Loading…
Balancing growth across geographic diversification and product diversification: A contingency approach
► We argue that firms simultaneously seek to balance their growth across the geographic diversification and product diversification domains. ► In this seeking for balance, a common strategy is that an under-diversified direction is expanded at the expense of an over-diversified one. ► Firms that hav...
Saved in:
Published in: | International business review 2012-12, Vol.21 (6), p.1052-1064 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-54d541d0d8fbf9003f281a29e357721e6be3a852baddd8ebcb669cb51e958d0f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-54d541d0d8fbf9003f281a29e357721e6be3a852baddd8ebcb669cb51e958d0f3 |
container_end_page | 1064 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1052 |
container_title | International business review |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Hashai, Niron Delios, Andrew |
description | ► We argue that firms simultaneously seek to balance their growth across the geographic diversification and product diversification domains. ► In this seeking for balance, a common strategy is that an under-diversified direction is expanded at the expense of an over-diversified one. ► Firms that have under-diversified in a given direction and over-diversified in the other will expand the former at the expense of the latter. ► Firms that have under-diversified in both directions will expand both diversification paths. ► Firms that have over-diversified in both directions will contract in both diversification routes.
We theorize that firms simultaneously seek to balance their growth across both the geographic and product diversification domains. To achieve this balance, businesses commonly adopt a strategy of expanding an under-diversified direction at the expense of an over-diversified one. Accordingly, we depict geographic diversification and product diversification as being an endogenous relationship, from which we hypothesize that firms that have under-diversified in a given direction and over-diversified in the other will expand the former at the expense of the latter. Meanwhile, firms that have under-diversified in both directions will expand both diversification paths, while firms that have over-diversified in both directions will contract in both diversification routes. We investigate these predicted relationships and show them empirically using a sample of leading Japanese multinationals in the 1990–2000 period. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2011.11.009 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1171861911</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0969593111001909</els_id><sourcerecordid>1171861911</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-54d541d0d8fbf9003f281a29e357721e6be3a852baddd8ebcb669cb51e958d0f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwCEg-cknwxnUSc0EF8SdV4gJny7E3qas2CXZS1LfHpT1xQVppDzszq28IuQaWAoP8dpW6agwet2nGANI4jMkTMoGy4EkOM3lKJkzmMhGSwzm5CGHFGBSM5xNSP-i1bo1rG9r47ntYUm18FwJtsGu87pfOUOu26IOrndGD61qqW0t739nRDH9vd3ROTdcOMQ9bs6O6j0JtlpfkrNbrgFfHPSWfz08fj6_J4v3l7XG-SAwv-JCImRUzsMyWdVVLxnidlaAziVwURQaYV8h1KbJKW2tLrEyV59JUAlCK0rKaT8nNITe-_RoxDGrjgsF1ZMRuDAqggDIHCRCl4iD95fVYq967jfY7BUzte1UrdexV7XuNXhV7jb77gw8jx9ahV8G4CIvWeTSDsp37J-EHJb-HAw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1171861911</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Balancing growth across geographic diversification and product diversification: A contingency approach</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Hashai, Niron ; Delios, Andrew</creator><creatorcontrib>Hashai, Niron ; Delios, Andrew</creatorcontrib><description>► We argue that firms simultaneously seek to balance their growth across the geographic diversification and product diversification domains. ► In this seeking for balance, a common strategy is that an under-diversified direction is expanded at the expense of an over-diversified one. ► Firms that have under-diversified in a given direction and over-diversified in the other will expand the former at the expense of the latter. ► Firms that have under-diversified in both directions will expand both diversification paths. ► Firms that have over-diversified in both directions will contract in both diversification routes.
We theorize that firms simultaneously seek to balance their growth across both the geographic and product diversification domains. To achieve this balance, businesses commonly adopt a strategy of expanding an under-diversified direction at the expense of an over-diversified one. Accordingly, we depict geographic diversification and product diversification as being an endogenous relationship, from which we hypothesize that firms that have under-diversified in a given direction and over-diversified in the other will expand the former at the expense of the latter. Meanwhile, firms that have under-diversified in both directions will expand both diversification paths, while firms that have over-diversified in both directions will contract in both diversification routes. We investigate these predicted relationships and show them empirically using a sample of leading Japanese multinationals in the 1990–2000 period.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0969-5931</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6149</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2011.11.009</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Balancing growth ; Diversification ; Economic growth ; Geographic distribution ; Geographic diversification ; Hypothesis ; Japan ; Multinational enterprises ; Product diversification ; Products</subject><ispartof>International business review, 2012-12, Vol.21 (6), p.1052-1064</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-54d541d0d8fbf9003f281a29e357721e6be3a852baddd8ebcb669cb51e958d0f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-54d541d0d8fbf9003f281a29e357721e6be3a852baddd8ebcb669cb51e958d0f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33224</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hashai, Niron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delios, Andrew</creatorcontrib><title>Balancing growth across geographic diversification and product diversification: A contingency approach</title><title>International business review</title><description>► We argue that firms simultaneously seek to balance their growth across the geographic diversification and product diversification domains. ► In this seeking for balance, a common strategy is that an under-diversified direction is expanded at the expense of an over-diversified one. ► Firms that have under-diversified in a given direction and over-diversified in the other will expand the former at the expense of the latter. ► Firms that have under-diversified in both directions will expand both diversification paths. ► Firms that have over-diversified in both directions will contract in both diversification routes.
