Loading…

Classical test theory and Rasch analysis validation of the Recent-Onset Arthritis Disability questionnaire in rheumatoid arthritis patients

Disability has been identified as a core outcome measure in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of this study was to perform a comprehensive psychometric analysis of the Recent-Onset Arthritis Disability (ROAD) questionnaire in patients with RA. The questionnaire was completed by 583 patients with RA...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical rheumatology 2013-02, Vol.32 (2), p.211-217
Main Authors: Salaffi, Fausto, Franchignoni, Franco, Giordano, Andrea, Ciapetti, Alessandro, Gasparini, Stefania, Ottonello, Marcella
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-1df8e7287cf34c54d0b67e9301eb572ed20dcdcb365d31510305b8716e938cb63
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-1df8e7287cf34c54d0b67e9301eb572ed20dcdcb365d31510305b8716e938cb63
container_end_page 217
container_issue 2
container_start_page 211
container_title Clinical rheumatology
container_volume 32
creator Salaffi, Fausto
Franchignoni, Franco
Giordano, Andrea
Ciapetti, Alessandro
Gasparini, Stefania
Ottonello, Marcella
description Disability has been identified as a core outcome measure in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of this study was to perform a comprehensive psychometric analysis of the Recent-Onset Arthritis Disability (ROAD) questionnaire in patients with RA. The questionnaire was completed by 583 patients with RA: 196 subjects participating in the NEW INDICES study and 387 subjects who were taking part in a long-term observational study. At confirmatory factor analysis for categorical data, data fit for a three-factor model was adequate to good (non-normed fit index = 0.98, comparative fit index = 0.99, root mean square error of approximation = 0.079, standardized root mean square residual = 0.047), with standardized item-to-factor loadings ranging from 0.60 to 0.90 and a cumulative explained variance of 83 %. The bifactor model of ROAD presented a clean independent cluster structure. The loadings in the unidimensional model were very similar to those on the general factor in the bifactor model. Rasch analysis showed a correct functioning of rating categories, a good fit of the data to the model for all three subscales, and satisfactory separation indexes and respective reliability (for both persons and items). This study, using both classical test theory and Rasch analysis methods, provides psychometric evidence of the reliability and internal and structural validity of ROAD in RA patients. Our results support the use of separate subscores for upper limb function, lower limb function, and activities of daily living/work, and the appropriateness of reporting an overall score (i.e., the mean of the three subscales).
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10067-012-2101-6
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1285462204</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2883786631</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-1df8e7287cf34c54d0b67e9301eb572ed20dcdcb365d31510305b8716e938cb63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kdFqHCEUhqWkJJu0D9CbIOSmN7ZHndGZy7BN00IgENprcdTpGmZnNh6nsM-Ql66TTUIp9EYFv_874k_IBw6fOID-jGVVmgEXTHDgTL0hK17JirVt1R6RFWgNTPK2OSGniPcAIJqWH5MTIUHVXMoVeVwPFjE6O9AcMNO8CVPaUzt6emfRbcrJDnuMSH_bIXqb4zTSqV84ehdcGDO7HTFkepnyJsVcwC8RbReHmPf0YS7OkhhtTIHGkaZNmLc2T9FT-xrYFWsR4TvytrcDhvfP-xn5-fXqx_obu7m9_r6-vGFOapEZ930TtGi062Xl6spDp3RoJfDQ1VoEL8A77zqpai95zUFC3TWaq8I0rlPyjHw8eHdpenqh2UZ0YRjsGKYZDRdNXSkhoCroxT_o_TSn8iVPVCWUaNtFyA-USxNiCr3Zpbi1aW84mKUpc2jKlKbM0pRZMufP5rnbBv-aeKmmAOIAYLkaf4X01-j_Wv8ATpSgSg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1284262996</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Classical test theory and Rasch analysis validation of the Recent-Onset Arthritis Disability questionnaire in rheumatoid arthritis patients</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Salaffi, Fausto ; Franchignoni, Franco ; Giordano, Andrea ; Ciapetti, Alessandro ; Gasparini, Stefania ; Ottonello, Marcella</creator><creatorcontrib>Salaffi, Fausto ; Franchignoni, Franco ; Giordano, Andrea ; Ciapetti, Alessandro ; Gasparini, Stefania ; Ottonello, Marcella ; “NEW INDICES” Study Group ; on behalf of the “NEW INDICES” Study Group</creatorcontrib><description>Disability has been identified as a core outcome measure in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of this study was to perform a comprehensive psychometric analysis of the Recent-Onset Arthritis Disability (ROAD) questionnaire in patients with RA. The questionnaire was completed by 583 patients with RA: 196 subjects participating in the NEW INDICES study and 387 subjects who were taking part in a long-term observational study. At confirmatory factor analysis for categorical data, data fit for a three-factor model was adequate to good (non-normed fit index = 0.98, comparative fit index = 0.99, root mean square error of approximation = 0.079, standardized root mean square residual = 0.047), with standardized item-to-factor loadings ranging from 0.60 to 0.90 and a cumulative explained variance of 83 %. The bifactor model of ROAD presented a clean independent cluster structure. The loadings in the unidimensional model were very similar to those on the general factor in the bifactor model. Rasch analysis showed a correct functioning of rating categories, a good fit of the data to the model for all three subscales, and satisfactory separation indexes and respective reliability (for both persons and items). This study, using both classical test theory and Rasch analysis methods, provides psychometric evidence of the reliability and internal and structural validity of ROAD in RA patients. Our results support the use of separate subscores for upper limb function, lower limb function, and activities of daily living/work, and the appropriateness of reporting an overall score (i.e., the mean of the three subscales).