Loading…
Electromyographical Analysis of Lower Extremity Muscle Activation During Variations of the Loaded Step-Up Exercise
ABSTRACTSimenz, CJ, Garceau, LR, Lutsch, BN, Suchomel, TJ, and Ebben, WP. Electromyographical analysis of lower extremity muscle activation during variations of the loaded step-up exercise. J Strength Cond Res 26(12)3398–3405, 2012—The loaded step-up exercise allows strength and conditioning practit...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of strength and conditioning research 2012-12, Vol.26 (12), p.3398-3405 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5259-d711b66632911055b91f2d9fbcf34c2cfd9a920a305ae8101d525aa4e35eb2793 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5259-d711b66632911055b91f2d9fbcf34c2cfd9a920a305ae8101d525aa4e35eb2793 |
container_end_page | 3405 |
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 3398 |
container_title | Journal of strength and conditioning research |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Simenz, Christopher J. Garceau, Luke R. Lutsch, Brittney N. Suchomel, Timothy J. Ebben, William P. |
description | ABSTRACTSimenz, CJ, Garceau, LR, Lutsch, BN, Suchomel, TJ, and Ebben, WP. Electromyographical analysis of lower extremity muscle activation during variations of the loaded step-up exercise. J Strength Cond Res 26(12)3398–3405, 2012—The loaded step-up exercise allows strength and conditioning practitioners to incorporate a unilateral resistance for athletes while performing extension at the hip, knee, and plantar flexion at the ankle. This study evaluated the activation of the biceps femoris (BF), gluteus maximus (GMx), gluteus medius (GMe), rectus femoris, semitendinosus (ST), vastus lateralis, and vastus medialis during 4 variations of the step-up exercise to assess the specific muscle training stimulus of each exercise variation. The exercises included the step-up, crossover step-up, diagonal step-up, and lateral step-up. Fifteen women who regularly engaged in lower body resistance training performed the 4 exercises with 6 repetition maximum loads on a 45.72-cm (18-in.) plyometric box. Data were collected with a telemetered electromyography (EMG) system, and root mean square values were calculated for EMG data for eccentric and concentric phases. Results of a repeated-measures analysis of variance revealed a variety of differences in muscle activation between the exercises (p ≤ 0.05). The results indicated that the crossover step-up elicited the greatest concentric muscle activation for the GMe, whereas the step-up elicited greatest eccentric activation for the GMe and greatest activation for the GMx, BF, and ST in both concentric and eccentric phases. These findings can be used by practitioners to inform exercise selection to best target and maximally activate a variety of hip and thigh musculature. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182472fad |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1272710798</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2838968161</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5259-d711b66632911055b91f2d9fbcf34c2cfd9a920a305ae8101d525aa4e35eb2793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU9v1DAQxSNERf_AN0AoEhcuaT3jOImPq-22gBZxKOUaOc6k6-Ksg-3Q7rfH2xaQeuIwmpH13rP0fln2FtgpCJBnn6-Wp6xjwIlDg2WNg-pfZEcgOC9KbOqX6WZVWTQM4DA7DuGWMRRC8FfZISLyGrg8yvzKko7ejTt349W0MVrZfLFVdhdMyN2Qr90d-Xx1Hz2NJu7yL3PQlvKFjuaXisZt8_PZm-1N_l158_DwYIsbSlbVU59fRZqK6yllkNcm0OvsYFA20JunfZJdX6y-LT8W66-Xn5aLdaEFCln0NUBXVRVHCcCE6CQM2Muh0wMvNeqhl0oiU5wJRQ0w6JNNqZK4oA5ryU-yD4-5k3c_ZwqxHU3QZK3akptDC1hjDayWzX9IkYmqAcAkff9Meutmnwrbq1Kp-4r3f5ePKu1dCJ6GdvJmVH7XAmv3-NqEr32OL9nePYXP3Uj9X9MfXv9y75yN5MMPOyc87YaUjZuWMcAS66bAdAAyxoo0KPlvm0emGg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1237125559</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Electromyographical Analysis of Lower Extremity Muscle Activation During Variations of the Loaded Step-Up Exercise</title><source>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</source><creator>Simenz, Christopher J. ; Garceau, Luke R. ; Lutsch, Brittney N. ; Suchomel, Timothy J. ; Ebben, William P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Simenz, Christopher J. ; Garceau, Luke R. ; Lutsch, Brittney N. ; Suchomel, Timothy J. ; Ebben, William P.</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACTSimenz, CJ, Garceau, LR, Lutsch, BN, Suchomel, TJ, and Ebben, WP. Electromyographical analysis of lower extremity muscle activation during variations of the loaded step-up exercise. J Strength Cond Res 26(12)3398–3405, 2012—The loaded step-up exercise allows strength and conditioning practitioners to incorporate a unilateral resistance for athletes while performing extension at the hip, knee, and plantar flexion at the ankle. This study evaluated the activation of the biceps femoris (BF), gluteus maximus (GMx), gluteus medius (GMe), rectus femoris, semitendinosus (ST), vastus lateralis, and vastus medialis during 4 variations of the step-up exercise to assess the specific muscle training stimulus of each exercise variation. The exercises included the step-up, crossover step-up, diagonal step-up, and lateral step-up. Fifteen women who regularly engaged in lower body resistance training performed the 4 exercises with 6 repetition maximum loads on a 45.72-cm (18-in.) plyometric box. Data were collected with a telemetered electromyography (EMG) system, and root mean square values were calculated for EMG data for eccentric and concentric phases. Results of a repeated-measures analysis of variance revealed a variety of differences in muscle activation between the exercises (p ≤ 0.05). The results indicated that the crossover step-up elicited the greatest concentric muscle activation for the GMe, whereas the step-up elicited greatest eccentric activation for the GMe and greatest activation for the GMx, BF, and ST in both concentric and eccentric phases. These findings can be used by practitioners to inform exercise selection to best target and maximally activate a variety of hip and thigh musculature.