Loading…
Effects of front‐of‐package and shelf nutrition labeling systems on consumers
As standards are considered for nutrition front‐of‐package (FOP) and shelf‐labeling systems in the United States, it is important to know what types of systems are most effective in conveying scientifically accurate and useful information to consumers. A systematic literature review identified 38 em...
Saved in:
Published in: | Nutrition reviews 2013-01, Vol.71 (1), p.1-14 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4230-6f3538abdb59bd93a2a5d04f014bbabb18516240225c36673ac3b1a014f047e63 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4230-6f3538abdb59bd93a2a5d04f014bbabb18516240225c36673ac3b1a014f047e63 |
container_end_page | 14 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Nutrition reviews |
container_volume | 71 |
creator | Hersey, James C Wohlgenant, Kelly C Arsenault, Joanne E Kosa, Katherine M Muth, Mary K |
description | As standards are considered for nutrition front‐of‐package (FOP) and shelf‐labeling systems in the United States, it is important to know what types of systems are most effective in conveying scientifically accurate and useful information to consumers. A systematic literature review identified 38 empirical studies on consumer response to FOP nutrition labeling and shelf labeling. Studies indicate that consumers can more easily interpret and select healthier products with nutrient‐specific FOP nutrition labels that incorporate text and symbolic color to indicate nutrient levels rather than nutrient‐specific labels that only emphasize numeric information, such as Guideline Daily Amounts expressed as percentages and/or grams. Summary systems may influence consumers to purchase healthier products. However, more research is needed to assess the influence of nutrient‐specific labels on consumers’ purchases. This review identified few studies that compared consumers’ ability to select healthier products using nutrient‐specific systems that incorporate text and color codes with multiple‐level summary icons. More research is needed to determine the effects of FOP nutrition labeling on consumers’ actual shopping behaviors and dietary intakes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/nure.12000 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1273160651</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1273160651</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4230-6f3538abdb59bd93a2a5d04f014bbabb18516240225c36673ac3b1a014f047e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90MlKxDAYB_Agio7LxQeQgggidMzWpD3KMC4wKIqeS5Im2rFNxqRF5uYj-Iw-iRlnVPBgDskhv2_hD8A-gkMUz6ntvR4iDCFcAwPEM5LSPOfrYAAhLlLGKNkC2yFMI0C4IJtgCxOcY0z5ANyOjdGqC4kzifHOdh9v787EaybUs3jUibBVEp50YxLbd77uameTRkjd1PYxCfPQ6TYW20Q5G_pW-7ALNoxogt5bvTvg4Xx8P7pMJzcXV6OzSaooJjBlhmQkF7KSWSGrgggssgpSAxGVUkiJ8gwxTCHGmSKMcSIUkUjEbwMp14zsgONl35l3L70OXdnWQemmEVa7PpQIc4IYZBmK9PAPnbre27hdVKxAnHO0UCdLpbwLwWtTznzdCj8vESwXQZeLoMuvoCM-WLXsZaurH_qdbARHKyCCEo3xwqo6_DpWQFZQEh1aute60fN_RpbXD3fj5fBPHr2WGg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1269177711</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of front‐of‐package and shelf nutrition labeling systems on consumers</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Hersey, James C ; Wohlgenant, Kelly C ; Arsenault, Joanne E ; Kosa, Katherine M ; Muth, Mary K</creator><creatorcontrib>Hersey, James C ; Wohlgenant, Kelly C ; Arsenault, Joanne E ; Kosa, Katherine M ; Muth, Mary K</creatorcontrib><description>As standards are considered for nutrition front‐of‐package (FOP) and shelf‐labeling systems in the United States, it is important to know what types of systems are most effective in conveying scientifically accurate and useful information to consumers. A systematic literature review identified 38 empirical studies on consumer response to FOP nutrition labeling and shelf labeling. Studies indicate that consumers can more easily interpret and select healthier products with nutrient‐specific FOP nutrition labels that incorporate text and symbolic color to indicate nutrient levels rather than nutrient‐specific labels that only emphasize numeric information, such as Guideline Daily Amounts expressed as percentages and/or grams. Summary systems may influence consumers to purchase healthier products. However, more research is needed to assess the influence of nutrient‐specific labels on consumers’ purchases. This review identified few studies that compared consumers’ ability to select healthier products using nutrient‐specific systems that incorporate text and color codes with multiple‐level summary icons. More research is needed to determine the effects of FOP nutrition labeling on consumers’ actual shopping behaviors and dietary intakes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-6643</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1753-4887</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/nure.12000</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23282247</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NUREA8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, NJ: Wiley</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Choice Behavior ; Community Participation - psychology ; consumer ; Consumer Behavior ; Descriptive labeling ; Diet ; Feeding. Feeding behavior ; Food - classification ; Food Labeling - methods ; Food Preferences - psychology ; front‐of‐package nutrition labeling ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Health Behavior ; Health Education - methods ; Humans ; Information ; Nutrition ; purchase behavior ; shelf labeling ; understanding ; Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems</subject><ispartof>Nutrition reviews, 2013-01, Vol.71 (1), p.1-14</ispartof><rights>2013 International Life Sciences Institute</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2013 International Life Sciences Institute.</rights><rights>Copyright International Life Sciences Institute Jan 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4230-6f3538abdb59bd93a2a5d04f014bbabb18516240225c36673ac3b1a014f047e63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4230-6f3538abdb59bd93a2a5d04f014bbabb18516240225c36673ac3b1a014f047e63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=26906943$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23282247$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hersey, James C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wohlgenant, Kelly C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arsenault, Joanne E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kosa, Katherine M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muth, Mary K</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of front‐of‐package and shelf nutrition labeling systems on consumers</title><title>Nutrition reviews</title><addtitle>Nutr Rev</addtitle><description>As standards are considered for nutrition front‐of‐package (FOP) and shelf‐labeling systems in the United States, it is important to know what types of systems are most effective in conveying scientifically accurate and useful information to consumers. A systematic literature review identified 38 empirical studies on consumer response to FOP nutrition labeling and shelf labeling. Studies indicate that consumers can more easily interpret and select healthier products with nutrient‐specific FOP nutrition labels that incorporate text and symbolic color to indicate nutrient levels rather than nutrient‐specific labels that only emphasize numeric information, such as Guideline Daily Amounts expressed as percentages and/or grams. Summary systems may influence consumers to purchase healthier products. However, more research is needed to assess the influence of nutrient‐specific labels on consumers’ purchases. This review identified few studies that compared consumers’ ability to select healthier products using nutrient‐specific systems that incorporate text and color codes with multiple‐level summary icons. More research is needed to determine the effects of FOP nutrition labeling on consumers’ actual shopping behaviors and dietary intakes.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Community Participation - psychology</subject><subject>consumer</subject><subject>Consumer Behavior</subject><subject>Descriptive labeling</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Feeding. Feeding behavior</subject><subject>Food - classification</subject><subject>Food Labeling - methods</subject><subject>Food Preferences - psychology</subject><subject>front‐of‐package nutrition labeling</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Health Behavior</subject><subject>Health Education - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>purchase behavior</subject><subject>shelf labeling</subject><subject>understanding</subject><subject>Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems</subject><issn>0029-6643</issn><issn>1753-4887</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90MlKxDAYB_Agio7LxQeQgggidMzWpD3KMC4wKIqeS5Im2rFNxqRF5uYj-Iw-iRlnVPBgDskhv2_hD8A-gkMUz6ntvR4iDCFcAwPEM5LSPOfrYAAhLlLGKNkC2yFMI0C4IJtgCxOcY0z5ANyOjdGqC4kzifHOdh9v787EaybUs3jUibBVEp50YxLbd77uameTRkjd1PYxCfPQ6TYW20Q5G_pW-7ALNoxogt5bvTvg4Xx8P7pMJzcXV6OzSaooJjBlhmQkF7KSWSGrgggssgpSAxGVUkiJ8gwxTCHGmSKMcSIUkUjEbwMp14zsgONl35l3L70OXdnWQemmEVa7PpQIc4IYZBmK9PAPnbre27hdVKxAnHO0UCdLpbwLwWtTznzdCj8vESwXQZeLoMuvoCM-WLXsZaurH_qdbARHKyCCEo3xwqo6_DpWQFZQEh1aute60fN_RpbXD3fj5fBPHr2WGg</recordid><startdate>201301</startdate><enddate>201301</enddate><creator>Hersey, James C</creator><creator>Wohlgenant, Kelly C</creator><creator>Arsenault, Joanne E</creator><creator>Kosa, Katherine M</creator><creator>Muth, Mary K</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201301</creationdate><title>Effects of front‐of‐package and shelf nutrition labeling systems on consumers</title><author>Hersey, James C ; Wohlgenant, Kelly C ; Arsenault, Joanne E ; Kosa, Katherine M ; Muth, Mary K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4230-6f3538abdb59bd93a2a5d04f014bbabb18516240225c36673ac3b1a014f047e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Community Participation - psychology</topic><topic>consumer</topic><topic>Consumer Behavior</topic><topic>Descriptive labeling</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Feeding. Feeding behavior</topic><topic>Food - classification</topic><topic>Food Labeling - methods</topic><topic>Food Preferences - psychology</topic><topic>front‐of‐package nutrition labeling</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Health Behavior</topic><topic>Health Education - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>purchase behavior</topic><topic>shelf labeling</topic><topic>understanding</topic><topic>Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hersey, James C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wohlgenant, Kelly C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arsenault, Joanne E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kosa, Katherine M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muth, Mary K</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nutrition reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hersey, James C</au><au>Wohlgenant, Kelly C</au><au>Arsenault, Joanne E</au><au>Kosa, Katherine M</au><au>Muth, Mary K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of front‐of‐package and shelf nutrition labeling systems on consumers</atitle><jtitle>Nutrition reviews</jtitle><addtitle>Nutr Rev</addtitle><date>2013-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>14</epage><pages>1-14</pages><issn>0029-6643</issn><eissn>1753-4887</eissn><coden>NUREA8</coden><abstract>As standards are considered for nutrition front‐of‐package (FOP) and shelf‐labeling systems in the United States, it is important to know what types of systems are most effective in conveying scientifically accurate and useful information to consumers. A systematic literature review identified 38 empirical studies on consumer response to FOP nutrition labeling and shelf labeling. Studies indicate that consumers can more easily interpret and select healthier products with nutrient‐specific FOP nutrition labels that incorporate text and symbolic color to indicate nutrient levels rather than nutrient‐specific labels that only emphasize numeric information, such as Guideline Daily Amounts expressed as percentages and/or grams. Summary systems may influence consumers to purchase healthier products. However, more research is needed to assess the influence of nutrient‐specific labels on consumers’ purchases. This review identified few studies that compared consumers’ ability to select healthier products using nutrient‐specific systems that incorporate text and color codes with multiple‐level summary icons. More research is needed to determine the effects of FOP nutrition labeling on consumers’ actual shopping behaviors and dietary intakes.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, NJ</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><pmid>23282247</pmid><doi>10.1111/nure.12000</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0029-6643 |
ispartof | Nutrition reviews, 2013-01, Vol.71 (1), p.1-14 |
issn | 0029-6643 1753-4887 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1273160651 |
source | Oxford Journals Online |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Choice Behavior Community Participation - psychology consumer Consumer Behavior Descriptive labeling Diet Feeding. Feeding behavior Food - classification Food Labeling - methods Food Preferences - psychology front‐of‐package nutrition labeling Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Health Behavior Health Education - methods Humans Information Nutrition purchase behavior shelf labeling understanding Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems |
title | Effects of front‐of‐package and shelf nutrition labeling systems on consumers |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T17%3A28%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20front%E2%80%90of%E2%80%90package%20and%20shelf%20nutrition%20labeling%20systems%20on%20consumers&rft.jtitle=Nutrition%20reviews&rft.au=Hersey,%20James%20C&rft.date=2013-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=14&rft.pages=1-14&rft.issn=0029-6643&rft.eissn=1753-4887&rft.coden=NUREA8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/nure.12000&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1273160651%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4230-6f3538abdb59bd93a2a5d04f014bbabb18516240225c36673ac3b1a014f047e63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1269177711&rft_id=info:pmid/23282247&rfr_iscdi=true |