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0770-3198</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1434-9949</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10067-012-2101-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23065133</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Activities of Daily Living ; Adult ; Aged ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid - diagnosis ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid - physiopathology ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid - psychology ; Disability Evaluation ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Motor Activity ; original Article ; Outpatients - psychology ; Psychometrics - methods ; Psychometrics - standards ; Reproducibility of Results ; Rheumatology ; Severity of Illness Index ; Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</subject><ispartof>Clinical rheumatology, 2013-02, Vol.32 (2), p.211-217</ispartof><rights>Clinical Rheumatology 2012</rights><rights>Clinical Rheumatology 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-1df8e7287cf34c54d0b67e9301eb572ed20dcdcb365d31510305b8716e938cb63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-1df8e7287cf34c54d0b67e9301eb572ed20dcdcb365d31510305b8716e938cb63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23065133$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Salaffi, Fausto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franchignoni, Franco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giordano, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciapetti, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gasparini, Stefania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ottonello, Marcella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>“NEW INDICES” Study Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>on behalf of the “NEW INDICES” Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>Classical test theory and Rasch analysis validation of the Recent-Onset Arthritis Disability questionnaire in rheumatoid arthritis patients</title><title>Clinical rheumatology</title><addtitle>Clin Rheumatol</addtitle><addtitle>Clin Rheumatol</addtitle><description>Disability has been identified as a core outcome measure in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of this study was to perform a comprehensive psychometric analysis of the Recent-Onset Arthritis Disability (ROAD) questionnaire in patients with RA. The questionnaire was completed by 583 patients with RA: 196 subjects participating in the NEW INDICES study and 387 subjects who were taking part in a long-term observational study. At confirmatory factor analysis for categorical data, data fit for a three-factor model was adequate to good (non-normed fit index = 0.98, comparative fit index = 0.99, root mean square error of approximation = 0.079, standardized root mean square residual = 0.047), with standardized item-to-factor loadings ranging from 0.60 to 0.90 and a cumulative explained variance of 83 %. The bifactor model of ROAD presented a clean independent cluster structure. The loadings in the unidimensional model were very similar to those on the general factor in the bifactor model. Rasch analysis showed a correct functioning of rating categories, a good fit of the data to the model for all three subscales, and satisfactory separation indexes and respective reliability (for both persons and items). This study, using both classical test theory and Rasch analysis methods, provides psychometric evidence of the reliability and internal and structural validity of ROAD in RA patients. Our results support the use of separate subscores for upper limb function, lower limb function, and activities of daily living/work, and the appropriateness of reporting an overall score (i.e., the mean of the three subscales).</description><subject>Activities of Daily Living</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - diagnosis</subject><subject>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - physiopathology</subject><subject>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - psychology</subject><subject>Disability Evaluation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Motor Activity</subject><subject>original Article</subject><subject>Outpatients - psychology</subject><subject>Psychometrics - methods</subject><subject>Psychometrics - standards</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Rheumatology</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</subject><issn>0770-3198</issn><issn>1434-9949</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kdFqHCEUhqWkJJu0D9CbIOSmN7ZHndGZy7BN00IgENprcdTpGmZnNh6nsM-Ql66TTUIp9EYFv_874k_IBw6fOID-jGVVmgEXTHDgTL0hK17JirVt1R6RFWgNTPK2OSGniPcAIJqWH5MTIUHVXMoVeVwPFjE6O9AcMNO8CVPaUzt6emfRbcrJDnuMSH_bIXqb4zTSqV84ehdcGDO7HTFkepnyJsVcwC8RbReHmPf0YS7OkhhtTIHGkaZNmLc2T9FT-xrYFWsR4TvytrcDhvfP-xn5-fXqx_obu7m9_r6-vGFOapEZ930TtGi062Xl6spDp3RoJfDQ1VoEL8A77zqpai95zUFC3TWaq8I0rlPyjHw8eHdpenqh2UZ0YRjsGKYZDRdNXSkhoCroxT_o_TSn8iVPVCWUaNtFyA-USxNiCr3Zpbi1aW84mKUpc2jKlKbM0pRZMufP5rnbBv-aeKmmAOIAYLkaf4X01-j_Wv8ATpSgSg</recordid><startdate>20130201</startdate><enddate>20130201</enddate><creator>Salaffi, Fausto</creator><creator>Franchignoni, Franco</creator><creator>Giordano, Andrea</creator><creator>Ciapetti, Alessandro</creator><creator>Gasparini, Stefania</creator><creator>Ottonello, Marcella</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130201</creationdate><title>Classical test theory and Rasch analysis validation of the Recent-Onset Arthritis Disability questionnaire in rheumatoid arthritis patients</title><author>Salaffi, Fausto ; Franchignoni, Franco ; Giordano, Andrea ; Ciapetti, Alessandro ; Gasparini, Stefania ; Ottonello, Marcella</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-1df8e7287cf34c54d0b67e9301eb572ed20dcdcb365d31510305b8716e938cb63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Activities of Daily Living</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - diagnosis</topic><topic>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - physiopathology</topic><topic>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - psychology</topic><topic>Disability Evaluation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Motor Activity</topic><topic>original Article</topic><topic>Outpatients - psychology</topic><topic>Psychometrics - methods</topic><topic>Psychometrics - standards</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Rheumatology</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Salaffi, Fausto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franchignoni, Franco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giordano, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciapetti, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gasparini, Stefania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ottonello, Marcella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>“NEW INDICES” Study Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>on behalf of the “NEW INDICES” Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical rheumatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Salaffi, Fausto</au><au>Franchignoni, Franco</au><au>Giordano, Andrea</au><au>Ciapetti, Alessandro</au><au>Gasparini, Stefania</au><au>Ottonello, Marcella</au><aucorp>“NEW INDICES” Study Group</aucorp><aucorp>on behalf of the “NEW INDICES” Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Classical test theory and Rasch analysis validation of the Recent-Onset Arthritis Disability questionnaire in rheumatoid arthritis patients</atitle><jtitle>Clinical rheumatology</jtitle><stitle>Clin Rheumatol</stitle><addtitle>Clin Rheumatol</addtitle><date>2013-02-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>211</spage><epage>217</epage><pages>211-217</pages><issn>0770-3198</issn><eissn>1434-9949</eissn><abstract>Disability has been identified as a core outcome measure in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of this study was to perform a comprehensive psychometric analysis of the Recent-Onset Arthritis Disability (ROAD) questionnaire in patients with RA. The questionnaire was completed by 583 patients with RA: 196 subjects participating in the NEW INDICES study and 387 subjects who were taking part in a long-term observational study. At confirmatory factor analysis for categorical data, data fit for a three-factor model was adequate to good (non-normed fit index = 0.98, comparative fit index = 0.99, root mean square error of approximation = 0.079, standardized root mean square residual = 0.047), with standardized item-to-factor loadings ranging from 0.60 to 0.90 and a cumulative explained variance of 83 %. The bifactor model of ROAD presented a clean independent cluster structure. The loadings in the unidimensional model were very similar to those on the general factor in the bifactor model. Rasch analysis showed a correct functioning of rating categories, a good fit of the data to the model for all three subscales, and satisfactory separation indexes and respective reliability (for both persons and items). This study, using both classical test theory and Rasch analysis methods, provides psychometric evidence of the reliability and internal and structural validity of ROAD in RA patients. Our results support the use of separate subscores for upper limb function, lower limb function, and activities of daily living/work, and the appropriateness of reporting an overall score (i.e., the mean of the three subscales).</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>23065133</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10067-012-2101-6</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0770-3198
ispartof Clinical rheumatology, 2013-02, Vol.32 (2), p.211-217
issn 0770-3198
1434-9949
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1285462204
source Springer Nature
subjects Activities of Daily Living
Adult
Aged
Arthritis, Rheumatoid - diagnosis
Arthritis, Rheumatoid - physiopathology
Arthritis, Rheumatoid - psychology
Disability Evaluation
Female
Humans
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Motor Activity
original Article
Outpatients - psychology
Psychometrics - methods
Psychometrics - standards
Reproducibility of Results
Rheumatology
Severity of Illness Index
Surveys and Questionnaires - standards
title Classical test theory and Rasch analysis validation of the Recent-Onset Arthritis Disability questionnaire in rheumatoid arthritis patients
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T02%3A11%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Classical%20test%20theory%20and%20Rasch%20analysis%20validation%20of%20the%20Recent-Onset%20Arthritis%20Disability%20questionnaire%20in%20rheumatoid%20arthritis%20patients&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20rheumatology&rft.au=Salaffi,%20Fausto&rft.aucorp=%E2%80%9CNEW%20INDICES%E2%80%9D%20Study%20Group&rft.date=2013-02-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=211&rft.epage=217&rft.pages=211-217&rft.issn=0770-3198&rft.eissn=1434-9949&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10067-012-2101-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2883786631%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-1df8e7287cf34c54d0b67e9301eb572ed20dcdcb365d31510305b8716e938cb63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1284262996&rft_id=info:pmid/23065133&rfr_iscdi=true