Loading…
Can Top-Down and Bottom-Up be Reconciled? Electoral Competition and Service Delivery in Malaysia
Top-down versus bottom-up is one of development’s enduring tensions, not least in public service delivery. In Malaysia, public services have traditionally been animated from the top down. Bottom-up forces in civil society have strengthened recently, but so too have top-down forces, and their impact...
Saved in:
Published in: | World development 2012-11, Vol.40 (11), p.2329-2341 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-2c01432ee1f5af65354b5cb99f45e5c0173f4139e263533d7419108c87a091923 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-2c01432ee1f5af65354b5cb99f45e5c0173f4139e263533d7419108c87a091923 |
container_end_page | 2341 |
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 2329 |
container_title | World development |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Mccourt, Willy |
description | Top-down versus bottom-up is one of development’s enduring tensions, not least in public service delivery. In Malaysia, public services have traditionally been animated from the top down. Bottom-up forces in civil society have strengthened recently, but so too have top-down forces, and their impact on public services is greater.
Malaysia’s experience suggests that where electoral competition gives politicians an incentive to respond to voters’ service preferences, top-down initiatives have the greater potential for large-scale social change. Participatory initiatives will be most effective when they play a supplementary role. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.03.023 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1124749091</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0305750X12000605</els_id><sourcerecordid>1124749091</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-2c01432ee1f5af65354b5cb99f45e5c0173f4139e263533d7419108c87a091923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFOGzEQhq0KpIbQV6gs9cJlt2N7HcenliYUkECV2iD15jreWcmRs17sTVDeHqPApRdOc5jv_zXzEfKZQc2Azb5u6qeYQtvivubAeA2iBi4-kAmbK1FJrdkJmYAAWSkJfz-Ss5w3ACCFVhPyb2F7uopDtYxPPbV9S3_EcYzb6mGga6S_0cXe-YDtN3oV0I0x2UAXcTvg6Ecfj5E_mPbeIV1i8HtMB-p7em-DPWRvz8lpZ0PGT69zSh5-Xq0WN9Xdr-vbxeVd5Rqhxoo7YI3giKyTtptJIZu1dGutu0aiLEsluoYJjXwmpBCtaphmMHdzZUEzzcWUXBx7hxQfd5hHs_XZYQi2x7jLhjHeqEYXuKBf_kM3cZf6cp1hoIUGzhUUanakXIo5J-zMkPzWpkOBzIt4szFv4s2LeAPCFPEl-P0YxPLu3mMy2XnsHbY-FYOmjf69imf5Oo2I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1093902270</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can Top-Down and Bottom-Up be Reconciled? Electoral Competition and Service Delivery in Malaysia</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Elsevier</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Mccourt, Willy</creator><creatorcontrib>Mccourt, Willy</creatorcontrib><description>Top-down versus bottom-up is one of development’s enduring tensions, not least in public service delivery. In Malaysia, public services have traditionally been animated from the top down. Bottom-up forces in civil society have strengthened recently, but so too have top-down forces, and their impact on public services is greater.
Malaysia’s experience suggests that where electoral competition gives politicians an incentive to respond to voters’ service preferences, top-down initiatives have the greater potential for large-scale social change. Participatory initiatives will be most effective when they play a supplementary role.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-750X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5991</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.03.023</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WODEDW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>civic engagement ; Civil society ; Democracy ; Development ; Elections ; Electoral behaviour ; Malaysia ; New Public Management ; participation ; Politicians ; Public administration ; Public services ; Social change ; South-East Asia ; Southeast Asia ; Studies ; Voter behavior</subject><ispartof>World development, 2012-11, Vol.40 (11), p.2329-2341</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Nov 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-2c01432ee1f5af65354b5cb99f45e5c0173f4139e263533d7419108c87a091923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-2c01432ee1f5af65354b5cb99f45e5c0173f4139e263533d7419108c87a091923</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866,27924,27925,33223,33224</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mccourt, Willy</creatorcontrib><title>Can Top-Down and Bottom-Up be Reconciled? Electoral Competition and Service Delivery in Malaysia</title><title>World development</title><description>Top-down versus bottom-up is one of development’s enduring tensions, not least in public service delivery. In Malaysia, public services have traditionally been animated from the top down. Bottom-up forces in civil society have strengthened recently, but so too have top-down forces, and their impact on public services is greater.
