Loading…
Forces and pressures on the horse’s back during bareback riding
The objectives of this study were to measure forces and pressure profiles when riding with a conventional saddle compared to bareback riding. An electronic pressure mat was used to compare contact area, mean total force and pressure variables for one rider riding seven horses at sitting trot with a...
Saved in:
Published in: | The veterinary journal (1997) 2013-01, Vol.195 (1), p.48-52 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-67a5d7d2710a5e190e25e62cfc64ab3cb053768b101cb59142766fbbcca02efb3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-67a5d7d2710a5e190e25e62cfc64ab3cb053768b101cb59142766fbbcca02efb3 |
container_end_page | 52 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 48 |
container_title | The veterinary journal (1997) |
container_volume | 195 |
creator | Clayton, H.M. Belock, B. Lavagnino, M. Kaiser, L.J. |
description | The objectives of this study were to measure forces and pressure profiles when riding with a conventional saddle compared to bareback riding. An electronic pressure mat was used to compare contact area, mean total force and pressure variables for one rider riding seven horses at sitting trot with a conventional saddle or bareback. The use of a saddle was associated with a larger contact area and higher mean total force compared with the bareback condition. Mass normalized mean total force for bareback riding was lower than expected based on the rider’s body mass, suggesting that shear forces exerted by the rider’s thighs were not being registered by the pressure mat. In spite of the lower total force, the bareback condition was associated with higher average pressure, higher maximal pressure and larger area with mean pressure >11kPa. Focal pressure concentrations were present beneath the rider’s ischial tuberosities in the area of the horse’s epaxial muscles when riding bareback but not when using a saddle. It was concluded that bareback riding was associated with focal pressure concentrations that may increase the risk of pressure-induced injury to the horse’s epaxial musculature. The findings also emphasized that researchers should remain cognizant of shear forces, which may not be registered by the pressure mat, but may contribute to the effects of riding on the horse’s back. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.06.002 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1273463159</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1090023312002341</els_id><sourcerecordid>1273463159</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-67a5d7d2710a5e190e25e62cfc64ab3cb053768b101cb59142766fbbcca02efb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFOwzAQRS0EoqVwARYoSzYJ40niEIlNVVFAqsQG1pbtTGhCmhQ7qcSOa3A9ToJLC0s2M3-k_780j7FzDhEHLq7qqN_UTYTAMQIRAeABG_M0xhDzjB96DTmEgHE8YifO1QCQJwkesxFilguOfMym884acoFqi2BtybnBj6Brg35JwbKzjr4-Pl2glXkNisFW7YvXln5uWxX-PmVHpWocne33hD3Pb59m9-Hi8e5hNl2EJkHsQ5GptMgKzDiolHgOhCkJNKURidKx0ZDGmbjW_jOj05wnmAlRam2MAqRSxxN2uetd2-5tINfLVeUMNY1qqRuc5JjFiYh5mnsr7qzGds5ZKuXaVitl3yUHuUUna7lFJ7foJAjp0fnQxb5_0Csq_iK_rLzhZmcg_-WmIiudqag1VFSWTC-Lrvqv_xuNRIAL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1273463159</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Forces and pressures on the horse’s back during bareback riding</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Clayton, H.M. ; Belock, B. ; Lavagnino, M. ; Kaiser, L.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Clayton, H.M. ; Belock, B. ; Lavagnino, M. ; Kaiser, L.J.</creatorcontrib><description>The objectives of this study were to measure forces and pressure profiles when riding with a conventional saddle compared to bareback riding. An electronic pressure mat was used to compare contact area, mean total force and pressure variables for one rider riding seven horses at sitting trot with a conventional saddle or bareback. The use of a saddle was associated with a larger contact area and higher mean total force compared with the bareback condition. Mass normalized mean total force for bareback riding was lower than expected based on the rider’s body mass, suggesting that shear forces exerted by the rider’s thighs were not being registered by the pressure mat. In spite of the lower total force, the bareback condition was associated with higher average pressure, higher maximal pressure and larger area with mean pressure >11kPa. Focal pressure concentrations were present beneath the rider’s ischial tuberosities in the area of the horse’s epaxial muscles when riding bareback but not when using a saddle. It was concluded that bareback riding was associated with focal pressure concentrations that may increase the risk of pressure-induced injury to the horse’s epaxial musculature. The findings also emphasized that researchers should remain cognizant of shear forces, which may not be registered by the pressure mat, but may contribute to the effects of riding on the horse’s back.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1090-0233</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2971</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.06.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22796121</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Back - physiology ; Bareback ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Equestrian ; Horses - physiology ; Humans ; Physical Conditioning, Animal ; Pressure ; Pressure mat ; Saddle ; Tack ; Weight-Bearing</subject><ispartof>The veterinary journal (1997), 2013-01, Vol.195 (1), p.48-52</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-67a5d7d2710a5e190e25e62cfc64ab3cb053768b101cb59142766fbbcca02efb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-67a5d7d2710a5e190e25e62cfc64ab3cb053768b101cb59142766fbbcca02efb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22796121$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clayton, H.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belock, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavagnino, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaiser, L.J.