Loading…

Prognostic value and differences of the sixth and seventh editions of the UICC/AJCC staging systems in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Background The aim of this study was to identify the prognostic value and differences between the 6th and 7th International Union Against Cancer/American Joint Committee on Cancer staging systems in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Methods The magnetic resonance imaging scans and medical records of 903 pat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology 2013-02, Vol.139 (2), p.307-314
Main Authors: Sun, Rui, Qiu, Hui-Zhi, Mai, Hai-Qiang, Zhang, Qing, Hong, Ming-Huang, Li, Yan-Xian, Yang, Jing, Sun, Jian, Mo, Hao-Yuan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background The aim of this study was to identify the prognostic value and differences between the 6th and 7th International Union Against Cancer/American Joint Committee on Cancer staging systems in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Methods The magnetic resonance imaging scans and medical records of 903 patients with histologically diagnosed non-disseminated nasopharyngeal carcinoma were reviewed retrospectively. Moreover, the extent of nasopharyngeal carcinoma was restaged according to the 6th and 7th editions of the staging systems. Results Among the 903 patients, the 5-year survival rates were as follows: overall survival (OS), 81 %; local relapse-free survival (LRFS), 90 %; distant metastasis-free survival, 86 %; and disease-free survival, 77 %. Using the 7th edition of the staging system, significant differences in OS between categories T1 and T3, categories T1 and T4, categories T2 and T3, and categories T2 and T4 were achieved ( P  
ISSN:0171-5216
1432-1335
DOI:10.1007/s00432-012-1333-9