Loading…

Balancing growth across geographic diversification and product diversification: A contingency approach

► We argue that firms simultaneously seek to balance their growth across the geographic diversification and product diversification domains. ► In this seeking for balance, a common strategy is that an under-diversified direction is expanded at the expense of an over-diversified one. ► Firms that hav...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International business review 2012-12, Vol.21 (6), p.1052-1064
Main Authors: Hashai, Niron, Delios, Andrew
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-54d541d0d8fbf9003f281a29e357721e6be3a852baddd8ebcb669cb51e958d0f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-54d541d0d8fbf9003f281a29e357721e6be3a852baddd8ebcb669cb51e958d0f3
container_end_page 1064
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1052
container_title International business review
container_volume 21
creator Hashai, Niron
Delios, Andrew
description ► We argue that firms simultaneously seek to balance their growth across the geographic diversification and product diversification domains. ► In this seeking for balance, a common strategy is that an under-diversified direction is expanded at the expense of an over-diversified one. ► Firms that have under-diversified in a given direction and over-diversified in the other will expand the former at the expense of the latter. ► Firms that have under-diversified in both directions will expand both diversification paths. ► Firms that have over-diversified in both directions will contract in both diversification routes. We theorize that firms simultaneously seek to balance their growth across both the geographic and product diversification domains. To achieve this balance, businesses commonly adopt a strategy of expanding an under-diversified direction at the expense of an over-diversified one. Accordingly, we depict geographic diversification and product diversification as being an endogenous relationship, from which we hypothesize that firms that have under-diversified in a given direction and over-diversified in the other will expand the former at the expense of the latter. Meanwhile, firms that have under-diversified in both directions will expand both diversification paths, while firms that have over-diversified in both directions will contract in both diversification routes. We investigate these predicted relationships and show them empirically using a sample of leading Japanese multinationals in the 1990–2000 period.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2011.11.009
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1171861911</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0969593111001909</els_id><sourcerecordid>1171861911</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-54d541d0d8fbf9003f281a29e357721e6be3a852baddd8ebcb669cb51e958d0f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwCEg-cknwxnUSc0EF8SdV4gJny7E3qas2CXZS1LfHpT1xQVppDzszq28IuQaWAoP8dpW6agwet2nGANI4jMkTMoGy4EkOM3lKJkzmMhGSwzm5CGHFGBSM5xNSP-i1bo1rG9r47ntYUm18FwJtsGu87pfOUOu26IOrndGD61qqW0t739nRDH9vd3ROTdcOMQ9bs6O6j0JtlpfkrNbrgFfHPSWfz08fj6_J4v3l7XG-SAwv-JCImRUzsMyWdVVLxnidlaAziVwURQaYV8h1KbJKW2tLrEyV59JUAlCK0rKaT8nNITe-_RoxDGrjgsF1ZMRuDAqggDIHCRCl4iD95fVYq967jfY7BUzte1UrdexV7XuNXhV7jb77gw8jx9ahV8G4CIvWeTSDsp37J-EHJb-HAw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1171861911</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Balancing growth across geographic diversification and product diversification: A contingency approach</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Hashai, Niron ; Delios, Andrew</creator><creatorcontrib>Hashai, Niron ; Delios, Andrew</creatorcontrib><description>► We argue that firms simultaneously seek to balance their growth across the geographic diversification and product diversification domains. ► In this seeking for balance, a common strategy is that an under-diversified direction is expanded at the expense of an over-diversified one. ► Firms that have under-diversified in a given direction and over-diversified in the other will expand the former at the expense of the latter. ► Firms that have under-diversified in both directions will expand both diversification paths. ► Firms that have over-diversified in both directions will contract in both diversification routes. We theorize that firms simultaneously seek to balance their growth across both the geographic and product diversification domains. To achieve this balance, businesses commonly adopt a strategy of expanding an under-diversified direction at the expense of an over-diversified one. Accordingly, we depict geographic diversification and product diversification as being an endogenous relationship, from which we hypothesize that firms that have under-diversified in a given direction and over-diversified in the other will expand the former at the expense of the latter. Meanwhile, firms that have under-diversified in both directions will expand both diversification paths, while firms that have over-diversified in both directions will contract in both diversification routes. We investigate these predicted relationships and show them empirically using a sample of leading Japanese multinationals in the 1990–2000 period.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0969-5931</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6149</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2011.11.009</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Balancing growth ; Diversification ; Economic growth ; Geographic distribution ; Geographic diversification ; Hypothesis ; Japan ; Multinational enterprises ; Product diversification ; Products</subject><ispartof>International business review, 2012-12, Vol.21 (6), p.1052-1064</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-54d541d0d8fbf9003f281a29e357721e6be3a852baddd8ebcb669cb51e958d0f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-54d541d0d8fbf9003f281a29e357721e6be3a852baddd8ebcb669cb51e958d0f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33224</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hashai, Niron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delios, Andrew</creatorcontrib><title>Balancing growth across geographic diversification and product diversification: A contingency approach</title><title>International business review</title><description>► We argue that firms simultaneously seek to balance their growth across the geographic diversification and product diversification domains. ► In this seeking for balance, a common strategy is that an under-diversified direction is expanded at the expense of