Malaysia’s experience suggests that where electoral competition gives politicians an incentive to respond to voters’ service preferences, top-down initiatives have the greater potential for large-scale social change. Participatory initiatives will be most effective when they play a supplementary role.</description><subject>civic engagement</subject><subject>Civil society</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Development</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Electoral behaviour</subject><subject>Malaysia</subject><subject>New Public Management</subject><subject>participation</subject><subject>Politicians</subject><subject>Public administration</subject><subject>Public services</subject><subject>Social change</subject><subject>South-East Asia</subject><subject>Southeast Asia</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Voter behavior</subject><issn>0305-750X</issn><issn>1873-5991</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMFOGzEQhq0KpIbQV6gs9cJlt2N7HcenliYUkECV2iD15jreWcmRs17sTVDeHqPApRdOc5jv_zXzEfKZQc2Azb5u6qeYQtvivubAeA2iBi4-kAmbK1FJrdkJmYAAWSkJfz-Ss5w3ACCFVhPyb2F7uopDtYxPPbV9S3_EcYzb6mGga6S_0cXe-YDtN3oV0I0x2UAXcTvg6Ecfj5E_mPbeIV1i8HtMB-p7em-DPWRvz8lpZ0PGT69zSh5-Xq0WN9Xdr-vbxeVd5Rqhxoo7YI3giKyTtptJIZu1dGutu0aiLEsluoYJjXwmpBCtaphmMHdzZUEzzcWUXBx7hxQfd5hHs_XZYQi2x7jLhjHeqEYXuKBf_kM3cZf6cp1hoIUGzhUUanakXIo5J-zMkPzWpkOBzIt4szFv4s2LeAPCFPEl-P0YxPLu3mMy2XnsHbY-FYOmjf69imf5Oo2I</recordid><startdate>20121101</startdate><enddate>20121101</enddate><creator>Mccourt, Willy</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Pergamon Press Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121101</creationdate><title>Can Top-Down and Bottom-Up be Reconciled? Electoral Competition and Service Delivery in Malaysia</title><author>Mccourt, Willy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-2c01432ee1f5af65354b5cb99f45e5c0173f4139e263533d7419108c87a091923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>civic engagement</topic><topic>Civil society</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Development</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Electoral behaviour</topic><topic>Malaysia</topic><topic>New Public Management</topic><topic>participation</topic><topic>Politicians</topic><topic>Public administration</topic><topic>Public services</topic><topic>Social change</topic><topic>South-East Asia</topic><topic>Southeast Asia</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Voter behavior</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mccourt, Willy</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>World development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mccourt, Willy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can Top-Down and Bottom-Up be Reconciled? Electoral Competition and Service Delivery in Malaysia</atitle><jtitle>World development</jtitle><date>2012-11-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2329</spage><epage>2341</epage><pages>2329-2341</pages><issn>0305-750X</issn><eissn>1873-5991</eissn><coden>WODEDW</coden><abstract>Top-down versus bottom-up is one of development’s enduring tensions, not least in public service delivery. In Malaysia, public services have traditionally been animated from the top down. Bottom-up forces in civil society have strengthened recently, but so too have top-down forces, and their impact on public services is greater.
Malaysia’s experience suggests that where electoral competition gives politicians an incentive to respond to voters’ service preferences, top-down initiatives have the greater potential for large-scale social change. Participatory initiatives will be most effective when they play a supplementary role.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.03.023</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0305-750X |
ispartof | World development, 2012-11, Vol.40 (11), p.2329-2341 |
issn | 0305-750X 1873-5991 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1124749091 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Elsevier; PAIS Index |
subjects | civic engagement Civil society Democracy Development Elections Electoral behaviour Malaysia New Public Management participation Politicians Public administration Public services Social change South-East Asia Southeast Asia Studies Voter behavior |
title | Can Top-Down and Bottom-Up be Reconciled? Electoral Competition and Service Delivery in Malaysia |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T23%3A23%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20Top-Down%20and%20Bottom-Up%20be%20Reconciled?%20Electoral%20Competition%20and%20Service%20Delivery%20in%20Malaysia&rft.jtitle=World%20development&rft.au=Mccourt,%20Willy&rft.date=2012-11-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2329&rft.epage=2341&rft.pages=2329-2341&rft.issn=0305-750X&rft.eissn=1873-5991&rft.coden=WODEDW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.03.023&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1124749091%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-2c01432ee1f5af65354b5cb99f45e5c0173f4139e263533d7419108c87a091923%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1093902270&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |