Loading…

Effects of front‐of‐package and shelf nutrition labeling systems on consumers

As standards are considered for nutrition front‐of‐package (FOP) and shelf‐labeling systems in the United States, it is important to know what types of systems are most effective in conveying scientifically accurate and useful information to consumers. A systematic literature review identified 38 em...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nutrition reviews 2013-01, Vol.71 (1), p.1-14
Main Authors: Hersey, James C, Wohlgenant, Kelly C, Arsenault, Joanne E, Kosa, Katherine M, Muth, Mary K
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4230-6f3538abdb59bd93a2a5d04f014bbabb18516240225c36673ac3b1a014f047e63
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4230-6f3538abdb59bd93a2a5d04f014bbabb18516240225c36673ac3b1a014f047e63
container_end_page 14
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title Nutrition reviews
container_volume 71
creator Hersey, James C
Wohlgenant, Kelly C
Arsenault, Joanne E
Kosa, Katherine M
Muth, Mary K
description As standards are considered for nutrition front‐of‐package (FOP) and shelf‐labeling systems in the United States, it is important to know what types of systems are most effective in conveying scientifically accurate and useful information to consumers. A systematic literature review identified 38 empirical studies on consumer response to FOP nutrition labeling and shelf labeling. Studies indicate that consumers can more easily interpret and select healthier products with nutrient‐specific FOP nutrition labels that incorporate text and symbolic color to indicate nutrient levels rather than nutrient‐specific labels that only emphasize numeric information, such as Guideline Daily Amounts expressed as percentages and/or grams. Summary systems may influence consumers to purchase healthier products. However, more research is needed to assess the influence of nutrient‐specific labels on consumers’ purchases. This review identified few studies that compared consumers’ ability to select healthier products using nutrient‐specific systems that incorporate text and color codes with multiple‐level summary icons. More research is needed to determine the effects of FOP nutrition labeling on consumers’ actual shopping behaviors and dietary intakes.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/nure.12000
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1273160651</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1273160651</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4230-6f3538abdb59bd93a2a5d04f014bbabb18516240225c36673ac3b1a014f047e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90MlKxDAYB_Agio7LxQeQgggidMzWpD3KMC4wKIqeS5Im2rFNxqRF5uYj-Iw-iRlnVPBgDskhv2_hD8A-gkMUz6ntvR4iDCFcAwPEM5LSPOfrYAAhLlLGKNkC2yFMI0C4IJtgCxOcY0z5ANyOjdGqC4kzifHOdh9v787EaybUs3jUibBVEp50YxLbd77uameTRkjd1PYxCfPQ6TYW20Q5G_pW-7ALNoxogt5bvTvg4Xx8P7pMJzcXV6OzSaooJjBlhmQkF7KSWSGrgggssgpSAxGVUkiJ8gwxTCHGmSKMcSIUkUjEbwMp14zsgONl35l3L70OXdnWQemmEVa7PpQIc4IYZBmK9PAPnbre27hdVKxAnHO0UCdLpbwLwWtTznzdCj8vESwXQZeLoMuvoCM-WLXsZaurH_qdbARHKyCCEo3xwqo6_DpWQFZQEh1aute60fN_RpbXD3fj5fBPHr2WGg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1269177711</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of front‐of‐package and shelf nutrition labeling systems on consumers</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Hersey, James C ; Wohlgenant, Kelly C ; Arsenault, Joanne E ; Kosa, Katherine M ; Muth, Mary K</creator><creatorcontrib>Hersey, James C ; Wohlgenant, Kelly C ; Arsenault, Joanne E ; Kosa, Katherine M ; Muth, Mary K</creatorcontrib><description>As standards are considered for nutrition front‐of‐package (FOP) and shelf‐labeling systems in the United States, it is important to know what types of systems are most effective in conveying scientifically accurate and useful information to consumers. A systematic literature review identified 38 empirical studies on consumer response to FOP nutrition labeling and shelf labeling. Studies indicate that consumers can more easily interpret and select healthier products with nutrient‐specific FOP nutrition labels that incorporate text and symbolic color to indicate nutrient levels rather than nutrient‐specific labels that only emphasize numeric information, such as Guideline Daily Amounts expressed as percentages and/or grams. Summary systems may influence consumers to purchase healthier products. However, more research is needed to assess the influence of nutrient‐specific labels on consumers’ purchases. This review identified few studies that compared consumers’ ability to select healthier products using nutrient‐specific systems that incorporate text and color codes with multiple‐level summary icons. More research is needed to determine the effects of FOP nutrition labeling on consumers’ actual shopping behaviors and dietary intakes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-6643</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1753-4887</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/nure.12000</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23282247</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NUREA8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, NJ: Wiley</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Choice Behavior ; Community Participation - psychology ; consumer ; Consumer Behavior ; Descriptive labeling ; Diet ; Feeding. Feeding behavior ; Food - classification ; Food Labeling - methods ; Food Preferences - psychology ; front‐of‐package nutrition labeling ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Health Behavior ; Health Education - methods ; Humans ; Information ; Nutrition ; purchase behavior ; shelf labeling ; understanding ; Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems</subject><ispartof>Nutrition reviews, 2013-01, Vol.71 (1), p.1-14</ispartof><rights>2013 International Life Sciences Institute</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2013 International Life Sciences Institute.</rights><rights>Copyright International Life Sciences Institute Jan 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4230-6f3538abdb59bd93a2a5d04f014bbabb18516240225c36673ac3b1a014f047e63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4230-6f3538abdb59bd93a2a5d04f014bbabb18516240225c36673ac3b1a014f047e63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=26906943$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23282247$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hersey, James C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wohlgenant, Kelly C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arsenault, Joanne E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kosa, Katherine M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muth, Mary K</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of front‐of‐package and shelf nutrition labeling systems on consumers</title><title>Nutrition reviews</title><addtitle>Nutr Rev</addtitle><description>As standards are considered for nutrition front‐of‐package (FOP) and shelf‐labeling systems in the United States, it is important to know what types of systems are most effective in conveying scientifically accurate and useful information to consumers. A systematic literature review identified 38 empirical studies on consumer response to FOP nutrition labeling and shelf labeling. Studies indicate that consumers can more easily interpret and select healthier products with nutrient‐specific FOP nutrition labels that incorporate text and symbolic color to indicate nutrient levels rather than nutrient‐specific labels that only emphasize numeric information, such as Guideline Daily Amounts expressed as percentages and/or grams. Summary systems may influence consumers to purchase healthier products. However, more research is needed to assess the influence of nutrient‐specific labels on consumers’ purchases. This review identified few studies that compared consumers’ ability to select healthier products using nutrient‐specific systems that incorporate text and color codes with multiple‐level summary icons. More research is needed to determine the effects of FOP nutrition labeling on consumers’ actual shopping behaviors and dietary intakes.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Community Participation - psychology</subject><subject>consumer</subject><subject>Consumer Behavior</subject><subject>Descriptive labeling</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Feeding. Feeding behavior</subject><subject>Food - classification</subject><subject>Food Labeling - methods</subject><subject>Food Preferences - psychology</subject><subject>front‐of‐package nutrition labeling</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Health Behavior</subject><subject>Health Education - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>purchase behavior</subject><subject>shelf labeling</subject><subject>understanding</subject><subject>Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems</subject><issn>0029-6643</issn><issn>1753-4887</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90MlKxDAYB_Agio7LxQeQgggidMzWpD3KMC4wKIqeS5Im2rFNxqRF5uYj-Iw-iRlnVPBgDskhv2_hD8A-gkMUz6ntvR4iDCFcAwPEM5LSPOfrYAAhLlLGKNkC2yFMI0C4IJtgCxOcY0z5ANyOjdGqC4kzifHOdh9v787EaybUs3jUibBVEp50YxLbd77uameTRkjd1PYxCfPQ6TYW20Q5G_pW-7ALNoxogt5bvTvg4Xx8P7pMJzcXV6OzSaooJjBlhmQkF7KSWSGrgggssgpSAxGVUkiJ8gwxTCHGmSKMcSIUkUjEbwMp14zsgONl35l3L70OXdnWQemmEVa7PpQIc4IYZBmK9PAPnbre27hdVKxAnHO0UCdLpbwLwWtTznzdCj8vESwXQZeLoMuvoCM-WLXsZaurH_qdbARHKyCCEo3xwqo6_DpWQFZQEh1aute60fN_RpbXD3fj5fBPHr2WGg</recordid><startdate>201301</startdate><enddate>201301</enddate><creator>Hersey, James C</creator><creator>Wohlgenant, Kelly C</creator><creator>Arsenault, Joanne E</creator><creator>Kosa, Katherine M</creator><creator>Muth, Mary K</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201301</creationdate><title>Effects of front‐of‐package and shelf nutrition labeling systems on consumers</title><author>Hersey, James C ; Wohlgenant, Kelly C ; Arsenault, Joanne E ; Kosa, Katherine M ; Muth, Mary K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4230-6f3538abdb59bd93a2a5d04f014bbabb18516240225c36673ac3b1a014f047e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Community Participation - psychology</topic><topic>consumer</topic><topic>Consumer Behavior</topic><topic>Descriptive labeling</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Feeding. Feeding behavior</topic><topic>Food - classification</topic><topic>Food Labeling - methods</topic><topic>Food Preferences - psychology</topic><topic>front‐of‐package nutrition labeling</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Health Behavior</topic><topic>Health Education - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>purchase behavior</topic><topic>shelf labeling</topic><topic>understanding</topic><topic>Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hersey, James C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wohlgenant, Kelly C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arsenault, Joanne E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kosa, Katherine M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muth, Mary K</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nutrition reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hersey, James C</au><au>Wohlgenant, Kelly C</au><au>Arsenault, Joanne E</au><au>Kosa, Katherine M</au><au>Muth, Mary K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of front‐of‐package and shelf nutrition labeling systems on consumers</atitle><jtitle>Nutrition reviews</jtitle><addtitle>Nutr Rev</addtitle><date>2013-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>14</epage><pages>1-14</pages><issn>0029-6643</issn><eissn>1753-4887</eissn><coden>NUREA8</coden><abstract>As standards are considered for nutrition front‐of‐package (FOP) and shelf‐labeling systems in the United States, it is important to know what types of systems are most effective in conveying scientifically accurate and useful information to consumers. A systematic literature review identified 38 empirical studies on consumer response to FOP nutrition labeling and shelf labeling. Studies indicate that consumers can more easily interpret and select healthier products with nutrient‐specific FOP nutrition labels that incorporate text and symbolic color to indicate nutrient levels rather than nutrient‐specific labels that only emphasize numeric information, such as Guideline Daily Amounts expressed as percentages and/or grams. Summary systems may influence consumers to purchase healthier products. However, more research is needed to assess the influence of nutrient‐specific labels on consumers’ purchases. This review identified few studies that compared consumers’ ability to select healthier products using nutrient‐specific systems that incorporate text and color codes with multiple‐level summary icons. More research is needed to determine the effects of FOP nutrition labeling on consumers’ actual shopping behaviors and dietary intakes.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, NJ</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><pmid>23282247</pmid><doi>10.1111/nure.12000</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0029-6643
ispartof Nutrition reviews, 2013-01, Vol.71 (1), p.1-14
issn 0029-6643
1753-4887
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1273160651
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Choice Behavior
Community Participation - psychology
consumer
Consumer Behavior
Descriptive labeling
Diet
Feeding. Feeding behavior
Food - classification
Food Labeling - methods
Food Preferences - psychology
front‐of‐package nutrition labeling
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Health Behavior
Health Education - methods
Humans
Information
Nutrition
purchase behavior
shelf labeling
understanding
Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems
title Effects of front‐of‐package and shelf nutrition labeling systems on consumers
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T17%3A28%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20front%E2%80%90of%E2%80%90package%20and%20shelf%20nutrition%20labeling%20systems%20on%20consumers&rft.jtitle=Nutrition%20reviews&rft.au=Hersey,%20James%20C&rft.date=2013-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=14&rft.pages=1-14&rft.issn=0029-6643&rft.eissn=1753-4887&rft.coden=NUREA8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/nure.12000&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1273160651%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4230-6f3538abdb59bd93a2a5d04f014bbabb18516240225c36673ac3b1a014f047e63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1269177711&rft_id=info:pmid/23282247&rfr_iscdi=true