Loading…

Natural pipes in blanket peatlands: major point sources for the release of carbon to the aquatic system

Natural soil pipes, which have been widely reported in peatlands, have been shown to contribute significantly to total stream flow. Here, using measurements from eight pipe outlets, we consider the role of natural pipes in the transport of fluvial carbon within a 17.4‐ha blanket‐peat‐covered catchme...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Global change biology 2012-12, Vol.18 (12), p.3568-3580
Main Authors: Holden, Joseph, Smart, Richard P., Dinsmore, Kerry J., Baird, Andy J., Billett, Mike F., Chapman, Pippa J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4334-d9bf29704911c380351d911ecc41b9c9dba258aa874a4b7a2f9498d05d0fc00a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4334-d9bf29704911c380351d911ecc41b9c9dba258aa874a4b7a2f9498d05d0fc00a3
container_end_page 3580
container_issue 12
container_start_page 3568
container_title Global change biology
container_volume 18
creator Holden, Joseph
Smart, Richard P.
Dinsmore, Kerry J.
Baird, Andy J.
Billett, Mike F.
Chapman, Pippa J.
description Natural soil pipes, which have been widely reported in peatlands, have been shown to contribute significantly to total stream flow. Here, using measurements from eight pipe outlets, we consider the role of natural pipes in the transport of fluvial carbon within a 17.4‐ha blanket‐peat‐covered catchment. Concentrations of dissolved and particulate organic carbon (DOC and POC) from pipe waters varied greatly between pipes and over time, ranging between 5.3 and 180.6 mg L−1 for DOC and 0.08 and 220 mg L−1 for POC. Pipes were important pathways for peatland fluvial carbon export, with fluxes varying between 0.6 and 67.8 kg yr−1 (DOC) and 0.1 and 14.4 kg yr−1 (POC) for individual pipes. Pipe DOC flux was equivalent to 20% of the annual DOC flux from the stream outlet while the POC flux from pipes was equivalent to 56% of the annual stream POC flux. The proportion of different forms of aquatic carbon to total aquatic carbon flux varied between pipes, with DOC ranging between 80.0% and 91.2%, POC from 3.6% to 17.1%, dissolved CO2‐C from 2.4% to 11.1% and dissolved CH4‐C from 0.004% to 1.3%. The total flux of dissolved CO2‐C and CH4‐C scaled up to all pipe outlets in the study catchment was estimated to be 89.4 and 3.6 kg yr−1 respectively. Overall, pipe outlets produced discharge equivalent to 14% of the discharge in the stream but delivered an amount of aquatic carbon equivalent to 22% of the aquatic carbon flux at the catchment outlet. Pipe densities in blanket peatlands are known to increase when peat is affected by drainage or drying. Hence, environmental change in many peatlands may lead to an increase in aquatic carbon fluxes from natural pipes, thereby influencing the peatland carbon balance and downstream ecological processes.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/gcb.12004
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1171893268</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1171893268</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4334-d9bf29704911c380351d911ecc41b9c9dba258aa874a4b7a2f9498d05d0fc00a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFv1DAQhSMEEqXtgX9gqUKCQ1qP7TgxN1jBlmpVLlt6tCaO03qbjVPbEey_r9stPSDhi5_s7z3NvKJ4D_QU8jm7Me0pMErFq-IAuKxKJhr5-lFXogQK_G3xLsYNpZQzKg-Km0tMc8CBTG6ykbiRtAOOdzaRyWLKsoufyRY3PpDJuzGR6OdgMtnnl3RrSbCDxWiJ74nB0PqRJP_0gfczJmdI3MVkt0fFmx6HaI-f78Pi6vu39eK8XP1c_lh8WZVGcC7KTrU9UzUVCsDwhvIKuiytMQJaZVTXIqsaxKYWKNoaWa-EajpadbQ3lCI_LD7uc6fg72cbk966aOyQN7F-jhqghkZxJpuMnvyDbvJuY54uU1BVTFAuM_VpT5ngYwy211NwWww7DfSRA50r10-VZ_bDcyJGg0MfcDQuvhiYlEwCY5k723O_3WB3_w_Uy8XXv8nl3uFymX9eHBjutKx5Xenry6VmK7W-WK9-6Wv-AHpcnck</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1115524036</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Natural pipes in blanket peatlands: major point sources for the release of carbon to the aquatic system</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Holden, Joseph ; Smart, Richard P. ; Dinsmore, Kerry J. ; Baird, Andy J. ; Billett, Mike F. ; Chapman, Pippa J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Holden, Joseph ; Smart, Richard P. ; Dinsmore, Kerry J. ; Baird, Andy J. ; Billett, Mike F. ; Chapman, Pippa J.</creatorcontrib><description>Natural soil pipes, which have been widely reported in peatlands, have been shown to contribute significantly to total stream flow. Here, using measurements from eight pipe outlets, we consider the role of natural pipes in the transport of fluvial carbon within a 17.4‐ha blanket‐peat‐covered catchment. Concentrations of dissolved and particulate organic carbon (DOC and POC) from pipe waters varied greatly between pipes and over time, ranging between 5.3 and 180.6 mg L−1 for DOC and 0.08 and 220 mg L−1 for POC. Pipes were important pathways for peatland fluvial carbon export, with fluxes varying between 0.6 and 67.8 kg yr−1 (DOC) and 0.1 and 14.4 kg yr−1 (POC) for individual pipes. Pipe DOC flux was equivalent to 20% of the annual DOC flux from the stream outlet while the POC flux from pipes was equivalent to 56% of the annual stream POC flux. The proportion of different forms of aquatic carbon to total aquatic carbon flux varied between pipes, with DOC ranging between 80.0% and 91.2%, POC from 3.6% to 17.1%, dissolved CO2‐C from 2.4% to 11.1% and dissolved CH4‐C from 0.004% to 1.3%. The total flux of dissolved CO2‐C and CH4‐C scaled up to all pipe outlets in the study catchment was estimated to be 89.4 and 3.6 kg yr−1 respectively. Overall, pipe outlets produced discharge equivalent to 14% of the discharge in the stream but delivered an amount of aquatic carbon equivalent to 22% of the aquatic carbon flux at the catchment outlet. Pipe densities in blanket peatlands are known to increase when peat is affected by drainage or drying. Hence, environmental change in many peatlands may lead to an increase in aquatic carbon fluxes from natural pipes, thereby influencing the peatland carbon balance and downstream ecological processes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1354-1013</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2486</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12004</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Aquatic ecosystems ; Biogeochemistry ; Biological and medical sciences ; blanket peat ; Carbon ; carbon export ; dissolved organic carbon ; Freshwater ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; macropores ; particulate organic carbon ; pipeflow ; piping ; Soils ; throughflow ; tunnel erosion</subject><ispartof>Global change biology, 2012-12, Vol.18 (12), p.3568-3580</ispartof><rights>2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4334-d9bf29704911c380351d911ecc41b9c9dba258aa874a4b7a2f9498d05d0fc00a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4334-d9bf29704911c380351d911ecc41b9c9dba258aa874a4b7a2f9498d05d0fc00a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=26626122$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Holden, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smart, Richard P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dinsmore, Kerry J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baird, Andy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Billett, Mike F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapman, Pippa J.</creatorcontrib><title>Natural pipes in blanket peatlands: major point sources for the release of carbon to the aquatic system</title><title>Global change biology</title><addtitle>Glob Change Biol</addtitle><description>Natural soil pipes, which have been widely reported in peatlands, have been shown to contribute significantly to total stream flow. Here, using measurements from eight pipe outlets, we consider the role of natural pipes in the transport of fluvial carbon within a 17.4‐ha blanket‐peat‐covered catchment. Concentrations of dissolved and particulate organic carbon (DOC and POC) from pipe waters varied greatly between pipes and over time, ranging between 5.3 and 180.6 mg L−1 for DOC and 0.08 and 220 mg L−1 for POC. Pipes were important pathways for peatland fluvial carbon export, with fluxes varying between 0.6 and 67.8 kg yr−1 (DOC) and 0.1 and 14.4 kg yr−1 (POC) for individual pipes. Pipe DOC flux was equivalent to 20% of the annual DOC flux from the stream outlet while the POC flux from pipes was equivalent to 56% of the annual stream POC flux. The proportion of different forms of aquatic carbon to total aquatic carbon flux varied between pipes, with DOC ranging between 80.0% and 91.2%, POC from 3.6% to 17.1%, dissolved CO2‐C from 2.4% to 11.1% and dissolved CH4‐C from 0.004% to 1.3%. The total flux of dissolved CO2‐C and CH4‐C scaled up to all pipe outlets in the study catchment was estimated to be 89.4 and 3.6 kg yr−1 respectively. Overall, pipe outlets produced discharge equivalent to 14% of the discharge in the stream but delivered an amount of aquatic carbon equivalent to 22% of the aquatic carbon flux at the catchment outlet. Pipe densities in blanket peatlands are known to increase when peat is affected by drainage or drying. Hence, environmental change in many peatlands may lead to an increase in aquatic carbon fluxes from natural pipes, thereby influencing the peatland carbon balance and downstream ecological processes.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Aquatic ecosystems</subject><subject>Biogeochemistry</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>blanket peat</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>carbon export</subject><subject>dissolved organic carbon</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>macropores</subject><subject>particulate organic carbon</subject><subject>pipeflow</subject><subject>piping</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>throughflow</subject><subject>tunnel erosion</subject><issn>1354-1013</issn><issn>1365-2486</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEFv1DAQhSMEEqXtgX9gqUKCQ1qP7TgxN1jBlmpVLlt6tCaO03qbjVPbEey_r9stPSDhi5_s7z3NvKJ4D_QU8jm7Me0pMErFq-IAuKxKJhr5-lFXogQK_G3xLsYNpZQzKg-Km0tMc8CBTG6ykbiRtAOOdzaRyWLKsoufyRY3PpDJuzGR6OdgMtnnl3RrSbCDxWiJ74nB0PqRJP_0gfczJmdI3MVkt0fFmx6HaI-f78Pi6vu39eK8XP1c_lh8WZVGcC7KTrU9UzUVCsDwhvIKuiytMQJaZVTXIqsaxKYWKNoaWa-EajpadbQ3lCI_LD7uc6fg72cbk966aOyQN7F-jhqghkZxJpuMnvyDbvJuY54uU1BVTFAuM_VpT5ngYwy211NwWww7DfSRA50r10-VZ_bDcyJGg0MfcDQuvhiYlEwCY5k723O_3WB3_w_Uy8XXv8nl3uFymX9eHBjutKx5Xenry6VmK7W-WK9-6Wv-AHpcnck</recordid><startdate>201212</startdate><enddate>201212</enddate><creator>Holden, Joseph</creator><creator>Smart, Richard P.</creator><creator>Dinsmore, Kerry J.</creator><creator>Baird, Andy J.</creator><creator>Billett, Mike F.