Loading…
Enhanced interpretability of the PFDI-20 with establishment of reference scores among women in the general population
Aims To enhance the interpretability of the PFDI‐20 by establishing a score distribution for women in the general population and to determine whether scores correspond with urinary and anal incontinence (UI and AI). Methods Subjects recruited during Twins Day Festivals from 2004 to 2009 completed a...
Saved in:
Published in: | Neurourology and urodynamics 2012-11, Vol.31 (8), p.1252-1257 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Aims
To enhance the interpretability of the PFDI‐20 by establishing a score distribution for women in the general population and to determine whether scores correspond with urinary and anal incontinence (UI and AI).
Methods
Subjects recruited during Twins Day Festivals from 2004 to 2009 completed a survey assessing for stress and urgency urinary incontinence (SUI and UUI) and AI of flatus and stool. Score distributions for the PFDI‐20 and each of its subscales were determined for all subjects and for women with isolated forms of incontinence. Scores were compared between continent and incontinent women and between incontinent subtypes by Wilcoxon rank‐sum tests.
Results
One thousand three hundred seventy‐six women completed the survey with PFDI‐20 (Median = 8.9, IQR 31.3), POPDI‐6 (Median = 0, IQR = 8.3), CRADI‐8 (Median = 0, IQR = 10.7), and UDI‐6 (Median = 0, IQR = 16.7). PFDI‐20, POPDI‐6, CRADI‐8, and UDI‐6 scores were significantly greater among women reporting isolated SUI (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0733-2467 1520-6777 |
DOI: | 10.1002/nau.22255 |