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1064-8011</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4287</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182472fad</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22237139</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: National Strength and Conditioning Association</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Analysis of Variance ; Athletes ; Electromyography ; Exercise ; Female ; Hips ; Humans ; Isometric Contraction - physiology ; Legs ; Lower Extremity - physiology ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; Muscles (activity) ; Muscles (exercise effects) ; Muscular system ; Plyometric Exercise ; Resistance exercise ; Resistance Training - methods ; Sports training ; Strength ; Variance analysis ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2012-12, Vol.26 (12), p.3398-3405</ispartof><rights>2012 National Strength and Conditioning Association</rights><rights>Copyright Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Dec 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5259-d711b66632911055b91f2d9fbcf34c2cfd9a920a305ae8101d525aa4e35eb2793</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5259-d711b66632911055b91f2d9fbcf34c2cfd9a920a305ae8101d525aa4e35eb2793</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22237139$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Simenz, Christopher J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garceau, Luke R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lutsch, Brittney N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suchomel, Timothy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebben, William P.</creatorcontrib><title>Electromyographical Analysis of Lower Extremity Muscle Activation During Variations of the Loaded Step-Up Exercise</title><title>Journal of strength and conditioning research</title><addtitle>J Strength Cond Res</addtitle><description>ABSTRACTSimenz, CJ, Garceau, LR, Lutsch, BN, Suchomel, TJ, and Ebben, WP. Electromyographical analysis of lower extremity muscle activation during variations of the loaded step-up exercise. J Strength Cond Res 26(12)3398–3405, 2012—The loaded step-up exercise allows strength and conditioning practitioners to incorporate a unilateral resistance for athletes while performing extension at the hip, knee, and plantar flexion at the ankle. This study evaluated the activation of the biceps femoris (BF), gluteus maximus (GMx), gluteus medius (GMe), rectus femoris, semitendinosus (ST), vastus lateralis, and vastus medialis during 4 variations of the step-up exercise to assess the specific muscle training stimulus of each exercise variation. The exercises included the step-up, crossover step-up, diagonal step-up, and lateral step-up. Fifteen women who regularly engaged in lower body resistance training performed the 4 exercises with 6 repetition maximum loads on a 45.72-cm (18-in.) plyometric box. Data were collected with a telemetered electromyography (EMG) system, and root mean square values were calculated for EMG data for eccentric and concentric phases. Results of a repeated-measures analysis of variance revealed a variety of differences in muscle activation between the exercises (p ≤ 0.05). The results indicated that the crossover step-up elicited the greatest concentric muscle activation for the GMe, whereas the step-up elicited greatest eccentric activation for the GMe and greatest activation for the GMx, BF, and ST in both concentric and eccentric phases. These findings can be used by practitioners to inform exercise selection to best target and maximally activate a variety of hip and thigh musculature.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Athletes</subject><subject>Electromyography</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hips</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Isometric Contraction - physiology</subject><subject>Legs</subject><subject>Lower Extremity - physiology</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>Muscles (activity)</subject><subject>Muscles (exercise effects)</subject><subject>Muscular system</subject><subject>Plyometric Exercise</subject><subject>Resistance exercise</subject><subject>Resistance Training - methods</subject><subject>Sports training</subject><subject>Strength</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1064-8011</issn><issn>1533-4287</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkU9v1DAQxSNERf_AN0AoEhcuaT3jOImPq-22gBZxKOUaOc6k6-Ksg-3Q7rfH2xaQeuIwmpH13rP0fln2FtgpCJBnn6-Wp6xjwIlDg2WNg-pfZEcgOC9KbOqX6WZVWTQM4DA7DuGWMRRC8FfZISLyGrg8yvzKko7ejTt349W0MVrZfLFVdhdMyN2Qr90d-Xx1Hz2NJu7yL3PQlvKFjuaXisZt8_PZm-1N_l158_DwYIsbSlbVU59fRZqK6yllkNcm0OvsYFA20JunfZJdX6y-LT8W66-Xn5aLdaEFCln0NUBXVRVHCcCE6CQM2Muh0wMvNeqhl0oiU5wJRQ0w6JNNqZK4oA5ryU-yD4-5k3c_ZwqxHU3QZK3akptDC1hjDayWzX9IkYmqAcAkff9Meutmnwrbq1Kp-4r3f5ePKu1dCJ6GdvJmVH7XAmv3-NqEr32OL9nePYXP3Uj9X9MfXv9y75yN5MMPOyc87YaUjZuWMcAS66bAdAAyxoo0KPlvm0emGg</recordid><startdate>201212</startdate><enddate>201212</enddate><creator>Simenz, Christopher J.</creator><creator>Garceau, Luke R.</creator><creator>Lutsch, Brittney N.</creator><creator>Suchomel, Timothy J.</creator><creator>Ebben, William P.