The Death Penalty in Texas

Kenneth Land, Raymond H. C. Teske, Jr., and Hui Zheng's article is an intereting addition to the scholarly research that has examined the possible deterrent effects of the death penalty. Although most of the nation's top criminologists believe that the published research has shown that the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Criminology & public policy 2012-08, Vol.11 (3), p.573-578
Main Author: Radelet, Michael L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Capital Punishment
Death
Homicide
Texas
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1801-f46541113dca8e122b69873169e0890b4ec29ee9082b2dd093a9f306223b54e53
cites
container_end_page 578
container_issue 3
container_start_page 573
container_title Criminology & public policy
container_volume 11
creator Radelet, Michael L.
description Kenneth Land, Raymond H. C. Teske, Jr., and Hui Zheng's article is an intereting addition to the scholarly research that has examined the possible deterrent effects of the death penalty. Although most of the nation's top criminologists believe that the published research has shown that the death penalty is not and never has been a superior deterrent to criminal homicide than alternative sentences of ling confinement, the scholarly debate is certain to continue. In this essay, I argue that Land at al.'s findings are not relevant to contemporary death penalty debates. Adapted from the source document.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2012.00831.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1221412953</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1221412953</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1801-f46541113dca8e122b69873169e0890b4ec29ee9082b2dd093a9f306223b54e53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIPcMqRS4LXjh37wKEqkCJVUIkiels56VZNSR_EqUj_noSi7mVH2pnRzjAWAI-gnftVBEmsQgtSRoKDiDg3EqLmjPVOh_MWK2lCHSfykl15v-IclALVY7fTJQWP5OplMKGNK-tDUGyCKTXOX7OLhSs93fzvPvt4fpoOR-H4LX0ZDsZhDoZDuIi1ittP5Dx3hkCITFuTSNCWuLE8iykXlshyIzIxn3MrnV1IroWQmYpJyT67O_ruqu33nnyN68LnVJZuQ9u9x9YSYhBWyZb6cKT-FCUdcFcVa1cdEDh2XeAKu8jYRcauC_zrAhscDiaTFrX68KgvfE3NSe-qL9SJTBR-vqY406P3dDYao5G_mY5gKg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1221412953</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Death Penalty in Texas</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Radelet, Michael L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Radelet, Michael L.</creatorcontrib><description>Kenneth Land, Raymond H. C. Teske, Jr., and Hui Zheng's article is an intereting addition to the scholarly research that has examined the possible deterrent effects of the death penalty. Although most of the nation's top criminologists believe that the published research has shown that the death penalty is not and never has been a superior deterrent to criminal homicide than alternative sentences of ling confinement, the scholarly debate is certain to continue. In this essay, I argue that Land at al.'s findings are not relevant to contemporary death penalty debates. Adapted from the source document.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1538-6473</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-9133</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2012.00831.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Capital Punishment ; Death ; Homicide ; Texas</subject><ispartof>Criminology &amp; public policy, 2012-08, Vol.11 (3), p.573-578</ispartof><rights>2012 American Society of Criminology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1801-f46541113dca8e122b69873169e0890b4ec29ee9082b2dd093a9f306223b54e53</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,33774</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Radelet, Michael L.</creatorcontrib><title>The Death Penalty in Texas</title><title>Criminology &amp; public policy</title><description>Kenneth Land, Raymond H. C. Teske, Jr., and Hui Zheng's article is an intereting addition to the scholarly research that has examined the possible deterrent effects of the death penalty. Although most of the nation's top criminologists believe that the published research has shown that the death penalty is not and never has been a superior deterrent to criminal homicide than alternative sentences of ling confinement, the scholarly debate is certain to continue. In this essay, I argue that Land at al.'s findings are not relevant to contemporary death penalty debates. Adapted from the source document.</description><subject>Capital Punishment</subject><subject>Death</subject><subject>Homicide</subject><subject>Texas</subject><issn>1538-6473</issn><issn>1745-9133</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNo9UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIPcMqRS4LXjh37wKEqkCJVUIkiels56VZNSR_EqUj_noSi7mVH2pnRzjAWAI-gnftVBEmsQgtSRoKDiDg3EqLmjPVOh_MWK2lCHSfykl15v-IclALVY7fTJQWP5OplMKGNK-tDUGyCKTXOX7OLhSs93fzvPvt4fpoOR-H4LX0ZDsZhDoZDuIi1ittP5Dx3hkCITFuTSNCWuLE8iykXlshyIzIxn3MrnV1IroWQmYpJyT67O_ruqu33nnyN68LnVJZuQ9u9x9YSYhBWyZb6cKT-FCUdcFcVa1cdEDh2XeAKu8jYRcauC_zrAhscDiaTFrX68KgvfE3NSe-qL9SJTBR-vqY406P3dDYao5G_mY5gKg</recordid><startdate>201208</startdate><enddate>201208</enddate><creator>Radelet, Michael L.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201208</creationdate><title>The Death Penalty in Texas</title><author>Radelet, Michael L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1801-f46541113dca8e122b69873169e0890b4ec29ee9082b2dd093a9f306223b54e53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Capital Punishment</topic><topic>Death</topic><topic>Homicide</topic><topic>Texas</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Radelet, Michael L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Criminology &amp; public policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Radelet, Michael L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Death Penalty in Texas</atitle><jtitle>Criminology &amp; public policy</jtitle><date>2012-08</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>573</spage><epage>578</epage><pages>573-578</pages><issn>1538-6473</issn><eissn>1745-9133</eissn><abstract>Kenneth Land, Raymond H. C. Teske, Jr., and Hui Zheng's article is an intereting addition to the scholarly research that has examined the possible deterrent effects of the death penalty. Although most of the nation's top criminologists believe that the published research has shown that the death penalty is not and never has been a superior deterrent to criminal homicide than alternative sentences of ling confinement, the scholarly debate is certain to continue. In this essay, I argue that Land at al.'s findings are not relevant to contemporary death penalty debates. Adapted from the source document.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1745-9133.2012.00831.x</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1538-6473
ispartof Criminology & public policy, 2012-08, Vol.11 (3), p.573-578
issn 1538-6473
1745-9133
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1221412953
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Capital Punishment
Death
Homicide
Texas
title The Death Penalty in Texas
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T22%3A57%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Death%20Penalty%20in%20Texas&rft.jtitle=Criminology%20&%20public%20policy&rft.au=Radelet,%20Michael%20L.&rft.date=2012-08&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=573&rft.epage=578&rft.pages=573-578&rft.issn=1538-6473&rft.eissn=1745-9133&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2012.00831.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E1221412953%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1801-f46541113dca8e122b69873169e0890b4ec29ee9082b2dd093a9f306223b54e53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1221412953&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true