Loading…

Indirect selection of implicit mutation protocols

A hypothesis that mutability evolves to facilitate evolutionary adaptation is dismissed by many biologists. Their skepticism is based on a theoretical expectation that natural selection must minimize mutation rates. That view, in turn, is historically grounded in an intuitive presumption that “the v...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2012-09, Vol.1267 (1), p.45-52
Main Author: King, David G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4695-711f7bb90624f7b162b15f6222a4af584bbdbca261bacdd3ee57fc25184700ff3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4695-711f7bb90624f7b162b15f6222a4af584bbdbca261bacdd3ee57fc25184700ff3
container_end_page 52
container_issue 1
container_start_page 45
container_title Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
container_volume 1267
creator King, David G.
description A hypothesis that mutability evolves to facilitate evolutionary adaptation is dismissed by many biologists. Their skepticism is based on a theoretical expectation that natural selection must minimize mutation rates. That view, in turn, is historically grounded in an intuitive presumption that “the vast majority of mutations are harmful.” But such skepticism is surely misplaced. Several highly mutagenic genomic patterns, including simple sequence repeats, and transposable elements, are integrated into an unexpectedly large proportion of functional genetic loci. Because alleles arising within such patterns can retain an intrinsic propensity toward a particular style of mutation, natural selection that favors any such allele can indirectly favor the site's mutability as well. By exploiting patterns that have produced beneficial alleles in the past, indirect selection can encourage mutation within constraints that reduce the probability of deleterious effect, thereby shaping implicit “mutation protocols” that effectively promote evolvability.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06615.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1136402790</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3966403441</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4695-711f7bb90624f7b162b15f6222a4af584bbdbca261bacdd3ee57fc25184700ff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc9LwzAUx4MoOqf_ghS8eGnN77QXYQw3h6KIingKaZpAZrvOpsXtvzfddAcvmst7JJ_3fS_fB0CEYILCuZwnSNAs5pzgBEOEE8g5YslqDwx2D_tgAKEQcZphcgSOvZ_DQKZUHIIjjDNGMeIDgGaLwjVGt5E3ZQiuXkS1jVy1LJ12bVR1rdpcLpu6rXVd-hNwYFXpzel3HIKXyfXz-Ca-e5jOxqO7WFOesVggZEWeZ5BjGhLEcY6Y5RhjRZVlKc3zItcKc5QrXRTEGCasxgyFCSG0lgzBxVY3dP7ojG9l5bw2ZakWpu68RIhwCrHI4N8oJCkPE_AsoOe_0HndNYvwEYkET1lQ4zRQ6ZbSTe19Y6xcNq5SzTpIyX4Dci57o2VvtOw3IDcbkKtQevbdoMsrU-wKfywPwNUW-HSlWf9bWN6_jZ76NAjEWwHnW7PaCajmXXJBBJOv91M5SeHjhNBbCckXUcehzQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1768590364</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Indirect selection of implicit mutation protocols</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>King, David G.</creator><creatorcontrib>King, David G.</creatorcontrib><description>A hypothesis that mutability evolves to facilitate evolutionary adaptation is dismissed by many biologists. Their skepticism is based on a theoretical expectation that natural selection must minimize mutation rates. That view, in turn, is historically grounded in an intuitive presumption that “the vast majority of mutations are harmful.” But such skepticism is surely misplaced. Several highly mutagenic genomic patterns, including simple sequence repeats, and transposable elements, are integrated into an unexpectedly large proportion of functional genetic loci. Because alleles arising within such patterns can retain an intrinsic propensity toward a particular style of mutation, natural selection that favors any such allele can indirectly favor the site's mutability as well. By exploiting patterns that have produced beneficial alleles in the past, indirect selection can encourage mutation within constraints that reduce the probability of deleterious effect, thereby shaping implicit “mutation protocols” that effectively promote evolvability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0077-8923</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1749-6632</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06615.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22954216</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANYAA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Adaptation, Biological - genetics ; evolvability ; Humans ; indirect selection ; Microsatellite Repeats ; Models, Genetic ; Mutagenesis ; Mutation ; mutation rate ; protocols ; Selection, Genetic ; simple sequence repeats ; variation</subject><ispartof>Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2012-09, Vol.1267 (1), p.45-52</ispartof><rights>2012 New York Academy of Sciences.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4695-711f7bb90624f7b162b15f6222a4af584bbdbca261bacdd3ee57fc25184700ff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4695-711f7bb90624f7b162b15f6222a4af584bbdbca261bacdd3ee57fc25184700ff3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22954216$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>King, David G.