</creator><general>National Strength and Conditioning Association</general><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201212</creationdate><title>Electromyographical Analysis of Lower Extremity Muscle Activation During Variations of the Loaded Step-Up Exercise</title><author>Simenz, Christopher J. ; Garceau, Luke R. ; Lutsch, Brittney N. ; Suchomel, Timothy J. ; Ebben, William P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5259-d711b66632911055b91f2d9fbcf34c2cfd9a920a305ae8101d525aa4e35eb2793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Athletes</topic><topic>Electromyography</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hips</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Isometric Contraction - physiology</topic><topic>Legs</topic><topic>Lower Extremity - physiology</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>Muscles (activity)</topic><topic>Muscles (exercise effects)</topic><topic>Muscular system</topic><topic>Plyometric Exercise</topic><topic>Resistance exercise</topic><topic>Resistance Training - methods</topic><topic>Sports training</topic><topic>Strength</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Simenz, Christopher J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garceau, Luke R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lutsch, Brittney N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suchomel, Timothy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebben, William P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of strength and conditioning research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Simenz, Christopher J.</au><au>Garceau, Luke R.</au><au>Lutsch, Brittney N.</au><au>Suchomel, Timothy J.</au><au>Ebben, William P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Electromyographical Analysis of Lower Extremity Muscle Activation During Variations of the Loaded Step-Up Exercise</atitle><jtitle>Journal of strength and conditioning research</jtitle><addtitle>J Strength Cond Res</addtitle><date>2012-12</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>3398</spage><epage>3405</epage><pages>3398-3405</pages><issn>1064-8011</issn><eissn>1533-4287</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACTSimenz, CJ, Garceau, LR, Lutsch, BN, Suchomel, TJ, and Ebben, WP. Electromyographical analysis of lower extremity muscle activation during variations of the loaded step-up exercise. J Strength Cond Res 26(12)3398–3405, 2012—The loaded step-up exercise allows strength and conditioning practitioners to incorporate a unilateral resistance for athletes while performing extension at the hip, knee, and plantar flexion at the ankle. This study evaluated the activation of the biceps femoris (BF), gluteus maximus (GMx), gluteus medius (GMe), rectus femoris, semitendinosus (ST), vastus lateralis, and vastus medialis during 4 variations of the step-up exercise to assess the specific muscle training stimulus of each exercise variation. The exercises included the step-up, crossover step-up, diagonal step-up, and lateral step-up. Fifteen women who regularly engaged in lower body resistance training performed the 4 exercises with 6 repetition maximum loads on a 45.72-cm (18-in.) plyometric box. Data were collected with a telemetered electromyography (EMG) system, and root mean square values were calculated for EMG data for eccentric and concentric phases. Results of a repeated-measures analysis of variance revealed a variety of differences in muscle activation between the exercises (p ≤ 0.05). The results indicated that the crossover step-up elicited the greatest concentric muscle activation for the GMe, whereas the step-up elicited greatest eccentric activation for the GMe and greatest activation for the GMx, BF, and ST in both concentric and eccentric phases. These findings can be used by practitioners to inform exercise selection to best target and maximally activate a variety of hip and thigh musculature.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>National Strength and Conditioning Association</pub><pmid>22237139</pmid><doi>10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182472fad</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1064-8011 |
ispartof | Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2012-12, Vol.26 (12), p.3398-3405 |
issn | 1064-8011 1533-4287 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1272710798 |
source | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
subjects | Analysis Analysis of Variance Athletes Electromyography Exercise Female Hips Humans Isometric Contraction - physiology Legs Lower Extremity - physiology Muscle, Skeletal - physiology Muscles (activity) Muscles (exercise effects) Muscular system Plyometric Exercise Resistance exercise Resistance Training - methods Sports training Strength Variance analysis Young Adult |
title | Electromyographical Analysis of Lower Extremity Muscle Activation During Variations of the Loaded Step-Up Exercise |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T20%3A07%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Electromyographical%20Analysis%20of%20Lower%20Extremity%20Muscle%20Activation%20During%20Variations%20of%20the%20Loaded%20Step-Up%20Exercise&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20strength%20and%20conditioning%20research&rft.au=Simenz,%20Christopher%20J.&rft.date=2012-12&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=3398&rft.epage=3405&rft.pages=3398-3405&rft.issn=1064-8011&rft.eissn=1533-4287&rft_id=info:doi/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182472fad&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2838968161%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5259-d711b66632911055b91f2d9fbcf34c2cfd9a920a305ae8101d525aa4e35eb2793%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1237125559&rft_id=info:pmid/22237139&rfr_iscdi=true |