</creator><creator>Chapman, Pippa J.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201212</creationdate><title>Natural pipes in blanket peatlands: major point sources for the release of carbon to the aquatic system</title><author>Holden, Joseph ; Smart, Richard P. ; Dinsmore, Kerry J. ; Baird, Andy J. ; Billett, Mike F. ; Chapman, Pippa J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4334-d9bf29704911c380351d911ecc41b9c9dba258aa874a4b7a2f9498d05d0fc00a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Aquatic ecosystems</topic><topic>Biogeochemistry</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>blanket peat</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>carbon export</topic><topic>dissolved organic carbon</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>macropores</topic><topic>particulate organic carbon</topic><topic>pipeflow</topic><topic>piping</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>throughflow</topic><topic>tunnel erosion</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Holden, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smart, Richard P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dinsmore, Kerry J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baird, Andy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Billett, Mike F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapman, Pippa J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Global change biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Holden, Joseph</au><au>Smart, Richard P.</au><au>Dinsmore, Kerry J.</au><au>Baird, Andy J.</au><au>Billett, Mike F.</au><au>Chapman, Pippa J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Natural pipes in blanket peatlands: major point sources for the release of carbon to the aquatic system</atitle><jtitle>Global change biology</jtitle><addtitle>Glob Change Biol</addtitle><date>2012-12</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>3568</spage><epage>3580</epage><pages>3568-3580</pages><issn>1354-1013</issn><eissn>1365-2486</eissn><abstract>Natural soil pipes, which have been widely reported in peatlands, have been shown to contribute significantly to total stream flow. Here, using measurements from eight pipe outlets, we consider the role of natural pipes in the transport of fluvial carbon within a 17.4‐ha blanket‐peat‐covered catchment. Concentrations of dissolved and particulate organic carbon (DOC and POC) from pipe waters varied greatly between pipes and over time, ranging between 5.3 and 180.6 mg L−1 for DOC and 0.08 and 220 mg L−1 for POC. Pipes were important pathways for peatland fluvial carbon export, with fluxes varying between 0.6 and 67.8 kg yr−1 (DOC) and 0.1 and 14.4 kg yr−1 (POC) for individual pipes. Pipe DOC flux was equivalent to 20% of the annual DOC flux from the stream outlet while the POC flux from pipes was equivalent to 56% of the annual stream POC flux. The proportion of different forms of aquatic carbon to total aquatic carbon flux varied between pipes, with DOC ranging between 80.0% and 91.2%, POC from 3.6% to 17.1%, dissolved CO2‐C from 2.4% to 11.1% and dissolved CH4‐C from 0.004% to 1.3%. The total flux of dissolved CO2‐C and CH4‐C scaled up to all pipe outlets in the study catchment was estimated to be 89.4 and 3.6 kg yr−1 respectively. Overall, pipe outlets produced discharge equivalent to 14% of the discharge in the stream but delivered an amount of aquatic carbon equivalent to 22% of the aquatic carbon flux at the catchment outlet. Pipe densities in blanket peatlands are known to increase when peat is affected by drainage or drying. Hence, environmental change in many peatlands may lead to an increase in aquatic carbon fluxes from natural pipes, thereby influencing the peatland carbon balance and downstream ecological processes.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/gcb.12004</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1354-1013
ispartof Global change biology, 2012-12, Vol.18 (12), p.3568-3580
issn 1354-1013
1365-2486
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1171893268
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Aquatic ecosystems
Biogeochemistry
Biological and medical sciences
blanket peat
Carbon
carbon export
dissolved organic carbon
Freshwater
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
macropores
particulate organic carbon
pipeflow
piping
Soils
throughflow
tunnel erosion
title Natural pipes in blanket peatlands: major point sources for the release of carbon to the aquatic system
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T23%3A31%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Natural%20pipes%20in%20blanket%20peatlands:%20major%20point%20sources%20for%20the%20release%20of%20carbon%20to%20the%20aquatic%20system&rft.jtitle=Global%20change%20biology&rft.au=Holden,%20Joseph&rft.date=2012-12&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=3568&rft.epage=3580&rft.pages=3568-3580&rft.issn=1354-1013&rft.eissn=1365-2486&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/gcb.12004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1171893268%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4334-d9bf29704911c380351d911ecc41b9c9dba258aa874a4b7a2f9498d05d0fc00a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1115524036&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true