Loading…
Measuring attitude toward social health insurance
In order to understand the health care system a country chooses to adopt or the health care reform a country decides to undertake, one must first be able to measure a country's attitude toward social health insurance. Our primary goal was to develop a construct that allows us to measure this &q...
Saved in:
Published in: | The European journal of health economics 2012-12, Vol.13 (6), p.707-722 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-c9f44b79cebc6aa930cf905e69ac352ef46ec88b4493682fd4906c28fcf1696b3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-c9f44b79cebc6aa930cf905e69ac352ef46ec88b4493682fd4906c28fcf1696b3 |
container_end_page | 722 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 707 |
container_title | The European journal of health economics |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Loh, Chung-Ping A. Nihalani, Katrin Schnusenberg, Oliver |
description | In order to understand the health care system a country chooses to adopt or the health care reform a country decides to undertake, one must first be able to measure a country's attitude toward social health insurance. Our primary goal was to develop a construct that allows us to measure this "attitude toward social health insurance". Using a sample of 724 students from the People's Republic of China, Germany, and the United States and an initial set of sixteen items, we extract a scale that measures the basic attitude toward social health insurance in the three countries. The scale is internally consistent in each of the three countries. A secondary factor labeled "government responsibility" is marginally consistent for the total sample and for the German sample. German respondents have the most favorable attitude toward social health insurance, followed by China, and then the United States. Chinese respondents have the most favorable attitude toward government responsibility in health insurance. The scale developed here can be used to further investigate and understand which health care system will succeed and which will fail in a given country, which is important from both a political and an economic perspective. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10198-011-0324-0 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1122625734</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23275617</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23275617</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-c9f44b79cebc6aa930cf905e69ac352ef46ec88b4493682fd4906c28fcf1696b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EoqXwAxhAkVhYAj5_xR5RxZdUxAKz5bgOTZUmxXaE-Pe4SguIgeXuhufeOz0InQK-AoyL6wAYlMwxQI4pYTneQ2MQIPNCYNjfzVzJEToKYYkxIQWhh2hEQFCMJRkjeHIm9L5u3zITYx37ucti92H8PAudrU2TLZxp4iKr24SZ1rpjdFCZJriTbZ-g17vbl-lDPnu-f5zezHLLuIy5VRVjZaGsK60wRlFsK4W5E8pYyomrmHBWypIxRYUk1ZwpLCyRla1AKFHSCboccte-e-9diHpVB-uaxrSu64MGIEQQXlCW0Is_6LLrfZu-SxRwRhkHkigYKOu7ELyr9NrXK-M_NWC98akHnzr51BufqUzQ-Ta5L1du_r2xE5gAMgBhvZHo_K_T_6SeDUvLEDv_E0pJwQUU9AvQg4gz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1115434512</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring attitude toward social health insurance</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>EconLit with Full Text</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Loh, Chung-Ping A. ; Nihalani, Katrin ; Schnusenberg, Oliver</creator><creatorcontrib>Loh, Chung-Ping A. ; Nihalani, Katrin ; Schnusenberg, Oliver</creatorcontrib><description>In order to understand the health care system a country chooses to adopt or the health care reform a country decides to undertake, one must first be able to measure a country's attitude toward social health insurance. Our primary goal was to develop a construct that allows us to measure this "attitude toward social health insurance". Using a sample of 724 students from the People's Republic of China, Germany, and the United States and an initial set of sixteen items, we extract a scale that measures the basic attitude toward social health insurance in the three countries. The scale is internally consistent in each of the three countries. A secondary factor labeled "government responsibility" is marginally consistent for the total sample and for the German sample. German respondents have the most favorable attitude toward social health insurance, followed by China, and then the United States. Chinese respondents have the most favorable attitude toward government responsibility in health insurance. The scale developed here can be used to further investigate and understand which health care system will succeed and which will fail in a given country, which is important from both a political and an economic perspective.