an over-diversified one. ► Firms that have under-diversified in a given direction and over-diversified in the other will expand the former at the expense of the latter. ► Firms that have under-diversified in both directions will expand both diversification paths. ► Firms that have over-diversified in both directions will contract in both diversification routes. We theorize that firms simultaneously seek to balance their growth across both the geographic and product diversification domains. To achieve this balance, businesses commonly adopt a strategy of expanding an under-diversified direction at the expense of an over-diversified one. Accordingly, we depict geographic diversification and product diversification as being an endogenous relationship, from which we hypothesize that firms that have under-diversified in a given direction and over-diversified in the other will expand the former at the expense of the latter. Meanwhile, firms that have under-diversified in both directions will expand both diversification paths, while firms that have over-diversified in both directions will contract in both diversification routes. We investigate these predicted relationships and show them empirically using a sample of leading Japanese multinationals in the 1990–2000 period.</description><subject>Balancing growth</subject><subject>Diversification</subject><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Geographic distribution</subject><subject>Geographic diversification</subject><subject>Hypothesis</subject><subject>Japan</subject><subject>Multinational enterprises</subject><subject>Product diversification</subject><subject>Products</subject><issn>0969-5931</issn><issn>1873-6149</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwCEg-cknwxnUSc0EF8SdV4gJny7E3qas2CXZS1LfHpT1xQVppDzszq28IuQaWAoP8dpW6agwet2nGANI4jMkTMoGy4EkOM3lKJkzmMhGSwzm5CGHFGBSM5xNSP-i1bo1rG9r47ntYUm18FwJtsGu87pfOUOu26IOrndGD61qqW0t739nRDH9vd3ROTdcOMQ9bs6O6j0JtlpfkrNbrgFfHPSWfz08fj6_J4v3l7XG-SAwv-JCImRUzsMyWdVVLxnidlaAziVwURQaYV8h1KbJKW2tLrEyV59JUAlCK0rKaT8nNITe-_RoxDGrjgsF1ZMRuDAqggDIHCRCl4iD95fVYq967jfY7BUzte1UrdexV7XuNXhV7jb77gw8jx9ahV8G4CIvWeTSDsp37J-EHJb-HAw</recordid><startdate>20121201</startdate><enddate>20121201</enddate><creator>Hashai, Niron</creator><creator>Delios, Andrew</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121201</creationdate><title>Balancing growth across geographic diversification and product diversification: A contingency approach</title><author>Hashai, Niron ; Delios, Andrew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-54d541d0d8fbf9003f281a29e357721e6be3a852baddd8ebcb669cb51e958d0f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Balancing growth</topic><topic>Diversification</topic><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Geographic distribution</topic><topic>Geographic diversification</topic><topic>Hypothesis</topic><topic>Japan</topic><topic>Multinational enterprises</topic><topic>Product diversification</topic><topic>Products</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hashai, Niron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delios, Andrew</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>International business review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hashai, Niron</au><au>Delios, Andrew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Balancing growth across geographic diversification and product diversification: A contingency approach</atitle><jtitle>International business review</jtitle><date>2012-12-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1052</spage><epage>1064</epage><pages>1052-1064</pages><issn>0969-5931</issn><eissn>1873-6149</eissn><abstract>► We argue that firms simultaneously seek to balance their growth across the geographic diversification and product diversification domains. ► In this seeking for balance, a common strategy is that an under-diversified direction is expanded at the expense of an over-diversified one. ► Firms that have under-diversified in a given direction and over-diversified in the other will expand the former at the expense of the latter. ► Firms that have under-diversified in both directions will expand both diversification paths. ► Firms that have over-diversified in both directions will contract in both diversification routes. We theorize that firms simultaneously seek to balance their growth across both the geographic and product diversification domains. To achieve this balance, businesses commonly adopt a strategy of expanding an under-diversified direction at the expense of an over-diversified one. Accordingly, we depict geographic diversification and product diversification as being an endogenous relationship, from which we hypothesize that firms that have under-diversified in a given direction and over-diversified in the other will expand the former at the expense of the latter. Meanwhile, firms that have under-diversified in both directions will expand both diversification paths, while firms that have over-diversified in both directions will contract in both diversification routes. We investigate these predicted relationships and show them empirically using a sample of leading Japanese multinationals in the 1990–2000 period.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ibusrev.2011.11.009</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0969-5931
ispartof International business review, 2012-12, Vol.21 (6), p.1052-1064
issn 0969-5931
1873-6149
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1171861911
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Balancing growth
Diversification
Economic growth
Geographic distribution
Geographic diversification
Hypothesis
Japan
Multinational enterprises
Product diversification
Products
title Balancing growth across geographic diversification and product diversification: A contingency approach
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T15%3A54%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Balancing%20growth%20across%20geographic%20diversification%20and%20product%20diversification:%20A%20contingency%20approach&rft.jtitle=International%20business%20review&rft.au=Hashai,%20Niron&rft.date=2012-12-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1052&rft.epage=1064&rft.pages=1052-1064&rft.issn=0969-5931&rft.eissn=1873-6149&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2011.11.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1171861911%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-54d541d0d8fbf9003f281a29e357721e6be3a852baddd8ebcb669cb51e958d0f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1171861911&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true