Loading…

Measuring attitude toward social health insurance

In order to understand the health care system a country chooses to adopt or the health care reform a country decides to undertake, one must first be able to measure a country's attitude toward social health insurance. Our primary goal was to develop a construct that allows us to measure this &q...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The European journal of health economics 2012-12, Vol.13 (6), p.707-722
Main Authors: Loh, Chung-Ping A., Nihalani, Katrin, Schnusenberg, Oliver
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-c9f44b79cebc6aa930cf905e69ac352ef46ec88b4493682fd4906c28fcf1696b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-c9f44b79cebc6aa930cf905e69ac352ef46ec88b4493682fd4906c28fcf1696b3
container_end_page 722
container_issue 6
container_start_page 707
container_title The European journal of health economics
container_volume 13
creator Loh, Chung-Ping A.
Nihalani, Katrin
Schnusenberg, Oliver
description In order to understand the health care system a country chooses to adopt or the health care reform a country decides to undertake, one must first be able to measure a country's attitude toward social health insurance. Our primary goal was to develop a construct that allows us to measure this "attitude toward social health insurance". Using a sample of 724 students from the People's Republic of China, Germany, and the United States and an initial set of sixteen items, we extract a scale that measures the basic attitude toward social health insurance in the three countries. The scale is internally consistent in each of the three countries. A secondary factor labeled "government responsibility" is marginally consistent for the total sample and for the German sample. German respondents have the most favorable attitude toward social health insurance, followed by China, and then the United States. Chinese respondents have the most favorable attitude toward government responsibility in health insurance. The scale developed here can be used to further investigate and understand which health care system will succeed and which will fail in a given country, which is important from both a political and an economic perspective.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10198-011-0324-0
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1122625734</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23275617</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23275617</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-c9f44b79cebc6aa930cf905e69ac352ef46ec88b4493682fd4906c28fcf1696b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EoqXwAxhAkVhYAj5_xR5RxZdUxAKz5bgOTZUmxXaE-Pe4SguIgeXuhufeOz0InQK-AoyL6wAYlMwxQI4pYTneQ2MQIPNCYNjfzVzJEToKYYkxIQWhh2hEQFCMJRkjeHIm9L5u3zITYx37ucti92H8PAudrU2TLZxp4iKr24SZ1rpjdFCZJriTbZ-g17vbl-lDPnu-f5zezHLLuIy5VRVjZaGsK60wRlFsK4W5E8pYyomrmHBWypIxRYUk1ZwpLCyRla1AKFHSCboccte-e-9diHpVB-uaxrSu64MGIEQQXlCW0Is_6LLrfZu-SxRwRhkHkigYKOu7ELyr9NrXK-M_NWC98akHnzr51BufqUzQ-Ta5L1du_r2xE5gAMgBhvZHo_K_T_6SeDUvLEDv_E0pJwQUU9AvQg4gz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1115434512</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring attitude toward social health insurance</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>EconLit with Full Text</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Loh, Chung-Ping A. ; Nihalani, Katrin ; Schnusenberg, Oliver</creator><creatorcontrib>Loh, Chung-Ping A. ; Nihalani, Katrin ; Schnusenberg, Oliver</creatorcontrib><description>In order to understand the health care system a country chooses to adopt or the health care reform a country decides to undertake, one must first be able to measure a country's attitude toward social health insurance. Our primary goal was to develop a construct that allows us to measure this "attitude toward social health insurance". Using a sample of 724 students from the People's Republic of China, Germany, and the United States and an initial set of sixteen items, we extract a scale that measures the basic attitude toward social health insurance in the three countries. The scale is internally consistent in each of the three countries. A secondary factor labeled "government responsibility" is marginally consistent for the total sample and for the German sample. German respondents have the most favorable attitude toward social health insurance, followed by China, and then the United States. Chinese respondents have the most favorable attitude toward government responsibility in health insurance. The scale developed here can be used to further investigate and understand which health care system will succeed and which will fail in a given country, which is important from both a political and an economic perspective.