7zH3u2pezdb15OrjaNk11su3ZGUSkQojI_8q7FCgDFsv4MvX7f_TYnruTD2KU4lyKGMGjcED7qrHmcKrbU2__9HXbNHZvjY-Z5iahMhY-j2Te_xh83bXOdXZnnrvDU9W9-pvNpTbjazNDbR5_G_DR9W33T3LkCKCQvQGpFInd</recordid><startdate>20120201</startdate><enddate>20120201</enddate><creator>BREWER, CHARLOTTE</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120201</creationdate><title>'HAPPY COPIOUSNESS'? OED'S RECORDING OF FEMALE AUTHORS OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY</title><author>BREWER, CHARLOTTE</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-799c42903be58611829d2d808b6900a3e601cd9f03f70e5c21be4ba309d002043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adam, Jean</topic><topic>Aubin, Penelope (1679-1731)</topic><topic>Authors</topic><topic>Criticism and interpretation</topic><topic>Dictionaries</topic><topic>Encyclopaedias</topic><topic>Encyclopedias and dictionaries</topic><topic>English language</topic><topic>European history</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Lexicography</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Poetry</topic><topic>Quotations</topic><topic>Seward, Anna (1742-1809)</topic><topic>Vocabulary</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Women authors</topic><topic>Women writers</topic><topic>Words</topic><topic>Writers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BREWER, CHARLOTTE</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>The Review of English studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BREWER, CHARLOTTE</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>'HAPPY COPIOUSNESS'? OED'S RECORDING OF FEMALE AUTHORS OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY</atitle><jtitle>The Review of English studies</jtitle><addtitle>Review of English Studies</addtitle><date>2012-02-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>258</issue><spage>86</spage><epage>117</epage><pages>86-117</pages><issn>0034-6551</issn><eissn>1471-6968</eissn><coden>RWESA9</coden><abstract>Eighteenth-century language usage is markedly under-represented in the first two editions of the OED, whose quotations for this period were gathered almost entirely during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. This article reviews some of the possible causes, characteristics and consequences of OED's gap in eighteenth-century documentation and shows that female authors were particularly scanted. The role of quotations in the OED, as the evidential basis for the dictionary, is briefly considered, along with eighteenth-century (and Victorian/Edwardian) views on women and language, and the availability of female-authored texts for quotation by the lexicographers. The article reports sample reading in eighteenth-century female writers (especially Jean Adam, Penelope Aubin and Anna Seward), which shows that OED could easily have supplied its eighteenth-century deficiency from such authors, and that it often favoured distinctive usages in female-authored texts—innovative, eccentric or domestic vocabulary—rather than usage which exemplified linguistic norms (especially in poetry, where Seward's case is examined). It also discusses revisions to the OED so far conducted in the third (ongoing) edition, and their implications for readers and editors of eighteenth-century texts.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/res/hgq102</doi><tpages>32</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0034-6551 |
ispartof | The Review of English studies, 2012-02, Vol.63 (258), p.86-117 |
issn | 0034-6551 1471-6968 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1112666509 |
source | EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】; Oxford Journals Online; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA); Humanities Index |
subjects | Adam, Jean Aubin, Penelope (1679-1731) Authors Criticism and interpretation Dictionaries Encyclopaedias Encyclopedias and dictionaries English language European history History Language Lexicography Linguistics Men Poetry Quotations Seward, Anna (1742-1809) Vocabulary Women Women authors Women writers Words Writers |
title | 'HAPPY COPIOUSNESS'? OED'S RECORDING OF FEMALE AUTHORS OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T06%3A38%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle='HAPPY%20COPIOUSNESS'?%20OED'S%20RECORDING%20OF%20FEMALE%20AUTHORS%20OF%20THE%20EIGHTEENTH%20CENTURY&rft.jtitle=The%20Review%20of%20English%20studies&rft.au=BREWER,%20CHARLOTTE&rft.date=2012-02-01&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=258&rft.spage=86&rft.epage=117&rft.pages=86-117&rft.issn=0034-6551&rft.eissn=1471-6968&rft.coden=RWESA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/res/hgq102&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA287680883%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-799c42903be58611829d2d808b6900a3e601cd9f03f70e5c21be4ba309d002043%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=994486710&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A287680883&rft_jstor_id=41410091&rfr_iscdi=true |