</creatorcontrib><title>Forces and pressures on the horse’s back during bareback riding</title><title>The veterinary journal (1997)</title><addtitle>Vet J</addtitle><description>The objectives of this study were to measure forces and pressure profiles when riding with a conventional saddle compared to bareback riding. An electronic pressure mat was used to compare contact area, mean total force and pressure variables for one rider riding seven horses at sitting trot with a conventional saddle or bareback. The use of a saddle was associated with a larger contact area and higher mean total force compared with the bareback condition. Mass normalized mean total force for bareback riding was lower than expected based on the rider’s body mass, suggesting that shear forces exerted by the rider’s thighs were not being registered by the pressure mat. In spite of the lower total force, the bareback condition was associated with higher average pressure, higher maximal pressure and larger area with mean pressure >11kPa. Focal pressure concentrations were present beneath the rider’s ischial tuberosities in the area of the horse’s epaxial muscles when riding bareback but not when using a saddle. It was concluded that bareback riding was associated with focal pressure concentrations that may increase the risk of pressure-induced injury to the horse’s epaxial musculature. The findings also emphasized that researchers should remain cognizant of shear forces, which may not be registered by the pressure mat, but may contribute to the effects of riding on the horse’s back.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Back - physiology</subject><subject>Bareback</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Equestrian</subject><subject>Horses - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Physical Conditioning, Animal</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>Pressure mat</subject><subject>Saddle</subject><subject>Tack</subject><subject>Weight-Bearing</subject><issn>1090-0233</issn><issn>1532-2971</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEFOwzAQRS0EoqVwARYoSzYJ40niEIlNVVFAqsQG1pbtTGhCmhQ7qcSOa3A9ToJLC0s2M3-k_780j7FzDhEHLq7qqN_UTYTAMQIRAeABG_M0xhDzjB96DTmEgHE8YifO1QCQJwkesxFilguOfMym884acoFqi2BtybnBj6Brg35JwbKzjr4-Pl2glXkNisFW7YvXln5uWxX-PmVHpWocne33hD3Pb59m9-Hi8e5hNl2EJkHsQ5GptMgKzDiolHgOhCkJNKURidKx0ZDGmbjW_jOj05wnmAlRam2MAqRSxxN2uetd2-5tINfLVeUMNY1qqRuc5JjFiYh5mnsr7qzGds5ZKuXaVitl3yUHuUUna7lFJ7foJAjp0fnQxb5_0Csq_iK_rLzhZmcg_-WmIiudqag1VFSWTC-Lrvqv_xuNRIAL</recordid><startdate>201301</startdate><enddate>201301</enddate><creator>Clayton, H.M.</creator><creator>Belock, B.</creator><creator>Lavagnino, M.</creator><creator>Kaiser, L.J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201301</creationdate><title>Forces and pressures on the horse’s back during bareback riding</title><author>Clayton, H.M. ; Belock, B. ; Lavagnino, M. ; Kaiser, L.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-67a5d7d2710a5e190e25e62cfc64ab3cb053768b101cb59142766fbbcca02efb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Back - physiology</topic><topic>Bareback</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Equestrian</topic><topic>Horses - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Physical Conditioning, Animal</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>Pressure mat</topic><topic>Saddle</topic><topic>Tack</topic><topic>Weight-Bearing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clayton, H.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belock, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavagnino, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaiser, L.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The veterinary journal (1997)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clayton, H.M.</au><au>Belock, B.</au><au>Lavagnino, M.</au><au>Kaiser, L.J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Forces and pressures on the horse’s back during bareback riding</atitle><jtitle>The veterinary journal (1997)</jtitle><addtitle>Vet J</addtitle><date>2013-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>195</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>48</spage><epage>52</epage><pages>48-52</pages><issn>1090-0233</issn><eissn>1532-2971</eissn><abstract>The objectives of this study were to measure forces and pressure profiles when riding with a conventional saddle compared to bareback riding. An electronic pressure mat was used to compare contact area, mean total force and pressure variables for one rider riding seven horses at sitting trot with a conventional saddle or bareback. The use of a saddle was associated with a larger contact area and higher mean total force compared with the bareback condition. Mass normalized mean total force for bareback riding was lower than expected based on the rider’s body mass, suggesting that shear forces exerted by the rider’s thighs were not being registered by the pressure mat. In spite of the lower total force, the bareback condition was associated with higher average pressure, higher maximal pressure and larger area with mean pressure >11kPa. Focal pressure concentrations were present beneath the rider’s ischial tuberosities in the area of the horse’s epaxial muscles when riding bareback but not when using a saddle. It was concluded that bareback riding was associated with focal pressure concentrations that may increase the risk of pressure-induced injury to the horse’s epaxial musculature. The findings also emphasized that researchers should remain cognizant of shear forces, which may not be registered by the pressure mat, but may contribute to the effects of riding on the horse’s back.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>22796121</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.06.002</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1090-0233 |
ispartof | The veterinary journal (1997), 2013-01, Vol.195 (1), p.48-52 |
issn | 1090-0233 1532-2971 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1273463159 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Animals Back - physiology Bareback Biomechanical Phenomena Equestrian Horses - physiology Humans Physical Conditioning, Animal Pressure Pressure mat Saddle Tack Weight-Bearing |
title | Forces and pressures on the horse’s back during bareback riding |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T16%3A20%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Forces%20and%20pressures%20on%20the%20horse%E2%80%99s%20back%20during%20bareback%20riding&rft.jtitle=The%20veterinary%20journal%20(1997)&rft.au=Clayton,%20H.M.&rft.date=2013-01&rft.volume=195&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=48&rft.epage=52&rft.pages=48-52&rft.issn=1090-0233&rft.eissn=1532-2971&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.06.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1273463159%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-67a5d7d2710a5e190e25e62cfc64ab3cb053768b101cb59142766fbbcca02efb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1273463159&rft_id=info:pmid/22796121&rfr_iscdi=true |