Market Transition: An Assessment of the State of the Field

Dramatic changes in global politics and economics have led a large number of economies to undergo transition from socialism to some form of market system. Sociologists have taken advantage of economic transition to develop and test ideas about basic social processes; this article assesses the state...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sociological perspectives 2012-07, Vol.55 (2), p.267-294
Main Authors: Keister, Lisa A., Borelli, E. Paige
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Economic change
Economic sociology
Economic transitions
Empirical evidence
Enduring Sociological Concepts
Evaluation
Evaluation Research
Global economy
Income inequality
Local government
Market
Market economies
Markets
Mobility
Political change
Political debate
Politics
Property rights
Rational choice
Rational choice theory
Social Processes
Socialism
Sociological Research
Sociologists
Sociology
Transition economies
Transitional economies
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Dramatic changes in global politics and economics have led a large number of economies to undergo transition from socialism to some form of market system. Sociologists have taken advantage of economic transition to develop and test ideas about basic social processes; this article assesses the state of the rich but contentious new literature that has resulted. The article provides a review and evaluation of sociological research that explores the two aspects of transition that have attracted the greatest attention: the nature of the transition process and the consequences of transition for stratification and mobility. The authors address the two theoretical approaches—institutional and corporatist—that have been the center of intense debate regarding transition and evaluate the empirical evidence for each. The authors argue that empirical evidence provides support for elements of each but that detailed scope conditions and more nuanced arguments are critical.
ISSN:0731-1214
1533-8673
DOI:10.1525/sop.2012.55.2.267