Loading…
Asymmetric implants for breast asymmetry
Summary The indications, advantages, and disadvantages of round and anatomical implants have previously been described. The principles of biodimensional implant selection have been developed by several authors, where the objective choice of breast prosthesis for augmentation is based on the patient&...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery reconstructive & aesthetic surgery, 2012-11, Vol.65 (11), p.1580-1583 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-cd9a6a30d23182d57eb23f51be6ebc869ce46072069b8d8435380b3a707727053 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-cd9a6a30d23182d57eb23f51be6ebc869ce46072069b8d8435380b3a707727053 |
container_end_page | 1583 |
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1580 |
container_title | Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery |
container_volume | 65 |
creator | Mallucci, P Branford, O.A |
description | Summary The indications, advantages, and disadvantages of round and anatomical implants have previously been described. The principles of biodimensional implant selection have been developed by several authors, where the objective choice of breast prosthesis for augmentation is based on the patient's breast tissues. This process has largely been applied to anatomical implant selection. We report a case of breast asymmetry, where we have applied the same concepts in the selection of implants based on tissue dimension. This resulted in an anatomical implant being used to augment the left breast, and a round implant on the right. To our knowledge a round implant and an anatomical implant have not previously been employed in the same patient to correct breast asymmetry. This resulted in excellent postoperative symmetry. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.bjps.2012.04.007 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1112681967</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1748681512002070</els_id><sourcerecordid>1112681967</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-cd9a6a30d23182d57eb23f51be6ebc869ce46072069b8d8435380b3a707727053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1r3DAQhkVpaT7aP9BD2EshF7ujD0sylEAITVII9ND2LGR5DHL8sdV4A_vvK7ObFnLISQI972jmGcY-cSg5cP2lL5t-S6UALkpQJYB5w065NbaAStZv890oW2jLqxN2RtQDKMlV9Z6dCFEpYUR9yi6vaT-OuKQYNnHcDn5aaNPNadMk9LRs_PF5_4G96_xA-PF4nrPft99-3dwXDz_uvt9cPxRBKb4Uoa299hJaIbkVbWWwEbKreIMam2B1HVBpMAJ03djWKllJC430BowRJvd9zi4Pdbdp_rNDWtwYKeCQO8N5R45zLvJItTYZFQc0pJkoYee2KY4-7R0HtxpyvVsNudWQA-WyoRy6ONbfNSO2_yLPSjLw-Qh4Cn7okp9CpP-crvIAQmfu64HDbOMpYnIUIk4B25gwLK6d4-t9XL2IhyFOMf_4iHukft6lKXt23FHOuJ_rLtdVcgEgwID8C9SnlvE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1112681967</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Asymmetric implants for breast asymmetry</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Mallucci, P ; Branford, O.A</creator><creatorcontrib>Mallucci, P ; Branford, O.A</creatorcontrib><description>Summary The indications, advantages, and disadvantages of round and anatomical implants have previously been described. The principles of biodimensional implant selection have been developed by several authors, where the objective choice of breast prosthesis for augmentation is based on the patient's breast tissues. This process has largely been applied to anatomical implant selection. We report a case of breast asymmetry, where we have applied the same concepts in the selection of implants based on tissue dimension. This resulted in an anatomical implant being used to augment the left breast, and a round implant on the right. To our knowledge a round implant and an anatomical implant have not previously been employed in the same patient to correct breast asymmetry. This resulted in excellent postoperative symmetry.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1748-6815</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-0539</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2012.04.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22542729</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anatomical ; Asymmetry ; Augmentation ; Biodimensional ; Biological and medical sciences ; Breast - abnormalities ; Breast implant ; Breast Implantation - methods ; Breast Implants ; Esthetics ; Female ; Humans ; Mammaplasty - methods ; Medical sciences ; Plastic Surgery ; Round ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the genital tract and mammary gland</subject><ispartof>Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery, 2012-11, Vol.65 (11), p.1580-1583</ispartof><rights>British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons</rights><rights>2012 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-cd9a6a30d23182d57eb23f51be6ebc869ce46072069b8d8435380b3a707727053</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-cd9a6a30d23182d57eb23f51be6ebc869ce46072069b8d8435380b3a707727053</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=26546026$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22542729$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mallucci, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Branford, O.A</creatorcontrib><title>Asymmetric implants for breast asymmetry</title><title>Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery</title><addtitle>J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg</addtitle><description>Summary The indications, advantages, and disadvantages of round and anatomical implants have previously been described. The principles of biodimensional implant selection have been developed by several authors, where the objective choice of breast prosthesis for augmentation is based on the patient's breast tissues. This process has largely been applied to anatomical implant selection. We report a case of breast asymmetry, where we have applied the same concepts in the selection of implants based on tissue dimension. This resulted in an anatomical implant being used to augment the left breast, and a round implant on the right. To our knowledge a round implant and an anatomical implant have not previously been employed in the same patient to correct breast asymmetry. This resulted in excellent postoperative symmetry.