Loading…
Surface Impurities Are Not Responsible For the Charge on the Oil/Water Interface: A Comment
The origin of the charge on oil/water interfaces that can be found from electrokinetic mobility measurements is a long‐standing issue that has invoked different explanations. Sum frequency scattering (SFS) shows that impurities are likely not a general cause for the charge (see picture).
Saved in:
Published in: | Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2012-12, Vol.51 (52), p.12938-12940 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4482-93f980f3929cb037adc8350fe8d9b20396ccc1e1298c7ed5004c4ee8da870ef43 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4482-93f980f3929cb037adc8350fe8d9b20396ccc1e1298c7ed5004c4ee8da870ef43 |
container_end_page | 12940 |
container_issue | 52 |
container_start_page | 12938 |
container_title | Angewandte Chemie International Edition |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Jena, Kailash C. Scheu, Rüdiger Roke, Sylvie |
description | The origin of the charge on oil/water interfaces that can be found from electrokinetic mobility measurements is a long‐standing issue that has invoked different explanations. Sum frequency scattering (SFS) shows that impurities are likely not a general cause for the charge (see picture). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/anie.201204662 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1273227330</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2844485161</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4482-93f980f3929cb037adc8350fe8d9b20396ccc1e1298c7ed5004c4ee8da870ef43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkL9PGzEYhi3UCiiwdqwsdWG54B_ns90tRIRGioJaWjEwWI7zHRjuzsG-U8t_X6ehEWLpYPuz_LyPrBehj5SMKCHszHYeRoxQRsqqYnvokApGCy4lf5fnkvNCKkEP0IeUHjKvFKn20QHjVBEhxCG6vR5ibR3gWbseou89JDyOgBehx98hrUOX_LIBPA0R9_eAJ_c23gEO3d_blW_ObmwPEc-6vG9EX_AYT0LbQtcfo_e1bRKcvJxH6Of04sfkazG_upxNxvPClaVihea1VqTmmmm3JFzalVNckBrUSi8Z4bpyzlGgTCsnYSUIKV0J-dUqSaAu-RE63XrXMTwNkHrT-uSgaWwHYUiGMslZXpxk9PMb9CEMscu_yxTXkknBRKZGW8rFkFKE2qyjb218NpSYTe1mU7vZ1Z4Dn160w7KF1Q7_13MG9Bb45Rt4_o_OjBezi9fyYpv1qYffu6yNj6aSXApzs7g0el5NVSXPzTf-B2oWm5A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1239727525</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Surface Impurities Are Not Responsible For the Charge on the Oil/Water Interface: A Comment</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Jena, Kailash C. ; Scheu, Rüdiger ; Roke, Sylvie</creator><creatorcontrib>Jena, Kailash C. ; Scheu, Rüdiger ; Roke, Sylvie</creatorcontrib><description>The origin of the charge on oil/water interfaces that can be found from electrokinetic mobility measurements is a long‐standing issue that has invoked different explanations. Sum frequency scattering (SFS) shows that impurities are likely not a general cause for the charge (see picture).</description><edition>International ed. in English</edition><identifier>ISSN: 1433-7851</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1521-3773</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/anie.201204662</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23180555</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ACIEAY</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Weinheim: WILEY-VCH Verlag</publisher><subject>interface ; nanodroplets ; nonlinear light scattering ; oil ; water</subject><ispartof>Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2012-12, Vol.51 (52), p.12938-12940</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4482-93f980f3929cb037adc8350fe8d9b20396ccc1e1298c7ed5004c4ee8da870ef43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4482-93f980f3929cb037adc8350fe8d9b20396ccc1e1298c7ed5004c4ee8da870ef43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23180555$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jena, Kailash C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheu, Rüdiger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roke, Sylvie</creatorcontrib><title>Surface Impurities Are Not Responsible For the Charge on the Oil/Water Interface: A Comment</title><title>Angewandte Chemie International Edition</title><addtitle>Angew. Chem. Int. Ed</addtitle><description>The origin of the charge on oil/water interfaces that can be found from electrokinetic mobility measurements is a long‐standing issue that has invoked different explanations. Sum frequency scattering (SFS) shows that impurities are likely not a general cause for the charge (see picture).</description><subject>interface</subject><subject>nanodroplets</subject><subject>nonlinear light scattering</subject><subject>oil</subject><subject>water</subject><issn>1433-7851</issn><issn>1521-3773</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkL9PGzEYhi3UCiiwdqwsdWG54B_ns90tRIRGioJaWjEwWI7zHRjuzsG-U8t_X6ehEWLpYPuz_LyPrBehj5SMKCHszHYeRoxQRsqqYnvokApGCy4lf5fnkvNCKkEP0IeUHjKvFKn20QHjVBEhxCG6vR5ibR3gWbseou89JDyOgBehx98hrUOX_LIBPA0R9_eAJ_c23gEO3d_blW_ObmwPEc-6vG9EX_AYT0LbQtcfo_e1bRKcvJxH6Of04sfkazG_upxNxvPClaVihea1VqTmmmm3JFzalVNckBrUSi8Z4bpyzlGgTCsnYSUIKV0J-dUqSaAu-RE63XrXMTwNkHrT-uSgaWwHYUiGMslZXpxk9PMb9CEMscu_yxTXkknBRKZGW8rFkFKE2qyjb218NpSYTe1mU7vZ1Z4Dn160w7KF1Q7_13MG9Bb45Rt4_o_OjBezi9fyYpv1qYffu6yNj6aSXApzs7g0el5NVSXPzTf-B2oWm5A</recordid><startdate>20121221</startdate><enddate>20121221</enddate><creator>Jena, Kailash C.</creator><creator>Scheu, Rüdiger</creator><creator>Roke, Sylvie</creator><general>WILEY-VCH Verlag</general><general>WILEY‐VCH Verlag</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121221</creationdate><title>Surface Impurities Are Not Responsible For the Charge on the Oil/Water Interface: A Comment</title><author>Jena, Kailash C. ; Scheu, Rüdiger ; Roke, Sylvie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4482-93f980f3929cb037adc8350fe8d9b20396ccc1e1298c7ed5004c4ee8da870ef43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>interface</topic><topic>nanodroplets</topic><topic>nonlinear light scattering</topic><topic>oil</topic><topic>water</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jena, Kailash C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheu, Rüdiger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roke, Sylvie</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Angewandte Chemie International Edition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jena, Kailash C.</au><au>Scheu, Rüdiger</au><au>Roke, Sylvie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Surface Impurities Are Not Responsible For the Charge on the Oil/Water Interface: A Comment</atitle><jtitle>Angewandte Chemie International Edition</jtitle><addtitle>Angew. Chem. Int. Ed</addtitle><date>2012-12-21</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>52</issue><spage>12938</spage><epage>12940</epage><pages>12938-12940</pages><issn>1433-7851</issn><eissn>1521-3773</eissn><coden>ACIEAY</coden><abstract>The origin of the charge on oil/water interfaces that can be found from electrokinetic mobility measurements is a long‐standing issue that has invoked different explanations. Sum frequency scattering (SFS) shows that impurities are likely not a general cause for the charge (see picture).</abstract><cop>Weinheim</cop><pub>WILEY-VCH Verlag</pub><pmid>23180555</pmid><doi>10.1002/anie.201204662</doi><tpages>3</tpages><edition>International ed. in English</edition></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1433-7851 |
ispartof | Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2012-12, Vol.51 (52), p.12938-12940 |
issn | 1433-7851 1521-3773 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1273227330 |
source | Wiley |
subjects | interface nanodroplets nonlinear light scattering oil water |
title | Surface Impurities Are Not Responsible For the Charge on the Oil/Water Interface: A Comment |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T03%3A22%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Surface%20Impurities%20Are%20Not%20Responsible%20For%20the%20Charge%20on%20the%20Oil/Water%20Interface:%20A%20Comment&rft.jtitle=Angewandte%20Chemie%20International%20Edition&rft.au=Jena,%20Kailash%20C.&rft.date=2012-12-21&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=52&rft.spage=12938&rft.epage=12940&rft.pages=12938-12940&rft.issn=1433-7851&rft.eissn=1521-3773&rft.coden=ACIEAY&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/anie.201204662&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2844485161%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4482-93f980f3929cb037adc8350fe8d9b20396ccc1e1298c7ed5004c4ee8da870ef43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1239727525&rft_id=info:pmid/23180555&rfr_iscdi=true |