Full length articles published in BJOMS during 2010–11—an analysis by sub-specialty and study type

• Published in: British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery 2012-12, Vol.50 (8), p.749-756
• Main Authors: Arakeri, Gururaj, Colbert, Serryth, Rosenbaum, Gavin, Brennan, Peter A
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Authorship; Bibliometrics; Biomedical Research - classification; Dentistry; Humans; Maxillofacial; Overseas; Periodicals as Topic - statistics & numerical data; Surgery; Surgery, Oral; United Kingdom
• ISSN: 0266-4356; 1532-1940
• DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2012.08.017

Abstract Full length articles such as prospective and retrospective studies, case series, laboratory-based research and reviews form the majority of papers published in the British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (BJOMS). We were interested to evaluate the breakdown of these types of articles both by sub-specialty and the type of study as well as the proportion that are written by UK colleagues compared to overseas authors over a 2 year period (2010–11). A total of 191 full length articles across all sub-specialties of our discipline were published, with 107 papers (56%) coming from UK authors. There were proportionately more oncology papers arising from the UK than overseas (60 and 30% of total respectively) while the opposite was found for cleft/deformity studies (10% and 22%). There was only one laboratory-based study published from the UK compared with 27 papers from overseas. The number of quality papers being submitted to the Journal continues to increase, and the type of article being published between UK and overseas probably reflects different practices and case-loads amongst colleagues. The relatively few UK laboratory based studies published in BJOMS compared to overseas authors are most likely due to authors seeking the most prestigious journals possible for their work.