Loading…
Indirect selection of implicit mutation protocols
A hypothesis that mutability evolves to facilitate evolutionary adaptation is dismissed by many biologists. Their skepticism is based on a theoretical expectation that natural selection must minimize mutation rates. That view, in turn, is historically grounded in an intuitive presumption that “the v...
Saved in:
Published in: | Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2012-09, Vol.1267 (1), p.45-52 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4695-711f7bb90624f7b162b15f6222a4af584bbdbca261bacdd3ee57fc25184700ff3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4695-711f7bb90624f7b162b15f6222a4af584bbdbca261bacdd3ee57fc25184700ff3 |
container_end_page | 52 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 45 |
container_title | Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences |
container_volume | 1267 |
creator | King, David G. |
description | A hypothesis that mutability evolves to facilitate evolutionary adaptation is dismissed by many biologists. Their skepticism is based on a theoretical expectation that natural selection must minimize mutation rates. That view, in turn, is historically grounded in an intuitive presumption that “the vast majority of mutations are harmful.” But such skepticism is surely misplaced. Several highly mutagenic genomic patterns, including simple sequence repeats, and transposable elements, are integrated into an unexpectedly large proportion of functional genetic loci. Because alleles arising within such patterns can retain an intrinsic propensity toward a particular style of mutation, natural selection that favors any such allele can indirectly favor the site's mutability as well. By exploiting patterns that have produced beneficial alleles in the past, indirect selection can encourage mutation within constraints that reduce the probability of deleterious effect, thereby shaping implicit “mutation protocols” that effectively promote evolvability. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06615.x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1136402790</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3966403441</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4695-711f7bb90624f7b162b15f6222a4af584bbdbca261bacdd3ee57fc25184700ff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc9LwzAUx4MoOqf_ghS8eGnN77QXYQw3h6KIingKaZpAZrvOpsXtvzfddAcvmst7JJ_3fS_fB0CEYILCuZwnSNAs5pzgBEOEE8g5YslqDwx2D_tgAKEQcZphcgSOvZ_DQKZUHIIjjDNGMeIDgGaLwjVGt5E3ZQiuXkS1jVy1LJ12bVR1rdpcLpu6rXVd-hNwYFXpzel3HIKXyfXz-Ca-e5jOxqO7WFOesVggZEWeZ5BjGhLEcY6Y5RhjRZVlKc3zItcKc5QrXRTEGCasxgyFCSG0lgzBxVY3dP7ojG9l5bw2ZakWpu68RIhwCrHI4N8oJCkPE_AsoOe_0HndNYvwEYkET1lQ4zRQ6ZbSTe19Y6xcNq5SzTpIyX4Dci57o2VvtOw3IDcbkKtQevbdoMsrU-wKfywPwNUW-HSlWf9bWN6_jZ76NAjEWwHnW7PaCajmXXJBBJOv91M5SeHjhNBbCckXUcehzQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1768590364</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Indirect selection of implicit mutation protocols</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>King, David G.</creator><creatorcontrib>King, David G.</creatorcontrib><description>A hypothesis that mutability evolves to facilitate evolutionary adaptation is dismissed by many biologists. Their skepticism is based on a theoretical expectation that natural selection must minimize mutation rates. That view, in turn, is historically grounded in an intuitive presumption that “the vast majority of mutations are harmful.” But such skepticism is surely misplaced. Several highly mutagenic genomic patterns, including simple sequence repeats, and transposable elements, are integrated into an unexpectedly large proportion of functional genetic loci. Because alleles arising within such patterns can retain an intrinsic propensity toward a particular style of mutation, natural selection that favors any such allele can indirectly favor the site's mutability as well. By exploiting patterns that have produced beneficial alleles in the past, indirect selection can encourage mutation within constraints that reduce the probability of deleterious effect, thereby shaping implicit “mutation protocols” that effectively promote evolvability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0077-8923</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1749-6632</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06615.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22954216</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANYAA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Adaptation, Biological - genetics ; evolvability ; Humans ; indirect selection ; Microsatellite Repeats ; Models, Genetic ; Mutagenesis ; Mutation ; mutation rate ; protocols ; Selection, Genetic ; simple sequence repeats ; variation</subject><ispartof>Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2012-09, Vol.1267 (1), p.45-52</ispartof><rights>2012 New York Academy of Sciences.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4695-711f7bb90624f7b162b15f6222a4af584bbdbca261bacdd3ee57fc25184700ff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4695-711f7bb90624f7b162b15f6222a4af584bbdbca261bacdd3ee57fc25184700ff3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22954216$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>King, David G.