Loading…

Servant leadership across cultures

Servant leadership is anchored in the human drive to bond with others and contribute to the betterment of the society. An emphasis on service motivation, as demonstrated by empowering and developing people with empathy and humility, differentiates servant leadership from other leadership frameworks....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of world business : JWB 2012-10, Vol.47 (4), p.555-570
Main Authors: Mittal, Rakesh, Dorfman, Peter W.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-b8d950ba91185cd5eaa7e695e9ddad923463ab6ae8ee76b52adcbde0c80b9fc63
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-b8d950ba91185cd5eaa7e695e9ddad923463ab6ae8ee76b52adcbde0c80b9fc63
container_end_page 570
container_issue 4
container_start_page 555
container_title Journal of world business : JWB
container_volume 47
creator Mittal, Rakesh
Dorfman, Peter W.
description Servant leadership is anchored in the human drive to bond with others and contribute to the betterment of the society. An emphasis on service motivation, as demonstrated by empowering and developing people with empathy and humility, differentiates servant leadership from other leadership frameworks. In this study, we analyzed the degree to which five aspects of servant leadership, Egalitarianism, Moral Integrity, Empowering, Empathy and Humility were endorsed as important for effective leadership across cultures. While each of these dimensions was found to be associated with effective leadership, there was considerable variation in degree of endorsement of components of servant leadership across different GLOBE culture clusters. The dimensions of Egalitarianism and Empowering were endorsed more strongly in Nordic/European cultures but less so in Asian and similar cultures. On the other hand, servant leadership dimensions of Empathy and Humility were more strongly endorsed in Asian cultures than European cultures. Further, significant relationships were found between several societal cultural values and aspects of servant leadership which help us understand why nations differ in endorsing this leadership construct.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jwb.2012.01.009
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1221847452</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1090951612000107</els_id><sourcerecordid>1221847452</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-b8d950ba91185cd5eaa7e695e9ddad923463ab6ae8ee76b52adcbde0c80b9fc63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwA9gqWFgSfE7s2GJCFV9SJQZgthz7IhylSbGTIv49LmVi4Ja74XlPdw8h50BzoCCu27z9rHNGgeUUckrVAZmBrGTGeVUcppkqmikO4picxNjSVJJXM3LxgmFr-nHRoXEY4rvfLIwNQ4wLO3XjFDCekqPGdBHPfvucvN3fvS4fs9Xzw9PydpXZsuRjVkunOK2NApDcOo7GVCgUR-WccYoVpShMLQxKxErUnBlna4fUSlqrxopiTq72ezdh-Jgwjnrto8WuMz0OU9TAGMiyKjlL6OUftB2m0KfrNNBClSATnCjYUz__BGz0Jvi1CV8J0jtrutXJmt5Z0xR0spYyN_sMpk-3HoOO1mNv0fmAdtRu8P-kvwH6TXRZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1039418122</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Servant leadership across cultures</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Mittal, Rakesh ; Dorfman, Peter W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mittal, Rakesh ; Dorfman, Peter W.</creatorcontrib><description>Servant leadership is anchored in the human drive to bond with others and contribute to the betterment of the society. An emphasis on service motivation, as demonstrated by empowering and developing people with empathy and humility, differentiates servant leadership from other leadership frameworks. In this study, we analyzed the degree to which five aspects of servant leadership, Egalitarianism, Moral Integrity, Empowering, Empathy and Humility were endorsed as important for effective leadership across cultures. While each of these dimensions was found to be associated with effective leadership, there was considerable variation in degree of endorsement of components of servant leadership across different GLOBE culture clusters. The dimensions of Egalitarianism and Empowering were endorsed more strongly in Nordic/European cultures but less so in Asian and similar cultures. On the other hand, servant leadership dimensions of Empathy and Humility were more strongly endorsed in Asian cultures than European cultures. Further, significant relationships were found between several societal cultural values and aspects of servant leadership which help us understand why nations differ in endorsing this leadership construct.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1090-9516</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-5573</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jwb.2012.01.009</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Greenwich: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Asia ; Cross cultural studies ; Cross-cultural analysis ; Cross-culture ; Cultural differences ; Cultural values ; Culture clusters ; Egalitarianism ; Empathy ; Employee empowerment ; Empowerment ; Endorsements ; Equality ; Europe ; GLOBE ; Leadership ; Management styles ; Morality ; Organizational behaviour ; Personnel management ; Servant leadership</subject><ispartof>Journal of world business : JWB, 2012-10, Vol.47 (4), p.555-570</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Oct 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-b8d950ba91185cd5eaa7e695e9ddad923463ab6ae8ee76b52adcbde0c80b9fc63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-b8d950ba91185cd5eaa7e695e9ddad923463ab6ae8ee76b52adcbde0c80b9fc63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,33222,33223</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mittal, Rakesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorfman, Peter W.