Cross-ranking of Decision Making Units in Data Envelopment Analysis

Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is a mathematical model that evaluates the relative efficiency of Decision Making Units (DMUs) with multiple input and output. In some applications of DEA, ranking of the DMUs are important. For this purpose, a number of approaches have been introduced. Among them is...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied mathematical modelling 2013-01, Vol.37 (1-2), p.398-405
Main Authors: Zerafat Angiz, Majid, Mustafa, Adli, Kamali, Mohammad Jalal
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Agglomeration
Computational efficiency
Data Envelopment Analysis
Decision making
Group decision making
Mathematical analysis
Mathematical models
Operations research
Preference aggregation
Ranking
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is a mathematical model that evaluates the relative efficiency of Decision Making Units (DMUs) with multiple input and output. In some applications of DEA, ranking of the DMUs are important. For this purpose, a number of approaches have been introduced. Among them is the cross-efficiency method. The method utilizes the result of the cross-efficiency matrix and averages the cross-efficiency scores of each DMU. Ranking is then performed based on the average efficiency scores. In this paper, we proposed a new way of handling the information from the cross-efficiency matrix. Based on the notion that the ranking order is more important than individual efficiency score, the cross-efficiency matrix is converted to a cross-ranking matrix. A cross-ranking matrix is basically a cross-efficiency matrix with the efficiency score of each element being replaced with the ranking order of that efficiency score with respect to the other efficiency scores in a column. By so doing, each DMU assume the role of a decision maker and how they voted or ranked the other DMUs are reflected in their respective column of the cross-ranking matrix. These votes are then aggregated using a preference aggregation method to determine the overall ranking of the DMUs. Comparison with an existing cross-efficiency method indicates a relatively better result through usage of the proposed method.
ISSN:0307-904X
DOI:10.1016/j.apm.2012.02.038