Loading…
Effectiveness of web-based tailored smoking cessation advice reports (iQuit): a randomized trial
Aims To determine whether web‐based tailored cessation advice, based on social cognitive theory and the perspectives on change model, was more effective in aiding a quit attempt than broadly similar web‐based advice that was not tailored. Design Participants were allocated randomly to one of two gro...
Saved in:
Published in: | Addiction (Abingdon, England) England), 2012-12, Vol.107 (12), p.2183-2190 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6472-5ed026d83095b4789de3f02093b77f74694ba0052bf186ae4e1d58c0174cee1d3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6472-5ed026d83095b4789de3f02093b77f74694ba0052bf186ae4e1d58c0174cee1d3 |
container_end_page | 2190 |
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 2183 |
container_title | Addiction (Abingdon, England) |
container_volume | 107 |
creator | Mason, Dan Gilbert, Hazel Sutton, Stephen |
description | Aims
To determine whether web‐based tailored cessation advice, based on social cognitive theory and the perspectives on change model, was more effective in aiding a quit attempt than broadly similar web‐based advice that was not tailored.
Design
Participants were allocated randomly to one of two groups, to receive either a cessation advice report and progress report that were tailored to individual‐level characteristics or a cessation advice report that presented standardized (non‐tailored) content. Tailoring was based on smoking‐related beliefs, personal characteristics and smoking patterns, self‐efficacy and outcome expectations.
Setting
Participant enrolment and baseline assessments were conducted remotely online via the study website, with the advice reports presented by the same website.
Participants
Participants (n = 1758) were visitors to the QUIT website who were based in the United Kingdom, aged 18 years or over and who smoked cigarettes or hand‐rolled tobacco.
Measurements
Follow‐up assessments were made at 6 months by telephone interview. The primary outcome measure was self‐reported 3 months prolonged abstinence, and secondary outcomes were 1 month prolonged abstinence, 7‐day and 24‐hour point prevalence abstinence.
Findings
The intervention group did not differ from the control group on the primary outcome (9.1% versus 9.3%; odds ratio = 1.02 95% confidence interval 0.73–1.42) or on any of the secondary outcomes. Intervention participants gave more positive evaluations of the materials than control participants.
Conclusions
A web‐based intervention that tailored content according to smoking‐related beliefs, personal characteristics and smoking patterns, self‐efficacy and outcome expectations, was not more effective than web‐based materials presenting broadly similar non‐tailored information. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03972.x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1284078956</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1284078956</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6472-5ed026d83095b4789de3f02093b77f74694ba0052bf186ae4e1d58c0174cee1d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkktv1DAUhS0EosPAX0CWEFJZJFw_YjtIXVRtKaCqFInXzjiJgzxN4sHOtFN-PQ4zDBIbxhtfyd-5Ptc-CGECOUnr5SInTEAGnLOcAqE5sFLSfH0PzXYH99EMSlFklHA4QI9iXACAVCV_iA4oFSUoRWfo21nb2np0N3awMWLf4ltbZZWJtsGjcZ0PqYi9v3bDd1wnxIzOD9g0N662ONilD2PEh-7Dyo0vXmGDgxka37ufkz440z1GD1rTRftku8_Rp9dnH0_eZBfvz9-eHF9kteCSZoVtgIpGMSiLiiebjWUtUChZJWUruSh5ZQAKWrVECWO5JU2haiCS1zbVbI4ON32Xwf9Y2Tjq3sXadp0ZrF9FTaji0_iF2AdlglNGyj1Rwvg-qJBAS1LI_6NpxJIyyievz_5BF34VhvSSqSGogtAikXOkNlQdfIzBtnoZXG_CnSagp8TohZ6Coadg6Ckx-ndi9DpJn24vWFW9bXbCPxFJwPMtYGJtujZ9cO3iX04IIqia5j_acLeus3d7G9DHp6dTlfTZRu_iaNc7vQnXWkgmC_3l8lzTd5_Z5dXVV83YL6lO52M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1208512592</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of web-based tailored smoking cessation advice reports (iQuit): a randomized trial</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Wiley</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>SPORTDiscus</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Mason, Dan ; Gilbert, Hazel ; Sutton, Stephen</creator><creatorcontrib>Mason, Dan ; Gilbert, Hazel ; Sutton, Stephen</creatorcontrib><description>Aims
To determine whether web‐based tailored cessation advice, based on social cognitive theory and the perspectives on change model, was more effective in aiding a quit attempt than broadly similar web‐based advice that was not tailored.
Design
Participants were allocated randomly to one of two groups, to receive either a cessation advice report and progress report that were tailored to individual‐level characteristics or a cessation advice report that presented standardized (non‐tailored) content. Tailoring was based on smoking‐related beliefs, personal characteristics and smoking patterns, self‐efficacy and outcome expectations.
Setting
Participant enrolment and baseline assessments were conducted remotely online via the study website, with the advice reports presented by the same website.
Participants
Participants (n = 1758) were visitors to the QUIT website who were based in the United Kingdom, aged 18 years or over and who smoked cigarettes or hand‐rolled tobacco.
Measurements
Follow‐up assessments were made at 6 months by telephone interview. The primary outcome measure was self‐reported 3 months prolonged abstinence, and secondary outcomes were 1 month prolonged abstinence, 7‐day and 24‐hour point prevalence abstinence.
Findings
The intervention group did not differ from the control group on the primary outcome (9.1% versus 9.3%; odds ratio = 1.02 95% confidence interval 0.73–1.42) or on any of the secondary outcomes. Intervention participants gave more positive evaluations of the materials than control participants.
Conclusions
A web‐based intervention that tailored content according to smoking‐related beliefs, personal characteristics and smoking patterns, self‐efficacy and outcome expectations, was not more effective than web‐based materials presenting broadly similar non‐tailored information.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0965-2140</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1360-0443</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03972.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22690882</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ADICE5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Abstinence ; Access to information ; Addiction ; Addictive behaviors ; Adult ; Adult and adolescent clinical studies ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition ; Counseling - methods ; Desintoxication. Drug withdrawal ; Drug addicts ; E-health ; Effectiveness studies ; Empowerment ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Internet ; internet intervention ; Intervention ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Medical treatment ; online support ; Patient Satisfaction ; Primary Groups ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Questionnaires ; Recurrence ; Remote Consultation - methods ; Self Care - methods ; self-help ; Smoking ; Smoking cessation ; Smoking Cessation - methods ; Smoking Prevention ; Substance use ; tailored interventions ; tailoring ; Telephone ; Therapy, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Tobacco smoking ; Tobacco, tobacco smoking ; Toxicology ; Treatment Outcome ; Treatments ; Trials ; United Kingdom ; web-based intervention ; Websites</subject><ispartof>Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2012-12, Vol.107 (12), p.2183-2190</ispartof><rights>2012 The Authors, Addiction © 2012 Society for the Study of Addiction</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2012 The Authors, Addiction © 2012 Society for the Study of Addiction.</rights><rights>2012 Society for the Study of Addiction</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6472-5ed026d83095b4789de3f02093b77f74694ba0052bf186ae4e1d58c0174cee1d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6472-5ed026d83095b4789de3f02093b77f74694ba0052bf186ae4e1d58c0174cee1d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27865,27924,27925,33223,33224,33775</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=26616289$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22690882$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mason, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, Hazel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutton, Stephen</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of web-based tailored smoking cessation advice reports (iQuit): a randomized trial</title><title>Addiction (Abingdon, England)</title><addtitle>Addiction</addtitle><description>Aims
To determine whether web‐based tailored cessation advice, based on social cognitive theory and the perspectives on change model, was more effective in aiding a quit attempt than broadly similar web‐based advice that was not tailored.
Design
Participants were allocated randomly to one of two groups, to receive either a cessation advice report and progress report that were tailored to individual‐level characteristics or a cessation advice report that presented standardized (non‐tailored) content. Tailoring was based on smoking‐related beliefs, personal characteristics and smoking patterns, self‐efficacy and outcome expectations.
Setting
Participant enrolment and baseline assessments were conducted remotely online via the study website, with the advice reports presented by the same website.
Participants
Participants (n = 1758) were visitors to the QUIT website who were based in the United Kingdom, aged 18 years or over and who smoked cigarettes or hand‐rolled tobacco.
Measurements
Follow‐up assessments were made at 6 months by telephone interview. The primary outcome measure was self‐reported 3 months prolonged abstinence, and secondary outcomes were 1 month prolonged abstinence, 7‐day and 24‐hour point prevalence abstinence.
Findings
The intervention group did not differ from the control group on the primary outcome (9.1% versus 9.3%; odds ratio = 1.02 95% confidence interval 0.73–1.42) or on any of the secondary outcomes. Intervention participants gave more positive evaluations of the materials than control participants.
Conclusions
A web‐based intervention that tailored content according to smoking‐related beliefs, personal characteristics and smoking patterns, self‐efficacy and outcome expectations, was not more effective than web‐based materials presenting broadly similar non‐tailored information.</description><subject>Abstinence</subject><subject>Access to information</subject><subject>Addiction</subject><subject>Addictive behaviors</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Counseling - methods</subject><subject>Desintoxication. Drug withdrawal</subject><subject>Drug addicts</subject><subject>E-health</subject><subject>Effectiveness studies</subject><subject>Empowerment</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>internet intervention</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><subject>online support</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Primary Groups</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Remote Consultation - methods</subject><subject>Self Care - methods</subject><subject>self-help</subject><subject>Smoking</subject><subject>Smoking cessation</subject><subject>Smoking Cessation - methods</subject><subject>Smoking Prevention</subject><subject>Substance use</subject><subject>tailored interventions</subject><subject>tailoring</subject><subject>Telephone</subject><subject>Therapy, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Tobacco smoking</subject><subject>Tobacco, tobacco smoking</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Treatments</subject><subject>Trials</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>web-based intervention</subject><subject>Websites</subject><issn>0965-2140</issn><issn>1360-0443</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkktv1DAUhS0EosPAX0CWEFJZJFw_YjtIXVRtKaCqFInXzjiJgzxN4sHOtFN-PQ4zDBIbxhtfyd-5Ptc-CGECOUnr5SInTEAGnLOcAqE5sFLSfH0PzXYH99EMSlFklHA4QI9iXACAVCV_iA4oFSUoRWfo21nb2np0N3awMWLf4ltbZZWJtsGjcZ0PqYi9v3bDd1wnxIzOD9g0N662ONilD2PEh-7Dyo0vXmGDgxka37ufkz440z1GD1rTRftku8_Rp9dnH0_eZBfvz9-eHF9kteCSZoVtgIpGMSiLiiebjWUtUChZJWUruSh5ZQAKWrVECWO5JU2haiCS1zbVbI4ON32Xwf9Y2Tjq3sXadp0ZrF9FTaji0_iF2AdlglNGyj1Rwvg-qJBAS1LI_6NpxJIyyievz_5BF34VhvSSqSGogtAikXOkNlQdfIzBtnoZXG_CnSagp8TohZ6Coadg6Ckx-ndi9DpJn24vWFW9bXbCPxFJwPMtYGJtujZ9cO3iX04IIqia5j_acLeus3d7G9DHp6dTlfTZRu_iaNc7vQnXWkgmC_3l8lzTd5_Z5dXVV83YL6lO52M</recordid><startdate>201212</startdate><enddate>201212</enddate><creator>Mason, Dan</creator><creator>Gilbert, Hazel</creator><creator>Sutton, Stephen</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201212</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of web-based tailored smoking cessation advice reports (iQuit): a randomized trial</title><author>Mason, Dan ; Gilbert, Hazel ; Sutton, Stephen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6472-5ed026d83095b4789de3f02093b77f74694ba0052bf186ae4e1d58c0174cee1d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Abstinence</topic><topic>Access to information</topic><topic>Addiction</topic><topic>Addictive behaviors</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Counseling - methods</topic><topic>Desintoxication. Drug withdrawal</topic><topic>Drug addicts</topic><topic>E-health</topic><topic>Effectiveness studies</topic><topic>Empowerment</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>internet intervention</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><topic>online support</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Primary Groups</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Remote Consultation - methods</topic><topic>Self Care - methods</topic><topic>self-help</topic><topic>Smoking</topic><topic>Smoking cessation</topic><topic>Smoking Cessation - methods</topic><topic>Smoking Prevention</topic><topic>Substance use</topic><topic>tailored interventions</topic><topic>tailoring</topic><topic>Telephone</topic><topic>Therapy, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Tobacco smoking</topic><topic>Tobacco, tobacco smoking</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Treatments</topic><topic>Trials</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>web-based intervention</topic><topic>Websites</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mason, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, Hazel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutton, Stephen</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Addiction (Abingdon, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mason, Dan</au><au>Gilbert, Hazel</au><au>Sutton, Stephen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness of web-based tailored smoking cessation advice reports (iQuit): a randomized trial</atitle><jtitle>Addiction (Abingdon, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Addiction</addtitle><date>2012-12</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>107</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2183</spage><epage>2190</epage><pages>2183-2190</pages><issn>0965-2140</issn><eissn>1360-0443</eissn><coden>ADICE5</coden><abstract>Aims
To determine whether web‐based tailored cessation advice, based on social cognitive theory and the perspectives on change model, was more effective in aiding a quit attempt than broadly similar web‐based advice that was not tailored.
Design
Participants were allocated randomly to one of two groups, to receive either a cessation advice report and progress report that were tailored to individual‐level characteristics or a cessation advice report that presented standardized (non‐tailored) content. Tailoring was based on smoking‐related beliefs, personal characteristics and smoking patterns, self‐efficacy and outcome expectations.
Setting
Participant enrolment and baseline assessments were conducted remotely online via the study website, with the advice reports presented by the same website.
Participants
Participants (n = 1758) were visitors to the QUIT website who were based in the United Kingdom, aged 18 years or over and who smoked cigarettes or hand‐rolled tobacco.
Measurements
Follow‐up assessments were made at 6 months by telephone interview. The primary outcome measure was self‐reported 3 months prolonged abstinence, and secondary outcomes were 1 month prolonged abstinence, 7‐day and 24‐hour point prevalence abstinence.
Findings
The intervention group did not differ from the control group on the primary outcome (9.1% versus 9.3%; odds ratio = 1.02 95% confidence interval 0.73–1.42) or on any of the secondary outcomes. Intervention participants gave more positive evaluations of the materials than control participants.
Conclusions
A web‐based intervention that tailored content according to smoking‐related beliefs, personal characteristics and smoking patterns, self‐efficacy and outcome expectations, was not more effective than web‐based materials presenting broadly similar non‐tailored information.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>22690882</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03972.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0965-2140 |
ispartof | Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2012-12, Vol.107 (12), p.2183-2190 |
issn | 0965-2140 1360-0443 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1284078956 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Wiley; PAIS Index; SPORTDiscus; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Abstinence Access to information Addiction Addictive behaviors Adult Adult and adolescent clinical studies Biological and medical sciences Cognition Counseling - methods Desintoxication. Drug withdrawal Drug addicts E-health Effectiveness studies Empowerment Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Internet internet intervention Intervention Male Medical sciences Medical treatment online support Patient Satisfaction Primary Groups Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychopathology. Psychiatry Questionnaires Recurrence Remote Consultation - methods Self Care - methods self-help Smoking Smoking cessation Smoking Cessation - methods Smoking Prevention Substance use tailored interventions tailoring Telephone Therapy, Computer-Assisted - methods Tobacco smoking Tobacco, tobacco smoking Toxicology Treatment Outcome Treatments Trials United Kingdom web-based intervention Websites |
title | Effectiveness of web-based tailored smoking cessation advice reports (iQuit): a randomized trial |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T16%3A53%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20web-based%20tailored%20smoking%20cessation%20advice%20reports%20(iQuit):%20a%20randomized%20trial&rft.jtitle=Addiction%20(Abingdon,%20England)&rft.au=Mason,%20Dan&rft.date=2012-12&rft.volume=107&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2183&rft.epage=2190&rft.pages=2183-2190&rft.issn=0965-2140&rft.eissn=1360-0443&rft.coden=ADICE5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03972.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1284078956%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6472-5ed026d83095b4789de3f02093b77f74694ba0052bf186ae4e1d58c0174cee1d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1208512592&rft_id=info:pmid/22690882&rfr_iscdi=true |