Controlled flux behaviour of membrane processes

Controlling ultrafiltration (UF) and microfiltration (MF) membrane fluxes at or around a region where fouling is minimal can provide an interesting and economic operating regime. Selectivity may be enhanced and cleaning may be easier. For a given flux it is sometimes possible to filter a product sus...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Macromolecular symposia. 2002-11, Vol.188 (1), p.23-36
Main Authors: Howell, J.A., Arnot, T.C., Chua, H.C., Godino, P., Hatziantoniou, D., Metsämuuronen, S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Cleaning
Economics
Flux
Fluxes
Fouling
Membranes
Molecular weight
Shear
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Controlling ultrafiltration (UF) and microfiltration (MF) membrane fluxes at or around a region where fouling is minimal can provide an interesting and economic operating regime. Selectivity may be enhanced and cleaning may be easier. For a given flux it is sometimes possible to filter a product suspension at the same trans‐membrane pressure (TMP) as for pure water (PWP), but this can require a lot of energy input to maintain cross‐flow or high shear in other ways if high fluxes are required. The critical flux is the flux above which one starts to observe fouling. By operating at lower cross‐flow velocities and just above the critical flux, and thus, with lower TMPs, periodic cleaning can be effected by temporarily stopping permeation. A change in feed rate demands a change in flux which is obtained by temporarily increasing energy inputs. Controlled flux improves macromolecular fractionation. As flux increases the rejection of high molecular weight materials decreases whilst that of lower molecular weight materials decreases. This paper discusses the causes of fouling and the use controlled flux operation to mitigate its effects.
ISSN:1022-1360
1521-3900
DOI:10.1002/1521-3900(200211)188:1<23::AID-MASY23>3.0.CO;2-U