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1618-7598</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1618-7601</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10198-011-0324-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21630082</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analysis ; Attitudes ; Business ; China ; Chinese culture ; Countries ; Discriminant analysis ; Economic Policy ; Economic theory ; Employees ; Employer provided health insurance ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Female ; Germany ; Government ; Health care ; Health Care Management ; Health care policy ; Health care reform ; Health Economics ; Health facilities ; Health insurance ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Health services ; Humans ; Insurance coverage ; Insurance premiums ; Literature ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; National Health Programs ; Original Paper ; Pharmacoeconomics and Health Outcomes ; Political attitudes ; Public Finance ; Public Health ; Public Opinion ; Rural areas ; Social policy ; Studies ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Taxes ; United States ; Urban areas ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>The European journal of health economics, 2012-12, Vol.13 (6), p.707-722</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-c9f44b79cebc6aa930cf905e69ac352ef46ec88b4493682fd4906c28fcf1696b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-c9f44b79cebc6aa930cf905e69ac352ef46ec88b4493682fd4906c28fcf1696b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1115434512/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1115434512?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,27924,27925,36060,36061,44363,58238,58471,74895</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21630082$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Loh, Chung-Ping A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nihalani, Katrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schnusenberg, Oliver</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring attitude toward social health insurance</title><title>The European journal of health economics</title><addtitle>Eur J Health Econ</addtitle><addtitle>Eur J Health Econ</addtitle><description>In order to understand the health care system a country chooses to adopt or the health care reform a country decides to undertake, one must first be able to measure a country's attitude toward social health insurance. Our primary goal was to develop a construct that allows us to measure this "attitude toward social health insurance". Using a sample of 724 students from the People's Republic of China, Germany, and the United States and an initial set of sixteen items, we extract a scale that measures the basic attitude toward social health insurance in the three countries. The scale is internally consistent in each of the three countries. A secondary factor labeled "government responsibility" is marginally consistent for the total sample and for the German sample. German respondents have the most favorable attitude toward social health insurance, followed by China, and then the United States. Chinese respondents have the most favorable attitude toward government responsibility in health insurance. The scale developed here can be used to further investigate and understand which health care system will succeed and which will fail in a given country, which is important from both a political and an economic perspective.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Business</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Chinese culture</subject><subject>Countries</subject><subject>Discriminant analysis</subject><subject>Economic Policy</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Employer provided health insurance</subject><subject>Factor Analysis, Statistical</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health Care Management</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Health care reform</subject><subject>Health Economics</subject><subject>Health facilities</subject><subject>Health insurance</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insurance coverage</subject><subject>Insurance premiums</subject><subject>Literature</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>National Health Programs</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Pharmacoeconomics and Health Outcomes</subject><subject>Political attitudes</subject><subject>Public Finance</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Public Opinion</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Social policy</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Taxes</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1618-7598</issn><issn>1618-7601</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EoqXwAxhAkVhYAj5_xR5RxZdUxAKz5bgOTZUmxXaE-Pe4SguIgeXuhufeOz0InQK-AoyL6wAYlMwxQI4pYTneQ2MQIPNCYNjfzVzJEToKYYkxIQWhh2hEQFCMJRkjeHIm9L5u3zITYx37ucti92H8PAudrU2TLZxp4iKr24SZ1rpjdFCZJriTbZ-g17vbl-lDPnu-f5zezHLLuIy5VRVjZaGsK60wRlFsK4W5E8pYyomrmHBWypIxRYUk1ZwpLCyRla1AKFHSCboccte-e-9diHpVB-uaxrSu64MGIEQQXlCW0Is_6LLrfZu-SxRwRhkHkigYKOu7ELyr9NrXK-M_NWC98akHnzr51BufqUzQ-Ta5L1du_r2xE5gAMgBhvZHo_K_T_6SeDUvLEDv_E0pJwQUU9AvQg4gz</recordid><startdate>20121201</startdate><enddate>20121201</enddate><creator>Loh, Chung-Ping A.