A Re-Assessment of Common Theoretical Approaches to Explain Gender Differences in Continuing Training Participation

It is often argued that gender differences in access to continuing training are a central cause of persisting gender inequalities in occupational attainment. Yet existing empirical work has presented rather mixed evidence regarding a potential sex gap in training participation. In this article, we c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:British journal of industrial relations 2011-06, Vol.49 (s1), p.s135-s157
Main Authors: Dieckhoff, Martina, Steiber, Nadia
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Crosscultural Differences
Employees
Equality
Europe
Gender differences
Industrial relations
Investments
Job Characteristics
Males
Men
Organization theory
Participation
Sex
Sex Differences
Sexual Inequality
Skill development
Studies
Surveys
Training
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:It is often argued that gender differences in access to continuing training are a central cause of persisting gender inequalities in occupational attainment. Yet existing empirical work has presented rather mixed evidence regarding a potential sex gap in training participation. In this article, we carry out an empirical test of the central theoretical models commonly used to explain gender differences in continuing training participation. Using the European Social Survey, we find that male employees are more likely to train than their female colleagues, controlling for worker, firm and job characteristics, with some tentative evidence for differences across countries. Common theoretical approaches to understanding gender differences in continuing skill investment to some degree explain men's training incidence, while they largely fail to predict that of women.
ISSN:0007-1080
1467-8543
DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8543.2010.00824.x