</creatorcontrib><title>Indirect selection of implicit mutation protocols</title><title>Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences</title><addtitle>Ann N Y Acad Sci</addtitle><description>A hypothesis that mutability evolves to facilitate evolutionary adaptation is dismissed by many biologists. Their skepticism is based on a theoretical expectation that natural selection must minimize mutation rates. That view, in turn, is historically grounded in an intuitive presumption that “the vast majority of mutations are harmful.” But such skepticism is surely misplaced. Several highly mutagenic genomic patterns, including simple sequence repeats, and transposable elements, are integrated into an unexpectedly large proportion of functional genetic loci. Because alleles arising within such patterns can retain an intrinsic propensity toward a particular style of mutation, natural selection that favors any such allele can indirectly favor the site's mutability as well. By exploiting patterns that have produced beneficial alleles in the past, indirect selection can encourage mutation within constraints that reduce the probability of deleterious effect, thereby shaping implicit “mutation protocols” that effectively promote evolvability.</description><subject>Adaptation, Biological - genetics</subject><subject>evolvability</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>indirect selection</subject><subject>Microsatellite Repeats</subject><subject>Models, Genetic</subject><subject>Mutagenesis</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>mutation rate</subject><subject>protocols</subject><subject>Selection, Genetic</subject><subject>simple sequence repeats</subject><subject>variation</subject><issn>0077-8923</issn><issn>1749-6632</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkc9LwzAUx4MoOqf_ghS8eGnN77QXYQw3h6KIingKaZpAZrvOpsXtvzfddAcvmst7JJ_3fS_fB0CEYILCuZwnSNAs5pzgBEOEE8g5YslqDwx2D_tgAKEQcZphcgSOvZ_DQKZUHIIjjDNGMeIDgGaLwjVGt5E3ZQiuXkS1jVy1LJ12bVR1rdpcLpu6rXVd-hNwYFXpzel3HIKXyfXz-Ca-e5jOxqO7WFOesVggZEWeZ5BjGhLEcY6Y5RhjRZVlKc3zItcKc5QrXRTEGCasxgyFCSG0lgzBxVY3dP7ojG9l5bw2ZakWpu68RIhwCrHI4N8oJCkPE_AsoOe_0HndNYvwEYkET1lQ4zRQ6ZbSTe19Y6xcNq5SzTpIyX4Dci57o2VvtOw3IDcbkKtQevbdoMsrU-wKfywPwNUW-HSlWf9bWN6_jZ76NAjEWwHnW7PaCajmXXJBBJOv91M5SeHjhNBbCckXUcehzQ</recordid><startdate>201209</startdate><enddate>201209</enddate><creator>King, David G.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201209</creationdate><title>Indirect selection of implicit mutation protocols</title><author>King, David G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4695-711f7bb90624f7b162b15f6222a4af584bbdbca261bacdd3ee57fc25184700ff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adaptation, Biological - genetics</topic><topic>evolvability</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>indirect selection</topic><topic>Microsatellite Repeats</topic><topic>Models, Genetic</topic><topic>Mutagenesis</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>mutation rate</topic><topic>protocols</topic><topic>Selection, Genetic</topic><topic>simple sequence repeats</topic><topic>variation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>King, David G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>King, David G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Indirect selection of implicit mutation protocols</atitle><jtitle>Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Ann N Y Acad Sci</addtitle><date>2012-09</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>1267</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>45</spage><epage>52</epage><pages>45-52</pages><issn>0077-8923</issn><eissn>1749-6632</eissn><coden>ANYAA9</coden><abstract>A hypothesis that mutability evolves to facilitate evolutionary adaptation is dismissed by many biologists. Their skepticism is based on a theoretical expectation that natural selection must minimize mutation rates. That view, in turn, is historically grounded in an intuitive presumption that “the vast majority of mutations are harmful.” But such skepticism is surely misplaced. Several highly mutagenic genomic patterns, including simple sequence repeats, and transposable elements, are integrated into an unexpectedly large proportion of functional genetic loci. Because alleles arising within such patterns can retain an intrinsic propensity toward a particular style of mutation, natural selection that favors any such allele can indirectly favor the site's mutability as well. By exploiting patterns that have produced beneficial alleles in the past, indirect selection can encourage mutation within constraints that reduce the probability of deleterious effect, thereby shaping implicit “mutation protocols” that effectively promote evolvability.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><pmid>22954216</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06615.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0077-8923 |
ispartof | Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2012-09, Vol.1267 (1), p.45-52 |
issn | 0077-8923 1749-6632 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1136402790 |
source | Wiley |
subjects | Adaptation, Biological - genetics evolvability Humans indirect selection Microsatellite Repeats Models, Genetic Mutagenesis Mutation mutation rate protocols Selection, Genetic simple sequence repeats variation |
title | Indirect selection of implicit mutation protocols |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T19%3A52%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Indirect%20selection%20of%20implicit%20mutation%20protocols&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20the%20New%20York%20Academy%20of%20Sciences&rft.au=King,%20David%20G.&rft.date=2012-09&rft.volume=1267&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=45&rft.epage=52&rft.pages=45-52&rft.issn=0077-8923&rft.eissn=1749-6632&rft.coden=ANYAA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06615.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3966403441%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4695-711f7bb90624f7b162b15f6222a4af584bbdbca261bacdd3ee57fc25184700ff3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1768590364&rft_id=info:pmid/22954216&rfr_iscdi=true |