</creator><creator>Nihalani, Katrin</creator><creator>Schnusenberg, Oliver</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121201</creationdate><title>Measuring attitude toward social health insurance</title><author>Loh, Chung-Ping A. ; Nihalani, Katrin ; Schnusenberg, Oliver</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-c9f44b79cebc6aa930cf905e69ac352ef46ec88b4493682fd4906c28fcf1696b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Business</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Chinese culture</topic><topic>Countries</topic><topic>Discriminant analysis</topic><topic>Economic Policy</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Employer provided health insurance</topic><topic>Factor Analysis, Statistical</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health Care Management</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Health care reform</topic><topic>Health Economics</topic><topic>Health facilities</topic><topic>Health insurance</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insurance coverage</topic><topic>Insurance premiums</topic><topic>Literature</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>National Health Programs</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Pharmacoeconomics and Health Outcomes</topic><topic>Political attitudes</topic><topic>Public Finance</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Public Opinion</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Social policy</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Taxes</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Loh, Chung-Ping A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nihalani, Katrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schnusenberg, Oliver</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The European journal of health economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Loh, Chung-Ping A.</au><au>Nihalani, Katrin</au><au>Schnusenberg, Oliver</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring attitude toward social health insurance</atitle><jtitle>The European journal of health economics</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Health Econ</stitle><addtitle>Eur J Health Econ</addtitle><date>2012-12-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>707</spage><epage>722</epage><pages>707-722</pages><issn>1618-7598</issn><eissn>1618-7601</eissn><abstract>In order to understand the health care system a country chooses to adopt or the health care reform a country decides to undertake, one must first be able to measure a country's attitude toward social health insurance. Our primary goal was to develop a construct that allows us to measure this "attitude toward social health insurance". Using a sample of 724 students from the People's Republic of China, Germany, and the United States and an initial set of sixteen items, we extract a scale that measures the basic attitude toward social health insurance in the three countries. The scale is internally consistent in each of the three countries. A secondary factor labeled "government responsibility" is marginally consistent for the total sample and for the German sample. German respondents have the most favorable attitude toward social health insurance, followed by China, and then the United States. Chinese respondents have the most favorable attitude toward government responsibility in health insurance. The scale developed here can be used to further investigate and understand which health care system will succeed and which will fail in a given country, which is important from both a political and an economic perspective.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>21630082</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10198-011-0324-0</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1618-7598 |
ispartof | The European journal of health economics, 2012-12, Vol.13 (6), p.707-722 |
issn | 1618-7598 1618-7601 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1122625734 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; EconLit with Full Text; ABI/INFORM Global; Springer Link |
subjects | Adult Analysis Attitudes Business China Chinese culture Countries Discriminant analysis Economic Policy Economic theory Employees Employer provided health insurance Factor Analysis, Statistical Female Germany Government Health care Health Care Management Health care policy Health care reform Health Economics Health facilities Health insurance Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice Health services Humans Insurance coverage Insurance premiums Literature Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health National Health Programs Original Paper Pharmacoeconomics and Health Outcomes Political attitudes Public Finance Public Health Public Opinion Rural areas Social policy Studies Surveys and Questionnaires Taxes United States Urban areas Young Adult |
title | Measuring attitude toward social health insurance |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T16%3A11%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20attitude%20toward%20social%20health%20insurance&rft.jtitle=The%20European%20journal%20of%20health%20economics&rft.au=Loh,%20Chung-Ping%20A.&rft.date=2012-12-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=707&rft.epage=722&rft.pages=707-722&rft.issn=1618-7598&rft.eissn=1618-7601&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10198-011-0324-0&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23275617%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-c9f44b79cebc6aa930cf905e69ac352ef46ec88b4493682fd4906c28fcf1696b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1115434512&rft_id=info:pmid/21630082&rft_jstor_id=23275617&rfr_iscdi=true |