Loading…
Differences in talker recognition by preschoolers and adults
► Talker variability pervades the speech signal, but we know little about how its processing changes over development. ► Preschoolers and adults learned to map voices to characters. ► Adults encoded similar talkers easily and better than preschoolers. ► Preschoolers easily learned distinct talkers,...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of experimental child psychology 2012-12, Vol.113 (4), p.487-509 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-2856519edc5fcd6eb2bba08495307f4b22615ed196cbc9157ccb80d3e39f97c23 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-2856519edc5fcd6eb2bba08495307f4b22615ed196cbc9157ccb80d3e39f97c23 |
container_end_page | 509 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 487 |
container_title | Journal of experimental child psychology |
container_volume | 113 |
creator | Creel, Sarah C. Jimenez, Sofia R. |
description | ► Talker variability pervades the speech signal, but we know little about how its processing changes over development. ► Preschoolers and adults learned to map voices to characters. ► Adults encoded similar talkers easily and better than preschoolers. ► Preschoolers easily learned distinct talkers, and a few preschoolers encoded similar-sounding voices readily. ► Encoding talker information reliably may take years of perceptual learning.
Talker variability in speech influences language processing from infancy through adulthood and is inextricably embedded in the very cues that identify speech sounds. Yet little is known about developmental changes in the processing of talker information. On one account, children have not yet learned to separate speech sound variability from talker-varying cues in speech, making them more sensitive than adults to talker variation. A different account is that children are less developed than adults at recognizing speech sounds and at recognizing talkers, and development involves protracted tuning of both recognition systems. The current research presented preschoolers and adults (N=180) with voices linked to two distinct cartoon characters. After exposure, participants heard each talker and selected which character was speaking. Consistent with the protracted tuning hypothesis, children were much less accurate than adults when talkers were matched on age, gender, and dialect (Experiments 1–3), even when prosody differed (Experiment 5). Children were highly accurate when voices differed in gender (Experiment 2) or age (mother vs. daughter; Experiment 6), suggesting that greater acoustic dissimilarity facilitated encoding. Implications for speech sound processing are discussed, as are the roles of language knowledge and the nature of talker perceptual space in talker encoding. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.07.007 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1114698610</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ986175</ericid><els_id>S0022096512001415</els_id><sourcerecordid>2792760851</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-2856519edc5fcd6eb2bba08495307f4b22615ed196cbc9157ccb80d3e39f97c23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV2L1TAQhoMo7nH1D4hIQQRvWidpkzawN8u6frHgjV6HdDLV1J7mmLTC_ntTz3EFL7wK4X1mMnmGsaccKg5cvR6rkfBQCeCigrYCaO-xHQetSmhke5_tAIQo812esUcpjQCcq6Z-yM6E0LLTSuzYxRs_DBRpRkqFn4vFTt8pFpEwfJ394sNc9LfFIVLCbyFMFFNhZ1dYt05LesweDHZK9OR0nrMvb68_X70vbz69-3B1eVNiU8ulFJ1UkmtyKAd0inrR9xa6Rssa2qHphVBckuNaYY-ayxax78DVVOtBtyjqc_bq2PcQw4-V0mL2PiFNk50prMlwzhulO8Uhoy_-QcewxjlPt1G1kF1db5Q4UhhDSpEGc4h-b-Ot4WA2t2Y0m1uzuTXQmuw2Fz0_tV77Pbm7kj8yM_DyBNiEdhqindGnv5ySWujfrz87chQ93sXXH7cftDLHF6c4K_3pKZqEfluQ83kti3HB_2_MX5EsnzU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1113258330</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differences in talker recognition by preschoolers and adults</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Creel, Sarah C. ; Jimenez, Sofia R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Creel, Sarah C. ; Jimenez, Sofia R.</creatorcontrib><description>► Talker variability pervades the speech signal, but we know little about how its processing changes over development. ► Preschoolers and adults learned to map voices to characters. ► Adults encoded similar talkers easily and better than preschoolers. ► Preschoolers easily learned distinct talkers, and a few preschoolers encoded similar-sounding voices readily. ► Encoding talker information reliably may take years of perceptual learning.
Talker variability in speech influences language processing from infancy through adulthood and is inextricably embedded in the very cues that identify speech sounds. Yet little is known about developmental changes in the processing of talker information. On one account, children have not yet learned to separate speech sound variability from talker-varying cues in speech, making them more sensitive than adults to talker variation. A different account is that children are less developed than adults at recognizing speech sounds and at recognizing talkers, and development involves protracted tuning of both recognition systems. The current research presented preschoolers and adults (N=180) with voices linked to two distinct cartoon characters. After exposure, participants heard each talker and selected which character was speaking. Consistent with the protracted tuning hypothesis, children were much less accurate than adults when talkers were matched on age, gender, and dialect (Experiments 1–3), even when prosody differed (Experiment 5). Children were highly accurate when voices differed in gender (Experiment 2) or age (mother vs. daughter; Experiment 6), suggesting that greater acoustic dissimilarity facilitated encoding. Implications for speech sound processing are discussed, as are the roles of language knowledge and the nature of talker perceptual space in talker encoding.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0965</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0457</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.07.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22958962</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JECPAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Acoustics ; Adult ; Adults ; Age ; Age Differences ; Association Learning ; Auditory learning ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; Child development ; Child, Preschool ; Cognitive Processes ; Color Perception ; Cues ; Developmental psychology ; Dialects ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Language Development ; Male ; Pattern Recognition, Physiological ; Pattern Recognition, Visual ; Perceptual learning ; Phonetics ; Preschool ; Preschool Children ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Recognition ; Recognition (Psychology) ; Sex ; Software ; Sound Spectrography ; Speech ; Speech Acoustics ; Speech Perception ; Suprasegmentals ; Talker variability ; Voice Quality ; Voices</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental child psychology, 2012-12, Vol.113 (4), p.487-509</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-2856519edc5fcd6eb2bba08495307f4b22615ed196cbc9157ccb80d3e39f97c23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-2856519edc5fcd6eb2bba08495307f4b22615ed196cbc9157ccb80d3e39f97c23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ986175$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=26592930$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22958962$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Creel, Sarah C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jimenez, Sofia R.</creatorcontrib><title>Differences in talker recognition by preschoolers and adults</title><title>Journal of experimental child psychology</title><addtitle>J Exp Child Psychol</addtitle><description>► Talker variability pervades the speech signal, but we know little about how its processing changes over development. ► Preschoolers and adults learned to map voices to characters. ► Adults encoded similar talkers easily and better than preschoolers. ► Preschoolers easily learned distinct talkers, and a few preschoolers encoded similar-sounding voices readily. ► Encoding talker information reliably may take years of perceptual learning.
Talker variability in speech influences language processing from infancy through adulthood and is inextricably embedded in the very cues that identify speech sounds. Yet little is known about developmental changes in the processing of talker information. On one account, children have not yet learned to separate speech sound variability from talker-varying cues in speech, making them more sensitive than adults to talker variation. A different account is that children are less developed than adults at recognizing speech sounds and at recognizing talkers, and development involves protracted tuning of both recognition systems. The current research presented preschoolers and adults (N=180) with voices linked to two distinct cartoon characters. After exposure, participants heard each talker and selected which character was speaking. Consistent with the protracted tuning hypothesis, children were much less accurate than adults when talkers were matched on age, gender, and dialect (Experiments 1–3), even when prosody differed (Experiment 5). Children were highly accurate when voices differed in gender (Experiment 2) or age (mother vs. daughter; Experiment 6), suggesting that greater acoustic dissimilarity facilitated encoding. Implications for speech sound processing are discussed, as are the roles of language knowledge and the nature of talker perceptual space in talker encoding.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Acoustics</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Age Differences</subject><subject>Association Learning</subject><subject>Auditory learning</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child development</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>Color Perception</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Developmental psychology</subject><subject>Dialects</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language Development</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Physiological</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual</subject><subject>Perceptual learning</subject><subject>Phonetics</subject><subject>Preschool</subject><subject>Preschool Children</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Recognition</subject><subject>Recognition (Psychology)</subject><subject>Sex</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Sound Spectrography</subject><subject>Speech</subject><subject>Speech Acoustics</subject><subject>Speech Perception</subject><subject>Suprasegmentals</subject><subject>Talker variability</subject><subject>Voice Quality</subject><subject>Voices</subject><issn>0022-0965</issn><issn>1096-0457</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kV2L1TAQhoMo7nH1D4hIQQRvWidpkzawN8u6frHgjV6HdDLV1J7mmLTC_ntTz3EFL7wK4X1mMnmGsaccKg5cvR6rkfBQCeCigrYCaO-xHQetSmhke5_tAIQo812esUcpjQCcq6Z-yM6E0LLTSuzYxRs_DBRpRkqFn4vFTt8pFpEwfJ394sNc9LfFIVLCbyFMFFNhZ1dYt05LesweDHZK9OR0nrMvb68_X70vbz69-3B1eVNiU8ulFJ1UkmtyKAd0inrR9xa6Rssa2qHphVBckuNaYY-ayxax78DVVOtBtyjqc_bq2PcQw4-V0mL2PiFNk50prMlwzhulO8Uhoy_-QcewxjlPt1G1kF1db5Q4UhhDSpEGc4h-b-Ot4WA2t2Y0m1uzuTXQmuw2Fz0_tV77Pbm7kj8yM_DyBNiEdhqindGnv5ySWujfrz87chQ93sXXH7cftDLHF6c4K_3pKZqEfluQ83kti3HB_2_MX5EsnzU</recordid><startdate>20121201</startdate><enddate>20121201</enddate><creator>Creel, Sarah C.</creator><creator>Jimenez, Sofia R.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121201</creationdate><title>Differences in talker recognition by preschoolers and adults</title><author>Creel, Sarah C. ; Jimenez, Sofia R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-2856519edc5fcd6eb2bba08495307f4b22615ed196cbc9157ccb80d3e39f97c23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Acoustics</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Age Differences</topic><topic>Association Learning</topic><topic>Auditory learning</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child development</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>Color Perception</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Developmental psychology</topic><topic>Dialects</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language Development</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Physiological</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual</topic><topic>Perceptual learning</topic><topic>Phonetics</topic><topic>Preschool</topic><topic>Preschool Children</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Recognition</topic><topic>Recognition (Psychology)</topic><topic>Sex</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Sound Spectrography</topic><topic>Speech</topic><topic>Speech Acoustics</topic><topic>Speech Perception</topic><topic>Suprasegmentals</topic><topic>Talker variability</topic><topic>Voice Quality</topic><topic>Voices</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Creel, Sarah C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jimenez, Sofia R.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental child psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Creel, Sarah C.</au><au>Jimenez, Sofia R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ986175</ericid><atitle>Differences in talker recognition by preschoolers and adults</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental child psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Child Psychol</addtitle><date>2012-12-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>113</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>487</spage><epage>509</epage><pages>487-509</pages><issn>0022-0965</issn><eissn>1096-0457</eissn><coden>JECPAE</coden><abstract>► Talker variability pervades the speech signal, but we know little about how its processing changes over development. ► Preschoolers and adults learned to map voices to characters. ► Adults encoded similar talkers easily and better than preschoolers. ► Preschoolers easily learned distinct talkers, and a few preschoolers encoded similar-sounding voices readily. ► Encoding talker information reliably may take years of perceptual learning.
Talker variability in speech influences language processing from infancy through adulthood and is inextricably embedded in the very cues that identify speech sounds. Yet little is known about developmental changes in the processing of talker information. On one account, children have not yet learned to separate speech sound variability from talker-varying cues in speech, making them more sensitive than adults to talker variation. A different account is that children are less developed than adults at recognizing speech sounds and at recognizing talkers, and development involves protracted tuning of both recognition systems. The current research presented preschoolers and adults (N=180) with voices linked to two distinct cartoon characters. After exposure, participants heard each talker and selected which character was speaking. Consistent with the protracted tuning hypothesis, children were much less accurate than adults when talkers were matched on age, gender, and dialect (Experiments 1–3), even when prosody differed (Experiment 5). Children were highly accurate when voices differed in gender (Experiment 2) or age (mother vs. daughter; Experiment 6), suggesting that greater acoustic dissimilarity facilitated encoding. Implications for speech sound processing are discussed, as are the roles of language knowledge and the nature of talker perceptual space in talker encoding.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>22958962</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jecp.2012.07.007</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-0965 |
ispartof | Journal of experimental child psychology, 2012-12, Vol.113 (4), p.487-509 |
issn | 0022-0965 1096-0457 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1114698610 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals; ERIC |
subjects | Accuracy Acoustics Adult Adults Age Age Differences Association Learning Auditory learning Biological and medical sciences Child Child development Child, Preschool Cognitive Processes Color Perception Cues Developmental psychology Dialects Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Language Development Male Pattern Recognition, Physiological Pattern Recognition, Visual Perceptual learning Phonetics Preschool Preschool Children Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Recognition Recognition (Psychology) Sex Software Sound Spectrography Speech Speech Acoustics Speech Perception Suprasegmentals Talker variability Voice Quality Voices |
title | Differences in talker recognition by preschoolers and adults |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T22%3A37%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences%20in%20talker%20recognition%20by%20preschoolers%20and%20adults&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20child%20psychology&rft.au=Creel,%20Sarah%20C.&rft.date=2012-12-01&rft.volume=113&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=487&rft.epage=509&rft.pages=487-509&rft.issn=0022-0965&rft.eissn=1096-0457&rft.coden=JECPAE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.07.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2792760851%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-2856519edc5fcd6eb2bba08495307f4b22615ed196cbc9157ccb80d3e39f97c23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1113258330&rft_id=info:pmid/22958962&rft_ericid=EJ986175&rfr_iscdi=true |