Loading…

Stapled haemorrhoidopexy vs. Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy for grade III haemorrhoids: a randomized clinical trial

The aim of this double blind randomized clinical trial was to compare the short-term and long-term outcomes of stapled haemorrhoidopexy (SH group) performed using a circular stapler with that of the Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy (MMH group). A total of 79 consecutive patients with grade III haem...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Il Giornale di chirurgia 2012-10, Vol.33 (10), p.346-351
Main Authors: Ammaturo, C, Tufano, A, Spiniello, E, Sodano, B, Iervolino, E M, Brillantino, A, Braccio, B
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 351
container_issue 10
container_start_page 346
container_title Il Giornale di chirurgia
container_volume 33
creator Ammaturo, C
Tufano, A
Spiniello, E
Sodano, B
Iervolino, E M
Brillantino, A
Braccio, B
description The aim of this double blind randomized clinical trial was to compare the short-term and long-term outcomes of stapled haemorrhoidopexy (SH group) performed using a circular stapler with that of the Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy (MMH group). A total of 79 consecutive patients with grade III haemorrhoids were randomized into two groups treated with SH (n. 39) and MMH (n. 40). The outcomes of the procedures were evaluated postoperatively and over a follow-up period of minimum 2 years. Patients undergoing the SH procedure showed greater short term advantages than MMH group with reduced pain, shorter length of hospital stay, earlier return to work and high patient satisfaction. Long-term follow-up has indicated more favourable results in MMH group in terms of resumption of symptoms with absence of residual prolapse and risk of recurrence of prolapse. At two years follow-up recurrent prolapse was confirmed in six patients of SH group (13%) whereas in none of the MMH group. At six months follow-up there weren't significant difference in the mean satisfaction score for the two groups. At two years the mean satisfaction score was higher in the MMH group vs SH group. Seven patients in the SH group needed a reoperation whereas none in MMH group. From January 2009, in our Surgery Unit the patients are always informed about a higher recurrence rate of SH and we perform this technique only when the patient choices to accept this risk to take advantage of the short-term benefits of this procedure.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1115525862</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1115525862</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-287e58fd1383aca97dfecf78e2913b389877109916aaba437b971b4aeb3191203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkDtPwzAYRT2AaFX6F5BHliA_6thmQxWPSK0YgDn6EjutkRMHO60Iv55IFKl3OcM9usO9QHPCNc00IWKGlil9kik5ZSstr9CMcaKFyPM5Or4N0Htr8B5sG2LcB2dCb79HfEx3eOu8dzvosm2IE84lWw-hHXETIt5FMBYXRXHep3sMOEJnQut-pv3au87V4PEQHfhrdNmAT3Z54gJ9PD2-r1-yzetzsX7YZD2jdMiYklaoxlCuONSgpWls3Uhlmaa84korKSnRmuYAFay4rLSk1QpsxammjPAFuv3b7WP4Otg0lK1LtfUeOhsOqaSUCsGEytmk3pzUQ9VaU_bRtRDH8v8r_gsf-ma1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1115525862</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stapled haemorrhoidopexy vs. Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy for grade III haemorrhoids: a randomized clinical trial</title><source>HEAL-Link subscriptions: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</source><creator>Ammaturo, C ; Tufano, A ; Spiniello, E ; Sodano, B ; Iervolino, E M ; Brillantino, A ; Braccio, B</creator><creatorcontrib>Ammaturo, C ; Tufano, A ; Spiniello, E ; Sodano, B ; Iervolino, E M ; Brillantino, A ; Braccio, B</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this double blind randomized clinical trial was to compare the short-term and long-term outcomes of stapled haemorrhoidopexy (SH group) performed using a circular stapler with that of the Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy (MMH group). A total of 79 consecutive patients with grade III haemorrhoids were randomized into two groups treated with SH (n. 39) and MMH (n. 40). The outcomes of the procedures were evaluated postoperatively and over a follow-up period of minimum 2 years. Patients undergoing the SH procedure showed greater short term advantages than MMH group with reduced pain, shorter length of hospital stay, earlier return to work and high patient satisfaction. Long-term follow-up has indicated more favourable results in MMH group in terms of resumption of symptoms with absence of residual prolapse and risk of recurrence of prolapse. At two years follow-up recurrent prolapse was confirmed in six patients of SH group (13%) whereas in none of the MMH group. At six months follow-up there weren't significant difference in the mean satisfaction score for the two groups. At two years the mean satisfaction score was higher in the MMH group vs SH group. Seven patients in the SH group needed a reoperation whereas none in MMH group. From January 2009, in our Surgery Unit the patients are always informed about a higher recurrence rate of SH and we perform this technique only when the patient choices to accept this risk to take advantage of the short-term benefits of this procedure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0391-9005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23095566</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Italy</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hemorrhoidectomy - methods ; Hemorrhoids - classification ; Hemorrhoids - surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Severity of Illness Index ; Surgical Stapling ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Il Giornale di chirurgia, 2012-10, Vol.33 (10), p.346-351</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23095566$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ammaturo, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tufano, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spiniello, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sodano, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iervolino, E M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brillantino, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braccio, B</creatorcontrib><title>Stapled haemorrhoidopexy vs. Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy for grade III haemorrhoids: a randomized clinical trial</title><title>Il Giornale di chirurgia</title><addtitle>G Chir</addtitle><description>The aim of this double blind randomized clinical trial was to compare the short-term and long-term outcomes of stapled haemorrhoidopexy (SH group) performed using a circular stapler with that of the Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy (MMH group). A total of 79 consecutive patients with grade III haemorrhoids were randomized into two groups treated with SH (n. 39) and MMH (n. 40). The outcomes of the procedures were evaluated postoperatively and over a follow-up period of minimum 2 years. Patients undergoing the SH procedure showed greater short term advantages than MMH group with reduced pain, shorter length of hospital stay, earlier return to work and high patient satisfaction. Long-term follow-up has indicated more favourable results in MMH group in terms of resumption of symptoms with absence of residual prolapse and risk of recurrence of prolapse. At two years follow-up recurrent prolapse was confirmed in six patients of SH group (13%) whereas in none of the MMH group. At six months follow-up there weren't significant difference in the mean satisfaction score for the two groups. At two years the mean satisfaction score was higher in the MMH group vs SH group. Seven patients in the SH group needed a reoperation whereas none in MMH group. From January 2009, in our Surgery Unit the patients are always informed about a higher recurrence rate of SH and we perform this technique only when the patient choices to accept this risk to take advantage of the short-term benefits of this procedure.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Hemorrhoidectomy - methods</subject><subject>Hemorrhoids - classification</subject><subject>Hemorrhoids - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Surgical Stapling</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0391-9005</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkDtPwzAYRT2AaFX6F5BHliA_6thmQxWPSK0YgDn6EjutkRMHO60Iv55IFKl3OcM9usO9QHPCNc00IWKGlil9kik5ZSstr9CMcaKFyPM5Or4N0Htr8B5sG2LcB2dCb79HfEx3eOu8dzvosm2IE84lWw-hHXETIt5FMBYXRXHep3sMOEJnQut-pv3au87V4PEQHfhrdNmAT3Z54gJ9PD2-r1-yzetzsX7YZD2jdMiYklaoxlCuONSgpWls3Uhlmaa84korKSnRmuYAFay4rLSk1QpsxammjPAFuv3b7WP4Otg0lK1LtfUeOhsOqaSUCsGEytmk3pzUQ9VaU_bRtRDH8v8r_gsf-ma1</recordid><startdate>201210</startdate><enddate>201210</enddate><creator>Ammaturo, C</creator><creator>Tufano, A</creator><creator>Spiniello, E</creator><creator>Sodano, B</creator><creator>Iervolino, E M</creator><creator>Brillantino, A</creator><creator>Braccio, B</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201210</creationdate><title>Stapled haemorrhoidopexy vs. Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy for grade III haemorrhoids: a randomized clinical trial</title><author>Ammaturo, C ; Tufano, A ; Spiniello, E ; Sodano, B ; Iervolino, E M ; Brillantino, A ; Braccio, B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-287e58fd1383aca97dfecf78e2913b389877109916aaba437b971b4aeb3191203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Hemorrhoidectomy - methods</topic><topic>Hemorrhoids - classification</topic><topic>Hemorrhoids - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Surgical Stapling</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ammaturo, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tufano, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spiniello, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sodano, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iervolino, E M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brillantino, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braccio, B</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Il Giornale di chirurgia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ammaturo, C</au><au>Tufano, A</au><au>Spiniello, E</au><au>Sodano, B</au><au>Iervolino, E M</au><au>Brillantino, A</au><au>Braccio, B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stapled haemorrhoidopexy vs. Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy for grade III haemorrhoids: a randomized clinical trial</atitle><jtitle>Il Giornale di chirurgia</jtitle><addtitle>G Chir</addtitle><date>2012-10</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>346</spage><epage>351</epage><pages>346-351</pages><issn>0391-9005</issn><abstract>The aim of this double blind randomized clinical trial was to compare the short-term and long-term outcomes of stapled haemorrhoidopexy (SH group) performed using a circular stapler with that of the Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy (MMH group). A total of 79 consecutive patients with grade III haemorrhoids were randomized into two groups treated with SH (n. 39) and MMH (n. 40). The outcomes of the procedures were evaluated postoperatively and over a follow-up period of minimum 2 years. Patients undergoing the SH procedure showed greater short term advantages than MMH group with reduced pain, shorter length of hospital stay, earlier return to work and high patient satisfaction. Long-term follow-up has indicated more favourable results in MMH group in terms of resumption of symptoms with absence of residual prolapse and risk of recurrence of prolapse. At two years follow-up recurrent prolapse was confirmed in six patients of SH group (13%) whereas in none of the MMH group. At six months follow-up there weren't significant difference in the mean satisfaction score for the two groups. At two years the mean satisfaction score was higher in the MMH group vs SH group. Seven patients in the SH group needed a reoperation whereas none in MMH group. From January 2009, in our Surgery Unit the patients are always informed about a higher recurrence rate of SH and we perform this technique only when the patient choices to accept this risk to take advantage of the short-term benefits of this procedure.</abstract><cop>Italy</cop><pmid>23095566</pmid><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0391-9005
ispartof Il Giornale di chirurgia, 2012-10, Vol.33 (10), p.346-351
issn 0391-9005
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1115525862
source HEAL-Link subscriptions: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
subjects Adult
Aged
Double-Blind Method
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Hemorrhoidectomy - methods
Hemorrhoids - classification
Hemorrhoids - surgery
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Severity of Illness Index
Surgical Stapling
Young Adult
title Stapled haemorrhoidopexy vs. Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy for grade III haemorrhoids: a randomized clinical trial
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T02%3A37%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stapled%20haemorrhoidopexy%20vs.%20Milligan-Morgan%20haemorrhoidectomy%20for%20grade%20III%20haemorrhoids:%20a%20randomized%20clinical%20trial&rft.jtitle=Il%20Giornale%20di%20chirurgia&rft.au=Ammaturo,%20C&rft.date=2012-10&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=346&rft.epage=351&rft.pages=346-351&rft.issn=0391-9005&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1115525862%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-287e58fd1383aca97dfecf78e2913b389877109916aaba437b971b4aeb3191203%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1115525862&rft_id=info:pmid/23095566&rfr_iscdi=true