Loading…

Forces and pressures on the horse’s back during bareback riding

The objectives of this study were to measure forces and pressure profiles when riding with a conventional saddle compared to bareback riding. An electronic pressure mat was used to compare contact area, mean total force and pressure variables for one rider riding seven horses at sitting trot with a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The veterinary journal (1997) 2013-01, Vol.195 (1), p.48-52
Main Authors: Clayton, H.M., Belock, B., Lavagnino, M., Kaiser, L.J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-67a5d7d2710a5e190e25e62cfc64ab3cb053768b101cb59142766fbbcca02efb3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-67a5d7d2710a5e190e25e62cfc64ab3cb053768b101cb59142766fbbcca02efb3
container_end_page 52
container_issue 1
container_start_page 48
container_title The veterinary journal (1997)
container_volume 195
creator Clayton, H.M.
Belock, B.
Lavagnino, M.
Kaiser, L.J.
description The objectives of this study were to measure forces and pressure profiles when riding with a conventional saddle compared to bareback riding. An electronic pressure mat was used to compare contact area, mean total force and pressure variables for one rider riding seven horses at sitting trot with a conventional saddle or bareback. The use of a saddle was associated with a larger contact area and higher mean total force compared with the bareback condition. Mass normalized mean total force for bareback riding was lower than expected based on the rider’s body mass, suggesting that shear forces exerted by the rider’s thighs were not being registered by the pressure mat. In spite of the lower total force, the bareback condition was associated with higher average pressure, higher maximal pressure and larger area with mean pressure >11kPa. Focal pressure concentrations were present beneath the rider’s ischial tuberosities in the area of the horse’s epaxial muscles when riding bareback but not when using a saddle. It was concluded that bareback riding was associated with focal pressure concentrations that may increase the risk of pressure-induced injury to the horse’s epaxial musculature. The findings also emphasized that researchers should remain cognizant of shear forces, which may not be registered by the pressure mat, but may contribute to the effects of riding on the horse’s back.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.06.002
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1273463159</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1090023312002341</els_id><sourcerecordid>1273463159</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-67a5d7d2710a5e190e25e62cfc64ab3cb053768b101cb59142766fbbcca02efb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFOwzAQRS0EoqVwARYoSzYJ40niEIlNVVFAqsQG1pbtTGhCmhQ7qcSOa3A9ToJLC0s2M3-k_780j7FzDhEHLq7qqN_UTYTAMQIRAeABG_M0xhDzjB96DTmEgHE8YifO1QCQJwkesxFilguOfMym884acoFqi2BtybnBj6Brg35JwbKzjr4-Pl2glXkNisFW7YvXln5uWxX-PmVHpWocne33hD3Pb59m9-Hi8e5hNl2EJkHsQ5GptMgKzDiolHgOhCkJNKURidKx0ZDGmbjW_jOj05wnmAlRam2MAqRSxxN2uetd2-5tINfLVeUMNY1qqRuc5JjFiYh5mnsr7qzGds5ZKuXaVitl3yUHuUUna7lFJ7foJAjp0fnQxb5_0Csq_iK_rLzhZmcg_-WmIiudqag1VFSWTC-Lrvqv_xuNRIAL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1273463159</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Forces and pressures on the horse’s back during bareback riding</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Clayton, H.M. ; Belock, B. ; Lavagnino, M. ; Kaiser, L.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Clayton, H.M. ; Belock, B. ; Lavagnino, M. ; Kaiser, L.J.</creatorcontrib><description>The objectives of this study were to measure forces and pressure profiles when riding with a conventional saddle compared to bareback riding. An electronic pressure mat was used to compare contact area, mean total force and pressure variables for one rider riding seven horses at sitting trot with a conventional saddle or bareback. The use of a saddle was associated with a larger contact area and higher mean total force compared with the bareback condition. Mass normalized mean total force for bareback riding was lower than expected based on the rider’s body mass, suggesting that shear forces exerted by the rider’s thighs were not being registered by the pressure mat. In spite of the lower total force, the bareback condition was associated with higher average pressure, higher maximal pressure and larger area with mean pressure &gt;11kPa. Focal pressure concentrations were present beneath the rider’s ischial tuberosities in the area of the horse’s epaxial muscles when riding bareback but not when using a saddle. It was concluded that bareback riding was associated with focal pressure concentrations that may increase the risk of pressure-induced injury to the horse’s epaxial musculature. The findings also emphasized that researchers should remain cognizant of shear forces, which may not be registered by the pressure mat, but may contribute to the effects of riding on the horse’s back.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1090-0233</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2971</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.06.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22796121</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Back - physiology ; Bareback ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Equestrian ; Horses - physiology ; Humans ; Physical Conditioning, Animal ; Pressure ; Pressure mat ; Saddle ; Tack ; Weight-Bearing</subject><ispartof>The veterinary journal (1997), 2013-01, Vol.195 (1), p.48-52</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-67a5d7d2710a5e190e25e62cfc64ab3cb053768b101cb59142766fbbcca02efb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-67a5d7d2710a5e190e25e62cfc64ab3cb053768b101cb59142766fbbcca02efb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22796121$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clayton, H.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belock, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavagnino, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaiser, L.J.</creatorcontrib><title>Forces and pressures on the horse’s back during bareback riding</title><title>The veterinary journal (1997)</title><addtitle>Vet J</addtitle><description>The objectives of this study were to measure forces and pressure profiles when riding with a conventional saddle compared to bareback riding. An electronic pressure mat was used to compare contact area, mean total force and pressure variables for one rider riding seven horses at sitting trot with a conventional saddle or bareback. The use of a saddle was associated with a larger contact area and higher mean total force compared with the bareback condition. Mass normalized mean total force for bareback riding was lower than expected based on the rider’s body mass, suggesting that shear forces exerted by the rider’s thighs were not being registered by the pressure mat. In spite of the lower total force, the bareback condition was associated with higher average pressure, higher maximal pressure and larger area with mean pressure &gt;11kPa. Focal pressure concentrations were present beneath the rider’s ischial tuberosities in the area of the horse’s epaxial muscles when riding bareback but not when using a saddle. It was concluded that bareback riding was associated with focal pressure concentrations that may increase the risk of pressure-induced injury to the horse’s epaxial musculature. The findings also emphasized that researchers should remain cognizant of shear forces, which may not be registered by the pressure mat, but may contribute to the effects of riding on the horse’s back.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Back - physiology</subject><subject>Bareback</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Equestrian</subject><subject>Horses - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Physical Conditioning, Animal</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>Pressure mat</subject><subject>Saddle</subject><subject>Tack</subject><subject>Weight-Bearing</subject><issn>1090-0233</issn><issn>1532-2971</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEFOwzAQRS0EoqVwARYoSzYJ40niEIlNVVFAqsQG1pbtTGhCmhQ7qcSOa3A9ToJLC0s2M3-k_780j7FzDhEHLq7qqN_UTYTAMQIRAeABG_M0xhDzjB96DTmEgHE8YifO1QCQJwkesxFilguOfMym884acoFqi2BtybnBj6Brg35JwbKzjr4-Pl2glXkNisFW7YvXln5uWxX-PmVHpWocne33hD3Pb59m9-Hi8e5hNl2EJkHsQ5GptMgKzDiolHgOhCkJNKURidKx0ZDGmbjW_jOj05wnmAlRam2MAqRSxxN2uetd2-5tINfLVeUMNY1qqRuc5JjFiYh5mnsr7qzGds5ZKuXaVitl3yUHuUUna7lFJ7foJAjp0fnQxb5_0Csq_iK_rLzhZmcg_-WmIiudqag1VFSWTC-Lrvqv_xuNRIAL</recordid><startdate>201301</startdate><enddate>201301</enddate><creator>Clayton, H.M.</creator><creator>Belock, B.</creator><creator>Lavagnino, M.</creator><creator>Kaiser, L.J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201301</creationdate><title>Forces and pressures on the horse’s back during bareback riding</title><author>Clayton, H.M. ; Belock, B. ; Lavagnino, M. ; Kaiser, L.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-67a5d7d2710a5e190e25e62cfc64ab3cb053768b101cb59142766fbbcca02efb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Back - physiology</topic><topic>Bareback</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Equestrian</topic><topic>Horses - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Physical Conditioning, Animal</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>Pressure mat</topic><topic>Saddle</topic><topic>Tack</topic><topic>Weight-Bearing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clayton, H.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belock, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavagnino, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaiser, L.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The veterinary journal (1997)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clayton, H.M.</au><au>Belock, B.</au><au>Lavagnino, M.</au><au>Kaiser, L.J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Forces and pressures on the horse’s back during bareback riding</atitle><jtitle>The veterinary journal (1997)</jtitle><addtitle>Vet J</addtitle><date>2013-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>195</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>48</spage><epage>52</epage><pages>48-52</pages><issn>1090-0233</issn><eissn>1532-2971</eissn><abstract>The objectives of this study were to measure forces and pressure profiles when riding with a conventional saddle compared to bareback riding. An electronic pressure mat was used to compare contact area, mean total force and pressure variables for one rider riding seven horses at sitting trot with a conventional saddle or bareback. The use of a saddle was associated with a larger contact area and higher mean total force compared with the bareback condition. Mass normalized mean total force for bareback riding was lower than expected based on the rider’s body mass, suggesting that shear forces exerted by the rider’s thighs were not being registered by the pressure mat. In spite of the lower total force, the bareback condition was associated with higher average pressure, higher maximal pressure and larger area with mean pressure &gt;11kPa. Focal pressure concentrations were present beneath the rider’s ischial tuberosities in the area of the horse’s epaxial muscles when riding bareback but not when using a saddle. It was concluded that bareback riding was associated with focal pressure concentrations that may increase the risk of pressure-induced injury to the horse’s epaxial musculature. The findings also emphasized that researchers should remain cognizant of shear forces, which may not be registered by the pressure mat, but may contribute to the effects of riding on the horse’s back.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>22796121</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.06.002</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1090-0233
ispartof The veterinary journal (1997), 2013-01, Vol.195 (1), p.48-52
issn 1090-0233
1532-2971
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1273463159
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Animals
Back - physiology
Bareback
Biomechanical Phenomena
Equestrian
Horses - physiology
Humans
Physical Conditioning, Animal
Pressure
Pressure mat
Saddle
Tack
Weight-Bearing
title Forces and pressures on the horse’s back during bareback riding
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T16%3A20%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Forces%20and%20pressures%20on%20the%20horse%E2%80%99s%20back%20during%20bareback%20riding&rft.jtitle=The%20veterinary%20journal%20(1997)&rft.au=Clayton,%20H.M.&rft.date=2013-01&rft.volume=195&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=48&rft.epage=52&rft.pages=48-52&rft.issn=1090-0233&rft.eissn=1532-2971&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.06.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1273463159%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-67a5d7d2710a5e190e25e62cfc64ab3cb053768b101cb59142766fbbcca02efb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1273463159&rft_id=info:pmid/22796121&rfr_iscdi=true