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1618-7598</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1618-7601</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10198-011-0324-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21630082</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analysis ; Attitudes ; Business ; China ; Chinese culture ; Countries ; Discriminant analysis ; Economic Policy ; Economic theory ; Employees ; Employer provided health insurance ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Female ; Germany ; Government ; Health care ; Health Care Management ; Health care policy ; Health care reform ; Health Economics ; Health facilities ; Health insurance ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Health services ; Humans ; Insurance coverage ; Insurance premiums ; Literature ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; National Health Programs ; Original Paper ; Pharmacoeconomics and Health Outcomes ; Political attitudes ; Public Finance ; Public Health ; Public Opinion ; Rural areas ; Social policy ; Studies ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Taxes ; United States ; Urban areas ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>The European journal of health economics, 2012-12, Vol.13 (6), p.707-722</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-c9f44b79cebc6aa930cf905e69ac352ef46ec88b4493682fd4906c28fcf1696b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-c9f44b79cebc6aa930cf905e69ac352ef46ec88b4493682fd4906c28fcf1696b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1115434512/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1115434512?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,27924,27925,36060,36061,44363,58238,58471,74895</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21630082$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Loh, Chung-Ping A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nihalani, Katrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schnusenberg, Oliver</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring attitude toward social health insurance</title><title>The European journal of health economics</title><addtitle>Eur J Health Econ</addtitle><addtitle>Eur J Health Econ</addtitle><description>In order to understand the health care system a country chooses to adopt or the health care reform a country decides to undertake, one must first be able to measure a country's attitude toward social health insurance. Our primary goal was to develop a construct that allows us to measure this "attitude toward social health insurance". Using a sample of 724 students from the People's Republic of China, Germany, and the United States and an initial set of sixteen items, we extract a scale that measures the basic attitude toward social health insurance in the three countries. The scale is internally consistent in each of the three countries. A secondary factor labeled "government responsibility" is marginally consistent for the total sample and for the German sample. German respondents have the most favorable attitude toward social health insurance, followed by China, and then the United States. Chinese respondents have the most favorable attitude toward government responsibility in health insurance. The scale developed here can be used to further investigate and understand which health care system will succeed and which will fail in a given country, which is important from both a political and an economic perspective.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Business</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Chinese culture</subject><subject>Countries</subject><subject>Discriminant analysis</subject><subject>Economic Policy</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Employer provided health insurance</subject><subject>Factor Analysis, Statistical</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health Care Management</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Health care reform</subject><subject>Health Economics</subject><subject>Health facilities</subject><subject>Health insurance</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insurance coverage</subject><subject>Insurance premiums</subject><subject>Literature</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>National Health Programs</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Pharmacoeconomics and Health Outcomes</subject><subject>Political attitudes</subject><subject>Public Finance</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Public Opinion</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Social policy</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Taxes</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1618-7598</issn><issn>1618-7601</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EoqXwAxhAkVhYAj5_xR5RxZdUxAKz5bgOTZUmxXaE-Pe4SguIgeXuhufeOz0InQK-AoyL6wAYlMwxQI4pYTneQ2MQIPNCYNjfzVzJEToKYYkxIQWhh2hEQFCMJRkjeHIm9L5u3zITYx37ucti92H8PAudrU2TLZxp4iKr24SZ1rpjdFCZJriTbZ-g17vbl-lDPnu-f5zezHLLuIy5VRVjZaGsK60wRlFsK4W5E8pYyomrmHBWypIxRYUk1ZwpLCyRla1AKFHSCboccte-e-9diHpVB-uaxrSu64MGIEQQXlCW0Is_6LLrfZu-SxRwRhkHkigYKOu7ELyr9NrXK-M_NWC98akHnzr51BufqUzQ-Ta5L1du_r2xE5gAMgBhvZHo_K_T_6SeDUvLEDv_E0pJwQUU9AvQg4gz</recordid><startdate>20121201</startdate><enddate>20121201</enddate><creator>Loh, Chung-Ping A.