Loading…

'HAPPY COPIOUSNESS'? OED'S RECORDING OF FEMALE AUTHORS OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY

Eighteenth-century language usage is markedly under-represented in the first two editions of the OED, whose quotations for this period were gathered almost entirely during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. This article reviews some of the possible causes, characteristics and consequ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Review of English studies 2012-02, Vol.63 (258), p.86-117
Main Author: BREWER, CHARLOTTE
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 117
container_issue 258
container_start_page 86
container_title The Review of English studies
container_volume 63
creator BREWER, CHARLOTTE
description Eighteenth-century language usage is markedly under-represented in the first two editions of the OED, whose quotations for this period were gathered almost entirely during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. This article reviews some of the possible causes, characteristics and consequences of OED's gap in eighteenth-century documentation and shows that female authors were particularly scanted. The role of quotations in the OED, as the evidential basis for the dictionary, is briefly considered, along with eighteenth-century (and Victorian/Edwardian) views on women and language, and the availability of female-authored texts for quotation by the lexicographers. The article reports sample reading in eighteenth-century female writers (especially Jean Adam, Penelope Aubin and Anna Seward), which shows that OED could easily have supplied its eighteenth-century deficiency from such authors, and that it often favoured distinctive usages in female-authored texts—innovative, eccentric or domestic vocabulary—rather than usage which exemplified linguistic norms (especially in poetry, where Seward's case is examined). It also discusses revisions to the OED so far conducted in the third (ongoing) edition, and their implications for readers and editors of eighteenth-century texts.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/res/hgq102
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1112666509</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A287680883</galeid><jstor_id>41410091</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A287680883</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-799c42903be58611829d2d808b6900a3e601cd9f03f70e5c21be4ba309d002043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0cFr2zAUBnAxVljW9bL7wOySMvD6niTL0mkYV4kDaRxi59CTcBwlS3Dj1nJg_e-r4LHDLr1IIH486dNHyFeEnwiK3XXW3f3evyDQD2SEPMZQKCE_khEA46GIIvxEPjt3BAAqmByR5ThLlsvHIM2Xs3xdLHRRjH8Fub4fF8FKp_nqfraYBvkkmOiHZK6DZF1m-aq4nJSZDvRsmpVaL8osSP26Xj1-IVe7qnH25u9-TdYTXaZZOM-nszSZhzXjrA9jpWpOFbCNjaRAlFRt6VaC3AgFUDErAOut2gHbxWCjmuLG8k3FQG3904Gza3I7zH3u2pezdb15OrjaNk11su3ZGUSkQojI_8q7FCgDFsv4MvX7f_TYnruTD2KU4lyKGMGjcED7qrHmcKrbU2__9HXbNHZvjY-Z5iahMhY-j2Te_xh83bXOdXZnnrvDU9W9-pvNpTbjazNDbR5_G_DR9W33T3LkCKCQvQGpFInd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>994486710</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>'HAPPY COPIOUSNESS'? OED'S RECORDING OF FEMALE AUTHORS OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY</title><source>EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><source>Humanities Index</source><creator>BREWER, CHARLOTTE</creator><creatorcontrib>BREWER, CHARLOTTE</creatorcontrib><description>Eighteenth-century language usage is markedly under-represented in the first two editions of the OED, whose quotations for this period were gathered almost entirely during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. This article reviews some of the possible causes, characteristics and consequences of OED's gap in eighteenth-century documentation and shows that female authors were particularly scanted. The role of quotations in the OED, as the evidential basis for the dictionary, is briefly considered, along with eighteenth-century (and Victorian/Edwardian) views on women and language, and the availability of female-authored texts for quotation by the lexicographers. The article reports sample reading in eighteenth-century female writers (especially Jean Adam, Penelope Aubin and Anna Seward), which shows that OED could easily have supplied its eighteenth-century deficiency from such authors, and that it often favoured distinctive usages in female-authored texts—innovative, eccentric or domestic vocabulary—rather than usage which exemplified linguistic norms (especially in poetry, where