We theorize that firms simultaneously seek to balance their growth across both the geographic and product diversification domains. To achieve this balance, businesses commonly adopt a strategy of expanding an under-diversified direction at the expense of an over-diversified one. Accordingly, we depict geographic diversification and product diversification as being an endogenous relationship, from which we hypothesize that firms that have under-diversified in a given direction and over-diversified in the other will expand the former at the expense of the latter. Meanwhile, firms that have under-diversified in both directions will expand both diversification paths, while firms that have over-diversified in both directions will contract in both diversification routes. We investigate these predicted relationships and show them empirically using a sample of leading Japanese multinationals in the 1990–2000 period.</description><subject>Balancing growth</subject><subject>Diversification</subject><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Geographic distribution</subject><subject>Geographic diversification</subject><subject>Hypothesis</subject><subject>Japan</subject><subject>Multinational enterprises</subject><subject>Product diversification</subject><subject>Products</subject><issn>0969-5931</issn><issn>1873-6149</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwCEg-cknwxnUSc0EF8SdV4gJny7E3qas2CXZS1LfHpT1xQVppDzszq28IuQaWAoP8dpW6agwet2nGANI4jMkTMoGy4EkOM3lKJkzmMhGSwzm5CGHFGBSM5xNSP-i1bo1rG9r47ntYUm18FwJtsGu87pfOUOu26IOrndGD61qqW0t739nRDH9vd3ROTdcOMQ9bs6O6j0JtlpfkrNbrgFfHPSWfz08fj6_J4v3l7XG-SAwv-JCImRUzsMyWdVVLxnidlaAziVwURQaYV8h1KbJKW2tLrEyV59JUAlCK0rKaT8nNITe-_RoxDGrjgsF1ZMRuDAqggDIHCRCl4iD95fVYq967jfY7BUzte1UrdexV7XuNXhV7jb77gw8jx9ahV8G4CIvWeTSDsp37J-EHJb-HAw</recordid><startdate>20121201</startdate><enddate>20121201</enddate><creator>Hashai, Niron</creator><creator>Delios, Andrew</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121201</creationdate><title>Balancing growth across geographic diversification and product diversification: A contingency approach</title><author>Hashai, Niron ; Delios, Andrew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-54d541d0d8fbf9003f281a29e357721e6be3a852baddd8ebcb669cb51e958d0f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Balancing growth</topic><topic>Diversification</topic><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Geographic distribution</topic><topic>Geographic diversification</topic><topic>Hypothesis</topic><topic>Japan</topic><topic>Multinational enterprises</topic><topic>Product diversification</topic><topic>Products</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hashai, Niron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delios, Andrew</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>International business review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hashai, Niron</au><au>Delios, Andrew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Balancing growth across geographic diversification and product diversification: A contingency approach</atitle><jtitle>International business review</jtitle><date>2012-12-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1052</spage><epage>1064</epage><pages>1052-1064</pages><issn>0969-5931</issn><eissn>1873-6149</eissn><abstract>► We argue that firms simultaneously seek to balance their growth across the geographic diversification and product diversification domains. ► In this seeking for balance, a common strategy is that an under-diversified direction is expanded at the expense of an over-diversified one. ► Firms that have under-diversified in a given direction and over-diversified in the other will expand the former at the expense of the latter. ► Firms that have under-diversified in both directions will expand both diversification paths. ► Firms that have over-diversified in both directions will contract in both diversification routes.
We theorize that firms simultaneously seek to balance their growth across both the geographic and product diversification domains. To achieve this balance, businesses commonly adopt a strategy of expanding an under-diversified direction at the expense of an over-diversified one. Accordingly, we depict geographic diversification and product diversification as being an endogenous relationship, from which we hypothesize that firms that have under-diversified in a given direction and over-diversified in the other will expand the former at the expense of the latter. Meanwhile, firms that have under-diversified in both directions will expand both diversification paths, while firms that have over-diversified in both directions will contract in both diversification routes. We investigate these predicted relationships and show them empirically using a sample of leading Japanese multinationals in the 1990–2000 period.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ibusrev.2011.11.009</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0969-5931 |
ispartof | International business review, 2012-12, Vol.21 (6), p.1052-1064 |
issn | 0969-5931 1873-6149 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1171861911 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Balancing growth Diversification Economic growth Geographic distribution Geographic diversification Hypothesis Japan Multinational enterprises Product diversification Products |
title | Balancing growth across geographic diversification and product diversification: A contingency approach |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T15%3A54%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Balancing%20growth%20across%20geographic%20diversification%20and%20product%20diversification:%20A%20contingency%20approach&rft.jtitle=International%20business%20review&rft.au=Hashai,%20Niron&rft.date=2012-12-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1052&rft.epage=1064&rft.pages=1052-1064&rft.issn=0969-5931&rft.eissn=1873-6149&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2011.11.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1171861911%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-54d541d0d8fbf9003f281a29e357721e6be3a852baddd8ebcb669cb51e958d0f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1171861911&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |