Loading…

Effectiveness of web-based tailored smoking cessation advice reports (iQuit): a randomized trial

Aims To determine whether web‐based tailored cessation advice, based on social cognitive theory and the perspectives on change model, was more effective in aiding a quit attempt than broadly similar web‐based advice that was not tailored. Design Participants were allocated randomly to one of two gro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Addiction (Abingdon, England) England), 2012-12, Vol.107 (12), p.2183-2190
Main Authors: Mason, Dan, Gilbert, Hazel, Sutton, Stephen
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6472-5ed026d83095b4789de3f02093b77f74694ba0052bf186ae4e1d58c0174cee1d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6472-5ed026d83095b4789de3f02093b77f74694ba0052bf186ae4e1d58c0174cee1d3
container_end_page 2190
container_issue 12
container_start_page 2183
container_title Addiction (Abingdon, England)
container_volume 107
creator Mason, Dan
Gilbert, Hazel
Sutton, Stephen
description Aims To determine whether web‐based tailored cessation advice, based on social cognitive theory and the perspectives on change model, was more effective in aiding a quit attempt than broadly similar web‐based advice that was not tailored. Design Participants were allocated randomly to one of two groups, to receive either a cessation advice report and progress report that were tailored to individual‐level characteristics or a cessation advice report that presented standardized (non‐tailored) content. Tailoring was based on smoking‐related beliefs, personal characteristics and smoking patterns, self‐efficacy and outcome expectations. Setting Participant enrolment and baseline assessments were conducted remotely online via the study website, with the advice reports presented by the same website. Participants Participants (n = 1758) were visitors to the QUIT website who were based in the United Kingdom, aged 18 years or over and who smoked cigarettes or hand‐rolled tobacco. Measurements Follow‐up assessments were made at 6 months by telephone interview. The primary outcome measure was self‐reported 3 months prolonged abstinence, and secondary outcomes were 1 month prolonged abstinence, 7‐day and 24‐hour point prevalence abstinence. Findings The intervention group did not differ from the control group on the primary outcome (9.1% versus 9.3%; odds ratio = 1.02 95% confidence interval 0.73–1.42) or on any of the secondary outcomes. Intervention participants gave more positive evaluations of the materials than control participants. Conclusions A web‐based intervention that tailored content according to smoking‐related beliefs, personal characteristics and smoking patterns, self‐efficacy and outcome expectations, was not more effective than web‐based materials presenting broadly similar non‐tailored information.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03972.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1284078956</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1284078956</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6472-5ed026d83095b4789de3f02093b77f74694ba0052bf186ae4e1d58c0174cee1d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkktv1DAUhS0EosPAX0CWEFJZJFw_YjtIXVRtKaCqFInXzjiJgzxN4sHOtFN-PQ4zDBIbxhtfyd-5Ptc-CGECOUnr5SInTEAGnLOcAqE5sFLSfH0PzXYH99EMSlFklHA4QI9iXACAVCV_iA4oFSUoRWfo21nb2np0N3awMWLf4ltbZZWJtsGjcZ0PqYi9v3bDd1wnxIzOD9g0N662ONilD2PEh-7Dyo0vXmGDgxka37ufkz440z1GD1rTRftku8_Rp9dnH0_eZBfvz9-eHF9kteCSZoVtgIpGMSiLiiebjWUtUChZJWUruSh5ZQAKWrVECWO5JU2haiCS1zbVbI4ON32Xwf9Y2Tjq3sXadp0ZrF9FTaji0_iF2AdlglNGyj1Rwvg-qJBAS1LI_6NpxJIyyievz_5BF34VhvSSqSGogtAikXOkNlQdfIzBtnoZXG_CnSagp8TohZ6Coadg6Ckx-ndi9DpJn24vWFW9bXbCPxFJwPMtYGJtujZ9cO3iX04IIqia5j_acLeus3d7G9DHp6dTlfTZRu_iaNc7vQnXWkgmC_3l8lzTd5_Z5dXVV83YL6lO52M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1208512592</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of web-based tailored smoking cessation advice reports (iQuit): a randomized trial</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Wiley</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>SPORTDiscus</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Mason, Dan ; Gilbert, Hazel ; Sutton, Stephen</creator><creatorcontrib>Mason, Dan ; Gilbert, Hazel ; Sutton, Stephen</creatorcontrib><description>Aims To determine whether web‐based tailored cessation advice, based on social cognitive theory and the perspectives on change model, was more effective in aiding a quit attempt than broadly similar web‐based advice that was not tailored. Design Participants were allocated randomly to one of two groups, to receive either a cessation advice report and progress report that were tailored to individual‐level characteristics or a cessation advice report that presented standardized (non‐tailored) content. Tailoring was based on smoking‐related beliefs, personal characteristics and smoking patterns, self‐efficacy and outcome expectations. Setting Participant enrolment and baseline assessments were conducted remotely online via the study website, with the advice reports presented by the same website. Participants Participants (n = 1758) were visitors to the QUIT website who were based in the United Kingdom, aged 18 years or over and who smoked cigarettes or hand‐rolled tobacco. Measurements Follow‐up assessments were made at 6 months by telephone interview. The primary outcome measure was self‐reported 3 months prolonged abstinence, and secondary outcomes were 1 month prolonged abstinence, 7‐day and 24‐hour point prevalence abstinence. Findings The intervention group did not differ from the control group on the primary outcome (9.1% versus 9.3%; odds ratio = 1.02 95% confidence interval 0.73–1.42) or on any of the secondary outcomes. Intervention participants gave more positive evaluations of the materials than control participants. Conclusions A web‐based intervention that tailored content according to smoking‐related beliefs, personal characteristics and smoking patterns, self‐efficacy and outcome expectations, was not more effective than web‐based materials presenting broadly similar non‐tailored information.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0965-2140</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1360-0443</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03972.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22690882</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ADICE5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Abstinence ; Access to information ; Addiction ; Addictive behaviors ; Adult ; Adult and adolescent clinical studies ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition ; Counseling - methods ; Desintoxication. Drug withdrawal ; Drug addicts ; E-health ; Effectiveness studies ; Empowerment ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Internet ; internet intervention ; Intervention ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Medical treatment ; online support ; Patient Satisfaction ; Primary Groups ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Questionnaires ; Recurrence ; Remote Consultation - methods ; Self Care - methods ; self-help ; Smoking ; Smoking cessation ; Smoking Cessation - methods ; Smoking Prevention ; Substance use ; tailored interventions ; tailoring ; Telephone ; Therapy, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Tobacco smoking ; Tobacco, tobacco smoking ; Toxicology ; Treatment Outcome ; Treatments ; Trials ; United Kingdom ; web-based intervention ; Websites</subject><ispartof>Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2012-12, Vol.107 (12), p.2183-2190</ispartof><rights>2012 The Authors, Addiction © 2012 Society for the Study of Addiction</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2012 The Authors, Addiction © 2012 Society for the Study of Addiction.</rights><rights>2012 Society for the Study of Addiction</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6472-5ed026d83095b4789de3f02093b77f74694ba0052bf186ae4e1d58c0174cee1d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6472-5ed026d83095b4789de3f02093b77f74694ba0052bf186ae4e1d58c0174cee1d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27865,27924,27925,33223,33224,33775</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=26616289$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22690882$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mason, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, Hazel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutton, Stephen</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of web-based tailored smoking cessation advice reports (iQuit): a randomized trial</title><title>Addiction (Abingdon, England)</title><addtitle>Addiction</addtitle><description>Aims To determine whether web‐based tailored cessation advice, based on social cognitive theory and the perspectives on change model, was more effective in aiding a quit attempt than broadly similar web‐based advice that was not tailored. Design Participants were allocated randomly to one of two groups, to receive either a cessation advice report and progress report that were tailored to individual‐level characteristics or a cessation advice report that presented standardized (non‐tailored) content. Tailoring was based on smoking‐related beliefs, personal characteristics and smoking patterns, self‐efficacy and outcome expectations. Setting Participant enrolment and baseline assessments were conducted remotely online via the study website, with the advice reports presented by the same website. Participants Participants (n = 1758) were visitors to the QUIT website who were based in the United Kingdom, aged 18 years or over and who smoked cigarettes or hand‐rolled tobacco. Measurements Follow‐up assessments were made at 6 months by telephone interview. The primary outcome measure was self‐reported 3 months prolonged abstinence, and secondary outcomes were 1 month prolonged abstinence, 7‐day and 24‐hour point prevalence abstinence. Findings The intervention group did not differ from the control group on the primary outcome (9.1% versus 9.3%; odds ratio = 1.02 95% confidence interval 0.73–1.42) or on any of the secondary outcomes. Intervention participants gave more positive evaluations of the materials than control participants. Conclusions A web‐based intervention that tailored content according to smoking‐related beliefs, personal characteristics and smoking patterns, self‐efficacy and outcome expectations, was not more effective than web‐based materials presenting broadly similar non‐tailored information.</description><subject>Abstinence</subject><subject>Access to information</subject><subject>Addiction</subject><subject>Addictive behaviors</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Counseling - methods</subject><subject>Desintoxication. Drug withdrawal</subject><subject>Drug addicts</subject><subject>E-health</subject><subject>Effectiveness studies</subject><subject>Empowerment</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>internet intervention</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><subject>online support</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Primary Groups</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Remote Consultation - methods</subject><subject>Self Care - methods</subject><subject>self-help</subject><subject>Smoking</subject><subject>Smoking cessation</subject><subject>Smoking Cessation - methods</subject><subject>Smoking Prevention</subject><subject>Substance use</subject><subject>tailored interventions</subject><subject>tailoring</subject><subject>Telephone</subject><subject>Therapy, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Tobacco smoking</subject><subject>Tobacco, tobacco smoking</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Treatments</subject><subject>Trials</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>web-based intervention</subject><subject>Websites</subject><issn>0965-2140</issn><issn>1360-0443</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkktv1DAUhS0EosPAX0CWEFJZJFw_YjtIXVRtKaCqFInXzjiJgzxN4sHOtFN-PQ4zDBIbxhtfyd-5Ptc-CGECOUnr5SInTEAGnLOcAqE5sFLSfH0PzXYH99EMSlFklHA4QI9iXACAVCV_iA4oFSUoRWfo21nb2np0N3awMWLf4ltbZZWJtsGjcZ0PqYi9v3bDd1wnxIzOD9g0N662ONilD2PEh-7Dyo0vXmGDgxka37ufkz440z1GD1rTRftku8_Rp9dnH0_eZBfvz9-eHF9kteCSZoVtgIpGMSiLiiebjWUtUChZJWUruSh5ZQAKWrVECWO5JU2haiCS1zbVbI4ON32Xwf9Y2Tjq3sXadp0ZrF9FTaji0_iF2AdlglNGyj1Rwvg-qJBAS1LI_6NpxJIyyievz_5BF34VhvSSqSGogtAikXOkNlQdfIzBtnoZXG_CnSagp8TohZ6Coadg6Ckx-ndi9DpJn24vWFW9bXbCPxFJwPMtYGJtujZ9cO3iX04IIqia5j_acLeus3d7G9DHp6dTlfTZRu_iaNc7vQnXWkgmC_3l8lzTd5_Z5dXVV83YL6lO52M</recordid><startdate>201212</startdate><enddate>201212</enddate><creator>Mason, Dan</creator><creator>Gilbert, Hazel</creator><creator>Sutton, Stephen</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201212</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of web-based tailored smoking cessation advice reports (iQuit): a randomized trial</title><author>Mason, Dan ; Gilbert, Hazel ; Sutton, Stephen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6472-5ed026d83095b4789de3f02093b77f74694ba0052bf186ae4e1d58c0174cee1d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Abstinence</topic><topic>Access to information</topic><topic>Addiction</topic><topic>Addictive behaviors</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Counseling - methods</topic><topic>Desintoxication. Drug withdrawal</topic><topic>Drug addicts</topic><topic>E-health</topic><topic>Effectiveness studies</topic><topic>Empowerment</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>internet intervention</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><topic>online support</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Primary Groups</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Remote Consultation - methods</topic><topic>Self Care - methods</topic><topic>self-help</topic><topic>Smoking</topic><topic>Smoking cessation</topic><topic>Smoking Cessation - methods</topic><topic>Smoking Prevention</topic><topic>Substance use</topic><topic>tailored interventions</topic><topic>tailoring</topic><topic>Telephone</topic><topic>Therapy, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Tobacco smoking</topic><topic>Tobacco, tobacco smoking</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Treatments</topic><topic>Trials</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>web-based intervention</topic><topic>Websites</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mason, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, Hazel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutton, Stephen</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Addiction (Abingdon, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mason, Dan</au><au>Gilbert, Hazel</au><au>Sutton, Stephen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness of web-based tailored smoking cessation advice reports (iQuit): a randomized trial</atitle><jtitle>Addiction (Abingdon, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Addiction</addtitle><date>2012-12</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>107</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2183</spage><epage>2190</epage><pages>2183-2190</pages><issn>0965-2140</issn><eissn>1360-0443</eissn><coden>ADICE5</coden><abstract>Aims To determine whether web‐based tailored cessation advice, based on social cognitive theory and the perspectives on change model, was more effective in aiding a quit attempt than broadly similar web‐based advice that was not tailored. Design Participants were allocated randomly to one of two groups, to receive either a cessation advice report and progress report that were tailored to individual‐level characteristics or a cessation advice report that presented standardized (non‐tailored) content. Tailoring was based on smoking‐related beliefs, personal characteristics and smoking patterns, self‐efficacy and outcome expectations. Setting Participant enrolment and baseline assessments were conducted remotely online via the study website, with the advice reports presented by the same website. Participants Participants (n = 1758) were visitors to the QUIT website who were based in the United Kingdom, aged 18 years or over and who smoked cigarettes or hand‐rolled tobacco. Measurements Follow‐up assessments were made at 6 months by telephone interview. The primary outcome measure was self‐reported 3 months prolonged abstinence, and secondary outcomes were 1 month prolonged abstinence, 7‐day and 24‐hour point prevalence abstinence. Findings The intervention group did not differ from the control group on the primary outcome (9.1% versus 9.3%; odds ratio = 1.02 95% confidence interval 0.73–1.42) or on any of the secondary outcomes. Intervention participants gave more positive evaluations of the materials than control participants. Conclusions A web‐based intervention that tailored content according to smoking‐related beliefs, personal characteristics and smoking patterns, self‐efficacy and outcome expectations, was not more effective than web‐based materials presenting broadly similar non‐tailored information.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>22690882</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03972.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0965-2140
ispartof Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2012-12, Vol.107 (12), p.2183-2190
issn 0965-2140
1360-0443
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1284078956
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Wiley; PAIS Index; SPORTDiscus; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Abstinence
Access to information
Addiction
Addictive behaviors
Adult
Adult and adolescent clinical studies
Biological and medical sciences
Cognition
Counseling - methods
Desintoxication. Drug withdrawal
Drug addicts
E-health
Effectiveness studies
Empowerment
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Internet
internet intervention
Intervention
Male
Medical sciences
Medical treatment
online support
Patient Satisfaction
Primary Groups
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
Questionnaires
Recurrence
Remote Consultation - methods
Self Care - methods
self-help
Smoking
Smoking cessation
Smoking Cessation - methods
Smoking Prevention
Substance use
tailored interventions
tailoring
Telephone
Therapy, Computer-Assisted - methods
Tobacco smoking
Tobacco, tobacco smoking
Toxicology
Treatment Outcome
Treatments
Trials
United Kingdom
web-based intervention
Websites
title Effectiveness of web-based tailored smoking cessation advice reports (iQuit): a randomized trial
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T16%3A53%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20web-based%20tailored%20smoking%20cessation%20advice%20reports%20(iQuit):%20a%20randomized%20trial&rft.jtitle=Addiction%20(Abingdon,%20England)&rft.au=Mason,%20Dan&rft.date=2012-12&rft.volume=107&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2183&rft.epage=2190&rft.pages=2183-2190&rft.issn=0965-2140&rft.eissn=1360-0443&rft.coden=ADICE5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03972.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1284078956%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6472-5ed026d83095b4789de3f02093b77f74694ba0052bf186ae4e1d58c0174cee1d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1208512592&rft_id=info:pmid/22690882&rfr_iscdi=true