</creatorcontrib><title>Indirect selection of implicit mutation protocols</title><title>Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences</title><addtitle>Ann N Y Acad Sci</addtitle><description>A hypothesis that mutability evolves to facilitate evolutionary adaptation is dismissed by many biologists. Their skepticism is based on a theoretical expectation that natural selection must minimize mutation rates. That view, in turn, is historically grounded in an intuitive presumption that “the vast majority of mutations are harmful.” But such skepticism is surely misplaced. Several highly mutagenic genomic patterns, including simple sequence repeats, and transposable elements, are integrated into an unexpectedly large proportion of functional genetic loci. Because alleles arising within such patterns can retain an intrinsic propensity toward a particular style of mutation, natural selection that favors any such allele can indirectly favor the site's mutability as well. By exploiting patterns that have produced beneficial alleles in the past, indirect selection can encourage mutation within constraints that reduce the probability of deleterious effect, thereby shaping implicit “mutation protocols” that effectively promote evolvability.</description><subject>Adaptation, Biological - genetics</subject><subject>evolvability</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>indirect selection</subject><subject>Microsatellite Repeats</subject><subject>Models, Genetic</subject><subject>Mutagenesis</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>mutation rate</subject><subject>protocols</subject><subject>Selection, Genetic</subject><subject>simple sequence repeats</subject><subject>variation</subject><issn>0077-8923</issn><issn>1749-6632</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkc9LwzAUx4MoOqf_ghS8eGnN77QXYQw3h6KIingKaZpAZrvOpsXtvzfddAcvmst7JJ_3fS_fB0CEYILCuZwnSNAs5pzgBEOEE8g5YslqDwx2D_tgAKEQcZphcgSOvZ_DQKZUHIIjjDNGMeIDgGaLwjVGt5E3ZQiuXkS1jVy1LJ12bVR1rdpcLpu6rXVd-hNwYFXpzel3HIKXyfXz-Ca-e5jOxqO7WFOesVggZEWeZ5BjGhLEcY6Y5RhjRZVlKc3zItcKc5QrXRTEGCasxgyFCSG0lgzBxVY3dP7ojG9l5bw2ZakWpu68RIhwCrHI4N8oJCkPE_AsoOe_0HndNYvwEYkET1lQ4zRQ6ZbSTe19Y6xcNq5SzTpIyX4Dci57o2VvtOw3IDcbkKtQevbdoMsrU-wKfywPwNUW-HSlWf9bWN6_jZ76NAjEWwHnW7PaCajmXXJBBJOv91M5SeHjhNBbCckXUcehzQ</recordid><startdate>201209</startdate><enddate>201209</enddate><creator>King, David G.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201209</creationdate><title>Indirect selection of implicit mutation protocols</title><author>King, David G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4695-711f7bb90624f7b162b15f6222a4af584bbdbca261bacdd3ee57fc25184700ff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adaptation, Biological - genetics</topic><topic>evolvability</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>indirect selection</topic><topic>Microsatellite Repeats</topic><topic>Models, Genetic</topic><topic>Mutagenesis</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>mutation rate</topic><topic>protocols</topic><topic>Selection, Genetic</topic><topic>simple sequence repeats</topic><topic>variation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>King, David G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>King, David G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Indirect selection of implicit mutation protocols</atitle><jtitle>Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Ann N Y Acad Sci</addtitle><date>2012-09</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>1267</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>45</spage><epage>52</epage><pages>45-52</pages><issn>0077-8923</issn><eissn>1749-6632</eissn><coden>ANYAA9</coden><abstract>A hypothesis that mutability evolves to facilitate evolutionary adaptation is dismissed by many biologists. Their skepticism is based on a theoretical expectation that natural selection must minimize mutation rates. That view, in turn, is historically grounded in an intuitive presumption that “the vast majority of mutations are harmful.” But such skepticism is surely misplaced. Several highly mutagenic genomic patterns, including simple sequence repeats, and transposable elements, are integrated into an unexpectedly large proportion of functional genetic loci. Because alleles arising within such patterns can retain an intrinsic propensity toward a particular style of mutation, natural selection that favors any such allele can indirectly favor the site's mutability as well. By exploiting patterns that have produced beneficial alleles in the past, indirect selection can encourage mutation within constraints that reduce the probability of deleterious effect, thereby shaping implicit “mutation protocols” that effectively promote evolvability.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><pmid>22954216</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06615.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0077-8923
ispartof Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2012-09, Vol.1267 (1), p.45-52
issn 0077-8923
1749-6632
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1136402790
source Wiley
subjects Adaptation, Biological - genetics
evolvability
Humans
indirect selection
Microsatellite Repeats
Models, Genetic
Mutagenesis
Mutation
mutation rate
protocols
Selection, Genetic
simple sequence repeats
variation
title Indirect selection of implicit mutation protocols
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T19%3A52%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Indirect%20selection%20of%20implicit%20mutation%20protocols&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20the%20New%20York%20Academy%20of%20Sciences&rft.au=King,%20David%20G.&rft.date=2012-09&rft.volume=1267&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=45&rft.epage=52&rft.pages=45-52&rft.issn=0077-8923&rft.eissn=1749-6632&rft.coden=ANYAA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06615.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3966403441%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4695-711f7bb90624f7b162b15f6222a4af584bbdbca261bacdd3ee57fc25184700ff3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1768590364&rft_id=info:pmid/22954216&rfr_iscdi=true