Property Concepts, Ecological Thought, and Ecosystem Management: A Case of Conservation Policymaking in Vermont

Ecosystem management focuses on dynamic processes that cross boundaries. The consequent need to work across boundaries clashes with notions of property. Beginning in 1996, the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources reformulated its land acquisition policy to incorporate newly articulated ecological goa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Society & natural resources 2002-04, Vol.15 (4), p.295-312
Main Authors: Hurley, Janet M., Ginger, Clare, Capen, David E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Conservation Policy
Ecosystem Management
Ecosystems
Environmental Planning
Natural Resource Conservation
Natural resources
Property Rights
Social relations
U.S.A
Vermont
Working Landscape
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Ecosystem management focuses on dynamic processes that cross boundaries. The consequent need to work across boundaries clashes with notions of property. Beginning in 1996, the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources reformulated its land acquisition policy to incorporate newly articulated ecological goals that parallel those of ecosystem management. The process triggered a debate about property rights and the role of the state in promoting ecological goals through land acquisition. We examined ecological and property concepts drawn on during the process, changes in the planning process, and implications for ecosystem management. Using the idea of property as divisible bundles of rights, the state advocated conservation easements, which split ownership among parties, and promoted the concept of a working landscape to accommodate resource-based livelihoods. Our analysis illustrates the importance of examining interactions among concepts, social relations, and physical space to understand relationships between ecological principles and property rights issues in regional environmental planning.
ISSN:0894-1920
1521-0723
DOI:10.1080/089419202753570792