Loading…

The influence of sex, gestational age, birth weight, blood transfusion, and timing of the heel prick on the pancreatitis-associated protein concentration in newborn screening for cystic fibrosis

Background Pancreatitis-associated protein (PAP) is currently discussed as a marker in newborn screening (NBS) for cystic fibrosis (CF). However, it is not known if PAP concentrations are influenced by sex, gestational age, birth weight, blood transfusion or time of collection and what this would me...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of inherited metabolic disease 2013, Vol.36 (1), p.147-154
Main Authors: Vernooij-van Langen, Annette M. M., Loeber, J. Gerard, Elvers, Bert, Triepels, Ralf H., Roefs, Jos, Gille, Johan J., Reijntjens, Sandra, Dompeling, Edward, Dankert-Roelse, Jeannette E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background Pancreatitis-associated protein (PAP) is currently discussed as a marker in newborn screening (NBS) for cystic fibrosis (CF). However, it is not known if PAP concentrations are influenced by sex, gestational age, birth weight, blood transfusion or time of collection and what this would mean for NBS for CF. Methods In 2008 all newborns in part of the Netherlands were screened for CF by an IRT/PAP protocol. PAP concentration was determined by the MucoPAP ELISA (DynaBio), which was modified to a Dissociation Enhanced Lanthanide Fluoroimmunoassay (DELFIA) method following a protocol of PerkinElmer. Results In healthy newborns, the median PAP concentration was 0.5 μg/l (Interquartile range (IQR 0.3-0.8) whereas this was 3.2 μg/l (IQR 2.0-12.5) in CF infants. PAP concentrations were lower in premature infants 0.94 and 0.91 times for 25 to 31 + 6 weeks GA and 32 to 36 + 6 weeks respectively. A higher PAP concentration was observed in low-birth-weight infants (
ISSN:0141-8955
1573-2665
DOI:10.1007/s10545-012-9498-6