Seward's case is examined). It also discusses revisions to the OED so far conducted in the third (ongoing) edition, and their implications for readers and editors of eighteenth-century texts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0034-6551</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-6968</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/res/hgq102</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RWESA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adam, Jean ; Aubin, Penelope (1679-1731) ; Authors ; Criticism and interpretation ; Dictionaries ; Encyclopaedias ; Encyclopedias and dictionaries ; English language ; European history ; History ; Language ; Lexicography ; Linguistics ; Men ; Poetry ; Quotations ; Seward, Anna (1742-1809) ; Vocabulary ; Women ; Women authors ; Women writers ; Words ; Writers</subject><ispartof>The Review of English studies, 2012-02, Vol.63 (258), p.86-117</ispartof><rights>Oxford University Press 2012</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford Publishing Limited(England) Feb 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41410091$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41410091$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,31270,33849,33850,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>BREWER, CHARLOTTE</creatorcontrib><title>'HAPPY COPIOUSNESS'? OED'S RECORDING OF FEMALE AUTHORS OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY</title><title>The Review of English studies</title><addtitle>Review of English Studies</addtitle><description>Eighteenth-century language usage is markedly under-represented in the first two editions of the OED, whose quotations for this period were gathered almost entirely during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. This article reviews some of the possible causes, characteristics and consequences of OED's gap in eighteenth-century documentation and shows that female authors were particularly scanted. The role of quotations in the OED, as the evidential basis for the dictionary, is briefly considered, along with eighteenth-century (and Victorian/Edwardian) views on women and language, and the availability of female-authored texts for quotation by the lexicographers. The article reports sample reading in eighteenth-century female writers (especially Jean Adam, Penelope Aubin and Anna Seward), which shows that OED could easily have supplied its eighteenth-century deficiency from such authors, and that it often favoured distinctive usages in female-authored texts—innovative, eccentric or domestic vocabulary—rather than usage which exemplified linguistic norms (especially in poetry, where Seward's case is examined). It also discusses revisions to the OED so far conducted in the third (ongoing) edition, and their implications for readers and editors of eighteenth-century texts.</description><subject>Adam, Jean</subject><subject>Aubin, Penelope (1679-1731)</subject><subject>Authors</subject><subject>Criticism and interpretation</subject><subject>Dictionaries</subject><subject>Encyclopaedias</subject><subject>Encyclopedias and dictionaries</subject><subject>English language</subject><subject>European history</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Lexicography</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Poetry</subject><subject>Quotations</subject><subject>Seward, Anna (1742-1809)</subject><subject>Vocabulary</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Women authors</subject><subject>Women writers</subject><subject>Words</subject><subject>Writers</subject><issn>0034-6551</issn><issn>1471-6968</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C18</sourceid><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0cFr2zAUBnAxVljW9bL7wOySMvD6niTL0mkYV4kDaRxi59CTcBwlS3Dj1nJg_e-r4LHDLr1IIH486dNHyFeEnwiK3XXW3f3evyDQD2SEPMZQKCE_khEA46GIIvxEPjt3BAAqmByR5ThLlsvHIM2Xs3xdLHRRjH8Fub4fF8FKp_nqfraYBvkkmOiHZK6DZF1m-aq4nJSZDvRsmpVaL8osSP26Xj1-IVe7qnH25u9-TdYTXaZZOM-nszSZhzXjrA9jpWpOFbCNjaRAlFRt6VaC3AgFUDErAOut2gHbxWCjmuLG8k3FQG3904Gza3I7zH3u2pezdb15OrjaNk11su3ZGUSkQojI_8q7FCgDFsv4MvX7f_TYnruTD2KU4lyKGMGjcED7qrHmcKrbU2__9HXbNHZvjY-Z5iahMhY-j2Te_xh83bXOdXZnnrvDU9W9-pvNpTbjazNDbR5_G_DR9W33T3LkCKCQvQGpFInd</recordid><startdate>20120201</startdate><enddate>20120201</enddate><creator>BREWER, CHARLOTTE</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120201</creationdate><title>'HAPPY COPIOUSNESS'? OED'S RECORDING OF FEMALE AUTHORS OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY</title><author>BREWER, CHARLOTTE</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-799c42903be58611829d2d808b6900a3e601cd9f03f70e5c21be4ba309d002043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adam, Jean</topic><topic>Aubin, Penelope (1679-1731)</topic><topic>Authors</topic><topic>Criticism and interpretation</topic><topic>Dictionaries</topic><topic>Encyclopaedias</topic><topic>Encyclopedias and dictionaries</topic><topic>English language</topic><topic>European history</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Lexicography</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Poetry</topic><topic>Quotations</topic><topic>Seward, Anna (1742-1809)</topic><topic>Vocabulary</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Women authors</topic><topic>Women writers</topic><topic>Words</topic><topic>Writers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BREWER, CHARLOTTE</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>The Review of English studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BREWER, CHARLOTTE</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>'HAPPY COPIOUSNESS'? OED'S RECORDING OF FEMALE AUTHORS OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY</atitle><jtitle>The Review of English studies</jtitle><addtitle>Review of English Studies</addtitle><date>2012-02-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>258</issue><spage>86</spage><epage>117</epage><pages>86-117</pages><issn>0034-6551</issn><eissn>1471-6968</eissn><coden>RWESA9</coden><abstract>Eighteenth-century language usage is markedly under-represented in the first two editions of the OED, whose quotations for this period were gathered almost entirely during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. This article reviews some of the possible causes, characteristics and consequences of OED's gap in eighteenth-century documentation and shows that female authors were particularly scanted. The role of quotations in the OED, as the evidential basis for the dictionary, is briefly considered, along with eighteenth-century (and Victorian/Edwardian) views on women and language, and the availability of female-authored texts for quotation by the lexicographers. The article reports sample reading in eighteenth-century female writers (especially Jean Adam, Penelope Aubin and Anna Seward), which shows that OED could easily have supplied its eighteenth-century deficiency from such authors, and that it often favoured distinctive usages in female-authored texts—innovative, eccentric or domestic vocabulary—rather than usage which exemplified linguistic norms (especially in poetry, where Seward's case is examined). It also discusses revisions to the OED so far conducted in the third (ongoing) edition, and their implications for readers and editors of eighteenth-century texts.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/res/hgq102</doi><tpages>32</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0034-6551
ispartof The Review of English studies, 2012-02, Vol.63 (258), p.86-117
issn 0034-6551
1471-6968
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1112666509
source EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】; Oxford Journals Online; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA); Humanities Index
subjects Adam, Jean
Aubin, Penelope (1679-1731)
Authors
Criticism and interpretation
Dictionaries
Encyclopaedias
Encyclopedias and dictionaries
English language
European history
History
Language
Lexicography
Linguistics
Men
Poetry
Quotations
Seward, Anna (1742-1809)
Vocabulary
Women
Women authors
Women writers
Words
Writers
title 'HAPPY COPIOUSNESS'? OED'S RECORDING OF FEMALE AUTHORS OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T06%3A38%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle='HAPPY%20COPIOUSNESS'?%20OED'S%20RECORDING%20OF%20FEMALE%20AUTHORS%20OF%20THE%20EIGHTEENTH%20CENTURY&rft.jtitle=The%20Review%20of%20English%20studies&rft.au=BREWER,%20CHARLOTTE&rft.date=2012-02-01&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=258&rft.spage=86&rft.epage=117&rft.pages=86-117&rft.issn=0034-6551&rft.eissn=1471-6968&rft.coden=RWESA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/res/hgq102&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA287680883%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-799c42903be58611829d2d808b6900a3e601cd9f03f70e5c21be4ba309d002043%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=994486710&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A287680883&rft_jstor_id=41410091&rfr_iscdi=true