</creator><creator>Nihalani, Katrin</creator><creator>Schnusenberg, Oliver</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121201</creationdate><title>Measuring attitude toward social health insurance</title><author>Loh, Chung-Ping A. ; Nihalani, Katrin ; Schnusenberg, Oliver</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-c9f44b79cebc6aa930cf905e69ac352ef46ec88b4493682fd4906c28fcf1696b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Business</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Chinese culture</topic><topic>Countries</topic><topic>Discriminant analysis</topic><topic>Economic Policy</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Employer provided health insurance</topic><topic>Factor Analysis, Statistical</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health Care Management</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Health care reform</topic><topic>Health Economics</topic><topic>Health facilities</topic><topic>Health insurance</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insurance coverage</topic><topic>Insurance premiums</topic><topic>Literature</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>National Health Programs</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Pharmacoeconomics and Health Outcomes</topic><topic>Political attitudes</topic><topic>Public Finance</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Public Opinion</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Social policy</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Taxes</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Loh, Chung-Ping A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nihalani, Katrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schnusenberg, Oliver</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The European journal of health economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Loh, Chung-Ping A.</au><au>Nihalani, Katrin</au><au>Schnusenberg, Oliver</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring attitude toward social health insurance</atitle><jtitle>The European journal of health economics</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Health Econ</stitle><addtitle>Eur J Health Econ</addtitle><date>2012-12-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>707</spage><epage>722</epage><pages>707-722</pages><issn>1618-7598</issn><eissn>1618-7601</eissn><abstract>In order to understand the health care system a country chooses to adopt or the health care reform a country decides to undertake, one must first be able to measure a country's attitude toward social health insurance. Our primary goal was to develop a construct that allows us to measure this "attitude toward social health insurance". Using a sample of 724 students from the People's Republic of China, Germany, and the United States and an initial set of sixteen items, we extract a scale that measures the basic attitude toward social health insurance in the three countries. The scale is internally consistent in each of the three countries. A secondary factor labeled "government responsibility" is marginally consistent for the total sample and for the German sample. German respondents have the most favorable attitude toward social health insurance, followed by China, and then the United States. Chinese respondents have the most favorable attitude toward government responsibility in health insurance. The scale developed here can be used to further investigate and understand which health care system will succeed and which will fail in a given country, which is important from both a political and an economic perspective.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>21630082</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10198-011-0324-0</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1618-7598
ispartof The European journal of health economics, 2012-12, Vol.13 (6), p.707-722
issn 1618-7598
1618-7601
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1122625734
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; EconLit with Full Text; ABI/INFORM Global; Springer Link
subjects Adult
Analysis
Attitudes
Business
China
Chinese culture
Countries
Discriminant analysis
Economic Policy
Economic theory
Employees
Employer provided health insurance
Factor Analysis, Statistical
Female
Germany
Government
Health care
Health Care Management
Health care policy
Health care reform
Health Economics
Health facilities
Health insurance
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Health services
Humans
Insurance coverage
Insurance premiums
Literature
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
National Health Programs
Original Paper
Pharmacoeconomics and Health Outcomes
Political attitudes
Public Finance
Public Health
Public Opinion
Rural areas
Social policy
Studies
Surveys and Questionnaires
Taxes
United States
Urban areas
Young Adult
title Measuring attitude toward social health insurance
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T16%3A11%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20attitude%20toward%20social%20health%20insurance&rft.jtitle=The%20European%20journal%20of%20health%20economics&rft.au=Loh,%20Chung-Ping%20A.&rft.date=2012-12-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=707&rft.epage=722&rft.pages=707-722&rft.issn=1618-7598&rft.eissn=1618-7601&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10198-011-0324-0&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23275617%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-c9f44b79cebc6aa930cf905e69ac352ef46ec88b4493682fd4906c28fcf1696b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1115434512&rft_id=info:pmid/21630082&rft_jstor_id=23275617&rfr_iscdi=true