</creatorcontrib><title>Servant leadership across cultures</title><title>Journal of world business : JWB</title><description>Servant leadership is anchored in the human drive to bond with others and contribute to the betterment of the society. An emphasis on service motivation, as demonstrated by empowering and developing people with empathy and humility, differentiates servant leadership from other leadership frameworks. In this study, we analyzed the degree to which five aspects of servant leadership, Egalitarianism, Moral Integrity, Empowering, Empathy and Humility were endorsed as important for effective leadership across cultures. While each of these dimensions was found to be associated with effective leadership, there was considerable variation in degree of endorsement of components of servant leadership across different GLOBE culture clusters. The dimensions of Egalitarianism and Empowering were endorsed more strongly in Nordic/European cultures but less so in Asian and similar cultures. On the other hand, servant leadership dimensions of Empathy and Humility were more strongly endorsed in Asian cultures than European cultures. Further, significant relationships were found between several societal cultural values and aspects of servant leadership which help us understand why nations differ in endorsing this leadership construct.</description><subject>Asia</subject><subject>Cross cultural studies</subject><subject>Cross-cultural analysis</subject><subject>Cross-culture</subject><subject>Cultural differences</subject><subject>Cultural values</subject><subject>Culture clusters</subject><subject>Egalitarianism</subject><subject>Empathy</subject><subject>Employee empowerment</subject><subject>Empowerment</subject><subject>Endorsements</subject><subject>Equality</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>GLOBE</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Management styles</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Organizational behaviour</subject><subject>Personnel management</subject><subject>Servant leadership</subject><issn>1090-9516</issn><issn>1878-5573</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwA9gqWFgSfE7s2GJCFV9SJQZgthz7IhylSbGTIv49LmVi4Ja74XlPdw8h50BzoCCu27z9rHNGgeUUckrVAZmBrGTGeVUcppkqmikO4picxNjSVJJXM3LxgmFr-nHRoXEY4rvfLIwNQ4wLO3XjFDCekqPGdBHPfvucvN3fvS4fs9Xzw9PydpXZsuRjVkunOK2NApDcOo7GVCgUR-WccYoVpShMLQxKxErUnBlna4fUSlqrxopiTq72ezdh-Jgwjnrto8WuMz0OU9TAGMiyKjlL6OUftB2m0KfrNNBClSATnCjYUz__BGz0Jvi1CV8J0jtrutXJmt5Z0xR0spYyN_sMpk-3HoOO1mNv0fmAdtRu8P-kvwH6TXRZ</recordid><startdate>201210</startdate><enddate>201210</enddate><creator>Mittal, Rakesh</creator><creator>Dorfman, Peter W.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201210</creationdate><title>Servant leadership across cultures</title><author>Mittal, Rakesh ; Dorfman, Peter W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-b8d950ba91185cd5eaa7e695e9ddad923463ab6ae8ee76b52adcbde0c80b9fc63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Asia</topic><topic>Cross cultural studies</topic><topic>Cross-cultural analysis</topic><topic>Cross-culture</topic><topic>Cultural differences</topic><topic>Cultural values</topic><topic>Culture clusters</topic><topic>Egalitarianism</topic><topic>Empathy</topic><topic>Employee empowerment</topic><topic>Empowerment</topic><topic>Endorsements</topic><topic>Equality</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>GLOBE</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Management styles</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Organizational behaviour</topic><topic>Personnel management</topic><topic>Servant leadership</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mittal, Rakesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorfman, Peter W.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of world business : JWB</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mittal, Rakesh</au><au>Dorfman, Peter W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Servant leadership across cultures</atitle><jtitle>Journal of world business : JWB</jtitle><date>2012-10</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>555</spage><epage>570</epage><pages>555-570</pages><issn>1090-9516</issn><eissn>1878-5573</eissn><abstract>Servant leadership is anchored in the human drive to bond with others and contribute to the betterment of the society. An emphasis on service motivation, as demonstrated by empowering and developing people with empathy and humility, differentiates servant leadership from other leadership frameworks. In this study, we analyzed the degree to which five aspects of servant leadership, Egalitarianism, Moral Integrity, Empowering, Empathy and Humility were endorsed as important for effective leadership across cultures. While each of these dimensions was found to be associated with effective leadership, there was considerable variation in degree of endorsement of components of servant leadership across different GLOBE culture clusters. The dimensions of Egalitarianism and Empowering were endorsed more strongly in Nordic/European cultures but less so in Asian and similar cultures. On the other hand, servant leadership dimensions of Empathy and Humility were more strongly endorsed in Asian cultures than European cultures. Further, significant relationships were found between several societal cultural values and aspects of servant leadership which help us understand why nations differ in endorsing this leadership construct.</abstract><cop>Greenwich</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jwb.2012.01.009</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1090-9516
ispartof Journal of world business : JWB, 2012-10, Vol.47 (4), p.555-570
issn 1090-9516
1878-5573
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1221847452
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Asia
Cross cultural studies
Cross-cultural analysis
Cross-culture
Cultural differences
Cultural values
Culture clusters
Egalitarianism
Empathy
Employee empowerment
Empowerment
Endorsements
Equality
Europe
GLOBE
Leadership
Management styles
Morality
Organizational behaviour
Personnel management
Servant leadership
title Servant leadership across cultures
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T00%3A03%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Servant%20leadership%20across%20cultures&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20world%20business%20:%20JWB&rft.au=Mittal,%20Rakesh&rft.date=2012-10&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=555&rft.epage=570&rft.pages=555-570&rft.issn=1090-9516&rft.eissn=1878-5573&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jwb.2012.01.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1221847452%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-b8d950ba91185cd5eaa7e695e9ddad923463ab6ae8ee76b52adcbde0c80b9fc63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1039418122&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true