Rivers as Barriers to Primate Distributions in Africa

Rivers border the geographic distributions of primate taxa, but the extent to which the rivers are effective barriers is debated. We here provide the first statistically substantiated analysis of the role of rivers as barriers to the distribution of primates in west and central Africa, as judged by...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of primatology 2012-02, Vol.33 (1), p.168-183
Main Authors: Harcourt, A. H., Wood, M. A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Africa
Animal Ecology
Animal Genetics and Genomics
Animal populations
Anthropology
Biogeography
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Body image
Body size
Central Africa
Evolutionary Biology
Geographic distribution
Geographical distribution
Geography
Human Genetics
Life Sciences
Primates
Primatology
Rivers
Statistical analysis
Taxa
Taxonomy
West Africa
Zoology
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Rivers border the geographic distributions of primate taxa, but the extent to which the rivers are effective barriers is debated. We here provide the first statistically substantiated analysis of the role of rivers as barriers to the distribution of primates in west and central Africa, as judged by the coincidence of the edge of distributions of forest-dwelling primates with rivers. We use data from the literature to analyze the distributions of 14 genera, 44 species, and 77 subspecies around 18 rivers, river groups, or stretches of rivers. Rivers bordered the distributions of more new taxa (subspecies) than of old taxa (genera), although within genera, age of origin of the taxon did not correlate with likelihood of rivers bordering distributions. Fewer taxa crossed wide rivers than crossed narrow ones. Some analyses indicated that more smaller-bodied genera were stopped by smaller rivers than were larger-bodied genera, but other analyses indicated no effect of body size. Genera with smaller geographic ranges crossed a smaller proportion of the rivers that they met than did genera with large ranges, implying a fundamental difference between small- and large-range taxa in their ability to disperse. Specialization might be the operating trait. Finally, although the aridity of the biogeographic gap in west Africa, the Dahomey Gap, is often argued to be the barrier to movement of species across the Gap, we found that for half the primate species that do not cross the Gap, the rivers that border the Gap could in fact be the effective barrier.
ISSN:0164-0291
1573-8604
DOI:10.1007/s10764-011-9558-z