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anatomical</subject><subject>Asymmetry</subject><subject>Augmentation</subject><subject>Biodimensional</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Breast - abnormalities</subject><subject>Breast implant</subject><subject>Breast Implantation - methods</subject><subject>Breast Implants</subject><subject>Esthetics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammaplasty - methods</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Plastic Surgery</subject><subject>Round</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the genital tract and mammary gland</subject><issn>1748-6815</issn><issn>1878-0539</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1r3DAQhkVpaT7aP9BD2EshF7ujD0sylEAITVII9ND2LGR5DHL8sdV4A_vvK7ObFnLISQI972jmGcY-cSg5cP2lL5t-S6UALkpQJYB5w065NbaAStZv890oW2jLqxN2RtQDKMlV9Z6dCFEpYUR9yi6vaT-OuKQYNnHcDn5aaNPNadMk9LRs_PF5_4G96_xA-PF4nrPft99-3dwXDz_uvt9cPxRBKb4Uoa299hJaIbkVbWWwEbKreIMam2B1HVBpMAJ03djWKllJC430BowRJvd9zi4Pdbdp_rNDWtwYKeCQO8N5R45zLvJItTYZFQc0pJkoYee2KY4-7R0HtxpyvVsNudWQA-WyoRy6ONbfNSO2_yLPSjLw-Qh4Cn7okp9CpP-crvIAQmfu64HDbOMpYnIUIk4B25gwLK6d4-t9XL2IhyFOMf_4iHukft6lKXt23FHOuJ_rLtdVcgEgwID8C9SnlvE</recordid><startdate>20121101</startdate><enddate>20121101</enddate><creator>Mallucci, P</creator><creator>Branford, O.A</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121101</creationdate><title>Asymmetric implants for breast asymmetry</title><author>Mallucci, P ; Branford, O.A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-cd9a6a30d23182d57eb23f51be6ebc869ce46072069b8d8435380b3a707727053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anatomical</topic><topic>Asymmetry</topic><topic>Augmentation</topic><topic>Biodimensional</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Breast - abnormalities</topic><topic>Breast implant</topic><topic>Breast Implantation - methods</topic><topic>Breast Implants</topic><topic>Esthetics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammaplasty - methods</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Plastic Surgery</topic><topic>Round</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the genital tract and mammary gland</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mallucci, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Branford, O.A</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mallucci, P</au><au>Branford, O.A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Asymmetric implants for breast asymmetry</atitle><jtitle>Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg</addtitle><date>2012-11-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1580</spage><epage>1583</epage><pages>1580-1583</pages><issn>1748-6815</issn><eissn>1878-0539</eissn><abstract>Summary The indications, advantages, and disadvantages of round and anatomical implants have previously been described. The principles of biodimensional implant selection have been developed by several authors, where the objective choice of breast prosthesis for augmentation is based on the patient's breast tissues. This process has largely been applied to anatomical implant selection. We report a case of breast asymmetry, where we have applied the same concepts in the selection of implants based on tissue dimension. This resulted in an anatomical implant being used to augment the left breast, and a round implant on the right. To our knowledge a round implant and an anatomical implant have not previously been employed in the same patient to correct breast asymmetry. This resulted in excellent postoperative symmetry.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>22542729</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bjps.2012.04.007</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1748-6815 |
ispartof | Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery, 2012-11, Vol.65 (11), p.1580-1583 |
issn | 1748-6815 1878-0539 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1112681967 |
source | Elsevier |
subjects | Adult Anatomical Asymmetry Augmentation Biodimensional Biological and medical sciences Breast - abnormalities Breast implant Breast Implantation - methods Breast Implants Esthetics Female Humans Mammaplasty - methods Medical sciences Plastic Surgery Round Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Surgery of the genital tract and mammary gland |
title | Asymmetric implants for breast asymmetry |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T04%3A33%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Asymmetric%20implants%20for%20breast%20asymmetry&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20plastic,%20reconstructive%20&%20aesthetic%20surgery&rft.au=Mallucci,%20P&rft.date=2012-11-01&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1580&rft.epage=1583&rft.pages=1580-1583&rft.issn=1748-6815&rft.eissn=1878-0539&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bjps.2012.04.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1112681967%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-cd9a6a30d23182d57eb23f51be6ebc869ce46072069b8d8435380b3a707727053%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1112681967&rft_id=info:pmid/22542729&rfr_iscdi=true |